| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
|
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
Whatyathink about Biden being such a cheap skate? Don't hear much
about that in the press do ya? Where are you, BTW. Do I hafta move my "Where's JR Pin"? Dave |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 10, 6:39*pm, JR wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR What gets me is Todd Palin going around playing up his Native American- ness. He is like 1/8th Yup'ic? Has never lived the culture. The reporters should see whether be passes as a minority on the oil companies' affirmative action rosters. Half my wifes family are more Native American than that, but nobody lives the culture, and nobody claims Native rights or shills as a token fractional Indian for the companies at over $100k a year in a casual come-when-you-can phony job. Palin wouldn't be the first right wing smartass to try this scam. Dave |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
|
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 7:43*am, Peaceful Bill
wrote: JR wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR MSNBC!!??!!??! ROTFLMAO. *ZERO credibility. Since when was lack of credibility any hindrance to successful propaganda? |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 7:47*am, wrote:
On Oct 11, 7:43*am, Peaceful Bill wrote: JR wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR MSNBC!!??!!??! ROTFLMAO. *ZERO credibility. Since when was lack of credibility any hindrance to successful propaganda? Indeed, probably well in excess of 99% of all the political crap on this group is merely bull**** and propaganda, as is obvious to any half-way sensible person, but there is no doubt at all that some of these morons actually believe the ****e they propagate. Even that is not necessary, repeating something often enough has an effect on other morons, and they in their turn propagate it. Thatīs how politics works, most especially this American election. These people deserve the worst possible government, because that is how they behave themselves. Indeed, they reflect more or less exactly the idiocy, greed, dishonesty, and dishonour that governs them now. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
Peaceful Bill wrote:
JR wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR MSNBC!!??!!??! ROTFLMAO. ZERO credibility. OK. How 'bout: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us...rooper.html?hp Oh, no. Of course not. NYT, only the U.S.'s newspaper of record, recognized globally as such, and therefore, of course, for the red-blooded Murcan illiterate, of ZERO credibity, so..... http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...-commissioner/ Fox News. You brown-shirts like that 'un, no? Spin THAT, Sparky. - JR |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Whatyathink about Biden being such a cheap skate? Don't hear much about that in the press do ya? Where are you, BTW. Do I hafta move my "Where's JR Pin"? Dave I think about Biden as Kevin does. *You* could never tell what I give to charity by looking at my 1040..... and you're welcome to think whatever you like about me. Still in DC. Live a couple hundred yards east of the Capitol building, bit farther north from the Marine barracks at 8th and I. Surrounded by scoundrels, make almost nothing, but eat well, so what's to complain? All would be well if only I fished more often. Love to Joanne, you retrograde knucklehead g. JR |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
JR wrote:
Dave LaCourse wrote: Whatyathink about Biden being such a cheap skate? Don't hear much about that in the press do ya? Where are you, BTW. Do I hafta move my "Where's JR Pin"? Dave I think about Biden as Kevin does. *You* could never tell what I give to charity by looking at my 1040..... and you're welcome to think whatever you like about me. Still in DC. Live a couple hundred yards east of the Capitol building, bit farther north from the Marine barracks at 8th and I. Surrounded by scoundrels, make almost nothing, but eat well, so what's to complain? All would be well if only I fished more often. Love to Joanne, you retrograde knucklehead g. JR So I'm not misunderstood, when I say "scoundrels", the Marines are definitely excluded. - JR |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 8:50*am, JR wrote:
JR wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Whatyathink about Biden being such a cheap skate? *Don't hear much about that in the press do ya? Where are you, BTW. *Do I hafta move my "Where's JR Pin"? Dave I think about Biden as Kevin does. **You* could never tell what I give to charity by looking at my 1040..... and you're welcome to think whatever you like about me. Still in DC. *Live a couple hundred yards east of the Capitol building, bit farther north from the Marine barracks at 8th and I. *Surrounded by scoundrels, make almost nothing, but eat well, so what's to complain? All would be well if only I fished more often. Love to Joanne, you retrograde knucklehead g. JR So I'm not misunderstood, when I say "scoundrels", the Marines are definitely excluded. - JR A mistake. They are highly trained and extremely useful scoundrels, as long as they are under control. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 8:20*am, JR wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote: JR wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR MSNBC!!??!!??! ROTFLMAO. *ZERO credibility. OK. How 'bout: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us...rooper.html?hp Oh, no. Of course not. *NYT, only the U.S.'s newspaper of record, recognized globally as such, and therefore, of course, for the red-blooded Murcan illiterate, of ZERO credibity, so..... http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...sed-power-firi... Fox News. *You brown-shirts like that 'un, no? Spin THAT, Sparky. - JR The trouble is you all try to "spin" something or other. Extremely naive to expect that personal motivation would be completely ignored by somebody in a situation like that. More or less everybody would do the same thing. There is no doubt that the trooper was dangerous and needed firing, there was no doubt that Monegan did not want to do it, and was pressured into it. Does not say much about Palin though, except that she is loyal to her family. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... Whatyathink about Biden being such a cheap skate? Don't hear much about that in the press do ya? Dave because it isn't an accurate report. I suspect that 'report' you cite doesn't include Catholic Charities. Tom p.s. Why is this any excuse for Palin's abuse of power?? |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message ... JR wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR MSNBC!!??!!??! ROTFLMAO. ZERO credibility. simmer down, Bill. They were reporting a publicly filed document. Questioning their credibility under such conditions make you look like an ideologically driven idiot. Which, apparently, you seem determined to be. Tom |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:50:10 -0400, JR wrote:
So I'm not misunderstood, when I say "scoundrels", the Marines are definitely excluded. Uh, to us sailors they are. d;o) Eat well. Dave |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:31:40 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote: p.s. Why is this any excuse for Palin's abuse of power?? It wasn't and isn't an excuse for Palin's actions. If she did wrong, she should pay for it. If Obama does wrong, he too should pay for it. His connection with Acorn (talk about voting fraud!) is played up very little in the press, as is his connection with Ayers and others. Dave |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... His connection with Acorn (talk about voting fraud!) is played up very little in the press, as is his connection with Ayers and others. Dave I would disagree on both counts, David. The ACORN thing is being played up in both the print and TV. My sense is that they are a loose cannon, with their own agenda(trying to curry favor with the likely winning candidate), as those actions in NO way resemble the registration drives I've been involved in all year. As for the Ayers thing, it was already trotted out, and vetted during the Hillary primary battle. That dog just doesn't really hunt, as it has been proven clearly that there is little in the way of a tangible political connection or obligation between Obama and Ayers. Hell, if we start tarring people over every questionable character they ever crossed paths with, or shared a dinner with, the pool of viable candidates would be limited to nuns and maybe a third of all seminary studentsg Tom |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 2:53*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:31:40 GMT, "Tom Littleton" wrote: p.s. Why is this any excuse for Palin's abuse of power?? It wasn't and isn't an excuse for Palin's actions. *If she did wrong, she should pay for it. *If Obama does wrong, he too should pay for it. His connection with Acorn (talk about voting fraud!) is played up very little in the press, as is his connection with Ayers and others. Dave Just as a matter of mild interest, whatīs your excuse for abusing this group, and freedom of speech, to abuse and defame others? What do you imagine you have to gain from it? Do you even know why you did it? Of course, it is invariably a mistake to attribute something to evil which may be just as easily explained by stupidity, and I suppose that is the reason here. You certainly are stupid LaCourse, there can be no doubt of that. You did wrong LaCourse, very wrong. Do you think you ought to be made to pay for it? |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 3:03*pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... His connection with Acorn (talk about voting fraud!) is played up very little in the press, as is his connection with Ayers and others. Dave I would disagree on both counts, David. The ACORN thing is being played up in both the print and TV. My sense is that they are a loose cannon, with their own agenda(trying to curry favor with the likely winning candidate), as those actions in NO way resemble the registration drives I've been involved in all year. As for the Ayers thing, it was already trotted out, and vetted during the Hillary primary battle. That dog just doesn't really hunt, as it has been proven clearly that there is little in the way of a tangible political connection or obligation between Obama and Ayers. Hell, if we start tarring people over every questionable character they ever crossed paths with, or shared a dinner with, the pool of viable candidates would be limited to nuns and maybe a third of all seminary studentsg * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom As we all know perfectly well you nasty lying mother****er, you tar people and lie about them for no other reason than that you happen to feel like it. What do you think ought to be done with a nasty stupid **** who does something like that? |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
Hell, if we start tarring people over
every questionable character they ever crossed paths with, or shared a dinner with, the pool of viable candidates would be limited to nuns and maybe a third of all seminary studentsg * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom I've already been told that my proposed run for Cass County Dog Catcher won't fly 'cause I hang out here. Frank Reid (hell, they didn't even mention the attempted murder charge) |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:03:25 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote: I would disagree on both counts, David. The ACORN thing is being played up in both the print and TV. My sense is that they are a loose cannon, with their own agenda(trying to curry favor with the likely winning candidate), as those actions in NO way resemble the registration drives I've been involved in all year. Congress tried to slip them $500,000 in that bill that was rejected. Who put *that* pork into the bill? I'm betting it wasn't a Republican or a McCain supporter. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 4:34*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:03:25 GMT, "Tom Littleton" wrote: I would disagree on both counts, David. The ACORN thing is being played up in both the print and TV. My sense is that they are a loose cannon, with their own agenda(trying to curry favor with the likely winning candidate), as those actions in NO way resemble the registration drives I've been involved in all year. Congress tried to slip them $500,000 in that bill that was rejected. Who put *that* pork into the bill? *I'm betting it wasn't a Republican or a McCain supporter. * Iīm betting it was the same type of unprincipled ****bag as you LaCourse, regardless of party. Somebody who would simply waste that amount of money, ( you know how many tins of ham and ****bags that would buy?) in order to further his own ends, (whatever they might be, who knows what an idiot thinks?), simply because he thought he could do it with impunity, and without even stopping to consider that it might harm somebody. Just like you denigrated and lied about people here LaCourse, because you thought it was "fun", or you thought you were right, and because you could. There is absolutely no difference between you and the people you are complaining about LaCourse, it is merely a matter of degree and opportunity. You had the means and the power to damage somebody, and you simply used it. You would do the same if you had more power or money. You are not to be trusted LaCourse. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
|
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
JR wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote: JR wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR MSNBC!!??!!??! ROTFLMAO. ZERO credibility. OK. How 'bout: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us...rooper.html?hp Oh, no. Of course not. NYT, only the U.S.'s newspaper of record, recognized globally as such, and therefore, of course, for the red-blooded Murcan illiterate, of ZERO credibity, so..... http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...-commissioner/ Fox News. You brown-shirts like that 'un, no? Spin THAT, Sparky. - JR If the report is true, she should pay the price as anyone else would. The same as Obama should. Who made up the commission looking into the abuse of power? Was it a majority of Democrats that would prefer to disgrace a Republican VP candidate during a critical pre-election period or was it an objective independent group? |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 10:02*am, Peaceful Bill
wrote: Republicans control the State Legislature in Alaska and its Republicans with whom Sarah has earned her nickname of "Barracuda" because she is famous for the art of the double-cross, not as the naive evangelicals or the right wingers looking for a saviour have attributed to her basketball and broadcasting mini career. The Alaska Republicans have gone after her because she has welshed on a number of handshake deals and kept the patronage plumbs for her suburban circle while freezing out the older, traditional Republican Statehouse patronage flies. As I have said in other posts, Alaska politics are far more complicated than can be understood from the deck of a cruise ship. I find it hilarious that the Rebubs and the National media have made so little progress in penetrating the Alaskan fog. Dave |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
DaveS wrote:
On Oct 11, 10:02 am, Peaceful Bill wrote: Republicans control the State Legislature in Alaska and its Republicans with whom Sarah has earned her nickname of "Barracuda" because she is famous for the art of the double-cross, not as the naive evangelicals or the right wingers looking for a saviour have attributed to her basketball and broadcasting mini career. The Alaska Republicans have gone after her because she has welshed on a number of handshake deals and kept the patronage plumbs for her suburban circle while freezing out the older, traditional Republican Statehouse patronage flies. As I have said in other posts, Alaska politics are far more complicated than can be understood from the deck of a cruise ship. I find it hilarious that the Rebubs and the National media have made so little progress in penetrating the Alaskan fog. Dave Yes, I agree you are truly in the fog. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 1:02*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote: If the report is true, she should pay the price as anyone else would. The same as Obama should. Who made up the commission looking into the abuse of power? *Was it a majority of Democrats that would prefer to disgrace a Republican VP candidate during a critical pre-election period or was it an objective independent group? It was a majority of Republicans, 8 of them to 4 Democrats, actually, and they voted unanimously. And they were given the charge to do this by the Alaskan legislature, composed of 36 Republicans and 24 Democrats with (naturally) a Republican Senate President, in a state with a Republican governor, a Republican Lieutenant Governor and a 100% Republican Congressional delegation. So, using your criteria, it most definitely was *not* an "objective independent group" but one tilted very heavily in Palin's favor. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 10:17*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote: DaveS wrote: On Oct 11, 10:02 am, Peaceful Bill wrote: Republicans control the State Legislature in Alaska and its Republicans with whom Sarah has earned her nickname of "Barracuda" because she is famous for the art of the double-cross, not as the naive evangelicals or the right wingers looking for a saviour have attributed to her basketball and broadcasting mini career. The Alaska Republicans have gone after her because she has welshed on a number of handshake deals and kept the patronage plumbs for her suburban circle while freezing out the older, traditional Republican Statehouse patronage flies. As I have said in other posts, Alaska politics are far more complicated than can be understood from the deck of a cruise ship. I find it hilarious that the Rebubs and the National media have made so little progress in penetrating the Alaskan fog. Dave Yes, I agree you are truly in the fog. What else would you expect from a dumb sheep shagging motherfogger? |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message ... If the report is true, she should pay the price as anyone else would. The same as Obama should. for what?? I haven't seen any public reports about abuse of power or violation of laws against Obama. Have you? Who made up the commission looking into the abuse of power? Was it a majority of Democrats that would prefer to disgrace a Republican VP candidate during a critical pre-election period or was it an objective independent group? good question. The commission was set up by the legislature(Republican controlled), but supposed to act independantly of controls by that body. The membership is bipartisan, with majority Republicans. The investigator is thought to be rather conservative, but is tight-lipped over the matter of partisan politics. hth, Tom |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
|
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
Tom Littleton wrote:
"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message ... If the report is true, she should pay the price as anyone else would. The same as Obama should. for what?? I haven't seen any public reports about abuse of power or violation of laws against Obama. Have you? Who made up the commission looking into the abuse of power? Was it a majority of Democrats that would prefer to disgrace a Republican VP candidate during a critical pre-election period or was it an objective independent group? good question. The commission was set up by the legislature(Republican controlled), but supposed to act independantly of controls by that body. The membership is bipartisan, with majority Republicans. The investigator is thought to be rather conservative, but is tight-lipped over the matter of partisan politics. hth, Tom It does. Thanks. Earlier reports seem to indicate that it was heavily weighted against her. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 11:01*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote: wrote: On Oct 11, 1:02 pm, Peaceful Bill wrote: If the report is true, she should pay the price as anyone else would. The same as Obama should. Who made up the commission looking into the abuse of power? *Was it a majority of Democrats that would prefer to disgrace a Republican VP candidate during a critical pre-election period or was it an objective independent group? *It was a majority of Republicans, 8 of them to 4 Democrats, actually, and they voted unanimously. *And they were given the charge to do this by the Alaskan legislature, composed of 36 Republicans and 24 Democrats with (naturally) a Republican Senate President, in a state with a Republican governor, a Republican Lieutenant Governor and a 100% Republican Congressional delegation. *So, using your criteria, it most definitely was *not* an "objective independent group" but one tilted very heavily in Palin's favor. So when is the trial date? *Or didn't they find that there were any laws broken? And IF they do go to trial, when do we hold most of congress to the same standards? You ought to at least read the various press release if you want to comment sensibly on such matters, No laws were broken, and no action will be taken. Indeed, at least one senator advised extreme caution in interpreting the published findings. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 11, 5:01*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote: So when is the trial date? *Or didn't they find that there were any laws broken? I don't know, I'm sure you could find that out as easily as anyone else. And IF they do go to trial, when do we hold most of congress to the same standards? Election day. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:20:21 -0400, JR wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote: JR wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ - JR MSNBC!!??!!??! ROTFLMAO. ZERO credibility. OK. How 'bout: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us...rooper.html?hp Oh, no. Of course not. NYT, only the U.S.'s newspaper of record, recognized globally as such, and therefore, of course, for the red-blooded Murcan illiterate, of ZERO credibity, so..... http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...-commissioner/ Fox News. You brown-shirts like that 'un, no? Spin THAT, Sparky. What's to spin? She did it. She "abused her power." Every executive, political or private business, has done it. In fact, every person with power has likely "abused" it at some point. And so what? She got her sister's husband, who admits he was a drunk who smacked around his wife and kids AND acknowledges he deserved being fired, fired "outside of channels." Was it "abuse?" Absolutely. Was it "wrong?" I'd offer that if she weren't McCain's running mate, 90-something percent of US adults would say no. If it had been a "non-personal" thing where she had "abused her power" to rid the force of some unrelated wife-beating, kid-Tasering drunk, not only would most folks not care, most would support the "abuse of power." HTH, R - JR |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:26:29 -0500, rdean3REMOVE wrote:
What's to spin? She did it. She "abused her power." Every executive, political or private business, has done it. In fact, every person with power has likely "abused" it at some point. And so what? She got her sister's husband, who admits he was a drunk who smacked around his wife and kids AND acknowledges he deserved being fired, fired "outside of channels." Was it "abuse?" Absolutely. Was it "wrong?" I'd offer that if she weren't McCain's running mate, 90-something percent of US adults would say no. If it had been a "non-personal" thing where she had "abused her power" to rid the force of some unrelated wife-beating, kid-Tasering drunk, not only would most folks not care, most would support the "abuse of power." HTH, R A little confused by facts, aren't you? Starting with, the sister's husband wasn't the one fired. |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
wrote in message t... Starting with, the sister's husband wasn't the one fired. I don't know who you are, but quit putting those disturbing facts into a completely illogical debate!g Tom |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
|
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
|
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
"Tom Littleton" wrote in message ... wrote in message t... Starting with, the sister's husband wasn't the one fired. I don't know who you are, but quit putting those disturbing facts into a completely illogical debate!g Tom I find it simply disgusting that some know-it-all lurker comes in here and hands R'ah Dean his ass in two sentences! Priceless. "Yeah, I kilt him. So what! He needed killin'. He was an abortion doctor. People kill each other everyday, it's no big deal, right?" Op --of course irrationalizing that political abuse of power is just an everyday affair and nothing to worry about is what R'ah Dean does best.-- ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:14:41 -0400, "Mr Opus McDopus"
wrote: "Tom Littleton" wrote in message ... wrote in message t... Starting with, the sister's husband wasn't the one fired. I don't know who you are, but quit putting those disturbing facts into a completely illogical debate!g Tom I find it simply disgusting that some know-it-all lurker comes in here and hands R'ah Dean his ass in two sentences! Priceless. "Yeah, I kilt him. So what! He needed killin'. He was an abortion doctor. People kill each other everyday, it's no big deal, right?" Hardly. And I'd offer that _every_ person on ROFF has "abused their power" in form or another and rationalized it to themselves. Had this been a Trooper with a good record who just happened to be divorcing her sister, it would have been "wrong" of Palin to attempt to get him fired. Should the people of Alaska be made aware of her "abuse?" Yes. Do I think such "abuse" should influence, negatively or positively, them (should she run for reelection) or national voters? No. HTH, R Op --of course irrationalizing that political abuse of power is just an everyday affair and nothing to worry about is what R'ah Dean does best.-- ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....
On Oct 12, 5:13*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:49:51 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:26:29 -0500, rdean3REMOVE wrote: What's to spin? *She did it. *She "abused her power." *Every executive, political or private business, has done it. *In fact, every person with power has likely "abused" it at some point. *And so what? *She got her sister's husband, who admits he was a drunk who smacked around his wife and kids AND acknowledges he deserved being fired, fired "outside of channels." *Was it "abuse?" *Absolutely. *Was it "wrong?" *I'd offer that if she weren't McCain's running mate, 90-something percent of US adults would say no. *If it had been a "non-personal" thing where she had "abused her power" to rid the force of some unrelated wife-beating, kid-Tasering drunk, not only would most folks not care, most would support the "abuse of power." HTH, R A little confused by facts, aren't you? *Starting with, the sister's husband wasn't the one fired. Yeah, that should been "She was attempting to get..." *IAC, the rest remains. *She "abused her power." *She didn't do it for financial gain and the reason is one that few with quarrel with if she wasn't the GOP veep candidate. *As far as firing the PSC (or whatever Mondrigan's ??? title was), that was found to be "lawful" and while the BIL's situation was part of that firing, it wasn't the sole reason, nor, apparently, the substantive reason. *IMO, the "abuse" was the attempt at getting the BIL fired, not the firing of the PSC. *Did the replacement PSC fire the BIL? TC, R Do you think in abbreviations as well? Some of your rubbish might make more sense, ( assuming it made any in the first place), if it was even readable and understandable. IAC? PSC? BIL? Apart from which the gentleman found your weakness immediately, you didnīt know the facts, and once again shot yourself in the foot. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004 - 2006 FishingBanter