|
|
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against
him? It's really quite comical. Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Opus wrote:
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? It's really quite comical. I saw something on CNN, or MSNBC today where they asked people if the US was doing enough to capture Barack Obama. Hilarious responses. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Opus wrote:
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? Barak will be the first president since Clinton who can actually talk. |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Opus typed: Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? It's really quite comical. Ted Kennedy is on the right? And no one told me? http://latefinal.com/archives/2005/01/osama_obama.html -- TL, Tim (if *anything* would make me dress to the left, that would be the thing.) --------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj/ |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"David Oznot" wrote in message . .. Opus wrote: Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? Barak will be the first president since Clinton who can actually talk. Possibly, but the question remains: Does Barak Hussein Obama still present a threat to this country. :~^ ) Honestly, I think he should sit out this time around. He needs to get some political time under his belt. He seems intelligent, articulate, and he is a personable individual, but that don't necessarily make him presidential material. We've got a moron for president now, we don't want a bright individual who isn't mature enough to handle the issues that will be thrown at him in that office. I say let the Dems screw up by nominating Hillary--against her will--lose the 2008 election and then in 4 years Obama and Edwards can run as Independents and take all. It'll be great for the country! Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Opus wrote: Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? It's really quite comical. Op Ted Kennedy did a pretty good job on his own. Obama needs a few more years under his belt. |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Tim J." wrote in message ... Opus typed: Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? It's really quite comical. Ted Kennedy is on the right? And no one told me? http://latefinal.com/archives/2005/01/osama_obama.html -- TL, Tim (if *anything* would make me dress to the left, that would be the thing.) Okay, I stand corrected. Though I was actually thinking of this exchange: http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/election...ame_is_hussein Although, in my defense, I always have said that both the Dems and the Repubs are morons. Ted Kennedy is such a class act too! |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:08:21 -0500, GM wrote:
Opus wrote: Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? It's really quite comical. I saw something on CNN, or MSNBC today where they asked people if the US was doing enough to capture Barack Obama. Hilarious responses. Well, the US oughta just nuke Freedonia right off the map unless they turn him over immediately! |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:30:55 -0500, "Opus"
wrote: \ I say let the Dems screw up by nominating Hillary--against her will--lose the 2008 election and then in 4 years Obama and Edwards can run as Independents and take all. I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice. First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog her right down. -- r.bc: vixen Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc.. Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:08:21 -0500, GM wrote: Opus wrote: Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? It's really quite comical. I saw something on CNN, or MSNBC today where they asked people if the US was doing enough to capture Barack Obama. Hilarious responses. Well, the US oughta just nuke Freedonia right off the map unless they turn him over immediately! Were you the only incoming freshmen congressional representative interviewed by Spy magazine? Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Cyli" wrote in message ... I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice. First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog her right down. -- r.bc: vixen I'm afraid that ego will trump intellect, in her case. Just as it has in Rah Dean's case, that is, if he had any intellect. What's more distressing is that the Dem. party machine will likely think nominating her is the right idea. I really want to see a Hillary Clinton/George Clooney vs. Sam Brownback/Rick Santorum election. This country ain't near ****ed-up enough, let's go all the way! Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"xorbit" wrote in message ... Opus wrote: Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against him? It's really quite comical. Op Ted Kennedy did a pretty good job on his own. As Mr. Tim Johnson pointed out to me earlier. Obama needs a few more years under his belt. Agreed. I'd also like to know how far back his family ties to Saddam Hussein go? Obama just barely is a citizen, I might add: Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama Hawaii Statehood: August 21, 1959 http://www.hawaiischoolreports.com/h.../statehood.htm Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:58:06 -0500, "Opus"
wrote: Obama just barely is a citizen, I might add: Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama Hawaii Statehood: August 21, 1959 http://www.hawaiischoolreports.com/h.../statehood.htm Op Wouldn't he have been a citizen even if Hawaii never changed from territory (or protectorate or whatever) to state? I suspect that anyone born in Puerto Rico is a U.S. citizen, for instance. -- r.bc: vixen Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc.. Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Cyli" wrote in message ... Wouldn't he have been a citizen even if Hawaii never changed from territory (or protectorate or whatever) to state? I suspect that anyone born in Puerto Rico is a U.S. citizen, for instance. -- r.bc: vixen Well yeah, but that doesn't fit well with my conspiracy theory! For future reference, I don't need no stinkin' FACT finders assistin' me in my endeavors to persevere! :~^ ) Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Cyli" wrote in message ... Wouldn't he have been a citizen even if Hawaii never changed from territory (or protectorate or whatever) to state? I suspect that anyone born in Puerto Rico is a U.S. citizen, for instance. -- r.bc: vixen Can territorial citizens be President? Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Cyli wrote:
I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice. First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog her right down. The buzz around Barack is happening too early and he realizes this, as evidenced in his own comments at last week's NH book signing, town-hall thing. His flame could burn bright and brief, at least for the 08 contest. I do like his message though: amongst other things, the audacious hope that a campaign can be fought with a respect for the opponent. I just wonder if he'll still walk on water when he realizes he has to go negative, either as a first strike, or in retaliation? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Opus" wrote in message ... "Cyli" wrote in message ... Wouldn't he have been a citizen even if Hawaii never changed from territory (or protectorate or whatever) to state? I suspect that anyone born in Puerto Rico is a U.S. citizen, for instance. -- r.bc: vixen Can territorial citizens be President? Well, presidents have, for the most part, been territorial. Wolfgang who, although not certain of much, rests assured that this observation is at least as valuable as most of the political pearls cast before this audience. |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
GM wrote:
... I just wonder if he'll still walk on water when he realizes he has to go negative, either as a first strike, or in retaliation? Don't worry about Barack Obama's fighting ability. He's won, and lost, elections for the Illinois legislature and Illinois politics is anything but genteel. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... Well, presidents have, for the most part, been territorial. Wolfgang who, although not certain of much, rests assured that this observation is at least as valuable as most of the political pearls cast before this audience. Okay, but could a Puerto Rican or Samoan citizen become POTUS? Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Cyli wrote:
I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice. First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog her right down. Not that I disagree with you, but evidently at least one big name on the right has a different take. It appears DeLay thinks Hillary will be elected in 2008 and will tab Obama as her veep: http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=28995 Of course he goes on to blame it on the media working in concert with a "liberal coalition" run by Carville, Blumenthal, Begala and Ickes. He also says Obama has the record of a "leftist-Marxist". Chuck Vance (of course this could all just be scare tactics on his part) |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Opus" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... Well, presidents have, for the most part, been territorial. Wolfgang who, although not certain of much, rests assured that this observation is at least as valuable as most of the political pearls cast before this audience. Okay, but could a Puerto Rican or Samoan citizen become POTUS? According to the information presented he http://topuertorico.org/government.shtml Puerto Ricans can't vote for president. I'd be careful about drawing hard and fast conclusions, but it seems to me that if you can't vote for it is unlikely that you can be. Samoans, on the other hand (or, at least the ones I've seen) tend to be large and rather fierce looking. I'm not going to tell them what they may or may not do or be. Wolfgang |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:16:22 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: GM wrote: ... I just wonder if he'll still walk on water when he realizes he has to go negative, either as a first strike, or in retaliation? Don't worry about Barack Obama's fighting ability. He's won, and lost, elections for the Illinois legislature and Illinois politics is anything but genteel. Er, yeah...he's the regular Fightin' Illini of politics...and in his last "game," the opposition sent the cheerleaders, but forgot to bring the actual team to the stadium... |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Conan The Librarian wrote in news:elp2ei$11bm$1
@news.swt.edu: Cyli wrote: I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice. First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog her right down. Not that I disagree with you, but evidently at least one big name on the right has a different take. It appears DeLay thinks Hillary will be elected in 2008 and will tab Obama as her veep: http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=28995 Of course he goes on to blame it on the media working in concert with a "liberal coalition" run by Carville, Blumenthal, Begala and Ickes. He also says Obama has the record of a "leftist-Marxist". Chuck Vance (of course this could all just be scare tactics on his part) He's just spreading rumors to secretly promote anyone who he thinks will be strong on prison reform. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Conan The Librarian wrote:
It appears DeLay thinks Hillary will be elected in 2008 and will tab Obama as her veep: I would humbly suggest that taking anything the bugman says at face value would be foolish. Joe F. |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "Opus" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... Well, presidents have, for the most part, been territorial. Wolfgang who, although not certain of much, rests assured that this observation is at least as valuable as most of the political pearls cast before this audience. Okay, but could a Puerto Rican or Samoan citizen become POTUS? According to the information presented he http://topuertorico.org/government.shtml Puerto Ricans can't vote for president. I'd be careful about drawing hard and fast conclusions, but it seems to me that if you can't vote for it is unlikely that you can be. I found that same info, basically, when I searched. I too thought that if Puerto Ricans were unable to vote for POTUS that they might be denied the right to become POTUS, if it is in fact a right, that is? I've not been able to find any thing definitive on the subject. the U.S. Constitution just says: Clause 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. http://www.law.emory.edu/cms/site/in...p?id=3085#7662 There is this also: Persons born in Puerto Rico acquire U.S. citizenship under 8 U.S.C. 1402, which is part of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act. This is statutory citizenship rather than citizenship arising from birth or naturalization in a state of the union under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. http://www.puertorico-herald.org/iss...nship-en.shtml XIV Amendment Section 1 The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. http://www.law.emory.edu/cms/site/in...p?id=3085#7662 Samoans, on the other hand (or, at least the ones I've seen) tend to be large and rather fierce looking. I'm not going to tell them what they may or may not do or be. I'm with ya on this one! Op --just curious about this, more than anything.-- Wolfgang |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Conan The Librarian" wrote in message ... He also says Obama has the record of a "leftist-Marxist". Well this alone assures him of my vote! Op Chuck Vance (of course this could all just be scare tactics on his part) |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Scott Seidman" wrote in message . 1.4... He's just spreading rumors to secretly promote anyone who he thinks will be strong on prison reform. -- Scott I sure hope he gets the chance to find out about prison culture! Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Opus" wrote in :
"Scott Seidman" wrote in message . 1.4... He's just spreading rumors to secretly promote anyone who he thinks will be strong on prison reform. -- Scott I sure hope he gets the chance to find out about prison culture! Op You and me both, Op. Even better if they can get him in a TX state facility. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:33:17 -0500, GM wrote:
Cyli wrote: I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice. First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog her right down. The buzz around Barack is happening too early and he realizes this, as evidenced in his own comments at last week's NH book signing, town-hall thing. Or his Bears' pregame "announcement"... His flame could burn bright and brief, at least for the 08 contest. I do like his message though: amongst other things, the audacious hope that a campaign can be fought with a respect for the opponent. I just wonder if he'll still walk on water when he realizes he has to go negative, either as a first strike, or in retaliation? If he joins up with McCain, they could both ignore whoever the opponents wind up being. If it does wind up being he and Hillary in a contest for Dem nominee, he won't need to "go negative" - the GOP and everyone else to the right of, oh, say, Michael Moore will do it for him. And speaking of idiots, Hillary and the Clintonistas seem to be right on schedule to **** up Hillary's chances by continuing to do what they do - attempting to rat**** _anyone_, including the voters, that they see as "in the way." If he's the Dem nominee, his objective negatives (no real experience, no real record at any level - no "yardstick"), combined with subjective negatives (he's a Dem, he's too black, he's not black enough, he's not "liberal"/"conservative" enough, he's too "liberal"/ "conservative," he's too young, etc.), will likely combine to get him defeated THIS TIME if the GOP puts up anyone short of maybe Pat Robertson. If it's McCain, Obama's done. They are both, as pols go, good men, but McCain has the name and the record, and if he goes (really) negative on McCain, he's _really_ done. IMO, though, if they are steering their own ships, neither would go unduly (and subjectively) negative on the other. If he's smart, whether he joins McCain or not, he will take a page from his playbook: don't go (subjectively) negative _against anyone_ and be thought of as one of the "good guys" by the entire center. And anyone wanna bet that Hillary (or her campaign) will bring up his skin color at least once? R |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Scott Seidman" wrote in message . 1.4... You and me both, Op. Even better if they can get him in a TX state facility. -- Scott Sadly, you and I both know he isn't likely to get any prison time and if he did it would be in a Club Fed facility. That's the way the system works, when you are connected politically or you have wealth. Think Michael Milkin and Ivan Boesky! "in Wall Street's biggest criminal prosecution ever, 98 indictments of fraud and racketeering were brought against Milkin. On April 14, 1990 Milkin was sentenced to ten years in jail and agreed to pay $600 million in fines." http://www.brainyhistory.com/events/...93_167702.html Milkin entered a minimum-security facility at Pleasanton, California in 1991. Two years later he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, and his prison sentence was reduced to time served. He was given 12 to 18 months to live. Milkin established Cap CURE, and raised $75 million to fund research into finding a cure for prostate cancer. In 1996 he and his brother Lowell founded Knowledge Universe, an educational services company which in a few years time was logging $1.5 billion in sales annually. In 1997 the Milkin Institute, an economics think tank, was created. The following year, Milkin's The Taste for Living Cookbook became a bestseller. http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id316.htm On May 18, 1986 Ivan Boesky gave the commencement address at Milkin's alma mater, the University of California at Berkeley's business school. "I think greed is healthy," he told his enthusiastic audience. "You can be greedy and still feel good about yourself." A few months later Boesky was indicted on the charges that would land him in Southern California's Lompoc Federal Prison, also known as Club Fed West. http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id316.htm Op ---- |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:29:13 -0600, Conan The Librarian
wrote: Cyli wrote: I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice. First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog her right down. Not that I disagree with you, but evidently at least one big name on the right has a different take. "Big name on the right?" Please. DeLay is a crooked little turd who got a well-deserved flush down the drain. It appears DeLay thinks Hillary will be elected in 2008 and will tab Obama as her veep: http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=28995 Golly! Whoda thunk DeLay could imagine something so original? Of course he goes on to blame it on the media working in concert with a "liberal coalition" run by Carville, Blumenthal, Begala and Ickes. He also says Obama has the record of a "leftist-Marxist". Well, to give credit where it's due, he's right about that - Obama's record as an elected US legislator is very similar to that of Karl Marx...or Henry VIII... Chuck Vance (of course this could all just be scare tactics on his part) Yeah, he's scared his silly-assed little blog managed to con the only 100 suckers out of 52 bucks it'll ever be able to con... R |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
He also says Obama has the record of a "leftist-Marxist".
Well this alone assures him of my vote! I am not sure that a socialist in the Whitehouse, be it Hillary or Obama, would be beneficial to this nation. The expansion of the failure of Great Society, and allowing every group to claim civil rights recognition, can only polarize this nation to a new higher level. As for Obama being a moderate (the often claim of the major media), consider the following: http://www.adaction.org/ The ADA Today Barack Obama (Illinois) Liberal Quotent (LQ) Rating: 100 (out of 100) The rating of 100 is considered [perfect]. From the ADA newsletter: " Liberal Quotient (LQ) is the rating of a Member of Congress determined by the percentage of votes cast in support of liberal policies, measured against the number of votes counted. The votes selected cover the full spectrum of domestic, foreign, economic, military, environmental and social issues. We often chose procedural votes, amendments, motions to table, or votes on rules for debate. These votes can reveal true attitudes obscured in final votes. " And from the opposite side of the political spectrum: http://www.conservative.org/archive2/2008potus.asp The American Conservative Union gave Obama a score of 8 (also out of 100). Even Hillary managed a 12 from this organization. |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
|
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On 13 Dec 2006 15:58:21 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: "Opus" wrote in : "Scott Seidman" wrote in message . 1.4... He's just spreading rumors to secretly promote anyone who he thinks will be strong on prison reform. -- Scott I sure hope he gets the chance to find out about prison culture! Op You and me both, Op. Even better if they can get him in a TX state facility. Thus demonstrating your and Op's political acumen. If an equally-crooked nest-feathering partisan ****ass tries to put the little turd in a Texas prison (esp. on trumped-up charges of which he's likely not guilty), it makes a martyr out of him (and one with a legit outcry). Let him run around with his cakehole open, and he marginalizes himself even further than he already is. There's no worse punishment for a creature like DeLay. In the event any real evidence of his actual crimes surface, let a USA (as non-partisan as possible) get him. R |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
wrote in message ... Or his Bears' pregame "announcement"... Not familiar with political humor, heh? If he joins up with McCain, they could both ignore whoever the opponents wind up being. If he goes with McCain, all this talk about his intellect will have been for naught. If it does wind up being he and Hillary in a contest for Dem nominee, Well which will be Pres and which will be VP? he won't need to "go negative" - the GOP and everyone else to the right of, oh, say, Michael Moore will do it for him. Well that is to be expected, I mean we are talking Dems. and Repubs., right? And speaking of idiots, This is not about you Rah. Hillary and the Clintonistas seem to be right on schedule to **** up Hillary's chances by continuing to do what they do - attempting to rat**** _anyone_, including the voters, that they see as "in the way." You reckon they shoot anyone in the face? If he's the Dem nominee, his objective negatives (no real experience, no real record at any level - no "yardstick"), Pretty much like the last two Ps'OTUS, right. I mean former governors aren't really qualified to hold the highest office in the land, right. But of course, politics ain't about qualifications. combined with subjective negatives (he's a Dem, he's too black, he's not black enough, he's not "liberal"/"conservative" enough, he's too "liberal"/ "conservative," he's too young, etc.), will likely combine to get him defeated THIS TIME if the GOP puts up anyone short of maybe Pat Robertson. Maybe he could get Colin Powell to run with him, he's got it all ya know. Of course the Republicans are likely to run someone just to the right of Satan, so they will have the best shot at getting their base vote anyway. If it's McCain, Obama's done. They are both, as pols go, good men, but McCain has the name and the record, and if he goes (really) negative on McCain, he's _really_ done. IMO, though, if they are steering their own ships, neither would go unduly (and subjectively) negative on the other. Yeah, wouldn't want to Swiftboat McCain the way Bush did. And of course McCains age certainly won't figure in. Remeber, he no Ronny Reagan. If he's smart, whether he joins McCain or not, he will take a page from his playbook: don't go (subjectively) negative _against anyone_ and be thought of as one of the "good guys" by the entire center. That a great and positive Republican strategy, right. And anyone wanna bet that Hillary (or her campaign) will bring up his skin color at least once? No, because neither will run this time out. Wanna bet on that? Op R |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
wrote in message ... ...Let him run around with his cakehole open, and he marginalizes himself even further than he already is. There's no worse punishment for a creature like [dicklet].... O, irony, thy name is......well, you know. Wolfgang absinthe emeril latifah oprah oprah absinthe emril absinthe |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Traveler" wrote in message oups.com... He also says Obama has the record of a "leftist-Marxist". Well this alone assures him of my vote! I am not sure that a socialist in the Whitehouse, be it Hillary or Obama, would be beneficial to this nation. The expansion of the failure of Great Society, and allowing every group to claim civil rights recognition, can only polarize this nation to a new higher level. As for Obama being a moderate (the often claim of the major media), consider the following: http://www.adaction.org/ The ADA Today Barack Obama (Illinois) Liberal Quotent (LQ) Rating: 100 (out of 100) The rating of 100 is considered [perfect]. From the ADA newsletter: " Liberal Quotient (LQ) is the rating of a Member of Congress determined by the percentage of votes cast in support of liberal policies, measured against the number of votes counted. The votes selected cover the full spectrum of domestic, foreign, economic, military, environmental and social issues. We often chose procedural votes, amendments, motions to table, or votes on rules for debate. These votes can reveal true attitudes obscured in final votes. " And from the opposite side of the political spectrum: http://www.conservative.org/archive2/2008potus.asp The American Conservative Union gave Obama a score of 8 (also out of 100). Even Hillary managed a 12 from this organization. Ah, yet another centrist political genius heard from! Wolfgang who would have thought that kennies and dicklets were incapable of parthenogenesis. |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:49:54 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: Don't worry about Barack Obama's fighting ability. He's won, and lost, elections for the Illinois legislature and Illinois politics is anything but genteel. Er, yeah...he's the regular Fightin' Illini of politics...and in his last "game," the opposition sent the cheerleaders, but forgot to bring the actual team to the stadium... The general election of the 2004 Senate race wasn't the "game", it was a foregone conclusion, the knock down drag out happened in the Democratic primary "Knock down drag out," huh? Yeah, it was a real down-to-the-wire nail-biter...what, 182% of the registered Dems voted for him, compared to the next-place guy, a Chicago legacycrook, who only got, what, 101%... as anyone who had even a cursory understanding of Illinois politics would well know. IOW, you don't have the slightest idea...and if you think winning some Chicago ballot-box-stuffing contest is any real prep for a US-wide Presidential race, you really are, um, way out there in left field... HTH, R |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
"Traveler" wrote in message oups.com... He also says Obama has the record of a "leftist-Marxist". Well this alone assures him of my vote! I am not sure that a socialist in the Whitehouse, be it Hillary or Obama, would be beneficial to this nation. The expansion of the failure of Great Society, and allowing every group to claim civil rights recognition, can only polarize this nation to a new higher level. Well, as my previous comment was tongue and cheek, I must say that I would much prefer extreme liberal, as we know it, to the totalitarian regime that we presently have in office. Besides, I would vote for a child molester or Satan before I'd vote for a Dem. or Repub.! Op |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?
Opus wrote:
Besides, I would vote for a child molester or Satan before I'd vote for a Dem. or Repub.! Lest it need be said, those are not mutually exclusive. :-) Joe F. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter