| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
What better symbol of the bullshit....
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...s-sex-scandal/
No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. But to be fair, maybe it just wasn't as much real news as Simon Cowell's income per minute, Lisa Marie naming her twins, and "Gossip Girls" doing an anti-McCain ad... Sheesh, R |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: http://elections.foxnews... Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you. ABC News broke the story, I just found it interesting that CNN is/was the only major "news" outlet in the US that didn't have it "front page," but rather had **** about Simon Cowell per-minute income and Lisa Marie's twins' names, esp. after their coverage of Foley. No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. ... More comedy from the right field bleachers. Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Much like Clinton, it's not the "boinking," it's the activity surrounding it - in this case, bribery, obstruction of justice, theft of funds, misuse of funds, etc. And then, there's the lefties' old fav, "bu-bu-but he campaigned _specifically_ on a "morality" platform!!!!" Naturally, an international defender of homosexual rights such as yourself wouldn't suggest that a homosexual (unmarried) is somehow a pervert whereas a straight guy cheating on his wife, bribing mistresses with campaign and taxpayer funds, all while campaigning as the "candidate of morality" is OK. And there is some question as to her being his mistress when she became an aide rather than his beginning an affair with an existing aide. And FWIW, apparently even his objective critics and law enforcement acknowledge that while Foley did exchange improper emails and possibly engage in highly improper conversations with pages, he did not engage in any sexual activity with _anyone_, page or otherwise, while they were pages or underage. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? LOL !! Sad. HTH, R |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 14, 7:02*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: http://elections.foxnews... Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you. ABC News broke the story, I just found it interesting that CNN is/was the only major "news" outlet in the US that didn't have it "front page," but rather had **** about Simon Cowell per-minute income and Lisa Marie's twins' names, esp. after their coverage of Foley. No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. ... More comedy from the right field bleachers. Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Much like Clinton, it's not the "boinking," it's the activity surrounding it - in this case, bribery, obstruction of justice, theft of funds, misuse of funds, etc. *And then, there's the lefties' old fav, "bu-bu-but he campaigned _specifically_ on a "morality" platform!!!!" Naturally, an international defender of homosexual rights such as yourself wouldn't suggest that a homosexual (unmarried) is somehow a pervert whereas a straight guy cheating on his wife, bribing mistresses with campaign and taxpayer funds, all while campaigning as the "candidate of morality" is OK. * And there is some question as to her being his mistress when she became an aide rather than his beginning an affair with an existing aide. * And FWIW, apparently even his objective critics and law enforcement acknowledge that while Foley did exchange improper emails and possibly engage in highly improper conversations with pages, he did not engage in any sexual activity with _anyone_, page or otherwise, while they were pages or underage. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? LOL !! Sad. HTH, R What better demonstration of bull**** than you two bull****ters trying to bull**** each other. The two of you are primarily responsible for turning this group into nothing more than a complete shower of bull****. Quite poetic justice really to see you trying to bull**** each other. |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
|
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? But you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at least one male page. RAPED HIM! And you say nothing of that. Soliciting versus the actual act of forceable RAPE, and you say nothing of it. And, let's through in Barney's little "mistakes". Your slip is showing, Ken. Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? But you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at least one male page. RAPED HIM! And you say nothing of that. ... It's all Clinton's fault !! LOL !! I'll give you the same advice I gave the other vocal wingnut from the far right on this group, take a break, ignore the election and then come back on November 5, cry in your beer for awhile and move on. -- Ken Fortenberry |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 14, 8:30*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry wrote: Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? But *you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at least one *male page. *RAPED HIM! * And you say nothing of that. Soliciting versus the actual act of forceable RAPE, and you say nothing of it. *And, let's through in Barney's little "mistakes". Your slip is showing, Ken. Dave And bull****ter number three chimes in on cue. Also boring...................... |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:37:37 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: It's all Clinton's fault !! LOL !! I'll give you the same advice I gave the other vocal wingnut from the far right on this group, take a break, ignore the election and then come back on November 5, cry in your beer for awhile and move on. Who the hell said anything about Clinton? Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. And *nothing* was done about it. Soliciting sex with pages? Yeah, well good luck. If you get caught you will be embarassed. Rape a page? Yeah, well good luck. If you get caught, and you're a Democrat, nothing will happen to you. I have said I can live with an Obama presidency, but I *know* you won't be able to function if McCain wins. Good luck, Ken. It is gonna be a miserable 8 years if McCain wins. d;o) Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: It's all Clinton's fault !! LOL !! Who the hell said anything about Clinton? Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ... Everything wrong is Clinton's fault. The GOP sent out a memo, apparently you didn't get the memo. And Gerry Studds never did any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie. But of course we all know that the Dems are vicious child rapers and Republicans are all paragons of virtue who are the victims of a vast liberal conspiracy consisting of the mainstream media and a bunch of America hating ex-hippies and egghead professors who never served their country. I know this because I heard it in a country western song playing on the loudspeakers before the start of a NASCAR race. LOL !! I have said I can live with an Obama presidency, but I *know* you won't be able to function if McCain wins. Well, apparently your spouse won't be able to function if Obama wins. What's the deal with that ? Nobody I know bases their decision on when to retire on the political party of the current President. Good luck, Ken. It is gonna be a miserable 8 years if McCain wins. Well, that's surely true enough, but I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. -- Ken Fortenberry |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. How do you know that? |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
wrote in message ... http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...s-sex-scandal/ No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. But to be fair, maybe it just wasn't as much real news as Simon Cowell's income per minute, Lisa Marie naming her twins, and "Gossip Girls" doing an anti-McCain ad... Sheesh, R fwiw, it made the first half-hour of All Things Considered on NPR tonight. Hypocrisy knows no party affiliation. Tom |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:59:57 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: It's all Clinton's fault !! LOL !! Who the hell said anything about Clinton? Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ... Everything wrong is Clinton's fault. The GOP sent out a memo, apparently you didn't get the memo. And Gerry Studds never did any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie. Studds got a male page drunk and had sex with him. That is rape. End of that story. But of course we all know that the Dems are vicious child rapers and Republicans are all paragons of virtue who are the victims of a vast liberal conspiracy consisting of the mainstream media and a bunch of America hating ex-hippies and egghead professors who never served their country. I know this because I heard it in a country western song playing on the loudspeakers before the start of a NASCAR race. LOL !! Nevery said that, but when calling up the short falls of Republicans that have stepped on their dicks, just remember that there is more than a few Democrats who are also in that camp. I have said I can live with an Obama presidency, but I *know* you won't be able to function if McCain wins. Well, apparently your spouse won't be able to function if Obama wins. What's the deal with that ? Nobody I know bases their decision on when to retire on the political party of the current President. Joanne can function quite well regardless who is president. Our tax burden is enormous and will get worse with Obama. Why redistribute our wealth? We'll take a cut in pay, get some freebees from him, and still live comfortably. Gooooooo Oooooman. d;o) Good luck, Ken. It is gonna be a miserable 8 years if McCain wins. Well, that's surely true enough, but I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. If McCain wins, I have nephew-in-laws that live close to you. I'll have them stop by for a suicide watch. I's gonna be very busy up here. d;o) Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote:
Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. How do you know that? He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory. Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ... ... Gerry Studds never did any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie. Studds got a male page drunk and had sex with him. That is rape. End of that story. You're a liar, Louie. You post outrageous lies here about John Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself. -- Ken Fortenberry |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. How do you know that? He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory. Again, how do you know that? |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
JR wrote in :
Dave LaCourse wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. How do you know that? He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory. Again, how do you know that? Yeah. Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory ;) -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:10:44 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. How do you know that? He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory. Er, no. The page was 17, so age-wise, it was consensual. The alcohol issue, from a criminal rape standpoint, is iffy at best, and AFAIK, the page never made such an accusation. That said, it was _significantly_ more improper than what Foley was alleged to have done in that Foley didn't engage in sexual relations with pages, of consensual age or otherwise. HTH, R Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:27:44 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ... ... Gerry Studds never did any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie. Studds got a male page drunk and had sex with him. That is rape. End of that story. You're a liar, Louie. You post outrageous lies here about John Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself. http://sweetness-light.com/archive/e...n-gerry-studds http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/...molesting.html http://alessandrareflections.wordpre...studds-resume/ "The page was drunk by his own admission." But, it doesn't really matter does it. You have already condoned his behavior of statutory rape. What more needs be said. I posted no lies about Kerry. Only what was in the press many years ago. And what was in the press on this hero of yours, Studds, is there for you to read, and weap. Dave (And the name for you is Dave) |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:41:30 -0400, JR wrote:
Again, how do you know that? It is in the Congressional report. The page admitted to being drunk. He was 16. That is forcible as well as statutory rape. Read it. Google for yourself. Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On 14 Oct 2008 22:46:37 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: Yeah. Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory ;) You really disappoint me lately, Scott. I thought you were better than the cheap shots you hve been taking lately. I guess going wimpy and apologizing to you-know-who makes a man that way. "Oh, please, don't cause me any trouble, oh please, I don't want any trouble......" Sheeeeeeesh. Gimme a break. Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... David, you post a bunch of links to right-wing loonsites, (moonbattery.com....come on!) and expect us to view you as someone whose facts are remotely correct? RDean just pointed out the factual errors in the Studds case, and most of your Kerry **** has long been proven to be just that....****. Just because you read this lying tripe about politicians you don't agree with, don't expect other, thinking folks to accept it as true. Tom |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: You're a liar, Louie. You post outrageous lies here about John Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself. ... I posted no lies about Kerry. Only what was in the press many years ago. And what was in the press on this hero of yours, Studds, is there for you to read, and weap. Dave (And the name for you is Dave) You're a liar, Dave. You post outrageous lies here about John Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself. Better now ? ;-) -- Ken Fortenberry |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote in
: On 14 Oct 2008 22:46:37 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote: Yeah. Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory ;) You really disappoint me lately, Scott. I thought you were better than the cheap shots you hve been taking lately. I guess going wimpy and apologizing to you-know-who makes a man that way. "Oh, please, don't cause me any trouble, oh please, I don't want any trouble......" Sheeeeeeesh. Gimme a break. Dave Oh come on, Dave. I thought that was pretty funny, especially with the little winky thing next to it. I don't care who's diddling who. I do know that when a congressman gets caught, the traditional early response is applause from the floor when the involved party gets caught, unless the act was homosexual. As to this latest guy, so he's doing to his aide what Bush has been doing to us all these years. If the Republicans had roped in the Idiot in Chief, even if just after the 2006 elections, they'd still be a viable party. They didn't and we're likely to be stuck with a very powerful Dem party for a decade. I think this is OK, but I think we'd have a better government if there were two viable parties. As to his looniness, its looking like I might need a clearance, and I don't need trouble from homophobic whack jobs-- at least of the sort he was threatening. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:27:44 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ... ... Gerry Studds never did any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie. Studds got a male page drunk and had sex with him. That is rape. End of that story. You're a liar, Louie. You post outrageous lies here about John Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself. Oops, nope. He did get the page drunk and have sex with him. But it wasn't "rape" in the criminal sense. OTOH, it certainly was conduct that should have garnered much more than a "naughty boy" from the House. If it were today and a Republican Congressman did the same thing with a female page, I'd bet _BIG_ that you'd in with other "liberals" yelling and screaming about what a scumbag he was, suggesting it was "rape" or nearly so. Gerry Studds was a sorry piece of **** and embarrassment to Congress, but, at least as far as is publicly known, he wasn't a rapist. HTH, R |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
|
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:57:49 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: You're a liar, Louie. You post outrageous lies here about John Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself. ... I'd bet _BIG_ ... OK big guy, I'll bet seventeen million, four hundred umpteen thousand, five hundred some aught dollars and thirty-seven centavos. Is that _BIG_ enough for you, Mr. High Roller ? _NOPE_. _HTH_, R |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
As to his looniness, its looking like I might need a clearance, and I don't need trouble from homophobic whack jobs-- at least of the sort he was threatening. * Do NOT use a ROFFian as a reference. Been there, done that, took 4+ years to accomplish a 5 year update. Frank "Hammered in Orlando" Reid (ever notice how all the plants down here are manicured to within an inch of their life? Had three guys run after me to clean up after I did some technicolor decoration on a shrub. Damn, love that free beer at a convention but don't ride the friggen roller coaster) |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
As to his looniness, its looking like I might need a clearance, and I
don't need trouble from homophobic whack jobs-- at least of the sort he was threatening. * Do NOT use a ROFFian as a reference. *Been there, done that, took 4+ years to accomplish a 5 year update. Frank "Hammered in Orlando" Reid (ever notice how all the plants down here are manicured to within an inch of their life? *Had three guys run after me to clean up after I did some technicolor decoration on a shrub. *Damn, love that free beer at a convention but don't ride the friggen roller coaster) By the way, Disney does save those pictures. Got popped hoppin' the fence at Disneyland in '74. Strolled into a hotel on the premises here on Sunday and all the alarms went off. Seems they put them pics in a facial recognition program, aged them 34 years, and decided to escort me off the grounds as a danger to the well being of the kiddies here in beautimous Orlando. You know what a pain it is attending an IT conference in a Little Mermaid costume (it was the only one they had left)? Frank "Under cover and under the sea" Reid |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Frank Reid Đ 2008
wrote: As to his looniness, its looking like I might need a clearance, and I don't need trouble from homophobic whack jobs-- at least of the sort he was threatening. * Do NOT use a ROFFian as a reference. *Been there, done that, took 4+ years to accomplish a 5 year update. Frank "Hammered in Orlando" Reid (ever notice how all the plants down here are manicured to within an inch of their life? *Had three guys run after me to clean up after I did some technicolor decoration on a shrub. *Damn, love that free beer at a convention but don't ride the friggen roller coaster) By the way, Disney does save those pictures. Got popped hoppin' the fence at Disneyland in '74. Strolled into a hotel on the premises here on Sunday and all the alarms went off. Seems they put them pics in a facial recognition program, aged them 34 years, and decided to escort me off the grounds as a danger to the well being of the kiddies here in beautimous Orlando. You know what a pain it is attending an IT conference in a Little Mermaid costume (it was the only one they had left)? Frank "Under cover and under the sea" Reid If you see this in time and have the time and interest, there's a pretty good Cuban place near DT - Numero Uno (it's near the corner of Michigan and Orange Aves). There's also a pretty good FFing shop a few blocks up Orange, The Fly Fisherman, which is right near Tim's Wine Market, which has generous tastings in the afternoons. HTH, R ....btw, the folks at Tim's and The F Fman would probably be amused by the costume, the folks at Numero Uno, um, well, not so much... |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 14, 8:06*pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
Dave LaCourse wrote : On 14 Oct 2008 22:46:37 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote: Yeah. *Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory ;) You really disappoint me lately, Scott. *I thought you were better than the cheap shots you hve been taking lately. *I guess going wimpy and apologizing to you-know-who makes a man that way. "Oh, please, don't cause me any trouble, oh please, I don't want any trouble......" * Sheeeeeeesh. *Gimme a break. Dave Oh come on, Dave. *I thought that was pretty funny, especially with the little winky thing next to it. I don't care who's diddling who. *I do know that when a congressman gets caught, the traditional early response is applause from the floor when the involved party gets caught, unless the act was homosexual. *As to this latest guy, so he's doing to his aide what Bush has been doing to us all these years. But the page *was* under age, wasn't he (she?)? At the very least he should have been censured. If the Republicans had roped in the Idiot in Chief, even if just after the 2006 elections, they'd still be a viable party. *They didn't and we're likely to be stuck with a very powerful Dem party for a decade. *I think this is OK, but I think we'd have a better government if there were two viable parties. * Yes, a lot better. And speaking of roping in, the Dems should consider doing that to Ms. Pelosi: that pre-bailout vote speech was over the top. No, I don't believe that it really affected Rep votes, but it did show just how deaf Washington pols like her have become. |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 14, 7:41*pm, wrote:
Oops, nope. *He did get the page drunk and have sex with him. *But it wasn't "rape" in the criminal sense. *OTOH, it certainly was conduct that should have garnered much more than a "naughty boy" from the House. If it were today and a Republican Congressman did the same thing with a female page, I'd bet _BIG_ that you'd in with other "liberals" yelling and screaming about what a scumbag he was, suggesting it was "rape" or nearly so. *Gerry Studds was a sorry piece of **** and embarrassment to Congress, but, at least as far as is publicly known, he wasn't a rapist. HTH, R Agreed. And Congress should have stripped him of committee assignments, censored him, and thrown him out on his ass if possible. Ditto with the Dem with the icebox full of cash. And Delay should be in jail too. And Louie, what you do with this kind of **** is not truthful in terms of how most people understand the term. Its that old means/ends thingy again. Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
|
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 15, 2:40*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
He "had sex" with a male page who was 16. *That is statutory rape. *If the kid was drunk and could not give his consent, that is rape, period. Gerry Studds raped a male page and made sexual advances at several more. Dave You will apparently never learn that making such allegations about people wont do any good at all. I have no idea whether there is any truth to them, but I know that you have made many other allegations, including completely unfounded allegations about me, so I would tend to disbelieve anything you wrote anyway, and presumably others will too. Do you consider making such allegations "helping your fellow man?". |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 15, 5:40*am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:41:26 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:27:44 -0500, Ken Fortenberry wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ... ... Gerry Studds never did any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie. Studds got a male page drunk and had sex with him. *That is rape. *End of that story. You're a liar, Louie. You post outrageous lies here about John Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself. Oops, nope. *He did get the page drunk and have sex with him. *But it wasn't "rape" in the criminal sense. *OTOH, it certainly was conduct that should have garnered much more than a "naughty boy" from the House. If it were today and a Republican Congressman did the same thing with a female page, I'd bet _BIG_ that you'd in with other "liberals" yelling and screaming about what a scumbag he was, suggesting it was "rape" or nearly so. *Gerry Studds was a sorry piece of **** and embarrassment to Congress, but, at least as far as is publicly known, he wasn't a rapist. HTH, R He "had sex" with a male page who was 16. *That is statutory rape. *If the kid was drunk and could not give his consent, that is rape, period. Gerry Studds raped a male page and made sexual advances at several more. Dave- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well I agree he should have been censored, Democrats are supposed to stick to the Bimbos, male pages are reserved for Republicans. Its a joke Louie, a joke. Honestly. kind of. :-)))) dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 15, 8:26*pm, DaveS wrote:
Well I agree he should have been censored, Democrats are supposed to stick to the Bimbos, male pages are reserved for Republicans. Its a joke Louie, a joke. Honestly. kind of. :-)))) dave Thatīs a bit inconsistent donīt you think? Painting pictures of people engaged in monkey fellatio, or shagging diseased sheep is fine with you, but you think Democrats and Republicans should be censored for turning over a new page? |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 15, 11:30*am, wrote:
On Oct 15, 8:26*pm, DaveS wrote: Well I agree he should have been censored, Democrats are supposed to stick to the Bimbos, male pages are reserved for Republicans. Its a joke Louie, a joke. Honestly. kind of. :-)))) dave Thatīs a bit inconsistent donīt you think? Painting pictures of people engaged in monkey fellatio, or shagging diseased sheep is fine with you, but you think Democrats and Republicans should be censored for turning over a new page? Not "people" Mike, YOU. I still think a series of paintings of you blowing a wide variety of monkeys, chimps etc., dressed in your sari, would sell like hotcakes. Of course there are your fans, on both sides of the Atlantic, but also sales of the collectable trading card versions, sales in the Third World, vending machine sales in truckstop restrooms, etc. Fame Mike, Fame. |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 16, 10:20*am, DaveS wrote:
Thatīs a bit inconsistent donīt you think? Painting pictures of people engaged in monkey fellatio, or shagging diseased sheep is fine with you, but you think Democrats and Republicans should be censored for turning over a new page? Not "people" Mike, YOU. I still think a series of paintings of you blowing a wide variety of monkeys, chimps etc., dressed in your sari, would sell like hotcakes. Of course there are your fans, on both sides of the Atlantic, but also sales of the collectable trading card versions, sales in the Third World, vending machine sales in truckstop restrooms, etc. Fame Mike, Fame. You are simply a nasty dumb loony. |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
|
OT: US Election, What better symbol of bullshit....
On Oct 20, 8:16*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:54:19 -0500, wrote: http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...-foley-seat-ge... No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. I think you've become a very good symbol of incessant childish whining. Sorting Dave |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004 - 2006 FishingBanter