| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
If so then give him a call *tonight* and ask that he vote to remove
against the budget reconciliation bill until Richard Pombo's public land giveaway is removed. http://www.tu.org/siteapps/advocacy/...NuFmG&b=376957 http://www.bettermines.org/pombo.cfm g.c. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:37:46 -0600, George Cleveland
wrote: If so then give him a call *tonight* and ask that he vote against the budget reconciliation bill until Richard Pombo's public land giveaway is removed. http://www.tu.org/siteapps/advocacy/...NuFmG&b=376957 http://www.bettermines.org/pombo.cfm g.c. The Pombo proposal made it through the Rules committee, although ANWR didn't. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...la-home-nation The only hope to defeat the porvision is to have the entire budget reconciliation bill defeated. g.c. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
Just heard a news report on NPR that the Senate will probably block the
bill unless the ANWR thing is put back in. The Pombo proposal might be moot if the bill gets ripped up in conference. I have a Red congressman, but I doubt if he would care one way or the other, probably leaning for it. We here in Texas would probably not be affected, since we have no Federal public lands. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
Great post. Thanks for the heads up. Seems Pombo and Bush are in
cahoots with trying to ruin our nations great public lands, and in turn the fragile coldwater fisheries we cherish. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
My republican congressman seems to take pride in voting against
anything that I am for. I am suggesting that we vote agains ALL politicians that are in office now on all levels of government. "I want a different bunch of idiots." Big Dale |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
THIS ****ES ME OFF!
This was one of my biggest fears when the present administration was elected and my fears were amplified when Gale Norton was appointed as the Secretary of the Interior. Gale Norton (who used to serve in my home state CO) is in favor of managing OUR public lands by the principal of "highest and best use" ie the usage that can produce the most (often short term)income. (She was a member of the think tank Mountain States Legal Foundation. Do some research on the think tank to see how they/she feels our public lands should be managed) This case goes even beyond being managed for the "highest and best use". The sales would be MUCH below market value. What's especially obnoxious to me is that, in a typical sleazy political maneuver, it's just a "little" rider that got attached to a much larger complicated Bill without any public input. First we get "nothing" for the land and once that land is sold, we ain't ever getting it back. THIS SUX!!! Willi |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
Willi wrote:
THIS SUX!!! It will be reversed when the Democrats win control of the House and the Senate in 2006. :-) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
I can't afford one.
If I were rich I might buy a couple though. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Willi" wrote Gale Norton (who used to serve in my home state CO) is in favor of managing OUR public lands by the principal of "highest and best use" ie the usage that can produce the most (often short term)income. Pombo is a 'local' rancher/developer whose major ideology is "more money in MY pocket, **** the future" He seems to have used millions of his own money to gain office for the specific reason of profiting on those millions spent by changing laws ( Endangered Species Act, for one ) that were slowing his personal efforts to destroy as much of California as possible, as fast as possible. TRUE scum and, therefore, I'm sure Bush must love him. Let's all wave our flags, chant a mantra about 'protecting the American people' and then do something to screw them while they aren't looking .... |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Willi" wrote in message ... THIS ****ES ME OFF! SNIP What's especially obnoxious to me is that, in a typical sleazy political maneuver, it's just a "little" rider that got attached to a much larger complicated Bill without any public input. First we get "nothing" for the land and once that land is sold, we ain't ever getting it back. THIS SUX!!! Willi Where's the Unibomber when we really need him. (Just joking FBI screener) ;-II Dave |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Where's the Unibomber when we really need him. (Just joking FBI screener) ;-II Dave That´s "Unabomber". http://www.thecourier.com/manifest.htm MC Ideology stinks. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Larry L" wrote in message ... "Willi" wrote Gale Norton (who used to serve in my home state CO) is in favor of managing OUR public lands by the principal of "highest and best use" ie the usage that can produce the most (often short term)income. Pombo is a 'local' rancher/developer whose major ideology is "more money in MY pocket, **** the future" He seems to have used millions of his own money to gain office for the specific reason of profiting on those millions spent by changing laws ( Endangered Species Act, for one ) that were slowing his personal efforts to destroy as much of California as possible, as fast as possible. TRUE scum and, therefore, I'm sure Bush must love him. Let's all wave our flags, chant a mantra about 'protecting the American people' and then do something to screw them while they aren't looking .... Bottomline is that the greed of this kind of scum is not usually intimidated by anything short of physical fear. Dave |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:07:15 -0700, Willi wrote:
THIS ****ES ME OFF! This was one of my biggest fears when the present administration was elected and my fears were amplified when Gale Norton was appointed as the Secretary of the Interior. Gale Norton (who used to serve in my home state CO) is in favor of managing OUR public lands by the principal of "highest and best use" ie the usage that can produce the most (often short term)income. (She was a member of the think tank Mountain States Legal Foundation. Do some research on the think tank to see how they/she feels our public lands should be managed) This case goes even beyond being managed for the "highest and best use". The sales would be MUCH below market value. What's especially obnoxious to me is that, in a typical sleazy political maneuver, it's just a "little" rider that got attached to a much larger complicated Bill without any public input. First we get "nothing" for the land and once that land is sold, we ain't ever getting it back. THIS SUX!!! Willi FWIW, you might want to look at more of the story and the rider itself. For example, on the site George cited, there are several categories of "outside" links. One category is "News Coverage" and the first link, "Critics assail federal mining measure, Associated Press, 11/09/05" goes to this: http://www.theminingnews.org/news.cfm?newsID=1595 However, clicking on the "complete article" link (required for the partial "quote") gets at least two sides of the story: http://www.casperstartribune.net/art...b4000594ac.txt Is the other side right or even accurate? Well, one will have to decide for oneself, but I'd say that folks not having the whole story is a big part of what you are ****ed off about. The way it was, er, "partially quoted" suggests that the whole story getting coverage is not what the folks running "theminingnews.com" want. For example, this little item from the "complete article:" "The bill exempts national parks, monuments and wilderness areas." Easy to check, and if you find it to be accurate, it exempts quite a bit of "public" land. That said, I'd readily agree that the "pro-rider" folks in general aren't interested in the other side being heard either, and many on that side would probably run as roughshod over things as they felt like they would/could get away with. Remember, the Congressional Record (http://www.gpoaccess.gov/crecord/) is your friend...well, OK, so it probably isn't, so here's some help: Go he http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...:h4241rh.t xt and do a page search (it isn't a search box at the site - for example, use "Edit" -- "Find (on This Page)" if using IE) for "Subtitle B--Miscellaneous Amendments Relating to Mining." TC, R |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"George Cleveland" wrote in message ... If so then give him a call *tonight* and ask that he vote to remove against the budget reconciliation bill until Richard Pombo's public land giveaway is removed. http://www.tu.org/siteapps/advocacy/...NuFmG&b=376957 http://www.bettermines.org/pombo.cfm g.c. Get real, how many of these gutless swine have even spoken up in the face of all the corruption, fraud, incompetence, espionage, lies, torture, and treason of the Bushies? It isn't about the USA anymore for these scum . . . its just protecting their partisan funnel for all the bribes they can pack in before the gravytrain crashes. And from what Ive seen your average Republican voter these days is either too embarrassed or cowed to speak up, or is still repeating 6 year old Monica blowjob jokes and staying half soused. And the Christian whackjobs are running amuck. Damn few intelligent Republicans are speaking up. (Hegel, Graham, McCain). Dave |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" wrote in message . .. "Larry L" wrote in message ... "Willi" wrote Gale Norton (who used to serve in my home state CO) is in favor of managing OUR public lands by the principal of "highest and best use" ie the usage that can produce the most (often short term)income. Pombo is a 'local' rancher/developer whose major ideology is "more money in MY pocket, **** the future" He seems to have used millions of his own money to gain office for the specific reason of profiting on those millions spent by changing laws ( Endangered Species Act, for one ) that were slowing his personal efforts to destroy as much of California as possible, as fast as possible. TRUE scum and, therefore, I'm sure Bush must love him. Let's all wave our flags, chant a mantra about 'protecting the American people' and then do something to screw them while they aren't looking .... Bottomline is that the greed of this kind of scum is not usually intimidated by anything short of physical fear. You STILL believe that scum of this sort is motivated by greed? Well, isn't that just precious! Is it any wonder that scum of this sort remains eternally leagues ahead of you? Wolfgang greed, as an ideology, is passé.......been that way for centuries. sucks.......ainna? :) |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Where's the Unibomber when we really need him. (Just joking FBI screener) ;-II Dave That´s "Unabomber". http://www.thecourier.com/manifest.htm MC Ideology stinks. Hee, hee, hee. And illiteracy swallows. :) Wolfgang hey, gitcher weekly readers!......gitem while there hot!......step right up!....... |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
The whole story is covered. the potential for the wholesale of a
hundred million acres of national forest and BLM land. That's where the nations best trout streams are, bar none. We are talking about millions of anglers losing access and their streams for forever. It alos appears that the mining companies won't be the only folks digging in. This is perhaps the greatest anti-fly fishing measure I have ever seen proposed by congress. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
On 10 Nov 2005 18:32:18 -0800, "Johnson"
wrote: The whole story is covered. Ah, well, if you are sure, that's good enough for me... the potential for the wholesale of a hundred million acres of national forest and BLM land. Well, there's _potential_ for bigfoots...er, bigfeets...well, big hairy sumbitches to come out of trees and eat babies...so let's be prophylactic and cut down all the trees...or get rid of all the tempting babies...LET'S DO SOMETHING FOR GAWDSAKES!!! That's where the nations best trout streams are, bar none. We are talking about millions of anglers losing access and their streams for forever. It alos appears that the mining companies won't be the only folks digging in. This is perhaps the greatest anti-fly fishing measure I have ever seen proposed by congress. Uh, huh - so we should protect the FFing streams at the cost of the national interest, or protect them for you, or...???...hmm...IAC, that might not be enough...some rogue might not get in under the guise of being a FFer. Let's REALLY protect things and just ban any and all access. I know that a true conservationist such as yourself will be the first to publicly pledge to never enter public land again because it might damage things... Eleven-and-half-eagles....dick |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
|
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
Wow that was perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen posted.
What kind of coldwater fly fishermen advocates selling off the national forests? You do know where the best trout fishing is, don't you? But I guess TU is just lying, and you are the one with all the knowledge. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Where's the Unibomber when we really need him. (Just joking FBI screener) ;-II Dave That´s "Unabomber". Must be the Unibomber's brother. Excuse me Mike, but next time you live in a country ruled by a man who says that God tells him which countries to invade, where the government protects companies who defraud millions of their pensions, where the primative religion of snake-handlers and illiterates defines what birth control methods will be legal, where the poor are taxed so the rich will have more to spend, and where angry children are often armed with automatic weapons, . .. . maybe I'll listen to you for advise as to what is and what is not reasonable. Dave Ideology fa schifo |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... SNIP You STILL believe that scum of this sort is motivated by greed? Well, isn't that just precious! Is it any wonder that scum of this sort remains eternally leagues ahead of you? Wolfgang greed, as an ideology, is passé.......been that way for centuries. sucks.......ainna? :) True to form, you once again reveal a near complete ignorance of current events, much less the background of the key actors. Im curious: as much as you pee on your feet, do you at least remove your shoes when you enter other's houses? And . . . were you bit by the Weekly Reader when you were a kid or what? Dave |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
|
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Must be the Unibomber's brother. Excuse me Mike, but next time you live in a country ruled by a man who says that God tells him which countries to invade, where the government protects companies who defraud millions of their pensions, where the primative religion of snake-handlers and illiterates defines what birth control methods will be legal, where the poor are taxed so the rich will have more to spend, and where angry children are often armed with automatic weapons, . . . maybe I'll listen to you for advise as to what is and what is not reasonable. Dave Ideology fa schifo I was not giving you advice, merely providing information which you apparently lack. Should you seriously be of the opinion that such a man as the unabomber would solve any of the problems you keep waffling about on here, then you do not need advice, you need therapy. QUOTE FROM WIKIPEDIA Dr. Theodore John Kaczynski, Ph.D., also known as the Unabomber (born May 22, 1942) is a Polish-American terrorist who attempted to fight against what he perceived as the evils of technological progress by sending mail bombs to various people over almost eighteen years, killing three and wounding 29. He was the target of the FBI's most expensive manhunt ever. Before his identity was known, the FBI referred to him as the UNABOM (from "university and airline bomber"). Variants of the code name appeared when the media started using the codename, including Unabomer, and Unabomber. UNQUOTE MC |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
wrote in message ... In article , says... "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Where's the Unibomber when we really need him. (Just joking FBI screener) ;-II Dave That?s "Unabomber". Must be the Unibomber's brother. Excuse me Mike, but next time you live in a country ruled by a man who says that God tells him which countries to invade, where the government protects companies who defraud millions of their pensions, where the primative religion of snake-handlers and illiterates defines what birth control methods will be legal, where the poor are taxed so the rich will have more to spend, and where angry children are often armed with automatic weapons, . . . maybe I'll listen to you for advise as to what is and what is not reasonable. Dave Ideology fa schifo You forgot dogs and cats living together........angry children armed with automatic weapons???? Talk about fear-mongering. - Ken P.S. Before you give yourself a heart attack responding, do yourself a favor and look up automatic weapons. Automatic weapons are practically outlawed (there's about 200-300K mostly owned by Hollywood and collectors) and are rarely used in crimes. Hey, I could go for a positive note. So . . . where might you suggest I "look up automatic weapons" to get your sublime point of view. And please let me know what non-automatic weapons the various kid shooting up their school mates, and doing the drive-bys etc.. favor. Or maybe we are going to revisit that canard of an argument that denies that a glock is an automatic weapon and the very existance of assault rifles depend on what the definition of "is," is. In which case please spare me from such enlightenment. Dave Ideology fa schifo |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" wrote in message . .. "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... SNIP You STILL believe that scum of this sort is motivated by greed? Well, isn't that just precious! Is it any wonder that scum of this sort remains eternally leagues ahead of you? Wolfgang greed, as an ideology, is passé.......been that way for centuries. sucks.......ainna? :) True to form, you once again reveal a near complete ignorance of current events, much less the background of the key actors. Oh? There are new developments in your psychosis that I haven't been informed of? DO tell! :) Im curious: Would that you actually were........it would make a difference in your life that you can't imagine. as much as you pee on your feet, do you at least remove your shoes when you enter other's houses? Having spent a good deal of time cleaning toilets, I've made of point achieving good aim. If someone or something gets peed upon you may rest assured that the warm wet sensation you experience so often is no accident. And my shoes are a good deal cleaner than what is festering in your head. That said, shoe removal on entry has been my default action for years.......not that it's much of an issue......I don't get invited in all that often. And . . . were you bit by the Weekly Reader when you were a kid or what? I read it regularly throughout my years of elementary education....six, maybe seven years. Upon greater exposure to the wider world.....school, libraries, the street, etc., I quickly learned that there are other commendable sources of information. Some of them even surpass "Weekly Reader" in both breadth and depth of news coverage. Not that they aren't still good.....they ARE....but an occasional peek at something else probably wouldn't do you much harm at your age. But, go easy on the PG 13 stuff on TV and at the movies unless your Mom says it's o.k.........o.k.? Wolfgang any of y'all ever get that strange tingly sorta premonition that your about to get cuffed.......again!? |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
wrote in message ... ...Automatic weapons are practically outlawed.... So is crack......and crank. Wolfgang and not a moment too soon......whew! um......come to think of it, homicide is practically outlawed too. well, it's good to know we won't have THAT to worry about anymore! :) |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
wrote in message Uh, huh - so we should protect the FFing streams at the cost of the national interest I would see your side, if I could find one bit of "national interest" beyond personal enrichment on lands purchased on behalf of the nation as a whole. Even with the exemptions, why should the government be selling off(at bargain rates) National Forest lands?? Plus, if it was in the "National Interest", they probably wouldn't have to sneak it into legislation, but could proudly pass it as a stand alone measure........just my guess. Tom |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Johnson" wrote in message oups.com... Wow that was perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen posted. Puhleeze, you haven't read much of ROFF for very long have you?bseg Tom |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
Thomas Littleton wrote:
I would see your side, if I could find one bit of "national interest" beyond personal enrichment on lands purchased on behalf of the nation as a whole. Even with the exemptions, why should the government be selling off(at bargain rates) National Forest lands?? Plus, if it was in the "National Interest", they probably wouldn't have to sneak it into legislation, but could proudly pass it as a stand alone measure........just my guess. You can see the deficit reduction bill in its current form by going he http://thomas.loc.gov , clicking on Search Bills and Resolutions, then typing in "HR 4241" for the bill number. The relevant sections are 6201 to 6207, under TITLE VI--COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES, Subtitle B--Miscellaneous Amendments Relating to Mining. At risk are millions of acres of National Forest land and Bureau of Land Management land, which have almost endless hunting and fishing opportunities..... opportunities now accessible to everyone, not just to the scions of Dean Foods and their ilk. Now maybe it's just me, but I tend to think that reclassification of our public lands should only be done through an entirely open and transparent process into which the public has significant input, not through “miscellaneous amendments” to a budget bill. JR |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:59:37 GMT, "Thomas Littleton"
wrote: wrote in message Uh, huh - so we should protect the FFing streams at the cost of the national interest I would see your side, if I could find one bit of "national interest" beyond personal enrichment on lands purchased on behalf of the nation as a whole. Even with the exemptions, why should the government be selling off(at bargain rates) National Forest lands?? First, I have no side in this, but that said, this all seems to be much ado about nothing. It does not allow the selling off of vast amounts of, much less anywhere near _all_, "public land." Also, I didn't say this part of the HR _was_ in the national interest, I simply asked (rhetorically) if the national interest should be a lesser issue than protecting the "public" right to access (a few/some) trout streams. Read up on this particular part of the whole issue, and look into some of the background on the whole issue. For example, the "fake" bill he (Pombo) circulated some time back about selling national monuments and other stuff. Google up "Pombo Markey sale Frederick Olmstead" (Olmstead was one of the parks - hopefully, it will work to cut down on unrelated stuff) and you should see quite a bit, much of it leftish media-driven hysteria about something Pombo plainly said he wasn't going to actually introduce. Plus, if it was in the "National Interest", they probably wouldn't have to sneak it into legislation, but could proudly pass it as a stand alone measure........just my guess. There are lots of things that would be in the national interest that would have to be disguised as Paris Hilton, carrying a Starflocks' Frappacappamochabreeze, and washing a Bentley while wearing nothing but a "Trumpthong" and a $485USD t-shirt to sneak it into legislation...for example, a Bill authorizing...nay, _requiring_ the sale (final, "as is, where is," with no warranties expressed or implied) of Paris Hilton to the Yakuza, Donald Trump to the Chinese, and making the possession of a Frappacappamochabreeze or anything remotely similar a Federal rap with some serious time. TC, R |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
wrote in message ... ...I have no side in this.. Hm..... A lot like life its own self......ainna? Wolfgang who, eternal optimist, stands firm in the conviction that the boy will discover that he has something to say.......someday......maybe. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
Wolfgang wrote: wrote in message ... ...I have no side in this.. Hm..... A lot like life its own self......ainna? Wolfgang who, eternal optimist, stands firm in the conviction that the boy will discover that he has something to say.......someday......maybe. He's a convincing argument that the best thing to do about the national debt is to give Texas to the Chinese and call it good. |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Mike Connor" wrote in message ... Well Mike, perhaps my hyperbole went a little far in the "Where is the Unibomber when we really need him" line, but my frustration with the situation in my country is not an orphan, and well within the normal curve. Dave The only reason some people are still alive is because its against the law to kill em. (FF: Canadian bumper sticker) |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... Well Mike, perhaps my hyperbole went a little far in the "Where is the Unibomber when we really need him" line, but my frustration with the situation in my country is not an orphan, and well within the normal curve. Dave The only reason some people are still alive is because its against the law to kill em. (FF: Canadian bumper sticker) Indeed, excessive hyperbole merely detracts from what one is trying to say. While I often sympathise with a lot of what you say, I can not see it doing anybody any good airing such grievances here. If you feel so strongly about it, why are you not politically active? Petty squabbling on here, with others who are in any case apparently well aware of the unfortunate situations pertaining, is not going to get you anywhere at all. Lots of people are frustrated at all sorts of things, not only in America. This is a result of being more or less powerless to change things that one feels are wrong, or that one disagrees with. Your only recourse in a democracy, is to try and find other people who agree with you, and use this collective power to change things.If you are unable to do this, it usually means that not enough people care enough about it to do anything. This is indeed usually the case. People, groups, countries, invariably receive the officials and governments they deserve. This is unfortunate for those who do not deserve it, but that is democracy. In a democracy, mediocrity rules, for the simple reason that there are more mediocre people than any other. Obviously there are quite a few people who are aware of corruption, lies, misdirection, etc etc. But they simply don´t care. Those in power do what they do for their own reasons, and it would be foolish in the extreme to imagine that this is liable to be the result of altruism. Enough. TL MC |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... Having spent a good deal of time cleaning toilets, I've made of point achieving good aim. SNIP Im sorry. Having replaced a toilet last week I can empathize. That said, shoe removal on entry has been my default action for years.......not that it's much of an issue......I don't get invited in all that often. Good idea. And do you enjoy these visits? Would you like more invitations? "But, go easy on the PG 13 stuff on TV and at the movies unless your Mom says it's o.k.........o.k.? Not really a problem as all but 2-3 of the movies I see in a year at the indy theater on the island, are not rated. And my Mom at 83 is more interested in her new SUV than supervising my media choices. Wolfgang any of y'all ever get that strange tingly sorta premonition that your about to get cuffed.......again!? Now, now, now, lets not project too far ahead. Im sure we can keep this session productive. You have renewed your mental health coverage, right? Dave Fa schifo ideology |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" wrote in message . .. "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... Having spent a good deal of time cleaning toilets, I've made of point achieving good aim. SNIP Im sorry. Having replaced a toilet last week I can empathize. Well.....gosh. That's touching. Um......you want to be careful about touching in this day and age......it can lead to all sorts of trouble. That said, shoe removal on entry has been my default action for years.......not that it's much of an issue......I don't get invited in all that often. Good idea. I've always thought so. And do you enjoy these visits? Some of them. Would you like more invitations? No thanks. I have little enough time to devote to various other pursuits as it is. "But, go easy on the PG 13 stuff on TV and at the movies unless your Mom says it's o.k.........o.k.? Not really a problem as all but 2-3 of the movies I see in a year at the indy theater on the island, are not rated. Somehow, we all knew that your film viewing habits would evince an unmistakable and doubtless well timed psychic shudder at the mediocre and mindless tripe offerred up by the majors. :) And my Mom at 83 is more interested in her new SUV than supervising my media choices. Hm.....so you've been every bit as conscientious in instilling an environmental awareness in her as she has been moderating your prurient interests, eh? Wolfgang any of y'all ever get that strange tingly sorta premonition that your about to get cuffed.......again!? Now, now, now, lets not project too far ahead. Im sure we can keep this session productive. You have renewed your mental health coverage, right? Insurance is a wonderful thing for those who need the coverage. But, I don't think I'm Dave Stoller......and I've never put myself in the position of having to continue to use a sig line that I now realize is stupid (after this fact has been clearly demonstrated innumerable times) because discontinuing its use would be correctly seen as a tacit admission of that realization. :) Dave Fa schifo ideology Wolfgang hm......snedeker......snedeker.....what the hell kinda name is that, anyway?......is that eyetalian? :( |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
|
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... Slicing thru your drivel, I guess it comes down to you liking the movie product of the "majors," and your feeling that ideology doesn't suck. As to "innumerable" whatnot, you have never demonstrated anything regarding ideology sucking, with the exception of revealing you don't understand either word. As for your taste in movies, if trash culture does it for you, fill er up. I find most of it painful (hurts my ears) and degrading. I stopped apologizing years ago for my tastes in fine art, film, and music, life is too short to spend it on crap, pretend that Arnold is kool, pretend Billy Crystal is funny, or pretend that women who look like boys with tits as big as their heads are inherently interesting. As for "fa schifo" I doubt you will ever understand either its similarity to the English "suck," or the difference. And if someone learning the basics of a few languages is another one of those things that make you uncomfortable, thats just sad. Dave Ideology still sucks |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter