| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
I'll admit it - I was stunned. If he loses, I can see Obama's
acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. And if so, it will be a shame, because I do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a setting. It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
|
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
|
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Aug 29, 5:22*am, wrote:
do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. *He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. *Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a set I'll admit it - I was stunned. If he loses, I can see Obama's acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. And if so, it will be a shame, because Iting. *It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R http://www.wbur.org/news/2008/79748_20080829.asp Most of the rest of the world thinks he will be the next president, and they have done for a while. Only the democrats themselves seem nervous. Although for many people outside America, ( including me) American politics is extremely difficult to gauge, much less understand. It is a historic moment that a black man should be nominated by a major party for the presidency of the United States of America, but whether that alone suffices, or indeed is sufficient grounds to actually elect him is another matter. In the final analysis, his colour or creed are irrelevant, it is his suitability or otherwise for the job which is actually more important. Quite a few people here get the impression that he actually has no firm policies, just hopes and promises. You can´t live ONLY on hopes and promises. Also, as other idealists have discovered to their cost, it is one thing to have ideals, it is quite another to actually implement them. |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Aug 28, 8:22*pm, wrote:
Wow. How did you do that? You summarized in almost the same words what I just heard on FOX. Amazing. Or did you take it from the script you had before the speech? In any case the synchronization would almost lead one to think Karl Rowe was back in the saddle with you guys. Bet the Fax is hot tonight. Do they still call em "talking points"? Dave Note to self: See they really do that dog-like "loyalty brings access" thingy real swell. |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
|
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
wrote in message ... I'll admit it - I was stunned. If he loses, I can see Obama's acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. And if so, it will be a shame, because I do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a setting. It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R was that 'stunned' or 'stoned', RD? No less than Bill Kristol heard that speech, shook his head and said," McCain has his work cut out for him. What speech were you listening to? Tom |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:31:23 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote: wrote in message .. . I'll admit it - I was stunned. If he loses, I can see Obama's acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. And if so, it will be a shame, because I do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a setting. It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R was that 'stunned' or 'stoned', RD? No less than Bill Kristol heard that speech, shook his head and said," McCain has his work cut out for him. What speech were you listening to? Tom Tom, I think RD is having fun with youse guys and you took the bait. It was a great speech. Will it be enough? I don't know. I'm going fishing. Dave |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
wrote in message ... I'll admit it - I was stunned. If he loses, I can see Obama's acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. And if so, it will be a shame, because I do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a setting. It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R The democrats have suddenly developed a keen sense of morality. John Edwards has been banned from making a speech at the democratic convention for having an affair and lying about it. In his place Bill Clinton spoke. And Jimmy Carter spoke on economic growth. They even had TED KENNEDY there??? Ted Kennedy addressed issues of violence against women The dems are embarassing!!! |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
|
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
"Tom Littleton" wrote in
news:LlPtk.1082$lf2.1031@trnddc07: wrote in message ... I'll admit it - I was stunned. If he loses, I can see Obama's acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. And if so, it will be a shame, because I do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a setting. It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R was that 'stunned' or 'stoned', RD? No less than Bill Kristol heard that speech, shook his head and said," McCain has his work cut out for him. What speech were you listening to? Tom Pat Buchanan was positively gushing -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
Dave LaCourse wrote in
: Tom, I think RD is having fun with youse guys and you took the bait. It was a great speech. Will it be enough? I don't know. I'm going fishing. Dave Little faith, Dave. Soon after Obama wins, we'll all be walking on the water instead of wading in it. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:31:23 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote: wrote in message .. . I'll admit it - I was stunned. If he loses, I can see Obama's acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. And if so, it will be a shame, because I do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a setting. It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R was that 'stunned' or 'stoned', RD? No less than Bill Kristol heard that speech, shook his head and said," McCain has his work cut out for him. What speech were you listening to? Tom http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12964.html http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1 It has nothing to do with being for or against Obama, it was the speech in context. There was enough stuff there to give Rove, Carville, et al, plenty to work with to craft opposition. The length of Biden's congressional career mirrors McCain's, and it seems kinda odd that a new politics of the future guy would be just like Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Kennedy. And how many working-class families have "rah-rah" videos from supporters prominently featuring the supporter hisownself sailing on his yacht around the family compound in Hyannisport? If McCain had shown such a video featuring Bush I tooling around in his boat, golfing at the R & A, etc., what would the reaction be? To tie yourself Roosevelt and Kennedy to counter a charge of elitism? To hint that your Presidency will be like that of Clinton's (but only in any, but non-specific, way that anyone might think was good, but be nothing like it in any, but non-specific way anyone might think bad)? No foreign oil in 10 years, but he's gonna reward companies that create jobs right here "in America" - is that South, Central, or North America? Seriously, though, the US oil industry, the one that he wants to tax the bejeebers out of, creates jobs and supports thousands and thousands of working-class families and by definition, can only create (or maintain) jobs in the US. Etc., etc., etc.... Even the closing song - if you don't know the lyrics, read them. Sure, one of the kids could grow up to be President, but they could also be the one going to prison - two choices, Prez or prison. And in the other verse, the couple are riding in a limo wanting to be "stars" - not helping, not changing, just wanting things for themselves. I'm surprised they didn't play "Save A Horse..."...you know, to get the PETA vote...here's a hint, Dems - don't use C & W songs at conventions. I stand by what I said - this was not a good speech. You and Oprah's mileage may vary... TC, R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
|
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:37:21 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: snip I stand by what I said - this was not a good speech. You and Oprah's mileage may vary... Only the most blind and rabid partisan could declare that was not a good speech. You're wrong, plain and simple. I'd say that only a blind a rabid partisan would wish to allow absolutely no criticism of not only the speech, but the candidate in general. And that anyone who doesn't see some pretty glaring weaknesses in Obama is not only blindly and rabidly partisan, but not rational, as well. You Republicans all repeat the same mantra at every turn; "Saying McCain equals four more years of Bush won't work". You guys say that all the time because you desperately need for it to be true but I got news for you, that's all Obama-Biden have to do between now and November. Just like the instructions on the shampoo bottle: McCain, Bush, repeat. LOL !! What makes you think I'm a Republican? IAC, as I've said, if it were Bush's veep or _certain_ folks in his administration running, such a charge could stick, but with McCain, it's not accurate and as such, it's not a certain strategy. Plus, given the candidates' weaknesses and strengths, it's too much of a "um, well, that's all we got..." strategy. TC, R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:11:49 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: I'll admit it - I was stunned. ... It must suck to be you. If you can't find it in your mean, small, cynical, it's all about me, me, me, mindset to appreciate the mind-boggling historic import of the nomination of the first black man to lead the ticket of a major party then you're too far gone. Um, why is it so mind-boggling that a black man would not only be nominated, but elected as POTUS? It's historic, but hardly "mind-boggling." Hell, had he have wanted to run, Powell would have almost certainly been nominated by the GOP and may well have won, and that was before Obama had even gotten elected to anything. I was born in 1956 and I never in a thousand years thought that I would see this day. You're a little older than me...perhaps that's why I have little doubt that not only can a black man, but black men, white women, black women, Hispanic men and women, Asian men and women, etc., be nominated, and some will win, over the course of US history. And some will be excellent Presidents, some will be lousy, and some will just be largely forgotten by the bulk of the population. I have no doubt that folks of all races and colors can be another Chester A. Arthur... That was a great speech and only a blind fool partisan cynic could believe otherwise. An Obama-supporting friend made what I think is a particularly good, "working-man" comment about it - "he sounded like a guy who just won a train that he isn't sure how to drive..." TC, R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Aug 29, 3:45*am, "Rick" wrote:
wrote in message You want embarrassing? How come you didn't mention anyone from that recent vast company of Republican closeted shoe tappers, child molesters, perverts, philanderers etc or wax eloquent with your opinions as to just who in the White House was the main customer for the male prostitute whose specialty was whipping with a gyrene theme. Jeff Gannon, a $200 dollar an hour Gay prostitute had free access to the White House with a signed Press Pass. I would think someone with your high minded values would be interested in just who in the Bush White House patronized this Jeff Gannon. Or maybe you approve? Dave |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
Ken Fortenberry typed:
snip . . . but I got news for you, that's all Obama-Biden have to do between now and November. Just like the instructions on the shampoo bottle: McCain, Bush, repeat. LOL !! Any bets on how they screw up your instructions? ;-) -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
In article ,
Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: I'll admit it - I was stunned. ... It must suck to be you. If you can't find it in your mean, small, cynical, it's all about me, me, me, mindset to appreciate the mind-boggling historic import of the nomination of the first black man to lead the ticket of a major party then you're too far gone. I was born in 1956 and I never in a thousand years thought that I would see this day. That was a great speech and only a blind fool partisan cynic could believe otherwise. We have already had black presidents. 5 have been documented, here are 2. Andrew Jackson was our 7th president from 1829 to 1837. The Virginia Magazine of History Volume 29 says that Jackson was the son of a White woman from Ireland who had intermarried with a Negro. The magazine also said that his eldest brother had been sold as a slave in Carolina. Joel Rogers says that Andrew Jackson Sr. died long before President Andrew Jackson Jr. was born. He says the president's mother then went to live on the Crawford farm where there were Negro slaves and that one of these men was Andrew Jr's father. Another account of the "brother sold into slavery˛ story can be found in David Coyle's book entitled "Ordeal of the Presidency" Abraham Lincoln was our 16th president from 1861 to 1865. J. A. Rogers quotes Lincoln's mother, Nancy Hanks, as saying that Abraham Lincoln was the illegitimate son of an African man. William Herndon, Lincoln's law partner, said that Lincoln had very dark skin and coarse hair and that his mother was from an Ethiopian tribe. In Herndon's book entitled "The Hidden Lincoln" he says that Thomas Lincoln could not have been Abraham Lincoln's father because he was sterile from childhood mumps and was later castrated. Lincoln's presidential opponents made cartoon drawings depicting him as a Negro and nicknamed him łAbraham Africanus the First." |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On 29 Aug 2008 12:21:23 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: Little faith, Dave. Soon after Obama wins, we'll all be walking on the water instead of wading in it. What? You can't walk on water now? Hell, maybe Richard will buy my GS3s. I won't need 'em. Dave |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Aug 29, 12:29*pm, wrote:
*I have no doubt that folks of all races and colors can be another Chester A. Arthur... now, wait just a damn minute. i normally eschew participation in these political ****ing contests, but when the honored name of chester a. arthur is sullied, even by implication, the **** *will* hit the fan. you are talking about a brilliant, clever, immensely effective champion of the poor, the unwashed, the little people--the salt of the union. this is a man of whom franklin delano roosevelt once said, "if chester arthur is for it, how can any be against it!" well, i *think* it was fdr... maybe that was ulysses grant... anyway, just watch your mouth about such a great man in the future. yfitons wayno(a closet whig, if the truth be known) |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
Ken Fortenberry wrote in rec.outdoors.fishing.fly:
wrote: I'll admit it - I was stunned. ... It must suck to be you. If you can't find it in your mean, small, cynical, it's all about me, me, me, mindset to appreciate the mind-boggling historic import of the nomination of the first black man to lead the ticket of a major party then you're too far gone. I was born in 1956 and I never in a thousand years thought that I would see this day. That was a great speech and only a blind fool partisan cynic could believe otherwise. Jeez Ken I always thought you were THE old fart around here. I was born in '54 and meet my "54" on Oct 14. As a Canucklehead I would sure as hell vote for Obama 'cause Bush has got to go. We're going to have our own election soon and at least I can put my two cents worth in here. We've gotta get rid of Harper because he's so far up Bush's ass our country is about to end up like the US with minimum jail sentencing, total revocation of rights etc. Next thing you know we'll have to buy a piece of river to fish. I don't have much use for the Liberal Party up here but anything is better than what's going on at this point. Tight lines to you and yours. Bruce |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:09:29 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: On Aug 29, 12:29*pm, wrote: *I have no doubt that folks of all races and colors can be another Chester A. Arthur... now, wait just a damn minute. i normally eschew participation in these political ****ing contests, but when the honored name of chester a. arthur is sullied, even by implication, the **** *will* hit the fan. you are talking about a brilliant, clever, immensely effective champion of the poor, the unwashed, the little people--the salt of the union. this is a man of whom franklin delano roosevelt once said, "if chester arthur is for it, how can any be against it!" well, i *think* it was fdr... maybe that was ulysses grant... anyway, just watch your mouth about such a great man in the future. Actually, it wasn't a dig. He was, by most accounts, exactly as you say, personally honest and effective, often as much by knowing what not to "fix" as what could actually benefit from a little tinkering, and most importantly, being objective and realistic about the whole thing. Even Twain/Clements liked him. And largely forgotten by history - when is the last time anyone, of any party, running for so much as dog catcher, suggested they would like to be remembered by a relative few folks, but for the few that do as the Chester A. Arthur of their generation? We're ass-deep in would-be Kennedys and re-Reagans. We got wannabe-Roosevelts and Lincolns out the ying-yang, and even a pseudo-Truman buck-stopper or two, but, alas, we're fresh the **** out of Chester A. Arthurs... yfitons wayno(a closet whig, if the truth be known) Um, "closet?" "Whig?" Oh, man, be careful - we got a Sergeant Snedeker running around on the lookout for just that sort of degenerate stuff...he'll be easy to spot - he'll be the guy who looks like an old New York Doll in a Jackie Kennedy suit and tin-foil pillbox hat... TC, R ....and amazingly enough, he was even a lawyer...Arthur, I mean, not Snedeker... |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:20:27 GMT, RedFisher54
wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote in rec.outdoors.fishing.fly: wrote: I'll admit it - I was stunned. ... It must suck to be you. If you can't find it in your mean, small, cynical, it's all about me, me, me, mindset to appreciate the mind-boggling historic import of the nomination of the first black man to lead the ticket of a major party then you're too far gone. I was born in 1956 and I never in a thousand years thought that I would see this day. That was a great speech and only a blind fool partisan cynic could believe otherwise. Jeez Ken I always thought you were THE old fart around here. I was born in '54 and meet my "54" on Oct 14. As a Canucklehead I would sure as hell vote for Obama 'cause Bush has got to go. Please don't think me insincere - I truly mean this: you obviously have a much better understanding of US politics and law, and even the world at large, than the vast majority of Obama supporters... We're going to have our own election soon and at least I can put my two cents worth in here. Uh-oh...and you were doing so well...IAC, will that be two cents US or Canadian? We've gotta get rid of Harper because he's so far up Bush's ass our country is about to end up like the US with minimum jail sentencing, total revocation of rights etc. Next thing you know we'll have to buy a piece of river to fish. Yeah, what's up with that? It's the thin end of the wedge, I tell ya. It'll lead to Disneyworld charging to ride ****, country clubs charging not only dues but initiation fees, having to buy ski-lift tickets, no more free boats from Boston Whaler or Hatteras (with lifetime free fuel and maintenance), and the real horror of horrors, the complete end of free food and lodging for all recreational travelers... I don't have much use for the Liberal Party up here but anything is better than what's going on at this point. Anything? Really? I mean, really, ANYTHING? You don't travel much, do ya? Tight lines to you and yours. And good luck to you and yours. Bruce R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:46:11 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote: Ken Fortenberry typed: snip . . . but I got news for you, that's all Obama-Biden have to do between now and November. Just like the instructions on the shampoo bottle: McCain, Bush, repeat. LOL !! Any bets on how they screw up your instructions? ;-) And speaking of screwing, the funny part is that the instructions on the shampoo bottle exist for a single purpose - to screw naive and gullible consumers. Hee-hee-hee, R ....I guess the folks who make Joy didn't think folks would fall for "Wash dishes. Dry. Rewash dishes"... |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... Tom, I think RD is having fun with youse guys and you took the bait. Hell, man, I KNOW Rick was having fun with it, which is part of the whole nature of our exchanges. You can't take this stuff TOO seriously, you know. Hope fishing goes well, it's raining here, but I may go up to Penn's for a day or two this weekend myself! Tom |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:35:56 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote: Hope fishing goes well, Fished a couple of ponds in Westminster, MA, where my two little grandsons live. Had a neighbor's kid with me. She did well, as did the grandsons. Worms and powerbait for them. I didn't fish. Beautiful day with the fall colors aready starting in the hills. Jo and I and a couple of friends from town are heading up to Lakewood soon. Gonna be cold. Dave |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... Jo and I and a couple of friends from town are heading up to Lakewood soon. Gonna be cold. Dave It's freaking Maine, David. Cold is permanent, there. There is a reason why Handyman wears shorts outside in March at Penn's Creek......... Tom |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:08:14 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote: Tom, I think RD is having fun with youse guys and you took the bait. It was a great speech. Will it be enough? I don't know. A total misread of Richard's ridiculous post, but that won't surprise anyone here... /daytripper (ahahahahahahaha!) |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:24:16 -0400, daytripper
wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:08:14 -0400, Dave LaCourse wrote: Tom, I think RD is having fun with youse guys and you took the bait. It was a great speech. Will it be enough? I don't know. A total misread of Richard's ridiculous post, but that won't surprise anyone here... Well, not a _total_ misread. I thought the speech was pretty weak and generally, another example of the Dems snatching defeat from what should be the jaws of certain victory, but I did post a some bait, as well. The last vestige of hope for at least one party to carry on a fairly straightforward, honest (as modern campaigns go) campaign relatively free of horse**** now appears totally snuffed well and truly out. Even if Palin turns out to be a real diamond in the rough, her selection will still be marred by the whole pandering aspect of it. Thus far, it doesn't seem to have the sheer hypocrisy of Obama picking Biden, but this thing is shaping up to be a real circus... HTH, R /daytripper (ahahahahahahaha!) |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
|
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
wrote in rec.outdoors.fishing.fly:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:20:27 GMT, RedFisher54 wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote in rec.outdoors.fishing.fly: wrote: I'll admit it - I was stunned. ... It must suck to be you. If you can't find it in your mean, small, cynical, it's all about me, me, me, mindset to appreciate the mind-boggling historic import of the nomination of the first black man to lead the ticket of a major party then you're too far gone. I was born in 1956 and I never in a thousand years thought that I would see this day. That was a great speech and only a blind fool partisan cynic could believe otherwise. Jeez Ken I always thought you were THE old fart around here. I was born in '54 and meet my "54" on Oct 14. As a Canucklehead I would sure as hell vote for Obama 'cause Bush has got to go. Please don't think me insincere - I truly mean this: you obviously have a much better understanding of US politics and law, and even the world at large, than the vast majority of Obama supporters... We're going to have our own election soon and at least I can put my two cents worth in here. Uh-oh...and you were doing so well...IAC, will that be two cents US or Canadian? We've gotta get rid of Harper because he's so far up Bush's ass our country is about to end up like the US with minimum jail sentencing, total revocation of rights etc. Next thing you know we'll have to buy a piece of river to fish. Yeah, what's up with that? It's the thin end of the wedge, I tell ya. It'll lead to Disneyworld charging to ride ****, country clubs charging not only dues but initiation fees, having to buy ski-lift tickets, no more free boats from Boston Whaler or Hatteras (with lifetime free fuel and maintenance), and the real horror of horrors, the complete end of free food and lodging for all recreational travelers... I don't have much use for the Liberal Party up here but anything is better than what's going on at this point. Anything? Really? I mean, really, ANYTHING? You don't travel much, do ya? Tight lines to you and yours. And good luck to you and yours. Bruce R Thanks for your response. Noted and ignored. Bruce |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:33:37 GMT, RedFisher54
wrote: Noted and ignored. SPLORK VANG MU! and BWAHAHASNICKER, too... Bruce Brucie, you're about as cute as they come, R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
wrote in rec.outdoors.fishing.fly:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:33:37 GMT, RedFisher54 wrote: Noted and ignored. SPLORK VANG MU! and BWAHAHASNICKER, too... Bruce Brucie, you're about as cute as they come, R Cuter than you by far. Oh, by the bi. My wife calls be Brucie when I'm done ..... Never mind! What the hell does any of this have to do with fly fishing? Sorry, waht the hell was I thinking. I better go over to the fly fishing group. ****! Been there, done that. Now I'm back here again. Hows about a nice 10' Powell salmon rod with a 9wt 32" shooting head matched with a double wind reel, 30 yds of Cortland running line followed with 250 yds of braided dacron. All run out nice with a 40lb spring in white water. I built the rod. I selected the gear. I tied the flies. I hooked and landed the fish. And I'm not blowing smoke up anybodys kilts unlike yourself. All I've ever heard from you is BS. You act like a real Barney. Lots of smoke and mirrors. F**k all for substance. My granddad left me his rods and my sons have fished them and know that they will hand them down to their own sons. You got nothing asshole. I love nailing trout in any number of streams, but there aint nothing like diving off a cliff into white water to land that steely that just won't stop running. Even when it's wild and has to go back. Or spending two days in a belly-boat chasing a big white spring down from the Harrison to the mouth of the Fraser. All you got is this crappy little group where only a few give a flying f**k about fishing and you're the king Turd. La-Dee-f**kin' da. I seen pukes like you way back on the BBSs. Always talking the big fight, but not worth a spit when push comes to shove. What the hell am I wasting my breath for. Rest of you. Tight lines. |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:54:32 GMT, RedFisher54
wrote: wrote in rec.outdoors.fishing.fly: On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:33:37 GMT, RedFisher54 wrote: Noted and ignored. SPLORK VANG MU! and BWAHAHASNICKER, too... Bruce Brucie, you're about as cute as they come, R Cuter than you by far. Oh, by the bi. My wife calls be Brucie when I'm done ..... No ****? I would guessed he called you One-Pump Peter or Sir Speedy or something... Sheesh, R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
Poor pathetic little wannabe.
Is that really the best you can do? I won't even bother plonking you. You're funnier than McCain's VP choice. Talk about lame ducks. Sorry. Didn't meen to bring up your... you know. Shsssss Where were we. Oh yeah. Delving into your lack of parental direction and bathroom etiquette. I'm pretty sure that if you gave it the old team effort you could get that floss around your tooth. One tooth shouldn't wear it out so much that it wouldn't make a great leader for your Barney rod. If it's still got a bit of wax on it you just might be able to float that bent pin your mommy glued the feather to. You remember, right? The one that fell out of the pillow your grampa used to shut you up with while he showed you the other use for your poop shute. Sorry, but I couldn't help but laugh when I was doing your mamma whilst watching your grampa doing you. Almost grabbed up one of those feathers to tickle your mammas clit with but she was worried about the old man's herpies. Oh well. I'ld rather go fishing than f**k your mamma anyhow. F**k you and anyone that looks like you! Not to mention the horse you tried to ride in on. |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Aug 28, 11:45*pm, daytripper wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:22:38 -0500, wrote: I'll admit it - I was stunned. *If he loses, I can see Obama's acceptance speech as being the source of his loss. *And if so, it will be a shame, because I do think he is better than his speech can (and probably will) be made to make him look. *He didn't even come right out and invoke King - at the DNC, for God sake. *Even the song "Only In America" was a terrible choice for such a setting. *It will be sad and ironic if he was book-ended by speeches at the DNC, and I think such is possible, if not likely. Stunned, R Oh my. The only thing stunning is how you totally slept through the speech of a lifetime. That's really too bad for you - but I'm certain you'll be able to see it on the web - including at least a few minutes citing MLK. Dumbass. /daytripper It was a good speech but "speech of a lifetime?" Maybe Kennedy's `80 or Humphrey's `48.... Kerry's the night before was good. |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:40:42 GMT, RedFisher54
wrote: Poor pathetic little wannabe. Is that really the best you can do? I won't even bother plonking you. You're funnier than McCain's VP choice. Talk about lame ducks. Sorry. Didn't meen to bring up your... you know. Shsssss Where were we. Oh yeah. Delving into your lack of parental direction and bathroom etiquette. I'm pretty sure that if you gave it the old team effort you could get that floss around your tooth. One tooth shouldn't wear it out so much that it wouldn't make a great leader for your Barney rod. If it's still got a bit of wax on it you just might be able to float that bent pin your mommy glued the feather to. You remember, right? The one that fell out of the pillow your grampa used to shut you up with while he showed you the other use for your poop shute. Sorry, but I couldn't help but laugh when I was doing your mamma whilst watching your grampa doing you. Almost grabbed up one of those feathers to tickle your mammas clit with but she was worried about the old man's herpies. Oh well. I'ld rather go fishing than f**k your mamma anyhow. F**k you and anyone that looks like you! Not to mention the horse you tried to ride in on. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA "your mammas clit" "the old man's herpies"...what are you, twelve? IAC, thankfully, you didn't say anything derogatory about Chester A. Arthur. Had you done so, I'd have had to send Fred your way to, um, geg meddeval onn yuor as... SNICKER, R |
Live by the speech, die by the speech...
wrote in message ... IAC, thankfully, you didn't say anything derogatory about Chester A. Arthur. Had you done so, I'd have had to send Fred your way to, um, geg meddeval onn yuor as... sheesh, where did that boy come from? It's always refreshing, after getting miffed at the stupid **** that we all regularly post here, to realize it gets worse out there..... much worse. Tom p.s. Chester A. Arthur probably never had so much good press as he's gotten around these parts of late. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter