![]() |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
1 Attachment(s)
|
45lb Tuna from this weekend
On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles
Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? -- Nogood Boyo |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it.
"Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? -- Nogood Boyo |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
On Thu, 10 May 2007 at 08:07:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles
Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it. A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. -- Nogood Boyo |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
Maybe you shouldn't go tuna fishing...
"Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. -- Nogood Boyo |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
Nogood Boyo wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 at 08:07:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it. A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. That's tuna fishing. They bleed a lot before they die - often on purpose so there is good, clean meat. The other fish may not bleed so much but they still end up on ice and, later, the dinner plate. "A lot of anglers"? You must be speaking of those (on their behalf) who have only fished in freshwater. Ever been deer hunting? |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
On Fri, 11 May 2007 at 14:04:51 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles
Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. Maybe you shouldn't go tuna fishing... You obviously don't get my point. -- Nogood Boyo |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
"Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 May 2007 at 08:07:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it. A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. Yes, anglers, regardless of whether they ever eat fish or not, who have never cleaned a fish on their own. If the sight of fish blood is disgusting then you shouldn't be fishing at all. |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
"Nogood Boyo" wrote in message FFS, couldn't you
have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? I however am disgusted, disgusted that I wasn't there to make that cut..fresh tuna is awesome |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
On Sat, 12 May 2007 at 16:11:58 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Putain
wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 May 2007 at 08:07:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it. A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. Yes, anglers, regardless of whether they ever eat fish or not, who have never cleaned a fish on their own. If the sight of fish blood is disgusting then you shouldn't be fishing at all. You miss my point as well. I'm not squeamish about blood. I kill and clean all my fish because I don't believe in C&R. But was that supposed to be a picture of a fine fish..? or a picture of the killing of a fish..? I'd prefer fine fish to be portrayed in such a way that we can see them at their best. Not upside down with a gaff in them and blood all over the place. -- Nogood Boyo |
45lb Tuna from this weekend
"Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 May 2007 at 16:11:58 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Putain wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 May 2007 at 08:07:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it. A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. Yes, anglers, regardless of whether they ever eat fish or not, who have never cleaned a fish on their own. If the sight of fish blood is disgusting then you shouldn't be fishing at all. You miss my point as well. I'm not squeamish about blood. I kill and clean all my fish because I don't believe in C&R. But was that supposed to be a picture of a fine fish..? or a picture of the killing of a fish..? I'd prefer fine fish to be portrayed in such a way that we can see them at their best. Not upside down with a gaff in them and blood all over the place. -- Nogood Boyo If your point was simply that it wasn't a good photograph artistically, as compared to a nice posed one displaying the fish in it's full beauty and glory, I'd say you certainly didn't convey it very well. At all in fact. Have you ever been tuna fishing? Due to the characteristic of the fish and the fact that the size calls for gaffing, it's always a pretty bloody affair. The photo depicted a scene I've seen before and I didn't find it "disgusting" at all. |
45lb Tuna from this weekend - rongaff01.jpg (0/1)
On Tue, 15 May 2007 01:04:18 GMT, "Putain"
wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 May 2007 at 16:11:58 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Putain wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 May 2007 at 08:07:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it. A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. Yes, anglers, regardless of whether they ever eat fish or not, who have never cleaned a fish on their own. If the sight of fish blood is disgusting then you shouldn't be fishing at all. You miss my point as well. I'm not squeamish about blood. I kill and clean all my fish because I don't believe in C&R. But was that supposed to be a picture of a fine fish..? or a picture of the killing of a fish..? I'd prefer fine fish to be portrayed in such a way that we can see them at their best. Not upside down with a gaff in them and blood all over the place. -- Nogood Boyo If your point was simply that it wasn't a good photograph artistically, as compared to a nice posed one displaying the fish in it's full beauty and glory, I'd say you certainly didn't convey it very well. At all in fact. Have you ever been tuna fishing? Due to the characteristic of the fish and the fact that the size calls for gaffing, it's always a pretty bloody affair. The photo depicted a scene I've seen before and I didn't find it "disgusting" at all. Actually, I found it kind of disgusting because the gaff hook obviously spoiled a sizeable amount of the fish's meat. Out of San Diego, where I fish tuna, the skippers and crew pride themselves in head-gaffing the fish so as not to mess up the meat. Here's an example (a 30 lb class bluefin from several years ago) (This is my first post -- I hope I get the attachment right.) Peter |
45lb Tuna from this weekend - rongaff01.jpg (1/1)
1 Attachment(s)
|
45lb Tuna from this weekend - rongaff01.jpg (0/1)
On Tue, 15 May 2007 at 23:22:19 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Peter
wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 May 2007 at 16:11:58 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Putain wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 May 2007 at 08:07:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: "Nogood Boyo" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 May 2007 at 11:44:24 in alt.binaries.pictures.fishing Charles Summers wrote: FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that? Naa... I wanted PETA to get a good look at it. A lot of anglers will have been disgusted by that picture of a fine fish, let alone PETA. Yes, anglers, regardless of whether they ever eat fish or not, who have never cleaned a fish on their own. If the sight of fish blood is disgusting then you shouldn't be fishing at all. You miss my point as well. I'm not squeamish about blood. I kill and clean all my fish because I don't believe in C&R. But was that supposed to be a picture of a fine fish..? or a picture of the killing of a fish..? I'd prefer fine fish to be portrayed in such a way that we can see them at their best. Not upside down with a gaff in them and blood all over the place. If your point was simply that it wasn't a good photograph artistically, as compared to a nice posed one displaying the fish in it's full beauty and glory, I'd say you certainly didn't convey it very well. At all in fact. I thought I did. My original post was "FFS, couldn't you have cleaned it up and portrayed it a bit more sensitively than that?" The response "I wanted PETA to get a good look at it" was crass. Have you ever been tuna fishing? Due to the characteristic of the fish and the fact that the size calls for gaffing, it's always a pretty bloody affair. The photo depicted a scene I've seen before and I didn't find it "disgusting" at all. Actually, I found it kind of disgusting because the gaff hook obviously spoiled a sizeable amount of the fish's meat. Out of San Diego, where I fish tuna, the skippers and crew pride themselves in head-gaffing the fish so as not to mess up the meat. Here's an example (a 30 lb class bluefin from several years ago) That's more like it - a picture which conveys the catching of a good fish rather than just the bloody landing. And presumably the head-gaffing kills the fish as well... -- Nogood Boyo |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter