FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Glory ? (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=36480)

MajorOz August 13th, 2010 04:17 AM

Glory ?
 
Water was WAY down below the dam on the White this morning.

Temp hit 100 yesterday with humidity in the 70's.

Water temp was mid 40's.

A bit of fog on the water.

Yeah..........a bit.

Fog was about 25 or so feet deep, and visibility was about 15-20 feet
in it. From above, it looked like the river valley was full of snow.

Standing in the water, with herons croaking and fish slapping the
surface here and there, it was very serene.

When the sun came up, I was surrounded by a rainbow. All around me.
The APPARENT width of the color bars was about 3 ft each.

I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an
hour and a half, until the fog (mostly) burned off.

Oh.........caught a few, and broke off a large(ish) one on an orange
stimulator, size 10, in an area where only the microscopic zebras and
sow bugs usually work.

Will try again tomorrow, if I get up early enough after watching the
Perseids.

cheers

oz

Jonathan Cook August 13th, 2010 05:36 PM

Glory ?
 
On Aug 12, 9:17*pm, MajorOz wrote:
I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". *I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an


Sounds like an awesome experience. Thanks for sharing.

Jon.

Bill Grey[_2_] August 13th, 2010 08:56 PM

Glory ?
 


"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
...
On Aug 12, 9:17 pm, MajorOz wrote:
I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an


Sounds like an awesome experience. Thanks for sharing.

Jon.


Should you find yourelf walking along a high ridge or hill when here is an
inversion - cloud layer lower than you- the sun behind you might cast a
shadow of you onto the cloud. This is called a Brocken Scpectre, and there
may be a halo around the head of the shadow - this is called a glory.

Google - "Brocken Spectre and Glory"

Bill



Bill Grey[_2_] August 13th, 2010 09:05 PM

Glory ?
 

"Bill Grey" wrote in message
...


"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
...
On Aug 12, 9:17 pm, MajorOz wrote:
I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an


Sounds like an awesome experience. Thanks for sharing.

Jon.


Should you find yourelf walking along a high ridge or hill when here is an
inversion - cloud layer lower than you- the sun behind you might cast a
shadow of you onto the cloud. This is called a Brocken Scpectre, and
there may be a halo around the head of the shadow - this is called a
glory.

Google - "Brocken Spectre and Glory"

Bill


Have a look at :-
http://cloudappreciationsociety.org/...ocken-spectre/

Bill



DaveS August 13th, 2010 09:34 PM

Glory ?
 
On Aug 13, 12:56*pm, "Bill Grey" wrote:
"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message

...
On Aug 12, 9:17 pm, MajorOz wrote:

I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an


Sounds like an awesome experience. Thanks for sharing.

Jon.

Should you find yourelf walking along a high ridge or hill when here is an
inversion - cloud layer lower than you- the sun behind you might cast a
shadow of you onto the cloud. *This is called a Brocken Scpectre, and there
may be a halo around the head of the shadow - this is called a glory.

Google - *"Brocken Spectre and Glory"

Bill


Makes me wonder if this spectre and halo effect thing occurs sometimes
in the Holy Land? Mt Olympus? On the Black Mesa? Machu Pichu?
Hummmmmmmmm. ;+))
Dave

Giles August 13th, 2010 10:30 PM

Glory ?
 
On Aug 13, 3:05*pm, "Bill Grey" wrote:
"Bill Grey" wrote in message

...







"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
....
On Aug 12, 9:17 pm, MajorOz wrote:
I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an


Sounds like an awesome experience. Thanks for sharing.


Jon.


Should you find yourelf walking along a high ridge or hill when here is an
inversion - cloud layer lower than you- the sun behind you might cast a
shadow of you onto the cloud. *This is called a Brocken Scpectre, and
there may be a halo around the head of the shadow - this is called a
glory.


Google - *"Brocken Spectre and Glory"


Bill


Have a look at :-http://cloudappreciationsociety.org/the-brocken-spectre/

Bill


I've seen an effect like this two or three times. A couple of things
come to mind. From the website:

"Of course, cloudspotters don’t have to climb the Brocken to see a
Brocken Spectre – any mountain can serve the purpose. Nor is the sight
of this psychadelic ghost only available to cloudspotters energetic
enough to go mountain climbing. Sometimes, the coloured rings of a
glory can also be seen around an aeroplane’s shadow, cast onto the
cloud layer below."

In fact, one need not be on a mountain or in an airplane. ANY
sufficient elevation above a cloud layer (and remember that fog is
just a very low lying cloud) will do.....a tall building, a hill, the
edge of a precipice overlooking a deep ravine, etc. But not TOO far
above, I suspect. A human being isn't going to cast much of a shadow
onto a cloud layer from thousands of feet above due to diffraction and
diffusion. The rainbow effect might (should?) still be visible
regardless (I think) but the shadow and halo would seem to require
proximity.

And then:

"It is merely an optical effect that appears when sunlight, coming
from directly behind the cloudspotter, falls onto a layer of cloud
droplets."

From the hairsplitting desk; technically, sunlight need not be coming
from behind the cloudspotter......that just makes it easier to see
unless you've got extra vertebrae in your neck that make it possible
for you to turn your head a full 180 degrees. You can stand facing
the sun and the effect will remain and be clearly visible to anyone
standing beside you and looking in the right direction. Meanwhile,
some may not have noticed or thought about it, but a rainbow ALWAYS
appears with the sunlight "coming from directly behind" the viewer, so
to speak.

Lastly:

"This optical effect is still only partially understood." Quite
possibly true, I suppose, but very surprising. No expert in optics, I
wouldn't know. However, optics is a highly developed field.....hell,
if what I've read is correct, Newton singlehandedly made it a highly
developed field nearly three centuries ago.

Anybody know exactly what is not fully understood about this
phenomenon? Anybody got any ideas about the optimum distance between
the subject/viewer and the cloud layer? Does angle of incidence have
anything to do with it? Any other atmospheric or other factors enter
into the equation?

giles

Giles August 13th, 2010 10:40 PM

Glory ?
 
On Aug 13, 3:34*pm, DaveS wrote:
On Aug 13, 12:56*pm, "Bill Grey" wrote:





"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message


....
On Aug 12, 9:17 pm, MajorOz wrote:


I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an


Sounds like an awesome experience. Thanks for sharing.


Jon.


Should you find yourelf walking along a high ridge or hill when here is an
inversion - cloud layer lower than you- the sun behind you might cast a
shadow of you onto the cloud. *This is called a Brocken Scpectre, and there
may be a halo around the head of the shadow - this is called a glory.


Google - *"Brocken Spectre and Glory"


Bill


Makes me wonder if this spectre and halo effect thing occurs sometimes
in the Holy Land? Mt Olympus? *On the Black Mesa? Machu Pichu?
Hummmmmmmmm. ;+))
Dave


Don't know about any of those, but it appears to have been common in
Renaissance painters' studios.

giles
who supposes that all of this was inspired by recent mention of "glory
holes" in these pages.....but cannot for the life of him quite see the
connection. :(

Bill Grey[_2_] August 13th, 2010 10:59 PM

Glory ?
 

"Giles" wrote in message
...
On Aug 13, 3:05 pm, "Bill Grey" wrote:
"Bill Grey" wrote in message

...







"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
...
On Aug 12, 9:17 pm, MajorOz wrote:
I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an


Sounds like an awesome experience. Thanks for sharing.


Jon.


Should you find yourelf walking along a high ridge or hill when here is
an
inversion - cloud layer lower than you- the sun behind you might cast a
shadow of you onto the cloud. This is called a Brocken Scpectre, and
there may be a halo around the head of the shadow - this is called a
glory.


Google - "Brocken Spectre and Glory"


Bill


Have a look at :-http://cloudappreciationsociety.org/the-brocken-spectre/

Bill


I've seen an effect like this two or three times. A couple of things
come to mind. From the website:

"Of course, cloudspotters don’t have to climb the Brocken to see a
Brocken Spectre – any mountain can serve the purpose. Nor is the sight
of this psychadelic ghost only available to cloudspotters energetic
enough to go mountain climbing. Sometimes, the coloured rings of a
glory can also be seen around an aeroplane’s shadow, cast onto the
cloud layer below."

In fact, one need not be on a mountain or in an airplane. ANY
sufficient elevation above a cloud layer (and remember that fog is
just a very low lying cloud) will do.....a tall building, a hill, the
edge of a precipice overlooking a deep ravine, etc. But not TOO far
above, I suspect. A human being isn't going to cast much of a shadow
onto a cloud layer from thousands of feet above due to diffraction and
diffusion. The rainbow effect might (should?) still be visible
regardless (I think) but the shadow and halo would seem to require
proximity.

And then:

"It is merely an optical effect that appears when sunlight, coming
from directly behind the cloudspotter, falls onto a layer of cloud
droplets."

From the hairsplitting desk; technically, sunlight need not be coming
from behind the cloudspotter......that just makes it easier to see
unless you've got extra vertebrae in your neck that make it possible
for you to turn your head a full 180 degrees. You can stand facing
the sun and the effect will remain and be clearly visible to anyone
standing beside you and looking in the right direction. Meanwhile,
some may not have noticed or thought about it, but a rainbow ALWAYS
appears with the sunlight "coming from directly behind" the viewer, so
to speak.

Lastly:

"This optical effect is still only partially understood." Quite
possibly true, I suppose, but very surprising. No expert in optics, I
wouldn't know. However, optics is a highly developed field.....hell,
if what I've read is correct, Newton singlehandedly made it a highly
developed field nearly three centuries ago.

Anybody know exactly what is not fully understood about this
phenomenon? Anybody got any ideas about the optimum distance between
the subject/viewer and the cloud layer? Does angle of incidence have
anything to do with it? Any other atmospheric or other factors enter
into the equation?

giles


Sorry I spoke !

Bill



Giles August 13th, 2010 11:39 PM

Glory ?
 
On Aug 13, 4:59*pm, "Bill Grey" wrote:


Sorry I spoke !

Bill


Why?

giles

Robert from Oz August 14th, 2010 05:04 AM

Glory ?
 
Hi Oz,
Who said fishing was just about catching fish. Enjoy the rest of your trip
and all the "little bonus' on the way. The best thing is having a front row
seat. I experienced a spectacular sunrise with the kids this morning from
home, brilliant reds and oranges. After the initial "wow", I yearned to be
fishing.

Rob.












"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
Water was WAY down below the dam on the White this morning.

Temp hit 100 yesterday with humidity in the 70's.

Water temp was mid 40's.

A bit of fog on the water.

Yeah..........a bit.

Fog was about 25 or so feet deep, and visibility was about 15-20 feet
in it. From above, it looked like the river valley was full of snow.

Standing in the water, with herons croaking and fish slapping the
surface here and there, it was very serene.

When the sun came up, I was surrounded by a rainbow. All around me.
The APPARENT width of the color bars was about 3 ft each.

I had never experienced this before, but remember relatives talking
about foggy mountain tops producing a phenomenon called a "glory". I
don't know if this was one, but it was glorious, and lasted about an
hour and a half, until the fog (mostly) burned off.

Oh.........caught a few, and broke off a large(ish) one on an orange
stimulator, size 10, in an area where only the microscopic zebras and
sow bugs usually work.

Will try again tomorrow, if I get up early enough after watching the
Perseids.

cheers

oz




Bill Grey[_2_] August 15th, 2010 10:13 AM

Glory ?
 

"Giles" wrote in message
...
On Aug 13, 4:59 pm, "Bill Grey" wrote:


Sorry I spoke !

Bill


Why?

giles

I simply tried to answer the original question in simple terms.

I wasn't in the mood for nitpicking discussion however interesting.

Bill



Giles August 15th, 2010 12:33 PM

Glory ?
 
On Aug 15, 4:13*am, "Bill Grey" wrote:
"Giles" wrote in message

...
On Aug 13, 4:59 pm, "Bill Grey" wrote:

Sorry I spoke !


Bill


Why?

giles

I simply tried to answer the original question in simple terms.

I *wasn't in the mood for nitpicking discussion however interesting.

Bill


One man's nit is another man's nugget.

giles
hm.....or maybe it's the other way around.

Giles August 15th, 2010 12:58 PM

Glory ?
 
On Aug 15, 6:33*am, Giles wrote:


One man's nit is another man's nugget.


Hm.....

That has the appearance of encoded sex baiting. Entirely unintended,
of course.....just a paraphrase of a well known old expresssion.

From "The Natural History of the Long Expedition to the Rocky
Mountains" by Howard Ensign Evans:*

"There were opportunities to visit villages of the Omaha, Oto,
Missouri and Iowa Indians. Like other plains Indians, these tribes
depended heavily on bison both for food and for robes and skins for
clothing and shelter. They also grew corn and pumpkins, which they
prepared in various ways. The squaws [sic] collected roots of
groundnut (Apios americana) and the seeds and roots of lotus, or pond
nut (Nelumbo lutea).

[Thomas] Say noted that the women searched for and ate the lice found
in one another's hair: 'One of them, who was engaged in combing the
head of a white man, was asked why she did not eat the vermin; she
replied that "white man's lice are not good."'"

Women, it would appear, are every bit as good at picking nits as are
their male counterparts.

giles
*Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 75.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter