FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   River Bank Erosion (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=24027)

Fred Lebow October 19th, 2006 04:56 AM

River Bank Erosion
 

I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??

Although - Not too pretty
--

Fred



Kevin Vang October 19th, 2006 05:19 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
In article ,
says...

I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??

Although - Not too pretty




They call it "Montana rip-rap."

[email protected] October 19th, 2006 12:46 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:56:08 -0600, "Fred Lebow"
wrote:


I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??


You must not travel in rural areas much. Crushed cars, broken-up silos,
cut-up tanks (storage tanks, not military tanks), etc., have long been
used for such. Done right, in a couple of years, you'd never know they
were there. Done wrong, yep, it's an eyesore.

TC,
R

Although - Not too pretty


Charlie Wilson October 19th, 2006 09:27 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

"Fred Lebow" wrote in message
et...

I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??


There was an ad in the FF magazines about ten years ago, it featured a
guy standing in the river with that old cars in the background. I'm can't
remember who's ad it was, but I'm thinking maybe it was Simms.



Skwala October 19th, 2006 09:43 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

"Charlie Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Fred Lebow" wrote in message
et...

I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??


There was an ad in the FF magazines about ten years ago, it featured a
guy standing in the river with that old cars in the background. I'm can't
remember who's ad it was, but I'm thinking maybe it was Simms.

Yeah, and if I recall correctly, the river was the Bitterroot, (I may be
wrong)... when I first hit the Bitterroot, Car rip rap was very common in
the lower river, there was a '49 Packard submerged in a hole below
Stevensville, that was home to a 26"+ brown that all the guides tried for.

It would come out to feed, and so would be caught occasionally, but a few
quick turns around the door post and he'd be off....

Of course, I may be romanticizing that a bit....

Skwala



JT October 19th, 2006 11:06 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

"Skwala" wrote in message
...

"Charlie Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Fred Lebow" wrote in message
et...

I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??


There was an ad in the FF magazines about ten years ago, it featured a
guy standing in the river with that old cars in the background. I'm can't
remember who's ad it was, but I'm thinking maybe it was Simms.


It was a Simms ad, however I believe it's was shot on the Bighole river.

Yeah, and if I recall correctly, the river was the Bitterroot, (I may be
wrong)... when I first hit the Bitterroot, Car rip rap was very common in
the lower river, there was a '49 Packard submerged in a hole below
Stevensville, that was home to a 26"+ brown that all the guides tried for.


I've fished that stretch several times, one of my favorite floats on the
Bitterroot. I have also heard the big brown in the trunk of the Packard
story...

One time while floating that stretch, we had all but finished the float,
there were several people ahead of us at the launch, so I dropped anchor
about 50 yds. up to stay out of the way. It was quite dim by this time, my
buddies and I were kicked back drinking a beer. We noticed a couple small
birds (sparrow size) standing on a rock drinking out of the river. About 5
seconds latter a *large* brown came out of the water after one of the
birds... We all looked at each other in disbelief, thinking, did you just
see what I saw...

That next afternoon/evening when it started getting dark, I tied on a mouse
pattern in hopes of pulling a large brown, but had no takers.

JT





rw October 19th, 2006 11:07 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
Skwala wrote:

Yeah, and if I recall correctly, the river was the Bitterroot, (I may be
wrong)... when I first hit the Bitterroot, Car rip rap was very common in
the lower river, there was a '49 Packard submerged in a hole below
Stevensville, that was home to a 26"+ brown that all the guides tried for.


There's a very good steelhead spot on the Salmon River called Pontiac
because someone drove a Pontiac Firebird into it. A guy I know pulled in
out of the river a couple of days later, for salvage, and it was already
full of bullet holes.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Wolfgang October 20th, 2006 12:22 AM

River Bank Erosion
 

Fred Lebow wrote:
I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??

Although - Not too pretty


Nor too environmentally friendly, I should think.

Wolfgang


Tim Lysyk October 20th, 2006 12:34 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
Wolfgang wrote:
Fred Lebow wrote:
I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??

Although - Not too pretty


Nor too environmentally friendly, I should think.

Wolfgang

The Crowsnest River has an area where the bank is lined by ore cars.
They are filled in and overgrown now, but you can still see them. The
fishing isn't too bad in that spot either.

Tim Lysyk

Wolfgang October 20th, 2006 12:37 AM

River Bank Erosion
 

Tim Lysyk wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:
Fred Lebow wrote:
I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??

Although - Not too pretty


Nor too environmentally friendly, I should think.

Wolfgang

The Crowsnest River has an area where the bank is lined by ore cars.
They are filled in and overgrown now, but you can still see them. The
fishing isn't too bad in that spot either.


Oar cars. Hm.....

Presumably, you're referring to railroad cars. Take the trucks out
from under them and the're just steel boxes. Seems innocuous enough to
me. Automobiles are another matter entirely.

Wolfgang


[email protected] October 20th, 2006 12:47 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
The car rip rap pictured in the ad is on the Bighorn river. Ft Smith, MT.

Snoop

Tim Lysyk October 20th, 2006 02:10 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
Wolfgang wrote:
Oar cars. Hm.....

Presumably, you're referring to railroad cars. Take the trucks out
from under them and the're just steel boxes. Seems innocuous enough to
me. Automobiles are another matter entirely.

Wolfgang


Actually, they are small ore cars, like the type used in mines. Yes,
except for the rust, they are just steel boxes.

Tim Lysyk

[email protected] October 20th, 2006 04:44 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
Wolfgang wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:
Fred Lebow wrote:
I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??

Although - Not too pretty

Nor too environmentally friendly, I should think.

Wolfgang

The Crowsnest River has an area where the bank is lined by ore cars.
They are filled in and overgrown now, but you can still see them. The
fishing isn't too bad in that spot either.


Oar cars. Hm.....

Presumably, you're referring to railroad cars. Take the trucks out
from under them and the're just steel boxes. Seems innocuous enough to
me. Automobiles are another matter entirely.

Wolfgang


Yeah, Good point (your first?), I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.

Skwala


Fred Lebow October 20th, 2006 05:06 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
Yeah, Good point (your first?), I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.

Skwala



Can you remember where you read that?
It is not surprising - just more depressing on the night the Mets lost!

Fred
Fred Lebow





Cyli October 20th, 2006 06:14 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
On 19 Oct 2006 16:37:44 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:




Nor too environmentally friendly, I should think.

Wolfgang

The Crowsnest River has an area where the bank is lined by ore cars.
They are filled in and overgrown now, but you can still see them. The
fishing isn't too bad in that spot either.


Oar cars. Hm.....

Presumably, you're referring to railroad cars. Take the trucks out
from under them and the're just steel boxes. Seems innocuous enough to
me. Automobiles are another matter entirely.


I'm under the impression that the cars for use that way have their
engines and probably gas tanks pulled before they go in the river.
Maybe a lot of their interiors, too, like the seats.
--

r.bc: vixen
Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc..
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

[email protected] October 20th, 2006 06:30 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
Fred Lebow wrote:
Yeah, Good point (your first?), I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.

Skwala



Can you remember where you read that?
It is not surprising - just more depressing on the night the Mets lost!

Fred
Fred Lebow


Well, it was the early 80's... so it as in print... but I'll do a brief
search to come up with the cites...


[email protected] October 20th, 2006 11:36 AM

River Bank Erosion
 
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:06:46 -0600, "Fred Lebow"
wrote:

Yeah, Good point (your first?), I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.


PCP pollution?! From _brake fluid_?! Have you been subjected to a lot
of this, um, "pollution?"

Skwala



Can you remember where you read that?


My bet is the answer would be something along the lines of,
"Strawberries!!"..."I'm a little teapot..."

It is not surprising


Uh, it's not? OK, I'll bite - just how leaking brake fluid, or anything
else on in, on, or related to an auto, causing "PCP pollution?"

- just more depressing on the night the Mets lost!


...."more depressing...," you say? Well, it would explain the PCP...

WTF,
R


Wolfgang October 20th, 2006 01:00 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote in message
ups.com...


Yeah, Good point


Is it? Well, good, I've been saving it for a long time in the hope of
finding someone of sufficiently penetrating insight and sound judgment to
assess it for me. Looks like this is my lucky day.

(your first?),


Don't know......I was hoping you'd tell me.

I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.


They should use retards. I read a study that suggested they're
biodegradable.

Wolfgang



[email protected] October 20th, 2006 03:21 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:06:46 -0600, "Fred Lebow"
wrote:

Yeah, Good point (your first?), I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.


PCP pollution?! From _brake fluid_?! Have you been subjected to a lot
of this, um, "pollution?"

Skwala


A quick google-ing returns scores of envionmetal studies concerning the
pollution effects from automotive chemicals... I may have had the PCP
source from brake fluid wrong, however.... memory, its a sometimes
thing...




Can you remember where you read that?


My bet is the answer would be something along the lines of,
"Strawberries!!"..."I'm a little teapot..."


Ahhhhh, short and stout?



It is not surprising


Uh, it's not? OK, I'll bite - just how leaking brake fluid, or anything
else on in, on, or related to an auto, causing "PCP pollution?"


Most definately pollution... definately, brake fluid is a problem...
definately, car leak bad things in to the water....


[email protected] October 20th, 2006 03:24 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

Wolfgang wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


Yeah, Good point


Is it? Well, good, I've been saving it for a long time in the hope of
finding someone of sufficiently penetrating insight and sound judgment to
assess it for me. Looks like this is my lucky day.


Not really, I'm not sure that even Sigmund and C.J could help you....

(your first?),


Don't know......I was hoping you'd tell me.

I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.


They should use retards. I read a study that suggested they're
biodegradable.


What have you got against the IQ challenged....


Wolfgang October 20th, 2006 03:53 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote in message
ups.com...

Wolfgang wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


Yeah, Good point


Is it? Well, good, I've been saving it for a long time in the hope of
finding someone of sufficiently penetrating insight and sound judgment to
assess it for me. Looks like this is my lucky day.


Not really, I'm not sure that even Sigmund and C.J could help you....


Well, if you're referring to Freud and Jung, last I heard they're both still
dead. As the only thing I really need help with right now is determining
exactly what it's going to take to get the electrical service in the house
up to code, I believe you're probably right. Doesn't matter though.....I've
got a master electrician stopping by later today. He should be able to work
it out without them.

(your first?),


Don't know......I was hoping you'd tell me.

I recall reading a study that suggested
the primary source of PCP polution in MT fresh water was leaking brake
fluid from car rip rap.


They should use retards. I read a study that suggested they're
biodegradable.


What have you got against the IQ challenged....


Not a thing. You're welcome to stay here as long as you please, as far as
I'm concerned.

Wolfgang
who notes that brother skwalid seems to have forgotten his name.



Wolfgang October 20th, 2006 07:25 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
On 19 Oct 2006 16:37:44 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:




Nor too environmentally friendly, I should think.

Wolfgang

The Crowsnest River has an area where the bank is lined by ore cars.
They are filled in and overgrown now, but you can still see them. The
fishing isn't too bad in that spot either.


Oar cars. Hm.....

Presumably, you're referring to railroad cars. Take the trucks out
from under them and the're just steel boxes. Seems innocuous enough to
me. Automobiles are another matter entirely.


I'm under the impression that the cars for use that way have their
engines and probably gas tanks pulled before they go in the river.
Maybe a lot of their interiors, too, like the seats.


Even when everything but the body and frame is stripped, this still leaves
paint which can be host to a virtually limitless array of toxic substances
including (but by no means limited to) metallic oxides and sulfides and many
organic compounds. There is also a good chance that painted parts will be
prepped with a bonding agent....zinc chromate pickling is one of several
options, especially for powder-coated steel. Sundry waxes and plastics are
used to protect the finish. There will also be zinc on any remaining
galvanized parts. Lead, copper, zinc and cadmium are common components of
batteries. Presumably, all batteries have been removed but they may have
leaked before or during removal. Even if the engine compartment is steam
cleaned, there will almost certainly be propylene glycol and/or other
antifreeze/coolant residues. There will also be motor oil, brake fluid,
transmission fluid, window washer. All of these will also be present on the
undercarriage, along with bits of asphalt, gasoline additives, road paint
and a million other bits of unidentifiable filth.

Meanwhile, I'd bet a shiny new nickel that not all of the removable parts
have been taken out. A lot of stuff isn't salvageable and it takes a lot of
time to completely disassemble a car. Look at the underside of the hood on
your car. Odds are there is some sort of insulation there, used for noise
reduction. This may be fiberglass or some sort of plastic foam. These are
sometimes glued in place. No one is going to make certain that all of this
material (and the glue) is removed. There are hundreds (maybe thousands?)
of fasteners used in the manufacture of automobiles.....clips, snaps,
catches, Velcro, screws, rivets, staples, straps, grommets......all of these
made of rubber, plastics, leather, fabrics, etc. There are gaskets and
seals. There is weather stripping. The instrument panel probably contains
little if anything that anyone would want to salvage or recycle. It
contains some combination of greased gears, cables, LEDs, liquid crystals,
light bulbs, rheostats, resistors, capacitors, silicon chips,
phosphors.....maybe even a few radioactive bits. Carpeting, seat and
ceiling fabrics, that nasty cheap fabric-like stuff they line the inside of
the trunk with......the list goes on and on and on.

Wolfgang



rb608 October 20th, 2006 09:13 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
wrote:
A quick google-ing returns scores of envionmetal studies concerning the
pollution effects from automotive chemicals... I may have had the PCP
source from brake fluid wrong, however.... memory, its a sometimes
thing...


Too much phenylcyclohexylpiperidine, aka PCP, probably does have an
adverse effect on memory; and as to how that may or may not have
affected you, I cannot say. However, given the persistance of the
thread's mistaken acronym, I feel compelled to suggest that what you
really mean is polychlorinated biphenyl, PCB.

Joe F.


[email protected] October 22nd, 2006 12:11 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
On 20 Oct 2006 13:13:48 -0700, "rb608" wrote:

wrote:
A quick google-ing returns scores of envionmetal studies concerning the
pollution effects from automotive chemicals... I may have had the PCP
source from brake fluid wrong, however.... memory, its a sometimes
thing...


Too much phenylcyclohexylpiperidine, aka PCP, probably does have an
adverse effect on memory; and as to how that may or may not have
affected you, I cannot say. However, given the persistance of the
thread's mistaken acronym, I feel compelled to suggest that what you
really mean is polychlorinated biphenyl, PCB.

Joe F.


Were there ever PCBs in brake fluid? IIRC, originally, it was something
like cod liver oil and alcohol and now is just another "rating" of
hydraulic fluid (well, several ratings), but ???

TC,
R

rb608 October 22nd, 2006 01:25 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
wrote in message
Were there ever PCBs in brake fluid? IIRC, originally, it was something
like cod liver oil and alcohol and now is just another "rating" of
hydraulic fluid (well, several ratings), but ???


They were used in hyrdarulic fluids of other sorts; whether auto brake fluid
was one of the applications, I really don't know. It's within the range of
possibilities I suppose.

Joe F.



[email protected] October 22nd, 2006 03:10 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:25:34 GMT, "rb608"
wrote:

wrote in message
Were there ever PCBs in brake fluid? IIRC, originally, it was something
like cod liver oil and alcohol and now is just another "rating" of
hydraulic fluid (well, several ratings), but ???


They were used in hyrdarulic fluids of other sorts; whether auto brake fluid
was one of the applications, I really don't know. It's within the range of
possibilities I suppose.

Fair enough.

Either way though, I'd offer that the vast majority of autos used for
such erosion control are pretty well stripped, plus have been sitting at
wrecking/breaking yards for a long time, and then, crushed. All of this
would suggest that very little fluids, interior/upholstery,
instrumentation and electronics, etc. would be left, regardless of the
final destination of the crushed remains. And that's the stuff placed
20-plus years ago. With the newer additions (not age of the auto, age
of the placement), all sorts of rules are in place, regardless of where
the car components are going. Refrigerant must be evac'ed, fluids
drained (and recycled), etc. And nowadays, with computerized inventory
and networked marketing, just about anything potentially sellable and
removable is removed and inventoried. I don't think I've been in a
wrecking yard in the last 5 years that doesn't have _some_ form of
computerized system. With newer autos, about all that gets "crushed" is
the unibody and any sheet metal that isn't sellable (totally mangled
doors, fenders, QP sections, etc.).

Bottom line is that economics keeps a lot of material out, regs keeps
just about anything else potentially harmful out, and in the end, what
is used _generally_ would be environmentally neutral.

TC,
R

rb608 October 22nd, 2006 03:49 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
wrote in message
Bottom line is that economics keeps a lot of material out, regs keeps
just about anything else potentially harmful out, and in the end, what
is used _generally_ would be environmentally neutral.


Fair enough; but my only reason for entering this thread was the apparent
confusion of the acronyms PCP and PCB. I had no intention of making any
scientific, political, or value judgement beyond that. For all I know,
these cars have PCP in their glove boxes, PCB in their brakes, and STP in
their crankcases.

Joe F.



Wolfgang October 22nd, 2006 04:05 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote:

...Bottom line is that economics keeps a lot of material out, regs keeps
just about anything else potentially harmful out, and in the end, what
is used _generally_ would be environmentally neutral.


Horse****, pure and simple.

As a compulsive liar with a store of ignorance truly staggering in both
breadth and depth, it has probably occurred to you that in any given
instance your audience can never tell for sure in what proportions
these major components of your persona are operating. What evidently
continues to escape you entirely, despite it's being pointed out to you
repeatedly, is that it really doesn't matter.

Wolfgang
"environmentally neutral"......crack me up! :)


[email protected] October 22nd, 2006 04:34 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
On 22 Oct 2006 08:05:01 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:

...Bottom line is that economics keeps a lot of material out, regs keeps
just about anything else potentially harmful out, and in the end, what
is used _generally_ would be environmentally neutral.


Horse****, pure and simple.


No, it isn't.

As a compulsive liar with a store of ignorance truly staggering in both
breadth and depth, it has probably occurred to you that in any given
instance your audience can never tell for sure in what proportions
these major components of your persona are operating. What evidently
continues to escape you entirely, despite it's being pointed out to you
repeatedly, is that it really doesn't matter.


Are talking to yourself, me, or someone else?

It might occur to the more-intelligent and observant that I've no
problem coming right out and stating what I don't know, just as I've no
problem stating what I do know. If it's based strictly on my
experience(s), I'll qualify it as appropriate. And in the instant case,
I'm confident that my knowledge and experience when it comes to
wrecking/breaking yards, automotive/industrial/equipment recycling, and
related activities exceeds yours, and my suspicion is that it does so
greatly....and no, YMMWNV...

Wolfgang
"environmentally neutral"......crack me up! :)


Yeah, we wouldn't want to go putting carbon- and ore-based materials in
the ground...

Dickie

Wolfgang October 22nd, 2006 05:16 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote:
On 22 Oct 2006 08:05:01 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:

...Bottom line is that economics keeps a lot of material out, regs keeps
just about anything else potentially harmful out, and in the end, what
is used _generally_ would be environmentally neutral.


Horse****, pure and simple.


No, it isn't.


Yes, it is.

As a compulsive liar with a store of ignorance truly staggering in both
breadth and depth, it has probably occurred to you that in any given
instance your audience can never tell for sure in what proportions
these major components of your persona are operating. What evidently
continues to escape you entirely, despite it's being pointed out to you
repeatedly, is that it really doesn't matter.


Are talking to yourself, me, or someone else?


HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

See, that's what we love about this place......cleverness on a scale
that would make Parker, Twain and Wilde blush with envy.

It might occur to the more-intelligent and observant that I've no
problem coming right out and stating what I don't know,


It has doubtless occurred to all and sundry that you have no problem at
all stating what you don't know. Most, dimly comprehended rules of
grammar notwithstanding, will probably experience little difficulty in
deciding which side of the ambiguity to jump on.

just as I've no problem stating what I do know.


Well, we can only speculate on how much trouble it would cost you, but
we are certain that it wouldn't take long. Hell, for all we know you
may have slipped it in somewhere at just about any point in any of the
myriad bits of inane **** you've posted here over the years. Tell you
what......why don't you just post it again, clearly labeled, so
everyone can make a note of it. That way you can be assured that we'll
all remember and you can leave, secure in the knowledge that everybody
will know all that you know. As a bonus (and as should be obvious now)
everyone will then know that you actually know TWO things!

If it's based strictly on my experience(s), I'll qualify it as appropriate.


Hm......

Based on the extensive and exquisitely detailed resumé you've provided
here over the years, I'm sure we'd all agree that no sort of
qualifications need be (or will be) forthcoming.

And in the instant case,
I'm confident that my knowledge and experience when it comes to
wrecking/breaking yards, automotive/industrial/equipment recycling, and
related activities exceeds yours,


Well, being confident is sort of implicit in confidentiality, ainna?
One supposes that pretty much sums up the point of being El Mysterioso.

and my suspicion is that it does so greatly....


Actually, you're a liar.

and no, YMMWNV...


Oh yeah? Well, JSDFIDHBWPWUBNF! HAH!

Wolfgang
"environmentally neutral"......crack me up! :)


Yeah, we wouldn't want to go putting carbon- and ore-based materials in
the ground...


Absolutely priceless!

Dickie


Damned if you do......and double damned if you don't. Sucks, don't it?

Wolfgang
let's see now.......what shall we have it call itself NEXT year?
:)


[email protected] October 22nd, 2006 05:22 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
On 22 Oct 2006 09:16:50 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:

....death, taxes, and Wolfgang...

wrote:
On 22 Oct 2006 08:05:01 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:

...Bottom line is that economics keeps a lot of material out, regs keeps
just about anything else potentially harmful out, and in the end, what
is used _generally_ would be environmentally neutral.

Horse****, pure and simple.


No, it isn't.


Yes, it is.

As a compulsive liar with a store of ignorance truly staggering in both
breadth and depth, it has probably occurred to you that in any given
instance your audience can never tell for sure in what proportions
these major components of your persona are operating. What evidently
continues to escape you entirely, despite it's being pointed out to you
repeatedly, is that it really doesn't matter.


Are talking to yourself, me, or someone else?


HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

See, that's what we love about this place......cleverness on a scale
that would make Parker, Twain and Wilde blush with envy.

It might occur to the more-intelligent and observant that I've no
problem coming right out and stating what I don't know,


It has doubtless occurred to all and sundry that you have no problem at
all stating what you don't know. Most, dimly comprehended rules of
grammar notwithstanding, will probably experience little difficulty in
deciding which side of the ambiguity to jump on.

just as I've no problem stating what I do know.


Well, we can only speculate on how much trouble it would cost you, but
we are certain that it wouldn't take long. Hell, for all we know you
may have slipped it in somewhere at just about any point in any of the
myriad bits of inane **** you've posted here over the years. Tell you
what......why don't you just post it again, clearly labeled, so
everyone can make a note of it. That way you can be assured that we'll
all remember and you can leave, secure in the knowledge that everybody
will know all that you know. As a bonus (and as should be obvious now)
everyone will then know that you actually know TWO things!

If it's based strictly on my experience(s), I'll qualify it as appropriate.


Hm......

Based on the extensive and exquisitely detailed resumé you've provided
here over the years, I'm sure we'd all agree that no sort of
qualifications need be (or will be) forthcoming.

And in the instant case,
I'm confident that my knowledge and experience when it comes to
wrecking/breaking yards, automotive/industrial/equipment recycling, and
related activities exceeds yours,


Well, being confident is sort of implicit in confidentiality, ainna?
One supposes that pretty much sums up the point of being El Mysterioso.

and my suspicion is that it does so greatly....


Actually, you're a liar.

and no, YMMWNV...


Oh yeah? Well, JSDFIDHBWPWUBNF! HAH!

Wolfgang
"environmentally neutral"......crack me up! :)


Yeah, we wouldn't want to go putting carbon- and ore-based materials in
the ground...


Absolutely priceless!

Dickie


Damned if you do......and double damned if you don't. Sucks, don't it?

Wolfgang
let's see now.......what shall we have it call itself NEXT year?
:)


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

[email protected] October 22nd, 2006 05:32 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:25:48 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote:


"Cyli" wrote in message
.. .
On 19 Oct 2006 16:37:44 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:




Nor too environmentally friendly, I should think.

Wolfgang

The Crowsnest River has an area where the bank is lined by ore cars.
They are filled in and overgrown now, but you can still see them. The
fishing isn't too bad in that spot either.

Oar cars. Hm.....

Presumably, you're referring to railroad cars. Take the trucks out
from under them and the're just steel boxes. Seems innocuous enough to
me. Automobiles are another matter entirely.


I'm under the impression that the cars for use that way have their
engines and probably gas tanks pulled before they go in the river.
Maybe a lot of their interiors, too, like the seats.


Even when everything but the body and frame is stripped, this still leaves
paint which can be host to a virtually limitless array of toxic substances
including (but by no means limited to) metallic oxides and sulfides and many
organic compounds. There is also a good chance that painted parts will be
prepped with a bonding agent....zinc chromate pickling is one of several
options, especially for powder-coated steel. Sundry waxes and plastics are
used to protect the finish. There will also be zinc on any remaining
galvanized parts. Lead, copper, zinc and cadmium are common components of
batteries. Presumably, all batteries have been removed but they may have
leaked before or during removal. Even if the engine compartment is steam
cleaned, there will almost certainly be propylene glycol and/or other
antifreeze/coolant residues. There will also be motor oil, brake fluid,
transmission fluid, window washer. All of these will also be present on the
undercarriage, along with bits of asphalt, gasoline additives, road paint
and a million other bits of unidentifiable filth.

Meanwhile, I'd bet a shiny new nickel that not all of the removable parts
have been taken out. A lot of stuff isn't salvageable and it takes a lot of
time to completely disassemble a car. Look at the underside of the hood on
your car. Odds are there is some sort of insulation there, used for noise
reduction. This may be fiberglass or some sort of plastic foam. These are
sometimes glued in place. No one is going to make certain that all of this
material (and the glue) is removed. There are hundreds (maybe thousands?)
of fasteners used in the manufacture of automobiles.....clips, snaps,
catches, Velcro, screws, rivets, staples, straps, grommets......all of these
made of rubber, plastics, leather, fabrics, etc. There are gaskets and
seals. There is weather stripping. The instrument panel probably contains
little if anything that anyone would want to salvage or recycle. It
contains some combination of greased gears, cables, LEDs, liquid crystals,
light bulbs, rheostats, resistors, capacitors, silicon chips,
phosphors.....maybe even a few radioactive bits. Carpeting, seat and
ceiling fabrics, that nasty cheap fabric-like stuff they line the inside of
the trunk with.....


.the list goes on and on and on.


And since it's you, it's somewhat surprising that it wasn't at least
twice as long and inaccurate...

....and "everyone" just "knows" how stolen cars are almost always found
with nothing missing but any loose valuables that the owner happened to
leave lying about...why, heck, "chop shops" became so named because of a
peculiar commonality: the folks involved in them seem to have a
voracious appetite for stuffed pork dishes...


Wolfgang October 22nd, 2006 06:25 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote:
On 22 Oct 2006 09:16:50 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:

...death, taxes, and Wolfgang...


Here's what you should do; you should go away now and think long and
hard about who makes your decisions for you......and why.....and what
all of this implies. And then come back someday when you grow some
hair in your pants.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....


You're welcome. No charge......this time.

Wolfgang
who, if he is going to write everyone's material for them, thinks he
should be entitled to some sort of just compensation. :)


[email protected] October 22nd, 2006 06:38 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
On 22 Oct 2006 10:25:47 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:
On 22 Oct 2006 09:16:50 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:

...death, taxes, and Wolfgang...


Here's what you should do; you should go away now and think long and
hard about who makes your decisions for you......and why.....and what
all of this implies. And then come back someday when you grow some
hair in your pants.


Uh-huh...just what I expected from ya, lil' pup - you ran right back
under the porch...but do come back if you finally gather up enough
nickels to buy yourself a set of neuticles and find out that it still
doesn't mean you've actually got balls - I'll be happy to slice 'em off
for you...and as an aside, I haven't the slightest desire for hairy
pants...

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....


You're welcome. No charge......this time.

Wolfgang
who...
thinks


Liar.

he should be entitled to some sort of just compensation. :)


Idiot.

Wolfgang October 22nd, 2006 07:17 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote:
On 22 Oct 2006 10:25:47 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:
On 22 Oct 2006 09:16:50 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:

...death, taxes, and Wolfgang...


Here's what you should do; you should go away now and think long and
hard about who makes your decisions for you......and why.....and what
all of this implies. And then come back someday when you grow some
hair in your pants.


Uh-huh...just what I expected from ya, lil' pup - you ran right back
under the porch...but do come back if you finally gather up enough
nickels to buy yourself a set of neuticles and find out that it still
doesn't mean you've actually got balls - I'll be happy to slice 'em off
for you...


Hee, hee, hee.

and as an aside, I haven't the slightest desire for hairy
pants...


Oops! My mistake......I posted that sentence in English.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....


You're welcome. No charge......this time.

Wolfgang
who...
thinks


Liar.

he should be entitled to some sort of just compensation. :)


Idiot.


Is anyone else getting the feeling that this is starting to be just the
teensiest bit embarrassing?

Wolfgang
often imitated...... :)


[email protected] October 23rd, 2006 01:59 AM

River Bank Erosion
 

rb608 wrote:
wrote:
A quick google-ing returns scores of envionmetal studies concerning the
pollution effects from automotive chemicals... I may have had the PCP
source from brake fluid wrong, however.... memory, its a sometimes
thing...


Too much phenylcyclohexylpiperidine, aka PCP, probably does have an
adverse effect on memory; and as to how that may or may not have
affected you, I cannot say. However, given the persistance of the
thread's mistaken acronym, I feel compelled to suggest that what you
really mean is polychlorinated biphenyl, PCB.

Joe F.


touche.... blame it on the 70's...


Wolfgang October 23rd, 2006 01:36 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:25:48 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote:

.the list goes on and on and on.


And since it's you, it's somewhat surprising that it wasn't at least
twice as long and inaccurate...


Well, this should be fun. Go ahead.....point out an inaccuracy. :)

...and "everyone" just "knows" how stolen cars are almost always found
with nothing missing but any loose valuables that the owner happened to
leave lying about...why, heck, "chop shops" became so named because of a
peculiar commonality: the folks involved in them seem to have a
voracious appetite for stuffed pork dishes...


O.k., I get it......the object here is to convince someone or other that
this means something.....right? Hows about you save the.......um......less
gifted.....readers among us the anguish of a long and futile search by
pointing out what you think it might be?

Wolfgang
just another carbon-based material.



salmobytes October 24th, 2006 07:45 PM

River Bank Erosion
 

Fred Lebow wrote:
I was on the Gallatin River and I saw something that I have never seen
before.
Crushed old vehicles used for river bank stabilization.
I guess if it works - great-??


One of biggest Gallatin River browns I ever caught
(down near Logan) came out the back seat of an old car.
The hard part was side-arm skip-casting a big
streamer back into the half submerged, busted-out window.

That old hulk fell into a deep hole years ago. Big brown trout do like
those fortress-like hiding places.


hayseed November 1st, 2006 06:28 PM

River Bank Erosion
 
Lots'a old car bodies used as rip-rap. This was Lady Bird Johnson's
brain storm. Half the fun of fly-fishing in Montana is playing "Name
That Car" while trying to wade around the rusted hulks.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter