|
|
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
Its really a comedy routine here.
These guys are all funny in a relatively morbid yet facinating sort of way. Altho I am surely not a historian, probably similar to many past human interactions but This one is on a virtual and crowded river w people fishing pockets of some kind of reailty and some are even trolling. And - They are all using flies Fred |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 11, 6:39 am, rw wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Ah yes, consciousness, that aggravating experience between naps.......... MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 11, 7:18 am, wrote:
Its really a comedy routine here. Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs. People who think these things are funny are also disturbed. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
No ****ing doubt - Jose
I am a disturbed mo fo" Disturbed about a lot of things The planet,Iraq, Iran our rivers, people who throw beercans ourt the car window, your nutso posts and talking about pigs you must have known! True... We just yesterday got three little pigs to fatten butcher and then eat in 3 mos atheir names are Cheney Bush & Rumsfeld. Fred |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 11, 7:59 am, wrote:
No ****ing doubt - Jose I am a disturbed mo fo" Disturbed about a lot of things The planet,Iraq, Iran our rivers, people who throw beercans ourt the car window, your nutso posts and talking about pigs you must have known! True... We just yesterday got three little pigs to fatten butcher and then eat in 3 mos atheir names are Cheney Bush & Rumsfeld. Fred Your post is unintelligible. For meaningful communication in this medium, it is necessary to conform to certain rules governing the use of written English. Should you not be privy to these rules, which is apparently the case, then you might as well refrain. Or simply confine yourself to statements like "Again you sure are a fat creep! " which although not apparently addressed to anybody in particular, you later stated to be directed at myself, and which you finally managed to complete, doubtless after prodigious mental effort, on your second attempt. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
Correctamundo Giuseppi!
You are the educated and intelligent one and all I can speak and understand is mindless drivel gagmmoomyvoken!!!! Yaaasbo! You. my man. Mike the Conner are the bastion of reason sanity and the American way and we - I - salute you So run it up the flagpole Mike No Run the flagople up it. I stand by my original opost You are a fat creep How much do you weigh? Fred |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 11, 8:25 am, wrote:
Correctamundo Giuseppi! You are the educated and intelligent one and all I can speak and understand is mindless drivel gagmmoomyvoken!!!! Yaaasbo! You. my man. Mike the Conner are the bastion of reason sanity and the American way and we - I - salute you So run it up the flagpole Mike No Run the flagople up it. I stand by my original opost You are a fat creep How much do you weigh? Fred Hey dumbo, you started it. I fear you will have to rely on maintaining your abstruse fantasies by dint of your obviously severely limited imagination. Just follow the lead provided by your equally primitive colleagues, Dick the ****, and The Frighteningly Foolish Fortenberry. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote:
Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs. There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
Tim J. wrote:
typed: Correctamundo Giuseppi! ... Since Ken is obviously asleep at the switch, I'll have to step in here. Fred, you may not speak or understand mindless drivel, but you sure can write it. ... I watch Jon Stewart's "The Daily Show" at 10:00 Central and then I'm down for the night. I don't sit in front of a computer screen 24 hours a day like some loony fruitcake and his gaggle of sockpuppets. And yes Fred, you ignorant slut, learn some friggin' manners and post in a way that isn't rude to the reader. It's just as easy to construct a readable post using conventional netiquette as it is to be a rude ****tard. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
"rw" wrote in message m... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Well, yes, you're right.....of course. Yes, it IS all about you and yes, everybody here DOES know it and no, there is nothing anyone can do to make SOME people admit it despite your uncanny ability to pack so much astonishing information into one single (and highly original) locution while, on the other hand, yes, we all believe that you STILL have enough money to rent all the friends you need. Wolfgang who feels that in this august company belaboring the fact that reading between the letters, like any other simple skill, becomes easier with practice, would be superfluous. |
Not meaning to leave Stevie out...
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:39:59 -0600, rw
wrote: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Aw, Stevie, my bad...while referring to you as a "nappy-headed Nazi homo ho" doesn't quite fit, I'll be happy to state you are a Pampers-load... Golly, didn't mean to leave you out, Dickie |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
rw wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Not even original, much less funny. Who are you trying to emulate, Wolfie or rdean ? I don't remember which one of them started the zzzzzzzz shtick. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message t... rw wrote: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Not even original, much less funny. Who are you trying to emulate, Wolfie or rdean ? I don't remember which one of them started the zzzzzzzz shtick. Check your notes. Wolfgang |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
wrote in message ups.com... On Apr 11, 7:59 am, wrote: No ****ing doubt - Jose I am a disturbed mo fo" Disturbed about a lot of things The planet,Iraq, Iran our rivers, people who throw beercans ourt the car window, your nutso posts and talking about pigs you must have known! True... We just yesterday got three little pigs to fatten butcher and then eat in 3 mos atheir names are Cheney Bush & Rumsfeld. Fred Your post is unintelligible. For meaningful communication in this medium, it is necessary to conform to certain rules governing the use of written English. Should you not be privy to these rules, which is apparently the case, then you might as well refrain. Or simply confine yourself to statements like "Again you sure are a fat creep! " which although not apparently addressed to anybody in particular, you later stated to be directed at myself, and which you finally managed to complete, doubtless after prodigious mental effort, on your second attempt. MC As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and positively contributing to ROFF in the first place. Jeremy Moe |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and positively contributing to ROFF in the first place. Jeremy Moe I donīt have a dispute as such, I merely reply occasionally to insulting posts. Anybody may post here, including dumbos, and they frequently do. If you wish to "constructively and positively" contribute here, although I cant really see why anybody would want to, in the meantime, then posting something about fly-fishing or related subjects is more likely to achieve such an aim, than posting negative criticism of others. Correct English usage is required for meaningful communication. Posting gibberish is simply pointless, although there is nothing to prevent anybody doing so. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
wrote in message ups.com... I donīt have a dispute as such, I merely reply *occasionally* to insulting posts. snip MC emphasis added.. ROFLMAO. Definately the ROFF understatement of the decade. Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 12, 2:36 am, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote: wrote in message ups.com... I donīt have a dispute as such, I merely reply *occasionally* to insulting posts. snip MC emphasis added.. ROFLMAO. Definately the ROFF understatement of the decade. Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR Probably escaped your notice, but I did not reply to most, merely a few of them. Just for the record. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 11, 1:19 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: I watch Jon Stewart's "The Daily Show" at 10:00 Central and then I'm down for the night. I don't sit in front of a computer screen 24 hours a day like some loony fruitcake and his gaggle of sockpuppets. And yes Fred, you ignorant slut, learn some friggin' manners and post in a way that isn't rude to the reader. It's just as easy to construct a readable post using conventional netiquette as it is to be a rude ****tard. -- Ken Fortenberry Tut tut....for somebody who constantly maintains he is opposed to foul mouthed invective you certainly engage in a lot of it. Calling a bloke a "slut" is a very strange thing to do. Perhaps you need a nappy change? MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 11, 11:49 am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote: Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs. There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk Well I certainly am sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities. I merely thought that somebody who doesnīt mind when people are referred to as nazi homos, or Cun** or a whole lot of of other similar pleasantries, would hardly be offended at precisely those people being referred to as degenerate pigs. My mistake. No problem, I am sure I will make many more. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
|
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 12 Apr 2007 03:15:34 -0700, wrote: On Apr 11, 11:49 am, Dave LaCourse wrote: On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote: Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs. There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk Well I certainly am sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities. I merely thought that somebody who doesnīt mind when people are referred to as nazi homos, or Cun** or a whole lot of of other similar pleasantries, would hardly be offended at precisely those people being referred to as degenerate pigs. My mistake. No problem, I am sure I will make many more. Mike, Fortenberry and Richard *are* human beings, not degenerate pigs. They are not degenerate human beings either. They have opinions just like you. If they call you names, ignore them. You fall for the trap every time they bait you and you can not see it. They are better at this than you are, and probably take delight in every angry post you make. You will never destroy roff. There are too many good people here (and that includes the two mentioned above) for you or anyone else to succeed. By even attempting such a scheme says volums about your integrity. If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. They are dishonourable degenerate assholes, who hide behind their keyboards in order to safely abuse others. I donīt know how many times I have to tell you this, but I am not in the least angry. I am merely carrying out what is necessary to achieve my aims. You donīt know anything at all about my integrity, and the rest of your post is a load of nonsense as well. You are just a dumbo. It is always very surprising to a lot of people what one determined and resourceful person can achieve, given sufficient motivation. I am going to wipe your stupid face in the **** you flung at me. Come back and tell me about my integrity when you and the other dumb assholes are the only people left here, trading puerile insults with each other, for lack of sense and imagination. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies. Why donīt you just wait and see what happens? Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
wrote in message
Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. If I may ask directly then, what does your honour demand by way of satisfaction? If you're looking for an apology from individuals or the group, I daresay you're not likely to get that on your present course. If you demand that all who have slighted or insulted you in the past be forever banished from this group, I fear you are setting unrealistic goals. No one has that power, and it isn't going to happen. You know that. If you demand, alternatively, that this group dissolve, thus depriving those posters of their forum, this too is unrealistic. Your present course of action is, I daresay, leading in exactly the opposite direction. At best, you will drive off only the "benign" posters, for those who thrive on the confrontation are enjoying the contest and will be the last ones to leave. You are merely harming innocents, those who actually seek knowledge, those who you claim to want to help. Furthermore, your volume of posts serves to inflate the perceived popularity of the group more so than to destroy it. The more you post, the statistically stronger ROFF becomes. By all means, carry on if you like; but I can't see where it's going to satisfy your honour as much as irredeemably harm it. Joe F. |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 12, 3:41 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. If I may ask directly then, what does your honour demand by way of satisfaction? If you're looking for an apology from individuals or the group, I daresay you're not likely to get that on your present course. If you demand that all who have slighted or insulted you in the past be forever banished from this group, I fear you are setting unrealistic goals. No one has that power, and it isn't going to happen. You know that. If you demand, alternatively, that this group dissolve, thus depriving those posters of their forum, this too is unrealistic. Your present course of action is, I daresay, leading in exactly the opposite direction. At best, you will drive off only the "benign" posters, for those who thrive on the confrontation are enjoying the contest and will be the last ones to leave. You are merely harming innocents, those who actually seek knowledge, those who you claim to want to help. Furthermore, your volume of posts serves to inflate the perceived popularity of the group more so than to destroy it. The more you post, the statistically stronger ROFF becomes. By all means, carry on if you like; but I can't see where it's going to satisfy your honour as much as irredeemably harm it. Joe F. I am not demanding anything at all. As you quite rightly point out, any demands at all would be completely unrealistic. Also, I have no more right to make demands than anybody else. Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. The "benign" posters will have no trouble at all staying in contact, or in posting elsewhere if they wish. Only the filth will be contained here. Isolating filth is a public service, like containing rats or cockroaches. They can trade filth among themselves as much as they like, nobody will care, but they cant damage any decent people. Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
wrote in message
Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time doing it? Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption? Joe F. |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 12, 4:20 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time doing it? Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption? Joe F. One learns a lot. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 12, 5:35 am, wrote:
On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote: If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies. Why donīt you just wait and see what happens? Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. MC You've already lost the war no matter how many "allies" you bring in. Sorry Mike, but you are acting just like GeorgeG. Sincerely, - Ken |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Apr 12, 4:20 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time doing it? Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption? Joe F. One learns a lot. MC |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
wrote in message Tut tut....for somebody who constantly maintains he is opposed to foul mouthed invective you certainly engage in a lot of it. Calling a bloke a "slut" is a very strange thing to do. Perhaps you need a nappy change? MC I think it is time to pour some chlorine into the gene pool and thin out some of the nappies, nazzis, homo's and the like.... This is almost funny to sit back and read all the flame war |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:20:17 GMT, "rb608"
wrote: wrote in message Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time doing it? Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption? Joe F. The answer is "melt down". "Melt down". /daytripper (and I donate my winnings to the Buy Mike A Life Fund...) |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
wrote in message oups.com... I am merely carrying out what is necessary to achieve my aims. which are what, exactly? I mean, I could easily observe what you seem to have achieved, but guess that those outcomes were not your desired objectives..... You donīt know anything at all about my integrity but, we're learning.....daily. Tom |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
"Tom Littleton" wrote in news:RhxTh.34595$AS6.33326
@trnddc04: which are what, exactly? http://content.vcommerce.com/product...16/5332616.jpg -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
can't y'all just top post this stuff? g
jeff (wishing he was at fawn lake) Tom Littleton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I am merely carrying out what is necessary to achieve my aims. which are what, exactly? I mean, I could easily observe what you seem to have achieved, but guess that those outcomes were not your desired objectives..... You donīt know anything at all about my integrity but, we're learning.....daily. Tom |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
On 12 Apr 2007 08:42:50 -0700, "
wrote: On Apr 12, 5:35 am, wrote: On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote: If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies. Why donīt you just wait and see what happens? Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. MC You've already lost the war no matter how many "allies" you bring in. Sorry Mike, but you are acting just like GeorgeG. Sincerely, - Ken While I never held any affection or respect for George Gherke, he would have realized that such a course of action would be counterproductive to his aims. George wanted to be liked and respected. While reality wasn't always close to George, it was never so far away that he'd have done something like this. -- r.bc: vixen Minnow goddess, Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher. Almost entirely harmless. Really. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/op...html?th&emc=th
Cyli wrote: On 12 Apr 2007 08:42:50 -0700, " wrote: On Apr 12, 5:35 am, wrote: On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote: If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies. Why donīt you just wait and see what happens? Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. MC You've already lost the war no matter how many "allies" you bring in. Sorry Mike, but you are acting just like GeorgeG. Sincerely, - Ken While I never held any affection or respect for George Gherke, he would have realized that such a course of action would be counterproductive to his aims. George wanted to be liked and respected. While reality wasn't always close to George, it was never so far away that he'd have done something like this. |
Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
"jeff" wrote in message ... http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/op...html?th&emc=th I read that without first checking to see who the author was (didn't notice his name at the top of the piece). When I finished I discovered that it was Harvey Fierstein. Didn't ring any bells, so I did a Google Images search. Oh.....duh.....I know him! Seen him in lots of movies and stuff. Often plays a fat, gay guy. Does it well. Now I know why! :) He's also articulate and thoughtful. Very good essay. It's a pity that those who need to won't read it. Thanks. Wolfgang |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004 - 2006 FishingBanter