![]() |
|
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask.
I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. Allyn |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Old Grey wrote:
Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. If you're backpacking and want to minimize weight, you don't really need a rod tube, especially with 4-piece. The sections are only 27". Just lash them (in a rod sock) to your pack frame. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
rw wrote:
Old Grey wrote: Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. If you're backpacking and want to minimize weight, you don't really need a rod tube, especially with 4-piece. The sections are only 27". Just lash them (in a rod sock) to your pack frame. I disagree. I'd never try to lash a rod sock full of fly rod to my pack and expect it to survive the trip. We just had this discussion a few weeks ago. Me and Larry L or maybe JR, one of the western guys I've never met at any rate, were bemoaning the disappearance of the Orvis plastic half-tube. If I could find those again I'd buy two, one for 3 piece rods and one for 4 piece. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
I disagree. I'd never try to lash a rod sock full of fly rod to my pack and expect it to survive the trip. That's your privilege -- to disagree. If you're aren't planning on falling off any cliffs, and if you can take a reasonable degree of care with your stuff, a rod tube is just extra weight. 10 oz is a LOT to save on a backpacking trip. If I were doubtful about my ability to take care of my stuff and not to fall off cliffs, however, I might not take an overpriced Winston. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Old Grey wrote:
Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. Allyn If you are a little bit handy you might want to just make one. See http://www.peninsulaflyfishers.org/T...eBackpack.html Mike McGuire |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
"Mike McGuire" wrote in message ink.net... Old Grey wrote: Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. Allyn If you are a little bit handy you might want to just make one. See http://www.peninsulaflyfishers.org/T...eBackpack.html Mike McGuire Wow, that seems unnecessarily complex. I built my fly rod tube out of PVC, and use 'male' endcaps that have little rubber gaskets to make them fit snugly. They make several dozen types of endcaps, so it wouldn't be hard to find one that did the job. To make the padding that fits inside the endcap, I just laid a peice of ensolite on a hard floor, put the endcap on it, and stepped on it, cutting a round piece of ensolite like a cookiecutter would, and pressed them into the endcap. Works perfectly, and the endcaps fit so snugly that they never pop off accidentally, even on flights. --riverman |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
riverman wrote:
"Mike McGuire" wrote in message ink.net... Old Grey wrote: Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. Allyn If you are a little bit handy you might want to just make one. See http://www.peninsulaflyfishers.org/T...eBackpack.html Mike McGuire Wow, that seems unnecessarily complex. I built my fly rod tube out of PVC, and use 'male' endcaps that have little rubber gaskets to make them fit snugly. They make several dozen types of endcaps, so it wouldn't be hard to find one that did the job. PVC is heavy. The lightest commonly available rod tubes are made with aluminum. Sage has great aluminum rod tubes. You can make lighter ones from carbon fiber. Or titanium. It's not worth it for backpacking. Rod tubes are great for keeping the air-cargo troglodytes from destroying your stuff, but if you take some minimally reasonably care of your rod, you don't need one when backpacking. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
"rw" wrote in message ink.net... riverman wrote: "Mike McGuire" wrote in message ink.net... Old Grey wrote: Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. Allyn If you are a little bit handy you might want to just make one. See http://www.peninsulaflyfishers.org/T...eBackpack.html Mike McGuire Wow, that seems unnecessarily complex. I built my fly rod tube out of PVC, and use 'male' endcaps that have little rubber gaskets to make them fit snugly. They make several dozen types of endcaps, so it wouldn't be hard to find one that did the job. PVC is heavy. The lightest commonly available rod tubes are made with aluminum. Sage has great aluminum rod tubes. You can make lighter ones from carbon fiber. Or titanium. It's not worth it for backpacking. Rod tubes are great for keeping the air-cargo troglodytes from destroying your stuff, but if you take some minimally reasonably care of your rod, you don't need one when backpacking. I agree that you can choose to go without a tube while backpacking, but I'd still carry a tube, just for those errant branches or occasional stumbles and falls. I find that the commercial tubes are big enough to put several rods in, so making a snug PVC one might still be lighter than the stock tube. However, if weight was still a factor, I might consider getting some heavy gauge nylon and wrapping my rod in it, and lashing it along the external frame. I don't hike with internal frame packs, as they get too sweaty against my back. Or another idea I have considered was to make a PVC tube and lash that to my frame with zip ties, and leave a little groove in the top wide enough so that I could sheathe it with the reel attached. That way, if I was hiking alongside a stream, I could leave the rod rigged up with the reel on it, break it down without taking the line off, and slip it into the tube like a holster. The rod could be kept in the holster with a short piece of bungee that slipped over the reel. --riverman |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
riverman wrote:
I agree that you can choose to go without a tube while backpacking, but I'd still carry a tube, just for those errant branches or occasional stumbles and falls. I find that the commercial tubes are big enough to put several rods in, so making a snug PVC one might still be lighter than the stock tube. Carrying "several" rods on a lightweight backbacking trip sounds kind of nuts to me. :-) I loved your TRs from NZ, BTW. Or another idea I have considered was to make a PVC tube and lash that to my frame with zip ties, and leave a little groove in the top wide enough so that I could sheathe it with the reel attached. That way, if I was hiking alongside a stream, I could leave the rod rigged up with the reel on it, break it down without taking the line off, and slip it into the tube like a holster. The rod could be kept in the holster with a short piece of bungee that slipped over the reel. When I'm hiking and fishing, I usually carry my rod in my right hand, completely rigged up. Another good alternative is to carry a 2-piece rod in a very durable tube, which does double duty as a hiking stick. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Why not just go first class and build a good one. 4' of 2" titanium
for only $196 http://cgi.ebay.com/TITANIUM-TUBING-...cmd ZViewItem Such a project would call for more than just an just ordinary screw on cap, any suggestions? |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Old Grey wrote in
: Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. Allyn Phenolic tubing may be an option. http://www.the-rocketman.com/store/tubing.html rt |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
rw wrote:
riverman wrote: them fit snugly. They make several dozen types of endcaps, so it wouldn't be hard to find one that did the job. PVC is heavy. The lightest commonly available rod tubes are made with aluminum. Sage has great aluminum rod tubes. Not so. You do have to use the schedule 200 thin wall irrigation pipe, not the thick wall schedule 40 domestic plumbing pipe. I weighed my PVC tube and closures. Comes in around 330 grams for a 4 piece 9' rod. . The aluminum tube it replaces comes in at 450 grams. What does Sage get for their tubes? I got about $2 in materials in my rod tube. I have used the type of closures riverman talks about for rod tubes where I don't care about the weight. I weighed one that closes a 1.5" tube. It weighs 75 grams. The rolled foam closure of the same size that I made for my backpack tube comes in at 10 grams. But what do you know about light weight--you're a horsepacker, cast iron dutch ovens and skillets and that kind of clunk. Mike |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 06:12:23 GMT, Mike McGuire
wrote: rw wrote: riverman wrote: them fit snugly. They make several dozen types of endcaps, so it wouldn't be hard to find one that did the job. PVC is heavy. The lightest commonly available rod tubes are made with aluminum. Sage has great aluminum rod tubes. Not so. You do have to use the schedule 200 thin wall irrigation pipe, not the thick wall schedule 40 domestic plumbing pipe. I weighed my PVC tube and closures. Comes in around 330 grams for a 4 piece 9' rod. . And 330 grams is... TC, R .... I'm going to bet it's darned near 1/3 of a kilogram...and a few ounces more than 9 or 10... |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:53:29 GMT, Old Grey
wrote: Since you own a fly shop I thought you might be a good person to ask. I hope you don't mind the intrusion. I have a 9' four piece Winston Ibis that came with the cordura rod tube. Together with the rod and tube it weighs in around 19 oz. I am looking to do some long backpacking trips this summer (Muir Trail) and am trying to find a lighter rod tube but one that still has rigid sides. Do you know of any rigid side tubes (aluminium or other material) 2 inch diameter by 30 inches long or so that weigh in less than 8 to 10 oz.? Thanks for any feedback. Allyn How "rigid" fits your definition of rigid? Does it need to survive a fall that you, um, won't or ??? If it simply needs to protect the rod and guides from bumps/snags, you might look at a corrugated plastic tube*, such as used for storing photos, plans, art prints, etc. I don't know the weight of it for a section 2" x 30", but I'd bet such data could be found fairly easily online, and like the paper-product tube, it has matching light plastic end caps, so if it will fit your needs, you could assemble your own with no more labor than cutting the tube as needed and inserting the end caps. If that won't be "strong" enough, look up the weights of thinwall aluminum tubing, and find the alloy type that will work, weight-wise, and locate it that way - IOW, it may be easier to find a 2" diameter tube of "XXXX" alloy material than to find a "rod tube" that weighs in at less than 9-10 oz. *This is like the corrugated sign material, and it comes in various weights, strengths, etc. HTH, R |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
rw wrote: If I were doubtful about my ability to take care of my stuff and not to fall off cliffs, however, I might not take an overpriced Winston. For the record, the IBIS the original poster mentioned my have been sold by Winston, but it is not a Winston, one's feeling on the pricing structure notwithstanding. And it was priced as an "entry level rod". Carry on. Wayne Who uses aluminum tools last time I backpacked. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
On 2/4/06 7:47 PM, in article
et, "rw" wrote: If I were doubtful about my ability to take care of my stuff and not to fall off cliffs, however, I might not take an overpriced Winston. That's what I was thinking. I mean, I thought that's why the make the Cabela's KPOS Three Forks 3 weight! Not that I do the Muir trail (I wish!) but that's what I carry when I'm hiking with a pack. I secure it to the side of my pack in the rod sock. Hasn't busted while hiking yet- though I did break the tip in the screen door one time. And my hikes are generally in the relatively tightly-wooded and rocky eastern US. Lots of rod-grabbing trailside stuff around here. Bill |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Thanks for the various feedback so far. The PVC idea has some merit,
but can't seem to find any Class 125 or 200 in the 2 inch diameter so far and the Schedule 40 is too heavy. The titanium tubing idea on eBay caught my eye, but the price ($195) was a little too much. The aluminum tubing out there seems to weigh a little more than I want, but the model rocket tubing looks like a possibility. A 2-inch diameter by 36 inch long piece is 8.7 oz and the 1.5 inch is 6.2 oz. As for the mailing tube type, weight is just right but is too flexible as not sure it would protect the rod. As for going just with the sock, not sure I want to risk that. While my hiking capabilities are not superior, I don't think I will be falling off of cliffs or such. Just 220 plus miles of pack on and off is too much of a chance for just the sock and I don't feel like carrying my rod all those miles in my hand. Figure if I go 220 plus miles through grand slam territory, I want my rod to make it. As for my rod, well it is what it is and works great for me. Don't really care who's name is on the label and who sold/made it. Price was right for me (birthday present from my wife). Thanks again.. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Wayne Knight wrote:
Wayne Who uses aluminum tools last time I backpacked. No offense, but I'm guessing that was time ago..... Back in my younger days, a 30 pounds of pack and gear was considered very light. Things have really changed for the better in terms of gear available. Inspired by Snoop, I've gotten back into some kind of shape and backpacking. I did a couple trips this past Fall and I have a number of short trips planned for this Summer. I bought some new gear and the pack, sleeping bag, pad, tent, stove, cooking gear, fuel, fishing gear, clothes, raingear with food and other assorted stuff for a long weekend is less than 20 pounds which even this aging body can carry fairly easily. I don't use a rod case. Willi |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Mike McGuire wrote:
rw wrote: riverman wrote: them fit snugly. They make several dozen types of endcaps, so it wouldn't be hard to find one that did the job. PVC is heavy. The lightest commonly available rod tubes are made with aluminum. Sage has great aluminum rod tubes. Not so. You do have to use the schedule 200 thin wall irrigation pipe, not the thick wall schedule 40 domestic plumbing pipe. I weighed my PVC tube and closures. Comes in around 330 grams for a 4 piece 9' rod. . The aluminum tube it replaces comes in at 450 grams. What does Sage get for their tubes? I got about $2 in materials in my rod tube. I have used the type of closures riverman talks about for rod tubes where I don't care about the weight. I weighed one that closes a 1.5" tube. It weighs 75 grams. The rolled foam closure of the same size that I made for my backpack tube comes in at 10 grams. But what do you know about light weight--you're a horsepacker, cast iron dutch ovens and skillets and that kind of clunk. Mike IMO, at 330 grams you're still dealing with considerable weight. I use PVC cases in my van and when flying, but I don't want to be toting one around in the mountains. Willi |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:56:28 GMT, Old Grey
wrote: Thanks for the various feedback so far. The PVC idea has some merit, but can't seem to find any Class 125 or 200 in the 2 inch diameter so far and the Schedule 40 is too heavy. The titanium tubing idea on eBay caught my eye, but the price ($195) was a little too much. The aluminum tubing out there seems to weigh a little more than I want, but the model rocket tubing looks like a possibility. A 2-inch diameter by 36 inch long piece is 8.7 oz and the 1.5 inch is 6.2 oz. As for the mailing tube type, weight is just right but is too flexible as not sure it would protect the rod. Not sure what you mean by "flexible" ??? The tube (made of the _corrugated_ material - the solid style wouldn't be as sturdy) itself wouldn't be what _I'd_ call "flexible," but granted, it wouldn't be as "side-impact" crush-resistant as solid PVC, aluminum, etc. As it can handle FedEx/UPS shipping, it is reasonably sturdy - as always, YMMV. If the titanium idea interests you, and you have any access to industry in which it is used, you might check that avenue for "scrap" tubing. I've gotten such material from scrap dealers for no more than the scrap weight value plus a little profit for them. For example, I have stainless steel fence gates that we've made out of non-spec tubing for under .50USD a pound TC, R |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
|
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
"Willi" wrote in message
... No offense, but I'm guessing that was time ago..... You guessed wrong, last year after the cardiologist and infectous disease guys released me. I wanted to see what I could still do. It probably wasn't pretty and it wasn't fast but I still did the Cohutta WMA in n GA for one day in, one day out and one day for fun. and for the record there were two rod tubes attached to the pack. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Wayne Knight wrote:
rw wrote: If I were doubtful about my ability to take care of my stuff and not to fall off cliffs, however, I might not take an overpriced Winston. For the record, the IBIS the original poster mentioned my have been sold by Winston, but it is not a Winston, one's feeling on the pricing structure notwithstanding. And it was priced as an "entry level rod". Carry on. Sorry, Wayne. I'm not intimately familiar with the Winston line of rods. It sounds like this particular rod is not a candidate for heartbreaking loss is the flyfisher/backpacker falls off a cliff. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
"rw" wrote in message
link.net... It sounds like this particular rod is not a candidate for heartbreaking loss is the flyfisher/backpacker falls off a cliff. Heartbreaking or not, there is something to be said for walking in several miles to fish somewhere only to break your rod before you get to fish. Regardless of how much the rod cost. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:14:17 -0500, "Wayne Knight"
wrote: Heartbreaking or not, there is something to be said for walking in several miles to fish somewhere only to break your rod before you get to fish. Regardless of how much the rod cost. Or row your iddy biddy pontoon boat all day after breaking your rod. Right, Barnard? d;o) |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Willi wrote:
Mike McGuire wrote: IMO, at 330 grams you're still dealing with considerable weight. I use PVC cases in my van and when flying, but I don't want to be toting one around in the mountains. Willi If you want to put in a tube with reasonable protection, you're not going to get much lighter than that. I am sceptical of the amount of serious backpacking is actually done by those who strain at this gnat. Mike |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Mike McGuire wrote:
Willi wrote: Mike McGuire wrote: IMO, at 330 grams you're still dealing with considerable weight. I use PVC cases in my van and when flying, but I don't want to be toting one around in the mountains. Willi If you want to put in a tube with reasonable protection, you're not going to get much lighter than that. I am sceptical of the amount of serious backpacking is actually done by those who strain at this gnat. Sceptical [sic] though you might be, lightweight backpacking is all about "straining at gnats." The idea is to trim weight, relentlessly. If you don't actually NEED it, then leave it. The 10 ounces a rod tube would take up is a huge amount of weight. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:14:17 -0500, "Wayne Knight" wrote: Heartbreaking or not, there is something to be said for walking in several miles to fish somewhere only to break your rod before you get to fish. Regardless of how much the rod cost. Or row your iddy biddy pontoon boat all day after breaking your rod. Right, Barnard? d;o) I recall that trip vividly. I broke my rod. Big deal. That was the trip where at the put-in you blew up at Joe MacIntosh for apparently no reason at all, embarrassing everyone. That was about the most uncomfortable moment I've ever experienced at a ROFF clave. It was also the trip where, according to you, you caught more fish and bigger fish than everyone else. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
rw wrote:
Mike McGuire wrote: Sceptical [sic] though you might be, lightweight backpacking is all about "straining at gnats." The idea is to trim weight, relentlessly. If you don't actually NEED it, then leave it. The 10 ounces a rod tube would take up is a huge amount of weight. But the question is do you want protection or not. You don't even NEED to go fishing on a backpack trip, so leave all the tackle behind and save even more. Mike |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
"rw" wrote in message nk.net... Mike McGuire wrote: Willi wrote: Mike McGuire wrote: IMO, at 330 grams you're still dealing with considerable weight. I use PVC cases in my van and when flying, but I don't want to be toting one around in the mountains. Willi If you want to put in a tube with reasonable protection, you're not going to get much lighter than that. I am sceptical of the amount of serious backpacking is actually done by those who strain at this gnat. Sceptical [sic] though you might be, lightweight backpacking is all about "straining at gnats." The idea is to trim weight, relentlessly. If you don't actually NEED it, then leave it. The 10 ounces a rod tube would take up is a huge amount of weight. True. I knew an ultralightweight packer who would drill holes in the handle of his toothbrush to save the grams. It all sounded pretty ludicrous to me until he showed me his full-gear pack....three seasons, five day pack (food included) at something like 10 pounds. But I think if someone wanted to supplement their food with freshly-caught fish, the weight of the rod tube would be worth the savings in food weight. --riverman |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
"riverman" wrote ... But I think if someone wanted to supplement their food with freshly-caught fish, the weight of the rod tube would be worth the savings in food weight. --riverman The food weight savings are quickly off-set by the additional gear required -- some sort of skillet, a heavier stove (hard to cook fish over an alcohol stove -- flame just doesn't last long enough), fuel for the stove, condiments, etc. Plus, the heaviset item of all: worry that no fish may be caught. Dan ...Mountain House isn't delicious, but it sure works.... |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:27:44 GMT, rw
wrote: That was the trip where at the put-in you blew up at Joe MacIntosh for apparently no reason at all, embarrassing everyone. That was about the most uncomfortable moment I've ever experienced at a ROFF clave. You should get your stories straight, Steve. There was a conversation about boat safety and for the necessity of watching where you cast. I mentioned that Joe had hit me in the head twice on a float the day before. Joe took exception to that and grabbed me by the shirt at my throat. Yeah, I blew up. Who wouldn't have under the same conditions. You don't go around grabbing folks by their throat. It was also the trip where, according to you, you caught more fish and bigger fish than everyone else. Actually it was Jeff Connelly and I who caught the most fish. Hell, that wasn't much of a feat considering that it was a miserable day and hardly any fish were taken. Jeff and I were in a boat expertly rowed by John Hightower. HE put us into the fish. You, otoh, were a bit of a klutz (eww, glad I'm not writing doggerel!) breaking your rod fairly early in the float. Never heard of anyone breaking a rod that way. Tragic but funny at the same time, dontchaknow. d;o) |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
|
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
|
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Wayne Knight wrote:
"Willi" wrote in message ... No offense, but I'm guessing that was time ago..... You guessed wrong, last year after the cardiologist and infectous disease guys released me. I wanted to see what I could still do. It probably wasn't pretty and it wasn't fast but I still did the Cohutta WMA in n GA for one day in, one day out and one day for fun. and for the record there were two rod tubes attached to the pack. Very Cool! Wayne I apologize for the erroneous assumption. Willi |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:40:04 -0700, Willi wrote:
Wayne Knight wrote: "Willi" wrote in message ... No offense, but I'm guessing that was time ago..... You guessed wrong, last year after the cardiologist and infectous disease guys released me. I wanted to see what I could still do. It probably wasn't pretty and it wasn't fast but I still did the Cohutta WMA in n GA for one day in, one day out and one day for fun. and for the record there were two rod tubes attached to the pack. Very Cool! Wayne Sure is! I apologize for the erroneous assumption. I'd rather use a stick of 8 3/8" casing as a backpacking rod case than apologize on ROFF... TC, R |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
Daniel-San wrote:
"riverman" wrote ... But I think if someone wanted to supplement their food with freshly-caught fish, the weight of the rod tube would be worth the savings in food weight. --riverman The food weight savings are quickly off-set by the additional gear required -- some sort of skillet, a heavier stove (hard to cook fish over an alcohol stove -- flame just doesn't last long enough), fuel for the stove, condiments, etc. If you're camping where fires are allowed all you need is some aluminum foil. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
"rw" wrote ... Daniel-San wrote: "riverman" wrote ... But I think if someone wanted to supplement their food with freshly-caught fish, the weight of the rod tube would be worth the savings in food weight. --riverman The food weight savings are quickly off-set by the additional gear required -- some sort of skillet, a heavier stove (hard to cook fish over an alcohol stove -- flame just doesn't last long enough), fuel for the stove, condiments, etc. If you're camping where fires are allowed all you need is some aluminum foil. True enough. While I do BP in a few areas that allow fires, I usually prefer not to have one. Just a preference, no real reason. Probably why I immediately think of stoves, etc. to cook fish. Dan |
Ping Bill Kiene - Fly Rod Tube?
My Hardy smuggler rod and its plastic rod tube (made from some sort of
water pipe, I think) together only weigh about 350 grams. The rod isn't great, but (heresy!) sometimes that isn't all that important. Lazarus |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter