![]() |
Ted Kennedy
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to
the late Sen. Kennedy. Still, when one looks back, it was one heck of an odd legacy. The guy starts out as the little brother of a couple of heavy hitters, sort of the kid the family expects nothing from. Then, just as he's thrust into prominence, he commits a crime that should have landed him in jail for at least a few years and gets off, essentially with a stern lecture. Then, after finally giving up on the whole Presidential idea, he spends 30 years in which he damn near mastered being a US Senator. I mean that in the positive sense, as the man learned how to compromise, deal and cajole a very clumsy mechanism towards many good ends. Even for those that don't agree with his goals and outcomes, it must be admitted he was as good at making that body work as anyone, possibly ever. Like I said, an odd course, and a hard one to reckon, overall. Thoughts? Tom |
Ted Kennedy
Tom Littleton wrote:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ... Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National. I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Ted Kennedy
one more drunk off the road...fine by me.....
|
Ted Kennedy
"Teddy was thrown out of Harvard in 1951 for cheating"
"but the senator's carousing -- and testimony about him wandering about the house in his shirttails and no pants" "Kennedy drove his car off a bridge and into a pond on Chappaquiddick Island, on Martha's Vineyard. Mary Jo Kopechne, a 28-year-old worker with RFK's campaign, was found dead in the submerged car's back seat 10 hours later." Nice legacy, Teddy... Guess you didn't have it in you to stick around long enough to get voted out like the rest of your croonies will in 2010... |
Ted Kennedy
On 2009-08-26 18:25:31 -0400, "Tom Littleton" said:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. Actually, we Massholes are not looking forward to TWO WEEKS of homage to Teddy. When Cardinal Maderieros died a few years back, we had his funeral on for ten days. Even the death of the Pope didn't match that one. I didn't like Ted (that goes without saying), but he did his job for the Massholes who voted for him. Another Kennedy will take his senate seat. Dave |
Ted Kennedy
HYPOCRITE: (1) A person who engages in the same behaviors he condemns others for. (2) A person who professes certain ideals, but fails to live up to them. (3) A person who holds other people to higher standards than he holds himself. The only reliable product of an organized liberalism is a flock of hypocrites who feel that only *their* hypocrisy is divinely sanctioned. Yup...that about sums up Ted Kennedy. I know his death is sad for some, but I refuse to get all worked up about it. To me, Ted Kennedy was simply a drunken, womanizing murderer that used his last name to get out of much deserved prison time for Chappaquiddick. The man defined absolute partisan hypocrisy. The mere fact that he asked for a law to be changed to allow the liberal governor to appoint a liberal to take his seat speaks volumes about his character. His refusal to stand by the law HE helped to pass which prevented the Republican governor (Romney) from getting that same power some years back is simply gross. Kennedy worked tirelessly to raise OUR taxes (the average American pays about 10% of their income in taxes each year) while he only paid about .04% of his income in taxes. He had tax shelters in Aruba and accounts in the names of his family members to avoid paying so much of his "hard earned" money in taxes. He didn't like paying taxes but thought that all of us working class people should. Teddy called him self an environmentalist, yet when a Cape Cod windmill project threatened to obstruct his sail boating landscape he tried to get a friend in the Army Corps of Engineers to "investigate" the project--and find reasons to shoot it down. Too bad for him that his friend's investigation only pointed out how successful and positive the Cape Wind project would inevitably be. Again, it seems that Ted Kennedy was only "green" when the cost or inconvenience applied to us and not him. Oh, and lets not forget that he was the guy that created the Obamacare amendment that excluded members of Congress from the very government run plan they would create. According to him, the public plan is good enough for us, but not for him or his politician pals. Smart thinking on his part I suppose, since a government run plan would surely not have given him the top notch medical care that he got for the last year. At his age they would have just offered him a blue pill... To me, he typified exactly what I can't stand about Democrats. He is the typical liberal that feels that they should get to play by a different set of rules than anyone else. I can't support that kind of blatant hypocrisy. He was not a man of integrity, certainly not a man of honor and I for one, will not be sobbing today and talking about "what a great man" he was. See, what he and all the other liberals of his ilk never seem to understand is that the TRUE equality that they claim to stand for will only come when THEY start subjecting themselves to the same oppression that they want us to suffer under. What's good for the wealthy elitist geese should always be what's good for the private sector gander... |
Ted Kennedy
On 2009-08-26 18:36:09 -0400, Ken Fortenberry
said: Tom Littleton wrote: Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ... Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National. I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it. I doubt there will be any "hatefest", unlike the one's I saw being broken up at Arlington for KIA military. |
Ted Kennedy
David LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry said: Tom Littleton wrote: Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ... Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National. I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it. I doubt there will be any "hatefest", unlike the one's I saw being broken up at Arlington for KIA military. The hatefest has already started in the right-wing blogosphere and on the Limbaugh show. I was talking about the creeps and wingnuts of roff. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Ted Kennedy
On 2009-08-26 19:12:02 -0400, Ken Fortenberry
said: David LaCourse wrote: Ken Fortenberry said: Tom Littleton wrote: Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ... Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National. I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it. I doubt there will be any "hatefest", unlike the one's I saw being broken up at Arlington for KIA military. The hatefest has already started in the right-wing blogosphere and on the Limbaugh show. I was talking about the creeps and wingnuts of roff. Well, since I do not follow any bogospheres, right, left, up or down, nor listen to the Limbaugh show, and most of the wingnuts on roff are anarchistic socialists, I have no idea what you are talking about. Dave |
Ted Kennedy
On 2009-08-26 19:07:15 -0400, "~^ beancounter ~^" said:
Yup...that about sums up Ted Kennedy. Look around you. That just about sums up all of humanity, including you, me, and Kennedy. |
Ted Kennedy
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:25:31 GMT, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. Still, when one looks back, it was one heck of an odd legacy. The guy starts out as the little brother of a couple of heavy hitters, sort of the kid the family expects nothing from. Then, just as he's thrust into prominence, he commits a crime that should have landed him in jail for at least a few years and gets off, essentially with a stern lecture. Then, after finally giving up on the whole Presidential idea, he spends 30 years in which he damn near mastered being a US Senator. I mean that in the positive sense, as the man learned how to compromise, deal and cajole a very clumsy mechanism towards many good ends. Even for those that don't agree with his goals and outcomes, it must be admitted he was as good at making that body work as anyone, possibly ever. Like I said, an odd course, and a hard one to reckon, overall. Thoughts? Tom Yes - the only good Kennedy is a Dead Kennedy... Seriously, he was a piece of **** when breathing, and now, he's dead - that's life...his death doesn't change my opinion of him. And no, I didn't and don't "hate" him - I'm not sure that I "hate" anyone, but I think that if I were going to "hate" someone, it'd be a better man than he. And I'm not sure why, but it reminds me of something my father once told me about the Klan. He thought they were a bunch of silly-ass pussies, aside from being racist crackers, and the reason was, he said, was that if you're going to "hate" someone, at least have the stones to stand up like a man, open and in the daylight, for all to see, and make it plain. There are my (off-hand) thoughts, R |
Ted Kennedy
|
Ted Kennedy
"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message ... "Teddy was thrown out of Harvard in 1951 for cheating" "but the senator's carousing -- and testimony about him wandering about the house in his shirttails and no pants" "Kennedy drove his car off a bridge and into a pond on Chappaquiddick Island, on Martha's Vineyard. Mary Jo Kopechne, a 28-year-old worker with RFK's campaign, was found dead in the submerged car's back seat 10 hours later." Nice legacy, Teddy... Guess you didn't have it in you to stick around long enough to get voted out like the rest of your croonies will in 2010... A surprisingly astute observation from someone who has never, ever f**ked up. John... there but for the grace of god... |
Ted Kennedy
"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message ... HYPOCRITE: (1) A person who engages in the same behaviors he condemns others for. (2) A person who professes certain ideals, but fails to live up to them. (3) A person who holds other people to higher standards than he holds himself. and your point being???? John... |
Ted Kennedy
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:08:21 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: "Tom Littleton" wrote: snip Thoughts? Yes - the only good Kennedy is a Dead Kennedy... Seriously, he was a piece of **** when breathing, and now, he's dead - that's life...his death doesn't change my opinion of him. ... The Daily Double has spoken. Rick is both roff's own creep and wingnut. Seriously Rick, you're a despicable piece of ****. Maybe, maybe not, but either way, it is of no bearing on Teddy Kennedy being a piece of ****. And for the record, my disgust with him has nothing to do with his politics, but rather, the way he conducted himself in his "personal life," and encouraged family members to conduct themselves in theirs. For example, William Smith was _probably_ innocent of rape, but literally under his uncle's influence, he found himself in trouble. HTH, R |
Ted Kennedy
Tom Littleton wrote:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. Still, when one looks back, it was one heck of an odd legacy. ... George Will's column in today's _Washington Post_ is a good read. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...082602209.html "He lived his own large life and the ledger of it shows a substantial positive balance." -- Ken Fortenberry |
Ted Kennedy
wrote: "Tom Littleton" wrote: snip Thoughts? Seriously, he was a piece of **** when breathing, and now, he's dead - that's life...his death doesn't change my opinion of him. ------- Holy ****! I agree w this guy!!!!???? I met Ted once at a resort sap in New England He looked like an old blousy boozer You could tell by the red veins on the end of his nose that he drank - A LOT As for being a wing nut - Yes it is true - I have been accused of this before As for being an anarchistic socialist - perhaops but only short term We will need a period of anarchy if this is truly to be a govt of and for the people and not a government controlled by a few select families or the dreaded miltary industrial complex that has come to fruition It would be wonderful if the US was not based on a wartime economy It would be wonderful if we did not support and maintain reactionary and terrorist regimes like the Suadi and Kuwaiti monarchies, - and Yes - including Israel and some others Enough of my soap box type remarks I will not miss Teddy I do not miss any of the Kennedy clan - Frantz Fanon |
Ted Kennedy
you mean this guy?
1. He was caught cheating at Harvard when he attended it. He was expelled twice, once for cheating on a test, and once for paying a classmate to cheat for him. 2. While expelled, Kennedy enlisted in the Army, but mistakenly signed up for four years instead of two. Oops! The man can't count to four! His father, Joseph P. Kennedy, former U.S. Ambassador to England (a step up from bootlegging liquor into the US from Canada during prohibition), pulled the necessary strings to have his enlistment shortened to two years, and to ensure that he served in Europe, not Korea , where a war was raging. No preferential treatment for him! (like he charged that President Bush received). 3. Kennedy was assigned to Paris , never advanced beyond the rank of Private, and returned to Harvard upon being discharged.. Imagine a person of his "education" NEVER advancing past the rank of Private! 4. While attending law school at the University of Virginia , he was cited for reckless driving four times, including once when he was clocked driving 90 miles per hour in a residential neighborhood with his headlights off after dark. Yet his Virginia driver's license was never revoked. Coincidentally, he passed the bar exam in 1959. Amazing! 5. In 1964, he was seriously injured in a plane crash, and hospitalized for several months. Test results done by the hospital at the time he was admitted had shown he was legally intoxicated. The results of those tests remained a "state secret" until in the 1980's when the report was unsealed. Didn't hear about that from the unbiased media, did we? 6. On July 19, 1969, Kennedy attended a party on Chappaquiddick Island in Massachusetts . At about 11:00 PM, he borrowed his chauffeur's keys to his Oldsmobile limousine, and offered to give a ride home to Mary Jo Kopechne, a campaign worker. Leaving the island via an unlit bridge with no guard rail, Kennedy steered the car off the bridge, flipped, and into Poucha Pond. 7. He swam to shore and walked back to the party, passing several houses and a fire station. Two friends then returned with him to the scene of the accident. According to their later testimony, they told him what he already knew - that he was required by law to immediately report the accident to the authorities. Instead Kennedy made his way to his hotel, called his lawyer, and went to sleep. Kennedy called the police the next morning and by then the wreck had already been discovered. Before dying, Kopechne had scratched at the upholstered floor above her head in the upside-down car. The Kennedy family began "calling in favors", ensuring that any inquiry would be contained. Her corpse was whisked out-of-state to her family, before an autopsy could be conducted. Further details are uncertain, but after the accident Kennedy says he repeatedly dove under the water trying to rescue Kopechne and he didn't call police because he was in a state of shock. It is widely assumed Kennedy was drunk, and he held off calling police in hopes that his family could fix the problem overnight. Since the accident, Kennedy's "political enemies" have referred to him as the distinguished Senator from Chappaquiddick. He pled guilty to leaving the scene of an accident, and was given a SUSPENDED SENTENCE OF TWO MONTHS. Kopechne's family received a small payout from the Kennedy's insurance policy, and never sued. There was later an effort to have her body exhumed and autopsied, but her family successfully fought against this in court, and Kennedy's family paid their attorney's bills... a "token of friendship"? 8. Kennedy has held his Senate seat for more than forty years, but considering his longevity, his accomplishments seem scant. He authored or argued for legislation that ensured a variety of civil rights, increased the minimum wage in 1981, made access to health care easier for the indigent, and funded Meals on Wheels for fixed-income seniors and is widely held as the "standard-bearer for liberalism". In his very first Senate roll, he was the floor manager for the bill that turned U.S. immigration policy upside down and opened the floodgate for immigrants from third world countries. 9. Since that time, he has been the prime instigator and author of every expansion of an increase in immigration, up to and including the latest attempt to grant amnesty to illegal aliens. Not to mention the pious grilling he gave the last two Supreme Court nominees, as if he was the standard bearer for the nation in matters of "what's right". What a pompous ass! 10. He is known around Washington as a public drunk, loud, boisterous and very disrespectful to ladies. JERK is a better description than "great American". "A blonde in every pond" is his motto. |
Ted Kennedy
|
Ted Kennedy
On Aug 27, 11:42*am, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: you mean this guy? snip Another hatemongering wingnut creep heard from. And this one's a plagiarizer not to mention a sorry excuse for a human being. Thanks a lot, Tom. You've managed to entice some of the vermin to crawl out of the woodwork. What this place needs is another rod loading thread. ;-) -- Ken Fortenberry Thanks Ken, Nice to be thought of John |
Ted Kennedy
|
Ted Kennedy
Look, liberals, here is the bottom line – keep goosestepping towards
the cliff while Conservatives let you think you’re in charge. This fight is slowly but surely escalating and will undoubtedly boil over into violence that none of us want in the not-so-distant future unless cooler heads prevail. Who do you think would be best positioned for victory in a conventional confrontation over ideals? You have Bawney Fwank and ACORN, we have millions of guns and a mostly-Conservative military. Do yourselves a favor, actually read the full Constitution. Learn in painful detail what our forefathers experienced and why they made those key decisions that gave birth to our nation. Stop blindly believing what politicians and networks tell you to believe and use some common sense. Do you want a nation where you are reliant on the government for everything…or would you rather rely on yourselves and your fellow citizens? If our society becomes government- controlled and one day you decided that you were wrong and didn’t like the situation…where would you go? What other nation on earth would give you the same freedoms we have right now? With those freedoms comes responsibility, so please think about your values and the decisions you make. A solid majority of Americans do not want the government takeover that is slowly being forced upon us, sooner or later something has to give. |
Ted Kennedy
On Aug 27, 1:16*pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: you mean this guy? snip Another hatemongering wingnut creep heard from. And this one's a plagiarizer not to mention a sorry excuse for a human being. Thanks a lot, Tom. You've managed to entice some of the vermin to crawl out of the woodwork. What this place needs is another rod loading thread. ;-) Thanks Ken, Nice to be thought of Well, like most people I don't think of the cockroaches in the wall until I see them scurrying across the floor. And you're quite welcome. -- Ken Fortenberry In relatively short order, Ted Kennedy lost 3 brothers and soon thereafter, not surprisingly made a horrible decision as a very young man. I did not agree with many of Kennedy's positions, but it is good enough for me to know that some of his closest friends were conservative Republicans like Orin Hatch. I cannot say with a clear conscious that had I lost one brother in a war and 2 to assassinations, all within 15 or 20 years (two within 5 or 6 years of his fateful mistake) I would not have a drinking problem. I have ALWAYS been a conservative and my values still lead me in this direction. But when I hear the lack of decency displayed in so short an order after his death (combined with observing the uncivil behavior of the right in other venues such as the health care debate and recent elections), I am sickened. It causes me to wonder where the decent folks of this line of thinking have gone. I am sure the zealots who find it necessary to deliberate on Kennedy's weaknesses, mistakes, and vices could improve their lives greatly by modeling their behavior after Ronald Reagan who considered Ted Kennedy to be a friend. Reagan had a sunny disposition, and drew even those not prone to favor the conservative cause to be far more willing to work with him and not against. He would not have condoned the rhetoric on this thread I am certain. Where is our Reagan and why have conservatives lost their way in following his example? |
Ted Kennedy
well, I warned you, Keng.......
Anyhow, I am probably in agreement with Family-Outdoors(by the way, a name would be nice, F-O.). I figured on a few demonstrations of blind ideology overtaking any nuance or sense of dignity. The whole of the man's life is a bizarre picture, but maybe Will is correct that the ledger tilts to the positive. I don't know. Rick speaks of conduct the man apparently got behind himself 10 years or so ago. Certainly, he benefitted from undue priviledge in the handling of his causing the death of another. Yet, politically, he became very savvy and a positive legislative influence. He stuck to certain principles in his legislative agenda with consistency. Time will tell where the verdict falls. Tom |
Ted Kennedy
On Aug 27, 4:47*pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
well, I warned you, Keng....... Anyhow, I am probably in agreement with Family-Outdoors(by the way, a name would be nice, F-O.). I figured on a few demonstrations of blind ideology overtaking any nuance or sense of dignity. The whole of the man's life is a bizarre picture, but maybe Will is correct that the ledger tilts to the positive. I don't know. Rick speaks of conduct the man apparently got behind himself 10 years or so ago. Certainly, he benefitted from undue priviledge in the handling of his causing the death of another. Yet, politically, he became very savvy and a positive legislative influence. He stuck to certain principles in his legislative agenda with consistency. Time will tell where the verdict falls. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom Agree in total... Family-Outdoors (Probably not F-O:) aka Allen Mann |
Ted Kennedy
wrote in message ... And for the record, my disgust with him has nothing to do with his politics, but rather, the way he conducted himself in his "personal life," and encouraged family members to conduct themselves in theirs. For example, William Smith was _probably_ innocent of rape, but literally under his uncle's influence, he found himself in trouble. yet, you write about his "hiding his true persona" in a way akin to a Klansman in a robe. Where the hell does that analogy come into play?? Really, if you are suggesting that he masked his foibles from the public, that doesn't wash. Probably very few people in the history of the planet have been scrutinized, for longer, than the Kennedy clan. If someone out there didn't know of Ted's moral shortcomings, they have been in a cave or something. So, what exactly makes the late Senator a 'pussy', hiding his true self or purpose? I don't get it. Now, that said, I never quite understood the Kennedy Worship that one sees in eastern Massachusetts. It's sort of creepy, and the whole dynasty concept gives me the willies. MA residents: is it a given that another Sen.Kennedy will succeed the late Teddy? Tom |
Ted Kennedy
On 2009-08-27 17:53:27 -0400, "Tom Littleton" said:
MA residents: is it a given that another Sen.Kennedy will succeed the late Teddy? Probably. The Kenndy name wins in for Massholes. There was a guy in Lowell who could not get elected, couldn't even win in the primaries. He legally changed his name to Kennedy and won a local election - nothing big, mind you, but the name won him a seat in some small school committee or council. With all the warts Ted had - Chappiquidick, the Florida trial of his nephew where it came out that he took them out drinking, knowing that they had prolems with the sauce, his drunken binge with Dodd in a DC restaurant, his cheating in college, his driving record, his trouble with alchohol, his fat homely face with all the gin blosooms - he still got elected and served his people well. I certainly won't miss him like I did his brothers, and anyone replacing him in the Senate will only be a pretender to the Kennedy Thrown. Now, one must admit that if poor Teddy was a Republican his **** would really, REALLY, stink. But because he is a liberal Dem, even his farts are odorless. Dave |
Ted Kennedy
Family-Outdoors wrote:
On Aug 27, 1:16 pm, Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: you mean this guy? snip Another hatemongering wingnut creep heard from. And this one's a plagiarizer not to mention a sorry excuse for a human being. Thanks a lot, Tom. You've managed to entice some of the vermin to crawl out of the woodwork. What this place needs is another rod loading thread. ;-) Thanks Ken, Nice to be thought of Well, like most people I don't think of the cockroaches in the wall until I see them scurrying across the floor. And you're quite welcome. -- Ken Fortenberry In relatively short order, Ted Kennedy lost 3 brothers and soon thereafter, not surprisingly made a horrible decision as a very young man. I did not agree with many of Kennedy's positions, but it is good enough for me to know that some of his closest friends were conservative Republicans like Orin Hatch. That relationship always seemed odd to me. Maybe says a lot about both men. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26482.html Russell |
Ted Kennedy
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:53:27 GMT, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
wrote in message .. . And for the record, my disgust with him has nothing to do with his politics, but rather, the way he conducted himself in his "personal life," and encouraged family members to conduct themselves in theirs. For example, William Smith was _probably_ innocent of rape, but literally under his uncle's influence, he found himself in trouble. yet, you write about his "hiding his true persona" in a way akin to a Klansman in a robe. I did? What I said was that my father didn't like the Klan because they did "hate" but hid and that if one is going to "hate" someone (I didn't and don't "hate" Ted, but someone - Ken? - used the term - I prefer to say "dislike"), have the guts to do it in the open. I've never made a secret of my dislike for Ted (and his brothers, father, as well as several other Kennedys), and so, I feel no reason to hide my feelings now that Ted is dead anymore than I have for the also-deceased John, Robert, Joe., etc. Where the hell does that analogy come into play?? See above. Really, if you are suggesting that he masked his foibles from the public, that doesn't wash. OK by me...I wasn't even hinting at that...and while I didn't mean that in my earlier response to your question, I will say that a lot of his "foibles" were hidden from "the public" in general. I'm not claiming to have some "secret" knowledge, but I can tell you that a lot of his ****-ups weren't widely reported. TC, R Probably very few people in the history of the planet have been scrutinized, for longer, than the Kennedy clan. If someone out there didn't know of Ted's moral shortcomings, they have been in a cave or something. So, what exactly makes the late Senator a 'pussy', hiding his true self or purpose? I don't get it. Now, that said, I never quite understood the Kennedy Worship that one sees in eastern Massachusetts. It's sort of creepy, and the whole dynasty concept gives me the willies. MA residents: is it a given that another Sen.Kennedy will succeed the late Teddy? Tom |
Ted Kennedy
In message 2009082718220916807-dplacourse@aolcom, David LaCourse
writes On 2009-08-27 17:53:27 -0400, "Tom Littleton" said: MA residents: is it a given that another Sen.Kennedy will succeed the late Teddy? Probably. The Kenndy name wins in for Massholes. There was a guy in Lowell who could not get elected, couldn't even win in the primaries. He legally changed his name to Kennedy and won a local election - nothing big, mind you, but the name won him a seat in some small school committee or council. With all the warts Ted had - Chappiquidick, the Florida trial of his nephew where it came out that he took them out drinking, knowing that they had prolems with the sauce, his drunken binge with Dodd in a DC restaurant, his cheating in college, his driving record, his trouble with alchohol, his fat homely face with all the gin blosooms - he still got elected and served his people well. I certainly won't miss him like I did his brothers, and anyone replacing him in the Senate will only be a pretender to the Kennedy Thrown. Now, one must admit that if poor Teddy was a Republican his **** would really, REALLY, stink. But because he is a liberal Dem, even his farts are odorless. Dave Apart from the /really/ high profile Kennedy's I can only think of Chappiquidick when it comes to Ted ! -- Bill Grey |
Ted Kennedy
"David LaCourse" wrote in message news:2009082718220916807-dplacourse@aolcom... the Kennedy Thrown. on some level, priceless. Tom |
Ted Kennedy
wrote in message ... What I said was that my father didn't like the Klan because they did "hate" but hid and that if one is going to "hate" someone (I didn't and don't "hate" Ted, but someone - Ken? - used the term - I prefer to say "dislike"), have the guts to do it in the open. that makes some sense.....I didn't read it that way the first time through. Perhaps, that explains Ken's response to you. Tom |
Ted Kennedy
On 2009-08-28 05:32:06 -0400, "Tom Littleton" said:
on some level, priceless. Yeah. Like there, they're, and their. |
Ted Kennedy
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:28:00 -0700 (PDT), Family-Outdoors
wrote: On Aug 27, 1:16*pm, Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: you mean this guy? snip Another hatemongering wingnut creep heard from. And this one's a plagiarizer not to mention a sorry excuse for a human being. Thanks a lot, Tom. You've managed to entice some of the vermin to crawl out of the woodwork. What this place needs is another rod loading thread. ;-) Thanks Ken, Nice to be thought of Well, like most people I don't think of the cockroaches in the wall until I see them scurrying across the floor. And you're quite welcome. -- Ken Fortenberry In relatively short order, Ted Kennedy lost 3 brothers and soon thereafter, not surprisingly made a horrible decision as a very young man. By the time he started making "horrible decisions," as a "young man," he had only lost one brother, and that, in WW2. I'd offer that such a status for a person born in 1933 (esp. into a Catholic family) was hardly unusual, and IAC, it was not an excuse for anything he did. I did not agree with many of Kennedy's positions, but it is good enough for me to know that some of his closest friends were conservative Republicans like Orin Hatch. I think you are confusing DC-style "friends" with "real world" _friends_. I cannot say with a clear conscious that had I lost one brother in a war and 2 to assassinations, all within 15 or 20 years (two within 5 or 6 years of his fateful mistake) I would not have a drinking problem. That is a potential flaw in your character (and no, I'm not saying that your character is flawed, only that your response to your own situation speaks only to you, not Ted). Again, he was demonstrating that he was nothing but a drunken amoral piece of ****, just as he was raised to be, long before (like 13-15 years before) 1963 - he wasn't 12, he was 30, out of college, married (and cheating), had been in the Army, etc. I have ALWAYS been a conservative and my values still lead me in this direction. But when I hear the lack of decency displayed in so short an order after his death (combined with observing the uncivil behavior of the right in other venues such as the health care debate and recent elections), I am sickened. It causes me to wonder where the decent folks of this line of thinking have gone. I am sure the zealots who find it necessary to deliberate on Kennedy's weaknesses, mistakes, and vices could improve their lives greatly by modeling their behavior after Ronald Reagan who considered Ted Kennedy to be a friend. Reagan had a sunny disposition, and drew even those not prone to favor the conservative cause to be far more willing to work with him and not against. He would not have condoned the rhetoric on this thread I am certain. Where is our Reagan and why have conservatives lost their way in following his example? And not only am I personally not purely "conservative," I have many _friends_ (including, by the way, both Forty and Tom) that lean to varying degrees to the left. I have a great deal of respect for folks like Bill Bradley and Barney Frank, with who I don't agree on much. I would have no more respect for Ted (or John or Robert or Joe, etc.) if they had shared exactly my personal politics because my dislike and lack of respect for them had little or nothing to do with their politics. HTH, R |
Ted Kennedy
Tom Littleton wrote:
that makes some sense.....I didn't read it that way the first time through. Perhaps, that explains Ken's response to you. Tom i know i'm naive and grossly under-informed/-educated. still, i'm always amused and bothered by crystal-clear pronouncements concerning the foibles, frailties, failings, faults, and follies of others, including our famous kennedy klan, despite the lack of any in-depth, direct or personal interaction them. as our welsh friend's statement suggests, these pronouncements are frequently based in a myopic vision...a vision shaped by one's overarching predispositions. we simply seek and select the data that supports our need to go on believing what we have already chosen to believe...not scientific, no alternative hypotheses, but very, very human...and one of our human failings. though ted kennedy undoubtedly had many qualities and behaviors that justified criticism of him personally and politically, i'm willing to accept he had a side and other qualities that equally justified the admiration and respect many had for him. each side can find something to anchor and illustrate their conflicting views. even drunks are capable of good works and truth-telling. in any event, ted's dead. whatever his flaws, they are at an end forever. whatever his individual promise, it will be unfulfilled forever. jeff |
Ted Kennedy
On Aug 27, 5:51*pm, Family-Outdoors wrote:
On Aug 27, 4:47*pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote: well, I warned you, Keng....... Rick speaks of conduct the man apparently got behind himself 10 years or so ago. Certainly, he benefitted from undue priviledge in the handling of his causing the death of another. Yet, politically, he became very savvy and a positive legislative influence. He stuck to certain principles in his legislative agenda with consistency. Time will tell where the verdict falls. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom Joe the Elder offers- hate to hear of anyones death--but at least it got that monkey in a bright outfit jumping around and grabbing his crotch off the scene for awhile ! |
Ted Kennedy
I of course was referring to Chappaquiddick, and that if I am not
mistaken occurred in 1969...therefore what I stated was true. Look, I am not going to debate with you on this. You are simply making a choice to disparage someone, within almost hours of his death, that the mainstream of thought in America is willing to accept the man in total... The mainstream of American thought is that as the man matured he did do what he felt was right and championed a cause. The means and perhaps even the ends with respect to the cause, I do not necessarily agree with. I am not certain. I do know that it is reported that just prior to his death, in the presence of his priest, he conveyed his comfort in knowing that he would be soon in the presence of his siblings and particularly his brothers. It sounds to me like he had made peace in his own mind with mistakes I know he knew he had made, and that he believed that the next stage of his journey was secured. My judgement or yours (so I believe anyway) is irrelevant. Finally, all I stated was that I did not know how I would stand up to the devastation of the losses he suffered. By the grace of God I have been blessed not to experience such tragedy in my life. If you have, and you know with certainty that you'd buck up under that load, I salute you. If you have not suffered such loss, and I sincerely hope you have not, I suggest that you are a fool for your assertion that it may be a negative reflection on my character. |
Ted Kennedy
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Family-Outdoors
wrote: I of course was referring to Chappaquiddick, Why "of course?" Joe, Jr. died in WW2, John in 1963, and Ted was not "a very young man," he was about middle-aged (he was 36/37) in 1969. And he had made scores of "horrible decisions" by that point, although granted, AFAIK, he had not yet let a young woman who he was fooling around with drown in a Ford, at the Vineyard, previous to that. He had, however, had a fair number of close calls while driving drunk, and a fair number of those occurred prior to John's death, so blaming his, um, issues on, or excusing them by, the death of his 3 brothers doesn't wash, and that if I am not mistaken occurred in 1969...therefore what I stated was true. Look, I am not going to debate with you on this. You are simply making a choice to disparage someone, within almost hours of his death, Er, no, I didn't. I made an admittedly dark joke - if you didn't know, "The Dead Kennedys" were a famous punk band, insofar as punk bands go, and then, I simply responded to Tom's question. I said that, as many here already know, I didn't like him in life and his dying did nothing to change my opinion of him. I didn't mention a single thing that he did/didn't do/whatever in my original reply, I simply referred to him _exactly_ as I have for 12-13 years on ROFF. that the mainstream of thought in America is willing to accept the man in total... The mainstream of American thought is that as the man matured he did do what he felt was right and championed a cause. "The mainstream of American thought?" Uh-huh... The means and perhaps even the ends with respect to the cause, I do not necessarily agree with. I am not certain. I do know that it is reported that just prior to his death, in the presence of his priest, he conveyed his comfort in knowing that he would be soon in the presence of his siblings and particularly his brothers. It sounds to me like he had made peace in his own mind with mistakes I know he knew he had made, and that he believed that the next stage of his journey was secured. No, he was being a typical Kennedy - as full of **** as a whole flock of Christmas geese. Many of the Kennedys have found God more times each than a stadium full of Pentecostals... My judgement or yours (so I believe anyway) is irrelevant. I have spent more time then I wished around Kennedys and their "friends" (a fair amount of time), grew up and spent a fair amount of my adult life in Palm Beach, spent time on Martha's Vineyard and have a number of friends who have done similarly, including several that also have family homes there. I mean this as a straightforward question: "what personal insight do you have into the Kennedys?" Finally, all I stated was that I did not know how I would stand up to the devastation of the losses he suffered. By the grace of God I have been blessed not to experience such tragedy in my life. If you have, and you know with certainty that you'd buck up under that load, I salute you. Like most folks, I've had tragedy in my life. I have no interest in getting into a "who's tragedy is more tragic" contest and even if I did, folks who have suffered well beyond what Ted, I, and apparently, you, have combined have not acted as Ted did nor have they used that suffering as an excuse. In fact, many have taken, if you pardon the pun, a licking and kept on ticking. If you have not suffered such loss, and I sincerely hope you have not, I suggest that you are a fool for your assertion that it may be a negative reflection on my character. Well, let me not suggest, but state it plain - if you were to have a drinking problem, it would be your problem, and blaming it on outside forces would be a flaw in your character. If you think Ted's actions are justified by the death of his brothers, or actions such as Ted's are justified or excused by tragedy, that too is a flaw in your character. And there you are, R |
Ted Kennedy
**** happens and life goes on. I am the last of my generation. I have
lost a brother and sister, both suddenly. I did not try to get a marriage annuled after more than 25 years of marriage, and by so doing, making my offspring legally *******s. Nor did I kill anyone, make havoc in a bar with Dodd, or go on a drunken spree that has lasted ever so long. Ted Kennedy is the weakest of the three brothers (I do not include Joe because Ted did no know him). I am sorry for his death, but I certainly will not miss his lies and hypocrisy. Richard was correct in his admonition of the man. Some will think him a saint; I look upon him as a joke, dead or alive. Dave |
Ted Kennedy
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:57:01 -0400, David LaCourse wrote:
**** happens and life goes on. I am the last of my generation. I have lost a brother and sister, both suddenly. I did not try to get a marriage annuled after more than 25 years of marriage, and by so doing, making my offspring legally *******s. Nor did I kill anyone, make havoc in a bar with Dodd, or go on a drunken spree that has lasted ever so long. Ted Kennedy is the weakest of the three brothers (I do not include Joe because Ted did no know him). I am sorry for his death, but I certainly will not miss his lies and hypocrisy. Richard was correct in his admonition of the man. Some will think him a saint; I look upon him as a joke, dead or alive. Richard did not "admonish" him - no definition of which he is aware would fit his opinion of Ted - he called him a piece of ****, and he stands by it. R Dave |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter