Line-up and weather
 

Qualifying rained out, do they line up by points?

What's the weather supposed to be like for the weekend?

If it rains during the scheduled race, any chance of completing the race
on Monday?

Line-up and weather
 

Mine Isn't Yours wrote:

Qualifying rained out, do they line up by points?

When qualifying is rained out, the starting order is determined by
points. But there are exceptions for road courses and also if Joon yer
needs help.


What's the weather supposed to be like for the weekend?

Getting mosly light just after dawn. Lighter as the day progresses
until it starts to darken near dusk.



If it rains during the scheduled race, any chance of completing the race
on Monday?

The race will be run at least to its half-way point. If the NASCAR gods
don't have a bad hangover, they might finish the race on Monday.
Chances are bad for that.

Line-up and weather
 

Mine Isn't Yours wrote:

Qualifying rained out, do they line up by points?

I think the first 35 are on points, but there might be some different
way (like number of previous qualifying attempts) to determine the
last eight (or seven, if there's a champions provisional).

What's the weather supposed to be like for the weekend?

Thunderstorms on Saturday; slight chance of rain on race day.

If it rains during the scheduled race, any chance of completing the race
on Monday?

According to the National Weather Service, it should be clear Sunday
night and all day Monday.

-- Don

Line-up and weather
 

On Mar 27, 11:22*pm, Don Del Grande
wrote:
Mine Isn't Yours wrote:
Qualifying rained out, do they line up by points?

I think the first 35 are on points, but there might be some different
way (like number of previous qualifying attempts) to determine the
last eight (or seven, if there's a champions provisional).

What's the weather supposed to be like for the weekend?

Thunderstorms on Saturday; slight chance of rain on race day.

If it rains during the scheduled race, any chance of completing the race
on Monday?

According to the National Weather Service, it should be clear Sunday
night and all day Monday.

-- Don

They have lights at Martinsville, (they use them for the modified
race), so they could run late. If they run one lap past halfway, it's
an official race, and would not be continued.

Line-up and weather
 

george9219 wrote in
:

They have lights at Martinsville, (they use them for the modified
race), so they could run late.

I don't think they have enough lights to run a televised race, so
if it gets dark they'd probably call it.

If they run one lap past halfway, it's
an official race, and would not be continued.

To be more accurate, if they run one lap past halfway it's an
official race and they do not have to continue it. Whether they
actually do or not is at NASCAR's discretion (altho, since NASCAR
is a slave to the TV folk, the likelyhood of their continuing on
Monday if they're past halfway is pretty much zero).

John

Line-up and weather
 

Don Del Grande wrote:

Mine Isn't Yours wrote:

Qualifying rained out, do they line up by points?

I think the first 35 are on points, but there might be some different
way (like number of previous qualifying attempts) to determine the
last eight (or seven, if there's a champions provisional).

If I'm reading Jayski's site right, the order for the "go or go
homers" is (a) most qualifying attempts, then (b) owners points, then
(c) it says "best finish", but this might be the "standard" tiebreaker
(most wins, then most 2nds, then so on down to 43rds, then best finish
in the previous race - then again, that's the same as "best finish,
then best 2nd-best finish, and so on"). Since nine drivers had
qualifying attempts in every previous race so far this season, 36-43
was based on points (although there was a tie in points for the last
spot, so they went to the best previous finish tiebreaker).

-- Don

crossposting
 

"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...

......to other newsgroups makes you look like an idiot.



You should tell that to the first guy that posted, not some poor schmuck
that replied several posters later, else it makes you look like the idiot.

crossposting
 

On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:58:13 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:


"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...

......to other newsgroups makes you look like an idiot.



You should tell that to the first guy that posted, not some poor schmuck
that replied several posters later, else it makes you look like the idiot.



FWIW, if you don't realize it, you (and any who respond without trimming the
headers) are cross-posting to a number of unrelated groups. If you do realize
it, um, well...carry on, I guess...

HTH

crossposting
 

riverman wrote:
On Mar 29, 7:49 am, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:58:13 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:

"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...
......to other newsgroups makes you look like an idiot.
You should tell that to the first guy that posted, not some poor schmuck
that replied several posters later, else it makes you look like the idiot.
FWIW, if you don't realize it, you (and any who respond without trimming the
headers) are cross-posting to a number of unrelated groups. If you do realize
it, um, well...carry on, I guess...

HTH

Apologies for jumping into rec.autos.sport.nascar, but I want to add
to rdean's point that no one constructively participating in this
thread is from rec.outdoors.fishing.fly, so if you delete roff from
the header, you will still be communicating with the intended
participants.

(Just in case you were concerned that trimming the header would remove
people who were active.)

Thanks. Enjoy your chats.

--riverman


If you're enjoying it, then why not keep reading and posting back? Who
cares? Maybe you need some education.

crossposting
 

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:58:13 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...

......to other newsgroups makes you look like an idiot.



You should tell that to the first guy that posted, not some poor schmuck
that replied several posters later, else it makes you look like the idiot.



FWIW, if you don't realize it, you (and any who respond without trimming
the
headers) are cross-posting to a number of unrelated groups. If you do
realize
it, um, well...carry on, I guess...

HTH

I actually went to the original post and coppied all of the groups back in
just to make my point.

FOR THE RECORD
There are only two groups in this crosspost. Hardly an example of a serious
problem. The larger issue is that the original post has no importance to
either group it was posted to.

crossposting
 

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:58:13 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...

......to other newsgroups makes you look like an idiot.



You should tell that to the first guy that posted, not some poor schmuck
that replied several posters later, else it makes you look like the idiot.



FWIW, if you don't realize it, you (and any who respond without trimming
the
headers) are cross-posting to a number of unrelated groups. If you do
realize
it, um, well...carry on, I guess...

HTH


I STAND CORRECTED
The original post applied to both nascar and fly fishing. The OP asked about
the weather cooperatiing, both race fans and fishermen prefer good weather.

crossposting
 

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:33:16 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:

I STAND CORRECTED
The original post applied to both nascar and fly fishing. The OP asked about
the weather cooperatiing, both race fans and fishermen prefer good weather.

Horse caca. Formula 1 races in the rain, as do most other forms of
racing except nascar. Fly fishing in the rain is always great.

crossposting
 

" Fly fishing in the rain is always great "

fish are feedin' during rain & right after.......runnoff and all....

crossposting
 

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:31:43 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:58:13 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
.. .

......to other newsgroups makes you look like an idiot.



You should tell that to the first guy that posted, not some poor schmuck
that replied several posters later, else it makes you look like the idiot.



FWIW, if you don't realize it, you (and any who respond without trimming
the
headers) are cross-posting to a number of unrelated groups. If you do
realize
it, um, well...carry on, I guess...

HTH

I actually went to the original post and coppied all of the groups back in
just to make my point.

FOR THE RECORD
There are only two groups in this crosspost. Hardly an example of a serious
problem. The larger issue is that the original post has no importance to
either group it was posted to.


Since you took the time to reply politely, I'll make one reply to let you and
anyone else interested on the NASCAR group know what's happening. A poster who
posts on both groups, usually as "Peaceful Bill," apparently got his panties in
a knot about something (I have no idea what about as I generally ignore him -
the few times I've read his posts, they are childish troll-like silliness -
maybe he's just another USENUT) and cross-posted 10-15 random replies, some
inflammatory, to the FFing group and a number of other random groups, although
not all posts went to all groups. Apparently, the FFing group was the only group
they all went to. He used a couple of sockpuppets - "Another Sunny Day" and
"Mine Isn't Yours" - to do it. If you want to see all of it, check out the
FFing group in the header via your news reader/client or here's a Google link
for those not wanting to fool with adding a group to their reader/client,
getting headers, etc.:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...y/topics?hl=en

And with this reply, unless there is something in particular, I'm gonna ignore
this thread past direct replies, if any.

HTH,
R

crossposting
 

wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:31:43 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:58:13 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:

"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...
......to other newsgroups makes you look like an idiot.


You should tell that to the first guy that posted, not some poor schmuck
that replied several posters later, else it makes you look like the idiot.



FWIW, if you don't realize it, you (and any who respond without trimming
the
headers) are cross-posting to a number of unrelated groups. If you do
realize
it, um, well...carry on, I guess...

HTH
I actually went to the original post and coppied all of the groups back in
just to make my point.

FOR THE RECORD
There are only two groups in this crosspost. Hardly an example of a serious
problem. The larger issue is that the original post has no importance to
either group it was posted to.


Since you took the time to reply politely, I'll make one reply to let you and
anyone else interested on the NASCAR group know what's happening. A poster who
posts on both groups, usually as "Peaceful Bill," apparently got his panties in
a knot about something (I have no idea what about as I generally ignore him -
the few times I've read his posts, they are childish troll-like silliness -
maybe he's just another USENUT) and cross-posted 10-15 random replies, some
inflammatory, to the FFing group and a number of other random groups, although
not all posts went to all groups. Apparently, the FFing group was the only group
they all went to. He used a couple of sockpuppets - "Another Sunny Day" and
"Mine Isn't Yours" - to do it. If you want to see all of it, check out the
FFing group in the header via your news reader/client or here's a Google link
for those not wanting to fool with adding a group to their reader/client,
getting headers, etc.:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...y/topics?hl=en

And with this reply, unless there is something in particular, I'm gonna ignore
this thread past direct replies, if any.

HTH,
R

As was obvious to pretty much anyone looking closely, it wasn't me. I
gave you the information, do your homework before spreading your filth
in this direction.

crossposting
 

On Mar 29, 1:54*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote:

See "Bill" part of the problem is that when you shade facts too much,
make up stuff, play fast and loose with the . . . . . , folks have a
tough time knowing when what you are saying is real vs. when it's just
another "Peaceful Bill" game. Don't put yourself in the same class of
wingnuts as "Beancounter."

Here's a suggestion: Use whatever freaky avatar names you want on the
whack-job sites where your "friends" play out the radical nonsense.
Some of these folk sound like future convicts but thats your choice.

But be a man and use your real world name on the Fly fishing site. It
makes a big difference.

Dave

crossposting
 

On Mar 31, 12:53*am, DaveS wrote:
On Mar 29, 1:54*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote:

See "Bill" part of the problem is that when you shade facts too much,
make up stuff, *play fast and loose with the . . . . . , folks have a
tough time knowing when what you are saying is real vs. when it's just
another "Peaceful Bill" game. Don't put yourself in the same class of
wingnuts as "Beancounter."

Here's a suggestion: Use whatever freaky avatar names you want on the
whack-job sites where your "friends" play out the radical nonsense.
Some of these folk sound like future convicts but thats your choice.

But be a man and use your real world name on the Fly fishing site. It
makes a big difference.

Damn straight!

giles
hoo boy.