![]() |
Maine Misadventure
This post was buried in an older thread. I feel so proud of it I want
it up front. It's about a recent experience I had in Downeast Maine. *** I already have an amusing anecdote about fishing (or not fishing) in the region. When I was up in November for the home inspection, I had a Saturday stayover on my frequent-flyer ticket, so I decided to find a place to fish, preferrably for trout. Now one feature of Maine fisheries is that most moving water is closed from October until Spring, so I only had a few places to choose from. I went and bought a Delorme Atlas, a fishing license, a bright orange hat (they hunt up there), and some bear spray (just in case). I mapped out a route from Machias where I was staying (Hello Broadway B &B) to a promising flowage between routes 1 and 9 in Washington County, North of Cherryfield, if anyone know where that is. Oh, I need to tell you that the jokers at Bangor Airport gave me a convertable car to rent when I left Bangor. The sad thing is that at first I was excited about it- excited to get a convertable car- in Maine- in November. So anyway, I took Route 1 (the main route along the coast) about halfway there, but there was this great meandering path through the wild blueberry fields, which Delorme said was paved. I had a full tank of gas, water, beer, and my lunch in the car, and it was 8:00 am, so onto the meandering path I went. The road was enjoyable albeit somewhat monotonous. Occasionally I passed a house or a barn, but mostly it was scrub and blueberry fields, some with large boulders stranded in the fields from the last glacier that went through. Everything was going great until I climbed up a long hill where the fields dropped off on both sides. I came down the hill and was in the middle of a vast field that was level into the distance. Then the road became dirt. At first it was well packed dirt, so I went on. Keep going, I thought, the road is straight and the pavement will pick up again. Then the road ended in a T. I had to turn. I turned north.?. (My destination was north-west). I kept going; sooner or later I had to find a road that was on the atlas. One turn turned to two which turned to twenty, and I was lost . . . lost in Blueberry fields. It is hard to describe how extensive they are, but on the map they are probably 15 miles by 30 miles square. What could I do? I kept driving, field after field, turn after turn for two hours. Alone except for the radio, no sign of humanity other than the road. After two hours, miracle of miracles, I saw an SUV coming down the road coming toward me. Now the dirt path was narrow, so we would both have to slow down and pull to the side to pass. I could see that the driver was about to nod and pull past, so I rolled down my window and waved my arms frantically. He stopped, lowered his window, looked me up and down, and said in a ringing down east accent, "You picked a pretty fine car for running around in the blueberries fields." I had to smile at that comment. I had no choice, I stuck in the middle of the blueberry wilderness. Without his help I may be stuck forever. I quickly described my plight, and asked him to guide my out of the fields. He said to turn around and follow him, which I did. We took innumerable turns, went past a lake, and down and up a gully where I also got stuck. After about twenty minutes we were on hard packed dirt, approaching a paved road. He stopped at the intersection with the paved road, and I pulled around him to thank him for the help. Before I could open my mouth, he pointed his arm out his window, past my car and said, "The road to the Bangor Airport is that way." I thanked him and went on my way. Of course, I wasn't going to the airport, but he figured that after getting lost so dumbly, I couldn't be from around there and would probably benefit from leaving as quickly as possible. Lessons learned: Maine is big, and Eastern Maine is more rural than you can imagine, probably more rural than any other place east of the Mississippi. Blueberry farms in Maine are big. Roads in Maine end abruptly. Finally, the only way to be sure where you are is to have a GPS. I didn't get to fish that day, but I am not discouraged. I am moving to an area with much wilderness- more every year, and I will enjoy exploring it. |
Maine Misadventure
I enjoyed your story. It reminded me of my college days at the
University of Maine at Orono when we would explore all those woods roads on weekends to see where they went. Sometimes we would hunt pah-tridge and rabbit, sometimes we would ice fish, but the driving was half the fun. Pete Collin |
Maine Misadventure
Memphis Jim wrote:
I didn't get to fish that day, but I am not discouraged. I am moving to an area with much wilderness- more every year, and I will enjoy exploring it. Cool story. What does "much wilderness - more every year" mean? I didn't think that was happening anywhere. Willi |
Maine Misadventure
"Willi" wrote in message ... Memphis Jim wrote: I didn't get to fish that day, but I am not discouraged. I am moving to an area with much wilderness- more every year, and I will enjoy exploring it. Cool story. What does "much wilderness - more every year" mean? I didn't think that was happening anywhere. Willi It's what happens when you quit mowing the back forty. Danl |
Maine Misadventure
"Memphis Jim" wrote in message oups.com... Everything was going great until I climbed up a long hill where the fields dropped off on both sides. I came down the hill and was in the middle of a vast field that was level into the distance. Then the road became dirt. Great story. It really brought back some memories. I spent may hours riding through the barrens in the back of an old hard top jeep driven by my cousin's father. "Mack" was a born and bred Mainer, had little use for comfort, and was happiest when there were as many people around as possible. So my father, my cousin (dad's age), Mack, my cousin's two sons (both a bit younger than me), and my brother and me, along with a very happy full grown lab and a dozen rods (classic Down-East fishing rods of the telescopic metallic variety), would load up in Mack's CJ7 and roar off from Northfield down to the barrens. Mack had no idea how rough the ride was in the back of the Jeep, or perhaps he thought all the bodies crammed together would offer some sort of cushioning, but at the speeds he traveled, we all spent as much time airborne as seated, if you can call the fender well a seat. I never decided whether he drove fast over the rutted dirt roads because he was anxious to get to the brooks, didn't have any idea how bloodied we were getting from the impact against the roof, or just thought driving fast was fun. In any case, by the time we rolled out of the Jeep, I would gladly have walked back to camp rather than ride back. Of course, by the next day, I had forgotten this discomfort, and was always ready to do it again. Mack always knew where the fishing was going to be good, and since there wasn't a lot of fishing pressure in the brooks of the barrens back then, it was almost always wonderful. In fact, I can never remember seeing another fisherman in all the trips we made. It always seemed that the barrens were our private fishing grounds, and I can remember my cousin's outrage when he thought someone was building a house near one of the brooks. They weren't, but it got his attention. We were meat fisherman, and kept our limit for dinner and the freezer long before there was any realization that the resource was limited. I learned early how to best preserve a nice bright brookie in a sphagnum moss lined basket creel so that it's flesh would still be firm at the end of the day - a skill I haven't needed to use in nearly 30 years of C&R. That's just the way it was back then, even with an 8 fish limit. Dad says my grandfather was devasted when Maine dropped the limit to 25 fish a day. There are many nice brooks and "rivers" on the barrens, and while I haven't fished them in 35 years, they always held fish. The season allowed fishing in "rivers" after August 15, but the brooks closed. If the map said it was a river, we fished it, even though many of the rivers were significantly smaller than some of the brooks. Sorry for the ramble. I cherish the experiences I have had fishing out West with my wife, but in the end, there is simply nothing like the joy of fishing a brook so tight with alders that you have to poke the pole though the branches. And but for a wrong turn or two, you were in the right place. Jim Ray |
Maine Misadventure
"jimbo" wrote in message ... ...Sorry for the ramble. I cherish the experiences I have had fishing out West with my wife, but in the end, there is simply nothing like the joy of fishing a brook so tight with alders that you have to poke the pole though the branches.... Thanks for taking us along. It was a much nicer ride than you had to endure to get there. :) Wolfgang |
Maine Misadventure
Hey Peter; I went to UMO. Did we have this conversation a few years ago?
--riverman "Peter A. Collin" wrote in message ... I enjoyed your story. It reminded me of my college days at the University of Maine at Orono when we would explore all those woods roads on weekends to see where they went. Sometimes we would hunt pah-tridge and rabbit, sometimes we would ice fish, but the driving was half the fun. Pete Collin |
Maine Misadventure
"Memphis Jim" wrote in message oups.com... This post was buried in an older thread. I feel so proud of it I want it up front. It's about a recent experience I had in Downeast Maine. Sounds like my entire teenage years. I spent many a summer (and winter) in the blueberry barrens. By the way, the region you were headed for (sounds like around Cathance Lake?) is not so great for winter fishing. --riverman |
Maine Misadventure
riverman wrote:
Hey Peter; I went to UMO. Did we have this conversation a few years ago? --riverman "Peter A. Collin" wrote in message ... I enjoyed your story. It reminded me of my college days at the University of Maine at Orono when we would explore all those woods roads on weekends to see where they went. Sometimes we would hunt pah-tridge and rabbit, sometimes we would ice fish, but the driving was half the fun. Pete Collin Oh, Maybe. I tend to repeat myself. Graduated '91. |
Maine Misadventure
"Peter A. Collin" wrote in message ... riverman wrote: Hey Peter; I went to UMO. Did we have this conversation a few years ago? --riverman "Peter A. Collin" wrote in message ... I enjoyed your story. It reminded me of my college days at the University of Maine at Orono when we would explore all those woods roads on weekends to see where they went. Sometimes we would hunt pah-tridge and rabbit, sometimes we would ice fish, but the driving was half the fun. Pete Collin Oh, Maybe. I tend to repeat myself. Graduated '91. December, '84. Worked in Boardman for the Geology department before Steve Kahl built the new labs out by Stillwater Village (near the Cabins field: you missed the Cabins era). --riverman |
Maine Misadventure
riverman wrote:
"Memphis Jim" wrote in message oups.com... This post was buried in an older thread. I feel so proud of it I want it up front. It's about a recent experience I had in Downeast Maine. Sounds like my entire teenage years. I spent many a summer (and winter) in the blueberry barrens. By the way, the region you were headed for (sounds like around Cathance Lake?) is not so great for winter fishing. --riverman While we are on the subject of Maine, may I ask, how far outside of Maine is is where a "camp" must properly be called a "cottage"? I always want to call people's summer homes "camps" no matter how many luxuries they contain. Pete |
Maine Misadventure
"Peter A. Collin" wrote in message ... riverman wrote: "Memphis Jim" wrote in message oups.com... This post was buried in an older thread. I feel so proud of it I want it up front. It's about a recent experience I had in Downeast Maine. Sounds like my entire teenage years. I spent many a summer (and winter) in the blueberry barrens. By the way, the region you were headed for (sounds like around Cathance Lake?) is not so great for winter fishing. --riverman While we are on the subject of Maine, may I ask, how far outside of Maine is is where a "camp" must properly be called a "cottage"? I always want to call people's summer homes "camps" no matter how many luxuries they contain. I think it has more to do with yearly income than anything else. Everyone I knew who had one, had a 'summah camp out in the woods'. Out of staters who could afford a summah place in Maine had a 'cottage on the lake'. I think once you are out of ME, NH and VT, you can call them 'Cottages'. I suppose it really has to do with what you use them for. Camps are used mostly to hunt from, I think. And even if you don't hunt, if some owner sometime in the past used it for hunting, its a camp. --riverman |
Maine Misadventure
"Peter A. Collin" wrote in message
While we are on the subject of Maine, may I ask, how far outside of Maine is is where a "camp" must properly be called a "cottage"? Vermont. Joe F. |
Maine Misadventure
There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and
parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Now in most of Maine, smaller farms are not economically productive (with the exception of Aroostook County in the northeast of the state where potato farms predominate). Over the past hundred years, much of interior Maine that used to be farmland has reverted back to woods. At the same time, over the last 40 years or so the population of the state has consolidated toward coast, toward the southwest, and toward urban areas, such that there are towns throughout Maine that are slowly dimming and blinking out. Close to where I will be living there is one town that no longer exists as a coporate entity, Centerville, and two others that are trying to go in that direction, Whitneyville, and Cooper (on Cathance Lake) Deorganization means lower taxes for these towns on the brink. When deorganization succeeds, local control of the community is given up. This ultimately furthers the trend toward forested land. Finally, much of the land in Maine is owned by international timber companies. Currently they are managing much of the land for pulp production, and letting forests regrow. If you didn't know better you might assume much of the land is preserved. The town where I am buying a house once had about 2500 people and was an industrial center for cutting wood (thorough water power). Now the mills are gone, along with the dams (thank goodness). If you didn't know the history of the town it would be hard to imagine how industrial the town was in the past. That is what I meant. |
Maine Misadventure
Thanks Petah I appreciate your comments. Good to know that there are
former Mainers on the board. |
Maine Misadventure
That's exactly my point.
As my wife and I looked at new places to settle, we found that we were attracted to places with zero or negative growth rates, places where strip mall development and suburbanization was not occurring. (I live in Memphis, Tennessee, a healthy hub of suburbanization, where no development project is ever turned down, so I know of which I speak). We have found that while we did not necessarily want to live in the woods, we did want to live in a place where the suburban imprint had not taken over. Places like Maine, apart from southern Maine, northern Vermont, and northern and western New York fit the bill. If you haven't been to rural sections of New York, you really cannot appreciate how rural it can be. |
Maine Misadventure
The tension you feel when you realize that you are really lost, really
in the middle of no where, and you really have to consider what the weather and nature have in store for you is a real moment of clarity. |
Maine Misadventure
The exact place I was heading toward was the Blog Brook Flowage, North
of Cherryfield, in Deblois township (Delorme map 25). I really didn't think the fishing would be good, but I had a fly rod and was ready to try. I didn't have a boad, canoe, float tube, etc. so I was trying to find water that had a little movement. |
Maine Misadventure
Willi wrote:
Memphis Jim wrote: There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Thanks, your and Greg's explanation make sense. For some stupid reason, I assumed that since our Country's population is growing, all areas of the Country would have population increases. Check out: http://www.patagonia.com/enviro/repo...o_common.shtml -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Maine Misadventure
Memphis Jim wrote:
There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Thanks, your and Greg's explanation make sense. For some stupid reason, I assumed that since our Country's population is growing, all areas of the Country would have population increases. The area I live in and the areas I most visit all are places with considerable growth and the issues are dealing with this growth while still retaining the open space that makes the areas desirable. Although ranching isn't profitable for smaller operations (and VERY difficult even for big ones), the land they're on is very valuable and many ranches get sold and developed into "gentleman ranchettes". Thankfully the majority of the mountainous areas in CO, NM, WY, MT, and UT are National Forests. Hopefully they'll stay that way. Willi |
Maine Misadventure
Jim, I really appreciate the post. I have it on good authority that
many of those small brooks still hold wild brook trout. If I can spend my time getting out into them, it will make my move to Washington County, Maine well worth it. I'll be living in East Machias, on the East Machias River, near head of tide. It sounds like you may be familiar with the area. It probably hasn't changed in 35 years. |
Maine Misadventure
rw wrote:
Willi wrote: Memphis Jim wrote: There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Thanks, your and Greg's explanation make sense. For some stupid reason, I assumed that since our Country's population is growing, all areas of the Country would have population increases. Check out: http://www.patagonia.com/enviro/repo...o_common.shtml That's cool! I was aware of some of this in CO and WY but I had no idea of the extent of it. An incredibly ambitious project. I can't imagine our government getting involved in something like that (no matter what party is in office). That's what makes the Nature's Conservancy so effective, they're able to operate outside of the political system. Willi |
Maine Misadventure
On 16 Mar 2006 15:00:55 -0800, "Memphis Jim"
wrote: Lessons learned: Maine is big, and Eastern Maine is more rural than you can imagine, probably more rural than any other place east of the Mississippi. Blueberry farms in Maine are big. Roads in Maine end abruptly. Finally, the only way to be sure where you are is to have a GPS. I didn't get to fish that day, but I am not discouraged. I am moving to an area with much wilderness- more every year, and I will enjoy exploring it. Maine has been my second home for the past 18 years or so. I am in love with its many streams and ponds full of beautiful brook trout. I understand you will be in East Machias; you can't get very much more Down East than that. d;o) When you get to exploring it, don't forget the Rapid River in the Ranchleys (grid 18 on the Maine Atlas/Gazatteer). Gimme a call and I'll be your guide (fishing guide, that is). Dave |
Maine Misadventure
December, '84. Worked in Boardman for the Geology department before Steve Kahl built the new labs out by Stillwater Village (near the Cabins field: you missed the Cabins era). --riverman Cabin field is where they Held Bumstock the first 4 years. I heard that they tore down the Ram's Horn - my favorite coffee house ever. |
Maine Misadventure
"Memphis Jim" wrote in message oups.com... There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Now in most of Maine, smaller farms are not economically productive (with the exception of Aroostook County in the northeast of the state where potato farms predominate). Over the past hundred years, much of interior Maine that used to be farmland has reverted back to woods. At the same time, over the last 40 years or so the population of the state has consolidated toward coast, toward the southwest, and toward urban areas, such that there are towns throughout Maine that are slowly dimming and blinking out. Close to where I will be living there is one town that no longer exists as a coporate entity, Centerville, and two others that are trying to go in that direction, Whitneyville, and Cooper (on Cathance Lake) Deorganization means lower taxes for these towns on the brink. When deorganization succeeds, local control of the community is given up. This ultimately furthers the trend toward forested land. Finally, much of the land in Maine is owned by international timber companies. Currently they are managing much of the land for pulp production, and letting forests regrow. If you didn't know better you might assume much of the land is preserved. The town where I am buying a house once had about 2500 people and was an industrial center for cutting wood (thorough water power). Now the mills are gone, along with the dams (thank goodness). If you didn't know the history of the town it would be hard to imagine how industrial the town was in the past. That is what I meant. What town is that where you are buying? It sounds like something east of Lincoln...out by the lakes on the Airline. I grew up in Bradford, a small town in central Maine that matches your description perfectly. Back at the turn of the last century, the town had something like 2000 residents, a mill, several town centers, a movie theatre, and lots of activity. When I left in the late 70s, the entire Bradford/North Bradford/Bradford Center region had only about 600 residents, and falling, and the woods (my regular haunts) had many many overgrown foundations and reclaimed homesteads. You'd know you were in one when you were walking in the woods and you stumbled onto an apple tree grove, found rhubarb and raspberries growing in patches, and a little poking around inevitably turned up an old collapsed foundation, a well (don't fall in), and some rusted farm machinery tangled in the grasses. Often, 50+ year old trees were growing from the foundation, and there was little or no trace of the access road left. A little sleuthing would show how the current woods road or skidder trail network used to be a main road across the region, and how old anonymous sections of stone wall that were deep in the forest were once roadside features, made by people long ago whose memories had faded along with the landscape they created. More than once, I'd find an old cemetary the did not appear on any maps, and was barely recognizable. I used to wonder what those folks would think if they saw the region today. What was, to them, a small dirt access road out back became the main paved highway through town. The old town center, with its church, lumberyard, store and even railway station is now a lost ruin deep in the woods, miles from any road or trail, with only 4-legged visitors. --riverman |
Maine Misadventure
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:20:21 -0700, Willi
wrote: Memphis Jim wrote: There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Thanks, your and Greg's explanation make sense. For some stupid reason, I assumed that since our Country's population is growing, all areas of the Country would have population increases. The area I live in and the areas I most visit all are places with considerable growth and the issues are dealing with this growth while still retaining the open space that makes the areas desirable. Although ranching isn't profitable for smaller operations (and VERY difficult even for big ones), the land they're on is very valuable and many ranches get sold and developed into "gentleman ranchettes". Thankfully the majority of the mountainous areas in CO, NM, WY, MT, and UT are National Forests. Hopefully they'll stay that way. Willi Helps if the land is too lousy to grow profitable crops and too far from cities and industrial areas to use as homes. Much of what keeps Northern WI, MN, and the U.P of Michigan going as far as the people who live there are concerned are tourists and summer people. If not for the tourists and summer people, a lot more of it would go back to trees and wild than already has. In northern MN some of our old pit mines are being turned into fishing lakes, as the mining business is almost all gone. The Boundary Waters Canoe Area has been around a long time. 'Useless' land turned to a tourist bonanza of a mild sort. Fortunately a lot of the land was turned into state parks and state or national forests during the early exodus from the area, so it'll stay forests. They snapped them up before 'the cabin up north' got into huge popularity again. -- r.bc: vixen Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc.. Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really. |
Maine Misadventure
"riverman" wrote in message ... ...When I left in the late 70s, the entire Bradford/North Bradford/Bradford Center region had only about 600 residents, and falling, and the woods (my regular haunts) had many many overgrown foundations and reclaimed homesteads. You'd know you were in one when you were walking in the woods and you stumbled onto an apple tree grove, found rhubarb and raspberries growing in patches, and a little poking around inevitably turned up an old collapsed foundation, a well (don't fall in), and some rusted farm machinery tangled in the grasses. Often, 50+ year old trees were growing from the foundation, and there was little or no trace of the access road left. A little sleuthing would show how the current woods road or skidder trail network used to be a main road across the region, and how old anonymous sections of stone wall that were deep in the forest were once roadside features, made by people long ago whose memories had faded along with the landscape they created. More than once, I'd find an old cemetary the did not appear on any maps, and was barely recognizable. I used to wonder what those folks would think if they saw the region today. What was, to them, a small dirt access road out back became the main paved highway through town. The old town center, with its church, lumberyard, store and even railway station is now a lost ruin deep in the woods, miles from any road or trail, with only 4-legged visitors. Back in those same late 70s and into the early 80s I knew a number of people who were involved in the nascent (and apparently stillborn) "back to the earth" movement. They rented or, in a few cases, bought old farm houses here in southeast Wisconsin and to one degree or another tried to make at least a part of their living off the land. Virtually all of them had a woodlot on or adjacent to their property, and I used to spend a lot of time exploring in them. I found many of the same kinds of tantalizing clues to former land use practices you described above and, more often than not, was left wondering what they might mean. Imagine my delight to find a book that was all about finding and interpreting those clues. I hadn't thought about "Reading the Landscape of America" by May Theilgaard Watts, for some time. Googling it just now, I guessed that it would be long out of print and difficult to find. Not so. Looks like it was reissued in 1999. Good thing. Good book: http://home.att.net/~naturebooks/rtla1.html Wolfgang |
Maine Misadventure
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "riverman" wrote in message ... ...When I left in the late 70s, the entire Bradford/North Bradford/Bradford Center region had only about 600 residents, and falling, and the woods (my regular haunts) had many many overgrown foundations and reclaimed homesteads. You'd know you were in one when you were walking in the woods and you stumbled onto an apple tree grove, found rhubarb and raspberries growing in patches, and a little poking around inevitably turned up an old collapsed foundation, a well (don't fall in), and some rusted farm machinery tangled in the grasses. Often, 50+ year old trees were growing from the foundation, and there was little or no trace of the access road left. A little sleuthing would show how the current woods road or skidder trail network used to be a main road across the region, and how old anonymous sections of stone wall that were deep in the forest were once roadside features, made by people long ago whose memories had faded along with the landscape they created. More than once, I'd find an old cemetary the did not appear on any maps, and was barely recognizable. I used to wonder what those folks would think if they saw the region today. What was, to them, a small dirt access road out back became the main paved highway through town. The old town center, with its church, lumberyard, store and even railway station is now a lost ruin deep in the woods, miles from any road or trail, with only 4-legged visitors. Back in those same late 70s and into the early 80s I knew a number of people who were involved in the nascent (and apparently stillborn) "back to the earth" movement. They rented or, in a few cases, bought old farm houses here in southeast Wisconsin and to one degree or another tried to make at least a part of their living off the land. Virtually all of them had a woodlot on or adjacent to their property, and I used to spend a lot of time exploring in them. I found many of the same kinds of tantalizing clues to former land use practices you described above and, more often than not, was left wondering what they might mean. Imagine my delight to find a book that was all about finding and interpreting those clues. I hadn't thought about "Reading the Landscape of America" by May Theilgaard Watts, for some time. Googling it just now, I guessed that it would be long out of print and difficult to find. Not so. Looks like it was reissued in 1999. Good thing. Good book: http://home.att.net/~naturebooks/rtla1.html Wow, this does indeed look like a good book. I think I'll track it down, thanks. :-) Meanwhile, a semi nonsequiter...more non- than semi-, is this book: http://tinyurl.com/ofvtl While it doesn't describe evolving fauna, it does occupy that same spot in my memory as "Reading the Landscape" seems to for you. After reading it many years ago, it now forms the baseline with which I build my familarity with placenames across the US. I loved it then, and if you haven't read it yet, I bet you'll enjoy it yourself. --riverman |
Maine Misadventure
"riverman" wrote in message ... While it doesn't describe evolving fauna, ....or flora, for that matta. --riverman |
Maine Misadventure
"riverman" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... http://home.att.net/~naturebooks/rtla1.html Wow, this does indeed look like a good book. I think I'll track it down, thanks. :-) De nada. Meanwhile, a semi nonsequiter...more non- than semi-, is this book: http://tinyurl.com/ofvtl While it doesn't describe evolving fauna, it does occupy that same spot in my memory as "Reading the Landscape" seems to for you. After reading it many years ago, it now forms the baseline with which I build my familarity with placenames across the US. I loved it then, and if you haven't read it yet, I bet you'll enjoy it yourself. Ack! This happens EVERY time! Clicked on the link. Saw the title.....scrolled down....saw old friends....Stegner, "Angle of Repose"....Miller, "A Canticle for Leibowitz".....Boorstin "The Americans".....I DON'T HAVE TIME TO GO TO THE BOOKSTORE TODAY, YOU *******! :( "Names on the Land" is a familiar title but I don't recall ever reading the book. Odd......this is right up my alley. I'll definitely be keeping an eye out for it. Thanks back at ya. Wolfgang |
Maine Misadventure
Riverman wrote:
What town is that where you are buying? It sounds like something east of Lincoln...out by the lakes on the Airline. That is a pretty good guess given what I've written. The town we are buying in is East Machias, further east and further down toward the coast from Lincoln. I think that there is something staggeringly poignant (and characteristically American) about finding former farms and villages in the woods. When I was looking at moving to Northern Vermont, there was a town (I can't remember which one) where an entire complex of 19th Century factories running down a hillside was taken over by forest. It is supposed to be a surreal scene. |
Maine Misadventure
Dave wrote:
I understand you will be in East Machias; you can't get very much more Down East than that. d;o) When you get to exploring it, don't forget the Rapid River in the Ranchleys (grid 18 on the Maine Atlas/Gazatteer). Gimme a call and I'll be your guide (fishing guide, that is). That sounds great Dave, I'll have to make a point of that. |
Maine Misadventure
Memphis Jim wrote: ....... Places like Maine, apart from southern Maine, northern Vermont, and northern and western New York fit the bill. If you haven't been to rural sections of New York, you really cannot appreciate how rural it can be. ... But I would guess that most of the Maine coast will be developed eventually, even if other parts are not. We really liked Belfast. That's another town that appears to have had an industrial past. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter