| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Cheney's new fishing companion
Wearing dark glasses while fly fishing can be dangerous!
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...10/CHENEY.html Ed |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Apr 11, 11:23*pm, egildone wrote:
Wearing dark glasses while fly fishing can be dangerous! http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...10/CHENEY.html Ed Hope he doesn't shoot her in the face! (Sorry, couldn't resist). Anyway, what type of gear does the Veep use? http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresid...tdoors/05.html -riverman |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:50:08 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote: http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresid...tdoors/05.html Hey, he can't be all bad..... he's got a dog named Dave. d;o) |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Apr 11, 11:23*am, egildone wrote:
Wearing dark glasses while fly fishing can be dangerous! http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...10/CHENEY.html Ed Sorry to disappoint, but I saw a blow-up of the reflection on www.flyfishinginnh.com, and it turns out to be a hand holding a flyrod. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On 11-Apr-2008, egildone wrote: Wearing dark glasses while fly fishing can be dangerous! http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...10/CHENEY.html Ed Cheney - one of my favorite people His new companions are probably the Saudi monarchy, Wonderful people also! They are very concerned about US inflation and and the pillaging and destruction of our environment. Geat humanitarians -all Useful humans Fred |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:38:59 -0400, daytripper
wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:08:12 GMT, wrote: On 11-Apr-2008, egildone wrote: Wearing dark glasses while fly fishing can be dangerous! http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...10/CHENEY.html Ed Cheney - one of my favorite people His new companions are probably the Saudi monarchy, Wonderful people also! They are very concerned about US inflation and and the pillaging and destruction of our environment. Geat humanitarians -all Useful humans Fred That spell checker is working perfectly... /daytripper ( golf claps ;-) Um, have you lost yer flothermucking mind...? Hey, OK....or, of you prefer, fey, fav ku rost ber muther****in' gind? Oh, help--- I think not, R |
Cheney's new fishing companion
wrote in message ... On 11-Apr-2008, egildone wrote: Wearing dark glasses while fly fishing can be dangerous! http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...10/CHENEY.html Ed Cheney - one of my favorite people His new companions are probably the Saudi monarchy, Wonderful people also! They are very concerned about US inflation and and the pillaging and destruction of our environment. Geat humanitarians -all Useful humans Fred Lets look at the last year. Democrat controlled Congress. Inflation has soared, unemployment has increased, oil has skyrocketed, spending has increased. Vote both parties incumbents out! |
Cheney's new fishing companion
Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message ... On 11-Apr-2008, egildone wrote: Wearing dark glasses while fly fishing can be dangerous! http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...10/CHENEY.html Ed Cheney - one of my favorite people His new companions are probably the Saudi monarchy, Wonderful people also! They are very concerned about US inflation and and the pillaging and destruction of our environment. Geat humanitarians -all Useful humans Fred Lets look at the last year. Democrat controlled Congress. Inflation has soared, unemployment has increased, oil has skyrocketed, spending has increased. Vote both parties incumbents out! Democrats don't "control" Congress. They have a bare majority in the House and a razor-thin majority in the Senate (including the Democrat in name only, Joe Lieberman). Until there's either a veto-proof Democratic majority in the Senate and/or a Democrat in the White House, they are essentially powerless to change the disastrous course the Bush administration and his party have set us on. That's the way the system works, and God help us if something doesn't change. The next administration, which I fervently hope will be Democratic, is going to have a helluva mess to clean up, left by eight years of corrupt and idiotic Republican policies, both on the domestic and foreign fronts. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
|
Cheney's new fishing companion
Scott Seidman wrote:
rw wrote in news:puednU_mo4uiF5 : Until there's either a veto-proof Democratic majority in the Senate and/or a Democrat in the White House, they are essentially powerless to change the disastrous course the Bush administration and his party have set us on. That's the way the system works, and God help us if something doesn't change. I call bull****. If the Dems had guts, they'd stop Bush. It might take a super majority to overide a veto, but it still takes a simple majority to pass a bill. The Dems have been caving far too easily. Suppose the House passes your great bill with a simple majority. The Senate either never votes because it can't get past a filibuster; or, if by some miracle, a few Senate Republicans have the guts to vote for the bill and vote for cloture, it won't survive a Presidential veto. Be it stem cell research, be it anti-torture, be it SCHIP, or whatever is your hot-button issue. That's the way the system works without a clear majority and a lock on power. Which, by the way, the Republicans had for six years, and look at the mess they've gotten us into. Maybe the Dems could have cut off war funding. It's not clear. I think Bushco would have defied them and we'd be in the middle of a Constitutional crisis. But be that as it may, it would have been irresponsible, IMO. That's too blunt an instrument to get us out of this trap Bush and Cheney have blundered us into. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"rw" wrote in message m... Scott Seidman wrote: rw wrote in news:puednU_mo4uiF5 : Until there's either a veto-proof Democratic majority in the Senate and/or a Democrat in the White House, they are essentially powerless to change the disastrous course the Bush administration and his party have set us on. That's the way the system works, and God help us if something doesn't change. I call bull****. If the Dems had guts, they'd stop Bush. It might take a super majority to overide a veto, but it still takes a simple majority to pass a bill. The Dems have been caving far too easily. Suppose the House passes your great bill with a simple majority. The Senate either never votes because it can't get past a filibuster; or, if by some miracle, a few Senate Republicans have the guts to vote for the bill and vote for cloture, it won't survive a Presidential veto. Be it stem cell research, be it anti-torture, be it SCHIP, or whatever is your hot-button issue. That's the way the system works without a clear majority and a lock on power. Which, by the way, the Republicans had for six years, and look at the mess they've gotten us into. Maybe the Dems could have cut off war funding. It's not clear. I think Bushco would have defied them and we'd be in the middle of a Constitutional crisis. But be that as it may, it would have been irresponsible, IMO. That's too blunt an instrument to get us out of this trap Bush and Cheney have blundered us into. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. BS! they are both feeding at the trough. They overspent for how many years when they had a Democrat Supermajority? Only reason Clinton somewhat balanced the budget, is revenues increased from the dot.bomb debacle faster than they could spend them. How much did spending go up during all those Clinton years? Including the first 2 years. It was a Democrat controlled Congress that put in "Baseline Budgeting" that built in a yearly 13% increase. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"rw" wrote in message m... Scott Seidman wrote: rw wrote in news:puednU_mo4uiF5 : Until there's either a veto-proof Democratic majority in the Senate and/or a Democrat in the White House, they are essentially powerless to change the disastrous course the Bush administration and his party have set us on. That's the way the system works, and God help us if something doesn't change. I call bull****. If the Dems had guts, they'd stop Bush. It might take a super majority to overide a veto, but it still takes a simple majority to pass a bill. The Dems have been caving far too easily. Suppose the House passes your great bill with a simple majority. The Senate either never votes because it can't get past a filibuster; or, if by some miracle, a few Senate Republicans have the guts to vote for the bill and vote for cloture, it won't survive a Presidential veto. Be it stem cell research, be it anti-torture, be it SCHIP, or whatever is your hot-button issue. That's the way the system works without a clear majority and a lock on power. Which, by the way, the Republicans had for six years, and look at the mess they've gotten us into. Maybe the Dems could have cut off war funding. It's not clear. I think Bushco would have defied them and we'd be in the middle of a Constitutional crisis. But be that as it may, it would have been irresponsible, IMO. That's too blunt an instrument to get us out of this trap Bush and Cheney have blundered us into. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Maybe we should listen to Iococca. Did not run it though Snopes but sounds good. Remember Lee Iacocca, the man who rescued Chrysler Corporation from it's death throes? He has a new book, and here are some excerpts. Lee Iacocca Says: 'Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the hell is our outrage? We should be screaming bloody murder. We've got a gang of clueless bozos steering our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even clean up after a hurricane much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, 'Stay the course' Stay the course? You've got to be kidding. This isAmerica, not the damned 'Titanic'. I'll give you a sound bite: 'Throw all the bums out!' You might think I'm getting senile, that I've gone off my rocker, and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this country anymore. The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys in handcuffs. While we're fiddling inIraq, theMiddle Eastis burning and nobody seems to know what to do. And the press is waving 'pom -poms' instead of asking hard questions. That's not the promise of the 'America' my parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I've had enough. How about you? I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have. The Biggest 'C' is Crisis ! Leaders are made, not born. Leadership is forged in times of crisis. It's easy to sit there with your feet up on the desk and talk theory. Or send someone else's kids off to war when you'v e never seen a battlefield yourself. It's another thing to lead when your world comes tumbling down. OnSeptember 11, 2001, we needed a strong leader more than any other time in our history. We needed a steady hand to guide us out of the ashes. A Hell of a Mess So here's where we stand. We're immersed in a bloody war with no plan for winning and no plan for leaving. We're running the biggest deficit in the history of the country. We're losing the manufacturing edge toAsia, while our once-great companies are getting slaughtered by health care costs. Gas prices are skyrocketing, and nobody in power has a coherent energy policy. Our schools are in trouble. Our borders are like sieves. The middle class is being squeezed every which way These are times that cry out for leadership. But when you look around, you've got to ask: 'Where have all the leaders gone?'&nb sp; Where are the curious, creative communicators? Where are the people of character, courage, conviction, omnipotence, and common sense? I may be a sucker for alliteration, but I think you get the point. Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo? We've spent billions of dollars building a huge new bureaucracy, and all we know how to do is react to things that have already happened. Name me one leader who emerged from the crisis of Hurricane Katrina. Congress has yet to spend a single day evaluating the response to the hurricane, or demanding accountability for the decisions that were made in the crucial hours after the storm. Everyone's hunkering down, fingers crossed, hoping it doesn't happen again. Now, that's just crazy. Storms happen. Deal with it. Make a plan. F igure out what you're going to do the next time. Name me an industry leader who is thinking creatively about how we can restore our competitive edge in manufacturing. Who would have believed that there could ever be a time when 'The Big Three' referred to Japanese car companies? How did this happen, and more important, what are we going to do about it? Name me a government leader who can articulate a plan for paying down the debit, or solving the energy crisis, or managing the health care problem. The silence is deafening. But these are the crises that are eating away at our cou ntry and milking the middle class dry. I have news for the gang in Congress. We didn't elect you to sit on your asses and do nothing and remain silent while our democracy is being hijacked and our greatness is being replaced with mediocrity. What is everybody so afraid of? That some& nbsp; bonehead on Fox News will call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine for a change? Had Enough? Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have hope I believe in America. In my lifetime I've had the privilege of living through some of America's greatest moments. I've also experienced some of our worst crises: the 'Great Depression', 'World War II', the 'Korean War', the 'Kennedy Assassination', the 'Vietnam War', the 1970's oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years culminating with 9/11. If I've learned one thing, it's this: 'You don't get anywhere by standing on the sidelines waiting for somebody else to take action. Whether it's building a better car or building a better future for our children, we all have a role to play. That's the challenge I'm ra ising in this book. It's a call to 'Action' for people who, like me, believe in America . It's not too late, but it's getting pretty close; So let's shake off the crap and go to work. Let's tell 'em all we've had 'enough.' |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On 13-Apr-2008, "Calif Bill" wrote: Lets look at the last year. Democrat controlled Congress. Inflation has soared, unemployment has increased, oil has skyrocketed, spending has increased. Vote both parties incumbents out! I agree But the problem goes fare deeper than you can really imagine - Who controls the world economies? In each country A few families here and there but the oligarchy is another story for another day Forget Republicrats One way that I differ from you is that once we vote the incumbents out we should try them for war crimes and war profiteering The deaths of 4200 American boys and countless other humans - mainly Iraqis For what? only Money - More money for ever greedy war profiteers and low end criminals. And an erosion of our civil liberties and a foreign debt that has broken all records Bush and Cheney have pocketed a lot of money And so have their friends. What can we do? Any ideas What is even worse is that Cheney is laughing at the US and World public Why should Bush reduce troops or pull them out of Iraq For every soldier we outfit he must see some $$ For every round fired he probably gets a cut No bid Haliburton Contracts No bid contract security forces and private armies Its a crazy world .. Ainna. Fred |
Cheney's new fishing companion
Calif Bill wrote:
BS! they are both feeding at the trough. They overspent for how many years when they had a Democrat Supermajority? Only reason Clinton somewhat balanced the budget, is revenues increased from the dot.bomb debacle faster than they could spend them. Clinton didn't "somewhat balance the budget." He balanced the budget. In fact, he did more. At the end of his administration we were running a fat surplus -- so much so that Alan Greenspan thought our biggest problem would be paying own the national debt too fast! (Look it up.) When Clinton entered office in 1992 with a Democratic majority in Congress he raised taxes, rather modestly, and mostly on upper-income people. The Republicans were all gloom and doom -- it would lead to a recession! Instead, it restored the faith of the financial markets that the US could actually meet its obligations, and we entered a period of enormous, unprecedented economic growth. That was then. This is now. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:45:39 GMT, wrote:
What can we do? Any ideas Yeah. Smoke a joint, take two ecstacy pills, and call me in the morning. Dr. Dave |
Cheney's new fishing companion
|
Cheney's new fishing companion
"rw" wrote in message m... Calif Bill wrote: BS! they are both feeding at the trough. They overspent for how many years when they had a Democrat Supermajority? Only reason Clinton somewhat balanced the budget, is revenues increased from the dot.bomb debacle faster than they could spend them. Clinton didn't "somewhat balance the budget." He balanced the budget. In fact, he did more. At the end of his administration we were running a fat surplus -- so much so that Alan Greenspan thought our biggest problem would be paying own the national debt too fast! (Look it up.) When Clinton entered office in 1992 with a Democratic majority in Congress he raised taxes, rather modestly, and mostly on upper-income people. The Republicans were all gloom and doom -- it would lead to a recession! Instead, it restored the faith of the financial markets that the US could actually meet its obligations, and we entered a period of enormous, unprecedented economic growth. That was then. This is now. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Clinton even admitted he raised taxes too much. He inherited an economic growth cycle, just as Bush inherited a down turning economic cycle. The budget was never balance. It was projected to be balanced, but look at the national debt for all his years. It did not decrease. And the inflow of money was huge! All those stock options that were cashed in gave the Federal government about 36.5% of each option. 35% tax and 1.5% Medicare. The California government got about 14% of all the Calif generated options. Plus the Newt Contract with America cut Clinton's and A DEMOCRAT CONTROL CONGRESS's overspending. All this added up to nirvana for the party in charge of the Executive Branch. Plus Clinton was a master of the PR world. When the government partly shut down in the fight against overspending, it stuck all the blame on the Republicans. Clinton was a lucky SOB. Greenspan screwed up in letting the 'unbridled enthusiasm' run rampant and the massive Ponzi scheme of the IPO's and margin's to run rampant. The "Contract with America' was one of the last good things that happened to the US. Too bad it did not last. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Apr 13, 6:08*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"rw" wrote in message m... Scott Seidman wrote: rw wrote in news:puednU_mo4uiF5 : Until there's either a veto-proof Democratic majority in the Senate and/or a Democrat in the White House, they are essentially powerless to change the disastrous course the Bush administration and his party have set us on. That's the way the system works, and God help us if something doesn't change. I call bull****. *If the Dems had guts, they'd stop Bush. *It might take a super majority to overide a veto, but it still takes a simple majority to pass a bill. *The Dems have been caving far too easily. Suppose the House passes your great bill with a simple majority. The Senate either never votes because it can't get past a filibuster; or, if by some miracle, a few Senate Republicans have the guts to vote for the bill and vote for cloture, it won't survive a Presidential veto. Be it stem cell research, be it anti-torture, be it SCHIP, or whatever is your hot-button issue. That's the way the system works without a clear majority and a lock on power. Which, by the way, the Republicans had for six years, and look at the mess they've gotten us into. Maybe the Dems could have cut off war funding. It's not clear. I think Bushco would have defied them and we'd be in the middle of a Constitutional crisis. But be that as it may, it would have been irresponsible, IMO. That's too blunt an instrument to get us out of this trap Bush and Cheney have blundered us into. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. BS! they are both feeding at the trough. *They overspent for how many years when they had a Democrat Supermajority? *Only reason Clinton somewhat balanced the budget, is revenues increased from the dot.bomb debacle faster than they could spend them. *How much did spending go up during all those Clinton years? *Including the first 2 years. *It was a Democrat controlled Congress that put in "Baseline Budgeting" that built in a yearly 13% increase.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This must be entertaining for you, pretending the last 6+ years just didn't happen. Kinda-like playing "Fuher Bunker," sending out dispatches to non-existant divisions. Fun times, take a riduculous stance and then defend it to ehaustion. Reminds me of a "catch and release" thread. Bottom line is that most sensible people are saddened for what's happened to our country, and realize that facing the pain ahead requires adult grade honesty if we are to fix the mess and move forward. Dave Dave |
Cheney's new fishing companion
Calif Bill wrote:
Clinton even admitted he raised taxes too much. He inherited an economic growth cycle, just as Bush inherited a down turning economic cycle. The budget was never balance. It was projected to be balanced, but look at the national debt for all his years. It did not decrease. And the inflow of money was huge! You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts. This web site shows a graph of the national debt as a percentage of the nation's annual income: http://zfacts.com/p/318.html Compare the increasing trends under Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II to the decreasing trends under Clinton. BTW, the data is from the Office of Management and Budget. That the modern-day Republicans could have a reputation as fiscal conservatives and good managers is a cosmic joke. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:50:08 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresid...tdoors/05.html Hey, he can't be all bad..... he's got a dog named Dave. So do we. Wolfgang |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:37:11 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote: "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:50:08 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresid...tdoors/05.html Hey, he can't be all bad..... he's got a dog named Dave. So do we. Wolfgang Ahhh, shucks, Wolfie. Thank you. And here I thought you didn't care. Davey the Dog Pirate, sometime doctor to the demented, and roff's own pet d;o) |
Cheney's new fishing companion
|
Cheney's new fishing companion
|
Cheney's new fishing companion
Calif Bill wrote:
Clinton even admitted he raised taxes too much. He inherited an economic growth cycle, just as Bush inherited a down turning economic cycle. The budget was never balance. It was projected to be balanced, but look at the national debt for all his years. It did not decrease. And the inflow of money was huge! All those stock options that were cashed in gave the Federal government about 36.5% of each option. 35% tax and 1.5% Medicare. The California government got about 14% of all the Calif generated options. Plus the Newt Contract with America cut Clinton's and A DEMOCRAT CONTROL CONGRESS's overspending. All this added up to nirvana for the party in charge of the Executive Branch. Plus Clinton was a master of the PR world. When the government partly shut down in the fight against overspending, it stuck all the blame on the Republicans. Clinton was a lucky SOB. Greenspan screwed up in letting the 'unbridled enthusiasm' run rampant and the massive Ponzi scheme of the IPO's and margin's to run rampant. The "Contract with America' was one of the last good things that happened to the US. Too bad it did not last. Here's a graph of federal spending (per household): http://www.heritage.org/research/fea...harts_s/s3.cfm Notice how it declined during the Clinton administration and began sharply increasing in 2000 after Bush II was elected. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:37:11 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote: "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:50:08 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresid...tdoors/05.html Hey, he can't be all bad..... he's got a dog named Dave. So do we. Wolfgang Ahhh, shucks, Wolfie. Thank you. And here I thought you didn't care. Davey the Dog Pirate, sometime doctor to the demented, and roff's own pet Better known (because more accurately) as an uneducated murderous pig......with a bad perm. Sent any more relatives off to kill.....and die.....lately? Wolfgang who wonders what could possibly be better than monday morning of jollity in the spring. :) |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"rw" wrote in message m... Calif Bill wrote: Clinton even admitted he raised taxes too much. He inherited an economic growth cycle, just as Bush inherited a down turning economic cycle. The budget was never balance. It was projected to be balanced, but look at the national debt for all his years. It did not decrease. And the inflow of money was huge! All those stock options that were cashed in gave the Federal government about 36.5% of each option. 35% tax and 1.5% Medicare. The California government got about 14% of all the Calif generated options. Plus the Newt Contract with America cut Clinton's and A DEMOCRAT CONTROL CONGRESS's overspending. All this added up to nirvana for the party in charge of the Executive Branch. Plus Clinton was a master of the PR world. When the government partly shut down in the fight against overspending, it stuck all the blame on the Republicans. Clinton was a lucky SOB. Greenspan screwed up in letting the 'unbridled enthusiasm' run rampant and the massive Ponzi scheme of the IPO's and margin's to run rampant. The "Contract with America' was one of the last good things that happened to the US. Too bad it did not last. Here's a graph of federal spending (per household): http://www.heritage.org/research/fea...harts_s/s3.cfm Notice how it declined during the Clinton administration and began sharply increasing in 2000 after Bush II was elected. Yeah, but that's only because of ill-advised fire suppression. Wolfgang |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:55:46 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote: Better known (because more accurately) as an uneducated murderous pig......with a bad perm. Murderous pig. Wow. Bad perm? You haven't seen my hair in a number of years, Straight as a board. Cancer and old age will do that to you. At least I kept my nickels at the playground when I was a kid, Napoleon. d;o) You got pushed around and pushed around, your nickels taken, probably corn-holed, maybe even had to suck a dick or two. No wonder you are such a bitter little shrimp. That had to have been a terrible burden as a shrimpy child. I imagine adulthood as a shrimpy child is even worse. No wonder you attract homely women. Probably wanna cuddle da little boy and soothe all his pains. d;o) |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On 14 Apr 2008 14:31:00 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: I really don't understand how anyone could look at the last 7.5 years and still think the two parties are the same. You ain't smokin' what old Fred is smokin'. d;o) He's into some baaaaaaad ****. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:55:46 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote: Better known (because more accurately) as an uneducated murderous pig......with a bad perm. Murderous pig. Wow. Bad perm? You haven't seen my hair in a number of years, Straight as a board. Cancer and old age will do that to you. A good dose of napalm would take care of all of that. At least I kept my nickels at the playground when I was a kid, Napoleon. d;o) You got pushed around and pushed around, your nickels taken, Sure, if you say so. probably corn-holed, maybe even had to suck a dick or two. No wonder you are such a bitter little shrimp. That had to have been a terrible burden as a shrimpy child. I imagine adulthood as a shrimpy child is even worse. No wonder you attract homely women. Probably wanna cuddle da little boy and soothe all his pains. Ooh! Ooh! Hardball! Wolfgang who knows when he's been slammed good and proper. :) |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:55:46 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote: Better known (because more accurately) as an uneducated murderous pig......with a bad perm. Murderous pig. Wow. Bad perm? You haven't seen my hair in a number of years, Straight as a board. Cancer and old age will do that to you. A good dose of napalm would take care of all of that. At least I kept my nickels at the playground when I was a kid, Napoleon. d;o) You got pushed around and pushed around, your nickels taken, Sure, if you say so. probably corn-holed, maybe even had to suck a dick or two. No wonder you are such a bitter little shrimp. That had to have been a terrible burden as a shrimpy child. I imagine adulthood as a shrimpy child is even worse. No wonder you attract homely women. Probably wanna cuddle da little boy and soothe all his pains. Ooh! Ooh! Hardball! Wolfgang who knows when he's been slammed good and proper. :) By the way, why do you supposed it is that you and kennie and stevie and mikie......and dicklet (hee, hee, hee).....are so possessed by homoerotic imagery? Wolfgang |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:37:48 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote: possessed by homoerotic imagery? Possessed? Homoerotic imagery? You seem to be the one that brought up that subject. Remind you of your old playground days? Eh? Davey, aka the Pirate, Dog, Murderous Pig, Doctor......... |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Apr 14, 6:43 am, rw wrote:
You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts. This web site shows a graph of the national debt as a percentage of the nation's annual income: http://zfacts.com/p/318.html Big deal. It's short term. If history is fair, Greenspan will be judged for allowing two very large periods of "irrational exuberance" run out of control. Although the first (the dot com bubble) left with some pain, the second one (the housing market) will end up causing more long-term pain, and perhaps severe pain, IMO. That Clinton happened to get in and get out at opportune times, and look good economically for doing so, was purely accidental and had nothing to do with any actual policy differences between the Dems and Reps. You don't really believe the dot-com bubble was anything more than an inevitably bursting bubble, do you? Oh, and I do agree that there's hardly such a thing as an economically conservative Republican anymore, and that both parties are addicted to feeding at the trough. Interestingly enough, John McCain is a zero- pork guy; I respect that. I also agree with Scott -- if the Dems really were strongly against what is happening, they could do something, even shut down the government if they wanted. Jon. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:37:48 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote: possessed by homoerotic imagery? Possessed? Yes. Homoerotic imagery? Uh huh. You seem to be the one that brought up that subject. I do? Hm...... O.k., why don't you go ahead and show us a relevant quote? Remind you of your old playground days? Eh? My playground days were spent doing what kids do on playgrounds. You really think your fantasies are going to convince anyone? Davey, aka the Pirate, Dog, Murderous Pig, Doctor......... Imbecile. Wolfgang |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... Possessed? Yes. Homoerotic imagery? Uh huh. You seem to be the one that brought up that subject. I do? Hm...... O.k., why don't you go ahead and show us a relevant quote? No? Well, gosh, ain't we all surprised? Now, where were we? Hm....... Oh yes......why do you supposed it is that you and kennie and stevie and mikie......and dicklet (hee, hee, hee).....are so possessed by homoerotic imagery? Wolfgang |
Cheney's new fishing companion
wrote:
On Apr 14, 6:43 am, rw wrote: You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts. This web site shows a graph of the national debt as a percentage of the nation's annual income: http://zfacts.com/p/318.html Big deal. It's short term. If history is fair, Greenspan will be judged for allowing two very large periods of "irrational exuberance" run out of control. Although the first (the dot com bubble) left with some pain, the second one (the housing market) will end up causing more long-term pain, and perhaps severe pain, IMO. That Clinton happened to get in and get out at opportune times, and look good economically for doing so, was purely accidental and had nothing to do with any actual policy differences between the Dems and Reps. So you don't believe that the differences between the Democrats and the Republicans regarding, for example, tax rates make any difference to the economy? -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Cheney's new fishing companion
|
Cheney's new fishing companion
"rw" wrote in message m... wrote: On Apr 14, 6:43 am, rw wrote: You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts. This web site shows a graph of the national debt as a percentage of the nation's annual income: http://zfacts.com/p/318.html Big deal. It's short term. If history is fair, Greenspan will be judged for allowing two very large periods of "irrational exuberance" run out of control. Although the first (the dot com bubble) left with some pain, the second one (the housing market) will end up causing more long-term pain, and perhaps severe pain, IMO. That Clinton happened to get in and get out at opportune times, and look good economically for doing so, was purely accidental and had nothing to do with any actual policy differences between the Dems and Reps. So you don't believe that the differences between the Democrats and the Republicans regarding, for example, tax rates make any difference to the economy? It doesn't. On the other hand, it DOES cause the proliferation of Ponderosa pine......at moderate elevations. Wolfgang who figures, what the hell, it CAN'T hurt to inject a bit of sense into yet another twitfest.....right? |
Cheney's new fishing companion
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message ... wrote: ... Interestingly enough, John McCain is a zero- pork guy; I respect that. I think it's silly. If one of my Senators climbed up on a high horse and declared that the rules of the game suck so on behalf of my constituents in Illinois I'm going to forfeit the game I'd fire the dumb sumbitch. Hm......which way doth the wind blow today? I also agree with Scott -- if the Dems really were strongly against what is happening, they could do something, even shut down the government if they wanted. Sure, the Dems could commit political suicide if they wanted to, but why on earth would they want to ? Well, it really isn't so much a matter of want. I mean, why would a blind man WANT to step off the cliff of whose presence he is entirely oblivious? Better to let the clock run out on Shrub and the current Congress then do better next time. And we're all counting on you to do it. Wolfgang seriously, you boys are a riot. :) |
Cheney's new fishing companion
On Apr 14, 12:23 pm, rw wrote:
So you don't believe that the differences between the Democrats and the Republicans regarding, for example, tax rates make any difference to the economy? The things they quibble over? Nope. Jon. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter