Being constent
 

I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 1:50*pm, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Nice troll.....not gonna bite.

Being constent
 

"sandy" wrote in message
. ..
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

What he said.

And Sandy, I'm still waiting for a mailing address from you or should I
just send the flyz to your web address :~^ ) once I tie them, of course.

Op

Being constent
 

Merry Christmas, Sandy. And a very prosperous New Year to you and yours.

Dave

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 4:00*pm, " wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:



I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

Being constent
 

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:



I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

Jeez, he hates college sportz and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!

Op --a non-Christian with at least an inkling of the joy and spirit of the
season--

Being constent
 

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:



I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

Jeez, he hates college sportz and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!

Op --a non-Christian with at least an inkling of the joy and spirit of the
season--

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Yep, and some of these congressmen have been in on the stealing, fraud
and overbilling of medicare. For Example, former Senator Bill Frist,
whose conflicts of interest, financial disclosure, insider trading and
campaign finance problems caused the group Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to name Frist as one of the
most "corrupt" members of Congress. The Frist family fortunes come
from the Hospital Corp of America, which Wiki says "was the subject of
a decade-long Federal investigation into double-bookkeeping and
suspected criminal fraud involving the bilking of Medicare, Medicaid,
and Tricare (the federal program that provides health insurance to
members of the military and their families)." So much for his claims
to be a patriot.

HCA companies had to repay more than, $1,700,000,000 yep thats more
than ONE point seven BILLION dollars, in fines the largest ever in US
history. And afterwords guess what? the Bushees let HCA stay in the
medicare program!!
I challenge anyone to deny that this occurred. See, for normal
Americans OVERBILLING is what the white collar thieves call it; to the
rest of us it's just plain stealing. Come on whackjobs, explain it
away.

These howling sons of bitches had 12 years to do something about
healthcare reform. They did diddly squat, zip, Nadya. Now, after being
coaxed, offered a role, treated as colleagues, the only thing they
have to offer is to spend MILLIONs to scare elders, lying that Obama's
efforts to crack down on FRAUD by fly-by-night companies and GOP
donors, are cuts in service.

The corrupt ideologues and Snake handler preachers who have captured
the GOP do not deserve the support of real conservatives and
Republican moderates. They stole your party and you owe them nothing.
Soon they will ask you to vote for some of the worst bigots and
theocrats to run for public office since reconstruction. Fight back.
Take your party back. Preserve the American two party system, the
bulwark our forefathers built against radicalism. Wise up. Don't be a
chump for the corporations and Wall Street.

Dave
America First

Being constent
 

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:



I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

If this ain't talent, the GOP will, enthusiastically, support all future Dem
initiatives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5aSs...eature=related

Jeez, he hates college sportz and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!

Op --a non-Christian with at least an inkling of the joy and spirit of the
season--

Being constent
 

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
(regarding the Beatles)
Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

each to their own. Many, many folks who know way more about music than I,
would disagree. And this eclectic music listener, who listens to jazz,
classical, rock
and delta blues at times in the same evening, strongly disagrees.
Tom
p.s. sales numbers mean little to me, either......

Being constent
 

On 24-Dec-2009, DaveS wrote:

am, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Yep, and some of these congressmen have been in on the stealing, fraud
and overbilling of medicare. For Example, former Senator Bill Frist,
whose conflicts of interest, financial disclosure, insider trading and
campaign finance problems caused the group Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to name Frist as one of the
most "corrupt" members of Congress. The Frist family fortunes come
from the Hospital Corp of America, which Wiki says "was the subject of
a decade-long Federal investigation into double-bookkeeping and
suspected criminal fraud involving the bilking of Medicare, Medicaid,
and Tricare (the federal program that provides health insurance to
members of the military and their families)." So much for his claims
to be a patriot.

HCA companies had to repay more than, $1,700,000,000 yep thats more
than ONE point seven BILLION dollars, in fines the largest ever in US
history. And afterwords guess what? the Bushees let HCA stay in the
medicare program!!
I challenge anyone to deny that this occurred. See, for normal
Americans OVERBILLING is what the white collar thieves call it; to the
rest of us it's just plain stealing. Come on whackjobs, explain it
away.

These howling sons of bitches had 12 years to do something about
healthcare reform. They did diddly squat, zip, Nadya. Now, after being
coaxed, offered a role, treated as colleagues, the only thing they
have to offer is to spend MILLIONs to scare elders, lying that Obama's
efforts to crack down on FRAUD by fly-by-night companies and GOP
donors, are cuts in service.

The corrupt ideologues and Snake handler preachers who have captured
the GOP do not deserve the support of real conservatives and
Republican moderates. They stole your party and you owe them nothing.
Soon they will ask you to vote for some of the worst bigots and
theocrats to run for public office since reconstruction. Fight back.
Take your party back. Preserve the American two party system, the
bulwark our forefathers built against radicalism. Wise up. Don't be a
chump for the corporations and Wall Street.

Dave
America First

Republocrats
I'd sooner shoot em and eat em'
Just varmints!

Davey Crockett

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:


I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.



Good to 'see' ya, Sandy G

There is evidence that "conservative" IS a genetic condition ...

I'm too lazy to search for the links on X-mas but I've read several
interesting studies. One has shown that people that call themselves
'conservative' have THREE TIMES the brain activity in areas associated
with fear as others, when shown exactly the same images or other
stimulation !! Another study has followed individuals for years
and indicates that it is possible to predict adult political leanings
by observing youngsters and their interactions ... those 'destined' to
conservative politics tend to be much less outgoing and, again, far
more prone to fear, as children.

Apparently, when 'they' engage in fear mongering, it's NOT just a
political game ... they really are afraid and know their constituents
really are too. Change IS often scary, is it not? It's probably
far more so to them.

Although, I've seen no studies to support this observations, I
personally, have also reached the conclusion that weak mental
abilities in the areas of 'empathy' and 'imagination' are strongly
connected to politically 'conservative' individuals. I first
noticed this many years ago in a discussion with a stongly
conservative friend. He simply was incapable of using his
imagination and mentally inserting himself into the shoes of
others, ... and it did appear to be lack of ability in those skills,
not any lack of effort, or lack of 'intelligence'. Since that
conversation, I've noticed the same weaknesses in many 'right wing'
people I've met.

It often seems conservatives simply aren't capable of visualizing a
future that is both different and better. Maybe their brains
really are that limited and they really can't. Maybe we should see
them as handicapped more than as simply self-serving boneheads, ....
maybe it would be fairer to them and make communicating with them
easier.

Being constent
 

With the Nation in economic distress and unemployment above 10% , the
Democrats in the House Of Representatives and, now a Senate,
Committee, without even knowing the content blundered thru Obama's
"Cap and Tax Bill". Legislation that could well topple our economy
into a depression. Pure fiscal insanity. For the Kool-aid addicts who
believed Obama when he said that he would give a tax break to 95% of
Americans, hold on to you wallets and prepare for the largest single
regressive tax increase in American history. This "Global Warming"
fraud will prove to be the biggest jobs killer ever conceived; and,
simply ship millions of America jobs overseas to countries such as
China and India. The next time you hear the ranting of an Obamanite,
ask them why there is "NO" statistical correlation between atmospheric
CO2 levels and global temperatures (the latter which actually have
slightly decreased over the last decade) -and- why the temperature
trend lines on Mars tracks identically with that on earth. ((Hint: the
Sun is the only common denominator.)) In brief: global temperature
variations correlate precisely with Solar activity. As for the
sustained hype over Ice Cap melting and sea level rise, Ice core
drilling in the fast ice off Davis Station in East Antarctica shows
that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest
in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s
is 1.67m. To emphasize the importance of these statistics, Antarctica
contains 90% of the world's ice pack. Now you know why the inventor of
the internet, Albert Gore, refuses to debate the issue. "If" the
Global Warming enthusiasts were sincere in their intent to reduce
manmade CO2 emissions, which constitute less than 0.00022 percent of
the total naturally emitted from the earth s mantle, they would be
actively promoting the significantly expanded use of Nuclear Power for
America's electrical energy generation. An endeavor intended not only
to rerduce CO2, which constitutes only about 0.037% of total
atmosphere gases ; but, as well, to dramatically reduce our dependence
on imported energy resources; and, to provide a distributed grid with
dormant interconnectivity. The logic in this dilemma is exceedingly
transparent, our Dictatorial Marxist, Barack Obama, simply wants more
control over your activities and lifestyle; and, the health of the
American economy be dammed. It's essential that we clean house in the
upcoming elections.

Plagiarist [email protected]
 

posted the message below, AS IF IT WERE HIS OWN, but the TRUE author is,
Greg Neubeck, who posted it as a commentary to an article in The
PhoenixStar, entitled, "Global warming skepticism on rise in U.S.," which
was written by, Ed Stoddard and Carey Gillam of Reuters on December 4, 2009.

**Public Service Notice**

Op --truly sad that the MORON is even incapable of writing his own shtick--

"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message
...
With the Nation in economic distress and unemployment above 10% , the
Democrats in the House Of Representatives and, now a Senate,
Committee, without even knowing the content blundered thru Obama's
"Cap and Tax Bill". Legislation that could well topple our economy
into a depression. Pure fiscal insanity. For the Kool-aid addicts who
believed Obama when he said that he would give a tax break to 95% of
Americans, hold on to you wallets and prepare for the largest single
regressive tax increase in American history. This "Global Warming"
fraud will prove to be the biggest jobs killer ever conceived; and,
simply ship millions of America jobs overseas to countries such as
China and India. The next time you hear the ranting of an Obamanite,
ask them why there is "NO" statistical correlation between atmospheric
CO2 levels and global temperatures (the latter which actually have
slightly decreased over the last decade) -and- why the temperature
trend lines on Mars tracks identically with that on earth. ((Hint: the
Sun is the only common denominator.)) In brief: global temperature
variations correlate precisely with Solar activity. As for the
sustained hype over Ice Cap melting and sea level rise, Ice core
drilling in the fast ice off Davis Station in East Antarctica shows
that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest
in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s
is 1.67m. To emphasize the importance of these statistics, Antarctica
contains 90% of the world's ice pack. Now you know why the inventor of
the internet, Albert Gore, refuses to debate the issue. "If" the
Global Warming enthusiasts were sincere in their intent to reduce
manmade CO2 emissions, which constitute less than 0.00022 percent of
the total naturally emitted from the earth s mantle, they would be
actively promoting the significantly expanded use of Nuclear Power for
America's electrical energy generation. An endeavor intended not only
to rerduce CO2, which constitutes only about 0.037% of total
atmosphere gases ; but, as well, to dramatically reduce our dependence
on imported energy resources; and, to provide a distributed grid with
dormant interconnectivity. The logic in this dilemma is exceedingly
transparent, our Dictatorial Marxist, Barack Obama, simply wants more
control over your activities and lifestyle; and, the health of the
American economy be dammed. It's essential that we clean house in the
upcoming elections.

dumb asses.......
 

"POSTED AS IF IT WERE HIS OWN"


Funny....

dumb asses.......
 

On Dec 25, 6:45*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
"POSTED AS IF IT WERE HIS OWN"

Funny....
Hmm, no attribution, no note on where it came from, author's name
striped off, only name associated with it is yours...
Seems spot on to me.
Frank Reid
(who has found some of his own stories plagerized)

dumb asses.......
 

The announcement by Alabama Rep. Parker Griffith that he is switching
to the Republican Party is just the latest warning sign that the
Democratic Party -- my lifelong political home -- has a critical
decision to make: Either we plot a more moderate, centrist course or
risk electoral disaster not just in the upcoming midterms but in many
elections to come.

Rep. Griffith's decision makes him the fifth centrist Democrat to
either switch parties or announce plans to retire rather than stand
for reelection in 2010. These announcements are a sharp reversal from
the progress the Democratic Party made starting in 2006 and continuing
in 2008, when it reestablished itself as the nation's majority party
for the first time in more than a decade. That success happened for
one major reason: Democrats made inroads in geographies and
constituencies that had trended Republican since the 1960s. In these
two elections, a majority of independents and a sizable number of
moderate Republicans joined the traditional
here is more for ya clowns......

Democratic base to sweep Democrats to commanding majorities in
Congress and to bring Barack Obama to the White House.

These independents and Republicans supported Democrats based on a
message indicating that the party would be a true Big Tent -- that we
would welcome a diversity of views even on tough issues such as
abortion, gun rights and the role of government in the economy.

This call was answered not just by voters but by a surge of smart,
talented candidates who came forward to run and win under the
Democratic banner in districts dominated by Republicans for a
generation. These centrists swelled the party's ranks in Congress and
contributed to Obama's victories in states such as Indiana, North
Carolina, Virginia, Colorado and other Republican bastions.

But now they face a grim political fate. On the one hand, centrist
Democrats are being vilified by left-wing bloggers, pundits and
partisan news outlets for not being sufficiently liberal, "true"
Democrats. On the other, Republicans are pounding them for their
association with a party that seems to be advancing an agenda far to
the left of most voters.

The political dangers of this situation could not be clearer.

dumb asses.......
 

Yale most memorable quotes of 2009:#1 Keep your government hands off
my medicare. After citizens discovered the Obama plan to cut
$550,000,000 from medicare.#4 You Lie! Wilson after repeated Obama
lies on Health Care during address to Joint Session.#5 The Cambridge
Police Acted Stupidly! When Major Hasan killed 13 people, Obama held a
press conference at the White House urging everyone to “not make any
rush to judgments.”

With all the evidence about Hasan coming to light and even though the
majority of Americans recognized this as a terrorist attack, Obama
stood up in front of thousands of military personnel and insulted
their intelligence, did he mention the word “terrorist.” Instead,
Obama blamed what happened at Fort Hood on “cynicism and divisiveness”
and the stress of multiple deployments.

There’s something very unique in this entire situation that the state-
run media has completely neglected: how Obama has reacted to various
situations that have arisen during his time in office.

Let’s go back to May of this year. On May 31, an anti-abortion
extremist named Scott Roeder gunned down Dr. George Tiller, an
abortion doctor. Almost immediately, Obama released a statement saying
he was “shocked and outraged” by Tiller’s murder.

Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, immediately stationed U.S.
Marshals at abortion clinics across the country.

A day later, on June 1, the first terrorist attack in Little Rock,
Ark. was committed under Obama’s watch. Pfc. William Long, 23, and
Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula, 18, were shot by a man named Abdulhakim
Mujahid Muhammad.

Obama’s reaction to this was more emotionally toned down. He did not
issue any remarks until a couple days later, when he claimed he was
“deeply saddened.” There were no U.S. Marshals stationed at recruiting
centers, as there were at abortion clinics.

Fast forward to July 26. Police in Cambridge, Mass. arrested professor
Henry-Lewis Gates, an African-American professor, for disorderly
conduct and disturbing the peace.

At a press conference on health care a day later, a reporter asked
Obama about his opinion on the incident. Obama said,“I don’t know all
the facts…but I think the police acted stupidly.”

In perhaps the only truthful thing Obama has ever said since becoming
president, he acknowledged he didn’t have all the facts. But he was
quick to pass judgment on white police officers arresting a black man.

This is also because Obama disdains our military. As a senator, he
voted to cut off vital funding to our troops fighting in Iraq and
Afghanistan and voted against the troop surge in Iraq. He is now in
command of the same troops he voted to betray.

As commander-in-chief, he proclaimed that the idea of victory in
Afghanistan makes him uncomfortable and,for nearly three months,
dragged his feet on deciding whether to send more troops to
Afghanistan.

Evem More Plagiarism from [email protected]
 

http://www.topix.com/forum/us-house/T2VRGOHGDCDA1CAMR

Oh how his ignorance shines so brightly!

Op


"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message
...
The announcement by Alabama Rep. Parker Griffith that he is switching
to the Republican Party is just the latest warning sign that the
Democratic Party -- my lifelong political home -- has a critical
decision to make: Either we plot a more moderate, centrist course or
risk electoral disaster not just in the upcoming midterms but in many
elections to come.

Rep. Griffith's decision makes him the fifth centrist Democrat to
either switch parties or announce plans to retire rather than stand
for reelection in 2010. These announcements are a sharp reversal from
the progress the Democratic Party made starting in 2006 and continuing
in 2008, when it reestablished itself as the nation's majority party
for the first time in more than a decade. That success happened for
one major reason: Democrats made inroads in geographies and
constituencies that had trended Republican since the 1960s. In these
two elections, a majority of independents and a sizable number of
moderate Republicans joined the traditional
here is more for ya clowns......

Democratic base to sweep Democrats to commanding majorities in
Congress and to bring Barack Obama to the White House.

These independents and Republicans supported Democrats based on a
message indicating that the party would be a true Big Tent -- that we
would welcome a diversity of views even on tough issues such as
abortion, gun rights and the role of government in the economy.

This call was answered not just by voters but by a surge of smart,
talented candidates who came forward to run and win under the
Democratic banner in districts dominated by Republicans for a
generation. These centrists swelled the party's ranks in Congress and
contributed to Obama's victories in states such as Indiana, North
Carolina, Virginia, Colorado and other Republican bastions.

But now they face a grim political fate. On the one hand, centrist
Democrats are being vilified by left-wing bloggers, pundits and
partisan news outlets for not being sufficiently liberal, "true"
Democrats. On the other, Republicans are pounding them for their
association with a party that seems to be advancing an agenda far to
the left of most voters.

The political dangers of this situation could not be clearer.

A Double Dose of Evem More Plagiarism from [email protected]
 

http://www.topix.com/forum/us/TDBHQ6CAEJ3I3IO7I/p3646

Just what one would expect from a lying scum!

Op


"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message
...

Yale most memorable quotes of 2009:#1 Keep your government hands off
my medicare. After citizens discovered the Obama plan to cut
$550,000,000 from medicare.#4 You Lie! Wilson after repeated Obama
lies on Health Care during address to Joint Session.#5 The Cambridge
Police Acted Stupidly! When Major Hasan killed 13 people, Obama held a
press conference at the White House urging everyone to “not make any
rush to judgments.”

With all the evidence about Hasan coming to light and even though the
majority of Americans recognized this as a terrorist attack, Obama
stood up in front of thousands of military personnel and insulted
their intelligence, did he mention the word “terrorist.” Instead,
Obama blamed what happened at Fort Hood on “cynicism and divisiveness”
and the stress of multiple deployments.

There’s something very unique in this entire situation that the state-
run media has completely neglected: how Obama has reacted to various
situations that have arisen during his time in office.

Let’s go back to May of this year. On May 31, an anti-abortion
extremist named Scott Roeder gunned down Dr. George Tiller, an
abortion doctor. Almost immediately, Obama released a statement saying
he was “shocked and outraged” by Tiller’s murder.

Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, immediately stationed U.S.
Marshals at abortion clinics across the country.

A day later, on June 1, the first terrorist attack in Little Rock,
Ark. was committed under Obama’s watch. Pfc. William Long, 23, and
Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula, 18, were shot by a man named Abdulhakim
Mujahid Muhammad.

Obama’s reaction to this was more emotionally toned down. He did not
issue any remarks until a couple days later, when he claimed he was
“deeply saddened.” There were no U.S. Marshals stationed at recruiting
centers, as there were at abortion clinics.

Fast forward to July 26. Police in Cambridge, Mass. arrested professor
Henry-Lewis Gates, an African-American professor, for disorderly
conduct and disturbing the peace.

At a press conference on health care a day later, a reporter asked
Obama about his opinion on the incident. Obama said,“I don’t know all
the facts…but I think the police acted stupidly.”

In perhaps the only truthful thing Obama has ever said since becoming
president, he acknowledged he didn’t have all the facts. But he was
quick to pass judgment on white police officers arresting a black man.

This is also because Obama disdains our military. As a senator, he
voted to cut off vital funding to our troops fighting in Iraq and
Afghanistan and voted against the troop surge in Iraq. He is now in
command of the same troops he voted to betray.

As commander-in-chief, he proclaimed that the idea of victory in
Afghanistan makes him uncomfortable and,for nearly three months,
dragged his feet on deciding whether to send more troops to
Afghanistan.

Plagiarist [email protected]
 

On Dec 25, 3:14*pm, "Mark Bowen" wrote:
posted the message below, AS IF IT WERE HIS OWN, but the TRUE author is,
Greg Neubeck, who posted it as a commentary to an article in The
PhoenixStar, entitled, "Global warming skepticism on rise in U.S.," which
was written by, Ed Stoddard and Carey Gillam of Reuters on December 4, 2009.

**Public Service Notice**

Op *--truly sad that the MORON is even incapable of writing his own shtick--

About par for the course. This is afterall a guy who had been pretty
vague as to his professional standing. His style of lying in the posts
is right out of the whackjob play book.

Dave

dumb asses......
 

Because he sympathizes with them. He thinks America is a bad country
that has abused the rest of the world, made them do our bidding,
bullied them, and stole their resources. Obama hates America; just
like his buddy Bill Ayers the SDS bomber and Jeremiah Wright do. That
is why Obama is always overseas apologizing for our "bad" country.
Americans elected a president who DOES NOT believe in the essential
goodness of America! We will come to regret that.

More Plagiarism from [email protected]
 

"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message
...

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 7:31*pm, MajorOz wrote:
On Dec 24, 4:00*pm, " wrote:



On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:

I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). *Their music does not "live". *

Their music does not live? I guess that would depend on what you mean
by "live"......or, perhaps more precisely, on whether we should assume
that any meaning at all attaches to the term as you use it.

It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

Well, it was popular music, so I guess that in one sense or another it
can legitimately be thought of as a fad.....ephemera, if you
will.....much as that of Beethoven, the Gershwins, Somalian drumming,
Irving Berlin, Andean pan-pipes and......um.....well, just about
anything that doesn't quite measure up to your personal tastes,
elevated standards and eternal authority.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

No, one should never confuse sales figures with quality. Quality is
an inherent esthetic characteristic demonstrated by conformity with
objective criteria which we are certain you will reveal to us when the
time is right.......when he have shown sufficient interest in and
mastery of what you will, if we are lucky, one day tell us matters.

g.
merely one of several hundred millions of journalists......or
dilatants.....or something.

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 10:46*pm, "Fred" wrote:

Republocrats
I'd sooner shoot em and eat em'
Just varmints!

Davey Crockett- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Eating up the last of our bacon and roast pig with my kids and
grandsons. Wonder what goes with Long-pig? I am not big on Fava beans.
Ideas? ;+))

Dave

Being constent
 

On 26-Dec-2009, DaveS wrote:

Republocrats
I'd sooner shoot em and eat em'
Just varmints!

Davey Crockett- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Eating up the last of our bacon and roast pig with my kids and
grandsons. Wonder what goes with Long-pig? I am not big on Fava beans.
Ideas? ;+))

Dave

Cheney on a Sesame seed bialy with tomato sauce and lemon - I will pass
My eclectic culinary taste only goes so far

Fried mule would be better.

Fred
Who once told his granddaughter that a chain restaurant - Pete's Fried Mule
- was moving to our small town - I told her that fried mule would go well
w peanut butter
She did not believe me ????

Being constent
 

On Dec 24, 8:00*pm, "Mark Bowen" wrote:
"MajorOz" wrote in message

...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:



On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:

I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). *Their music does not "live". *It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

If this ain't talent, the GOP will, enthusiastically, support all future Dem
initiatives.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5aSs...eature=related

Jeez, he hates college sportz

Actually, he loves college sports...or, at least did when it was
sport. They should all revert to the Ivy Leage concept, leaving it
where it belongs.

and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!

No.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

Cheers

oz

Being constent
 

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
On Dec 24, 8:00 pm, "Mark Bowen" wrote:
"MajorOz" wrote in message

...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:



On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:

I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting
rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull
Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and
to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care
luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”

Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

If this ain't talent, the GOP will, enthusiastically, support all future
Dem
initiatives.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5aSs...eature=related

Jeez, he hates college sportz

Actually, he loves college sports...or, at least did when it was
sport. They should all revert to the Ivy Leage concept, leaving it
where it belongs.

and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!

No.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

Cheers

oz

Okay, that ain't so bad then! Mozart is good, Bob Wills is a bit before my
time, though I'm sure I'd like him--he's a Rapper, right?

MC, HH, FK, and HNY to ya Major Oz!

Being constent
 

On 26-Dec-2009, "Mark Bowen" wrote:

Okay, that ain't so bad then! Mozart is good, Bob Wills is a bit before my

time, though I'm sure I'd like him--he's a Rapper, right?

You would like him.

The father of Western (Texas) Country Swing
Bob Wills and the Texas Playboys
http://www.bobwills.com/

They had a unique sound - like none other - Immensely popular

Fred

Being constent
 

On Dec 25, 12:55*pm, Larry L wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:



I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

Good to 'see' ya, Sandy G

There is evidence that "conservative" IS a genetic condition ...

I'm too lazy to search for the links on X-mas but I've read several
interesting studies. * One has shown that people that call themselves
'conservative' have THREE TIMES the brain activity in areas associated
with fear as others, when shown exactly the same images or other
stimulation !! * * Another study *has followed individuals for years
and indicates that it is possible to predict adult political leanings
by observing youngsters and their interactions ... those 'destined' to
conservative politics tend to be much less outgoing and, again, far
more prone to fear, as children.

Apparently, when 'they' engage in fear mongering, it's NOT just a
political game ... they really are afraid and know their constituents
really are too. * Change IS often scary, is it not? * It's probably
far more so to them.

Although, I've seen no studies to support this observations, I
personally, have also reached the conclusion that weak mental
abilities in the areas of 'empathy' and 'imagination' are strongly
connected to politically 'conservative' individuals. * *I first
noticed this many years ago in a discussion with a stongly
conservative friend. * He simply was incapable of using his
imagination and mentally inserting himself into the shoes of
others, ... and it did appear to be lack of ability in those skills,
not any lack of effort, or lack of 'intelligence'. * Since that
conversation, I've noticed the same weaknesses in many 'right wing'
people I've met.

It often seems conservatives simply aren't capable of visualizing a
future that is both different and better. * * Maybe their brains
really are that limited and they really can't. * *Maybe we should see
them as handicapped more than as simply self-serving boneheads, ....
maybe it would be fairer to them and make communicating with them
easier.

In point of fact, the problems that beset America (and other places as
well, I suppose) today have much less to do with whether people
identify themselves, or one another, as conservatives or liberals,
than with the fact that not one in a thousand can be relied upon to
demonstrate that either term has any relevant meaning at all......let
alone what that meaning might be.

But then, you're not one of the multitude......right?

Go ahead.....try it.

g.

Being constent
 

On Dec 25, 2:16*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
With the Nation in economic distress and unemployment above 10% , the
Democrats in the House Of Representatives and, now a Senate,
Committee, without even knowing the content blundered thru Obama's
"Cap and Tax Bill". Legislation that could well topple our economy
into a depression. Pure fiscal insanity. For the Kool-aid addicts who
believed Obama when he said that he would give a tax break to 95% of
Americans, hold on to you wallets and prepare for the largest single
regressive tax increase in American history. This "Global Warming"
fraud will prove to be the biggest jobs killer ever conceived; and,
simply ship millions of America jobs overseas to countries such as
China and India. The next time you hear the ranting of an Obamanite,
ask them why there is "NO" statistical correlation between atmospheric
CO2 levels and global temperatures (the latter which actually have
slightly decreased over the last decade) -and- why the temperature
trend lines on Mars tracks identically with that on earth. ((Hint: the
Sun is the only common denominator.)) In brief: global temperature
variations correlate precisely with Solar activity. As for the
sustained hype over Ice Cap melting and sea level rise, Ice core
drilling in the fast ice off Davis Station in East Antarctica shows
that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest
in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s
is 1.67m. To emphasize the importance of these statistics, Antarctica
contains 90% of the world's ice pack. Now you know why the inventor of
the internet, Albert Gore, refuses to debate the issue. "If" the
Global Warming enthusiasts were sincere in their intent to reduce
manmade CO2 emissions, which constitute less than 0.00022 percent of
the total naturally emitted from the earth s mantle, they would be
actively promoting the significantly expanded use of Nuclear Power for
America's electrical energy generation. An endeavor intended not only
to rerduce CO2, which constitutes only about 0.037% of total
atmosphere gases ; but, as well, to dramatically reduce our dependence
on imported energy resources; and, to provide a distributed grid with
dormant interconnectivity. The logic in this dilemma is exceedingly
transparent, our Dictatorial Marxist, Barack Obama, simply wants more
control over your activities and lifestyle; and, the health of the
American economy be dammed. It's essential that we clean house in the
upcoming elections.

Moron.

g.

dumb asses.......
 

On Dec 25, 7:35*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
The announcement by Alabama Rep. Parker Griffith that he is switching
to the Republican Party is just the latest warning sign that the
Democratic Party -- my lifelong political home -- has a critical
decision to make: Either we plot a more moderate, centrist course or
risk electoral disaster not just in the upcoming midterms but in many
elections to come.

Rep. Griffith's decision makes him the fifth centrist Democrat to
either switch parties or announce plans to retire rather than stand
for reelection in 2010. These announcements are a sharp reversal from
the progress the Democratic Party made starting in 2006 and continuing
in 2008, when it reestablished itself as the nation's majority party
for the first time in more than a decade. That success happened for
one major reason: Democrats made inroads in geographies and
constituencies that had trended Republican since the 1960s. In these
two elections, a majority of independents and a sizable number of
moderate Republicans joined the traditional
here is more for ya clowns......

Democratic base to sweep Democrats to commanding majorities in
Congress and to bring Barack Obama to the White House.

These independents and Republicans supported Democrats based on a
message indicating that the party would be a true Big Tent -- that we
would welcome a diversity of views even on tough issues such as
abortion, gun rights and the role of government in the economy.

This call was answered not just by voters but by a surge of smart,
talented candidates who came forward to run and win under the
Democratic banner in districts dominated by Republicans for a
generation. These centrists swelled the party's ranks in Congress and
contributed to Obama's victories in states such as Indiana, North
Carolina, Virginia, Colorado and other Republican bastions.

But now they face a grim political fate. On the one hand, centrist
Democrats are being vilified by left-wing bloggers, pundits and
partisan news outlets for not being sufficiently liberal, "true"
Democrats. On the other, Republicans are pounding them for their
association with a party that seems to be advancing an agenda far to
the left of most voters.

The political dangers of this situation could not be clearer.

Imbecile.

dumb asses.......
 

On Dec 25, 7:42*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
Yale most memorable quotes of 2009:#1 Keep your government hands off
my medicare. After citizens discovered the Obama plan to cut
$550,000,000 from medicare.#4 You Lie! Wilson after repeated Obama
lies on Health Care during address to Joint Session.#5 The Cambridge
Police Acted Stupidly! When Major Hasan killed 13 people, Obama held a
press conference at the White House urging everyone to “not make any
rush to judgments.”

With all the evidence about Hasan coming to light and even though the
majority of Americans recognized this as a terrorist attack, Obama
stood up in front of thousands of military personnel and insulted
their intelligence, did he mention the word “terrorist.” Instead,
Obama blamed what happened at Fort Hood on “cynicism and divisiveness”
and the stress of multiple deployments.

There’s something very unique in this entire situation that the state-
run media has completely neglected: how Obama has reacted to various
situations that have arisen during his time in office.

Let’s go back to May of this year. On May 31, an anti-abortion
extremist named Scott Roeder gunned down Dr. George Tiller, an
abortion doctor. Almost immediately, Obama released a statement saying
he was “shocked and outraged” by Tiller’s murder.

Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, immediately stationed U.S.
Marshals at abortion clinics across the country.

A day later, on June 1, the first terrorist attack in Little Rock,
Ark. was committed under Obama’s watch. Pfc. William Long, 23, and
Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula, 18, were shot by a man named Abdulhakim
Mujahid Muhammad.

Obama’s reaction to this was more emotionally toned down. He did not
issue any remarks until a couple days later, when he claimed he was
“deeply saddened.” There were no U.S. Marshals stationed at recruiting
centers, as there were at abortion clinics.

Fast forward to July 26. Police in Cambridge, Mass. arrested professor
Henry-Lewis Gates, an African-American professor, for disorderly
conduct and disturbing the peace.

At a press conference on health care a day later, a reporter asked
Obama about his opinion on the incident. Obama said,“I don’t know all
the facts…but I think the police acted stupidly.”

In perhaps the only truthful thing Obama has ever said since becoming
president, he acknowledged he didn’t have all the facts. But he was
quick to pass judgment on white police officers arresting a black man.

This is also because Obama disdains our military. As a senator, he
voted to cut off vital funding to our troops fighting in Iraq and
Afghanistan and voted against the troop surge in Iraq. He is now in
command of the same troops he voted to betray.

As commander-in-chief, he proclaimed that the idea of victory in
Afghanistan makes him uncomfortable and,for nearly three months,
dragged his feet on deciding whether to send more troops to
Afghanistan.

Idiot.

g.

dumb asses......
 

On Dec 26, 8:39*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
Because he sympathizes with them. He thinks America is a bad country
that has abused the rest of the world, made them do our bidding,
bullied them, and stole their resources. Obama hates America; just
like his buddy Bill Ayers the SDS bomber and Jeremiah Wright do. That
is why Obama is always overseas apologizing for our "bad" country.
Americans elected a president who DOES NOT believe in the essential
goodness of America! We will come to regret that.

dumb asses......
 

On Dec 26, 8:39*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
Because he sympathizes with them. He thinks America is a bad country
that has abused the rest of the world, made them do our bidding,
bullied them, and stole their resources. Obama hates America; just
like his buddy Bill Ayers the SDS bomber and Jeremiah Wright do. That
is why Obama is always overseas apologizing for our "bad" country.
Americans elected a president who DOES NOT believe in the essential
goodness of America! We will come to regret that.

Cretin.

g.

Being constent
 

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

and, that album they did together was fabulous!g
Tom

Being constent
 

On Dec 27, 5:56*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"MajorOz" wrote in message

...

.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

and, that album they did together was fabulous!g
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

....heh, heh, heh............that absolutely boggles the mind.
Although I would expect that Mozart would respect and appreciate the
music of BW.

cheers

oz.........as Strauss would have appreciated Kubric's treatment in
_2001_.

Being constent
 

On Dec 27, 1:08*pm, MajorOz wrote:
On Dec 27, 5:56*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:

"MajorOz" wrote in message

....

.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

and, that album they did together was fabulous!g
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

...heh, heh, heh............that absolutely boggles the mind.
Although I would expect that Mozart would respect and appreciate the
music of BW.

cheers

oz.........as Strauss would have appreciated Kubric's treatment in
_2001_.

And they would all beat beancounter in tic tac toe.
Frank Reid