![]() |
Fly Tying Magnification
Okay, been tying size 24 dandruff flies, things like a zebra midge or
miracle midge. Even got some size 22 flashback pheasant tails. I can put the leader on these with one of those magnetic gizmos that stands the fly up and gives you a slot to push the tippet through. http://www.riverbum.com/2020-Magnetic-Tippet-Threader/ Actually works fairly well. Alternately, I can use a threader flybox. However, how the hell do you see to tie one of these little *******s? I got it made, personally, as my dentist gave me an old pair of these, http://www.designsforvision.com/DentHtml/D-TTL1.htm Then I found out the cost between 500 and a thousand dollars!!! He had some old ones in his drawer that he didn't use, as the new ones have a light. They give you an area of about 3" at 2.5 or 3X magnification. Found out you can get something similiar for about 15 bucks if you go to ebay: Listed in category: Bread Crumb LinkJewelry & Watches Jewelry Design & Repair Tools Loupes, Magnifiers For those of us that are getting just a year or two older, this might help. I know the ones I have may look geeky, but what the hell, I can see. Frank Reid |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 7:53*am, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
Okay, been tying size 24 dandruff flies, things like a zebra midge or miracle midge. *Even got some size 22 flashback pheasant tails. I can put the leader on these with one of those magnetic gizmos that stands the fly up and gives you a slot to push the tippet through.http://www.riverbum.com/2020-Magneti...ader/*Actually works fairly well. *Alternately, I can use a threader flybox. However, how the hell do you see to tie one of these little *******s? I got it made, personally, as my dentist gave me an old pair of these,http://www.designsforvision.com/Dent...-TTL1.htm*Then I found out the cost between 500 and a thousand dollars!!! *He had some old ones in his drawer that he didn't use, as the new ones have a light. *They give you an area of about 3" at 2.5 or 3X magnification. Found out you can get something similiar for about 15 bucks if you go to ebay: Listed in category: Bread Crumb LinkJewelry & Watches Jewelry Design & Repair Tools Loupes, Magnifiers For those of us that are getting just a year or two older, this might help. *I know the ones I have may look geeky, but what the hell, I can see. Frank Reid I'm thinking one of these will be my next expensive fly tying purchase: http://tinyurl.com/4c3sq9u --riverman |
Fly Tying Magnification
On 1/22/2011 6:53 PM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
snipped, about magnification seems an AWFULLY expensive way to go. The McKenzie magnifier is around 60 bucks, as I recall, and works fine. I now wear glasses to read, so clearly, I am dealing with the same vision issues. I see no reason at all to seek out a multi-hundred dollar solution, nor wear something that is head-mounted while tying. YMMV, but the McKenzie is worth a look-see(no pun intended....) Tom |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 6:11*am, Tom Littleton wrote:
On 1/22/2011 6:53 PM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote: snipped, about magnification seems an AWFULLY expensive way to go. The McKenzie magnifier is around 60 bucks, as I recall, and works fine. I now wear glasses to read, so clearly, I am dealing with the same vision issues. I see no reason at all to seek out a multi-hundred dollar solution, nor wear something that is head-mounted while tying. YMMV, but the McKenzie is worth a look-see(no pun intended....) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom I'm not recommending the multi hundred dollar solution. There are some on ebay similar to what I'm using for about 15 bucks. Frank Reid |
Fly Tying Magnification
On 1/23/2011 8:19 AM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
Tom I'm not recommending the multi hundred dollar solution. There are some on ebay similar to what I'm using for about 15 bucks. Frank Reid do you prefer the headpiece approach to a flex-arm lens? If so, why? I've tried both, Frank, and just find the head-mounted magnification unpleasant. Perhaps, I just didn't take the necessary time to adjust to it, but I just didn't like the feel of it. Personally, I prefer to see most of the world at normal scale, and get my 4x magnification only when I am focused on vise and hook. Tom |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 7:47*am, Tom Littleton wrote:
On 1/23/2011 8:19 AM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom I I'm not recommending the multi hundred dollar solution. There are some on ebay similar to what I'm using for about 15 bucks. Frank Reid do you prefer the headpiece approach to a flex-arm lens? If so, why? I've tried both, Frank, and just find the head-mounted magnification unpleasant. Perhaps, I just didn't take the necessary time to adjust to it, but I just didn't like the feel of it. Personally, I prefer to see most of the world at normal scale, and get my 4x magnification only when I am focused on vise and hook. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom Thats why I like the ones I have. They are "through the lens" magnification. Its almost like a bifocal, a VERY strong bifocal. The rest of the lens is plain glass. I can look through at the vise without having anything in the way. I'm getting more and more used the NorVise. This would require me to have a magnifier for a space about 10 inches across, as I use the dubbing brush making capabilities a lot. So all in all, having something that will move with my head works well. Frank Reid |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 22, 3:53*pm, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
Okay, been tying size 24 dandruff flies, things like a zebra midge or miracle midge. *Even got some size 22 flashback pheasant tails. I can put the leader on these with one of those magnetic gizmos that stands the fly up and gives you a slot to push the tippet through.http://www.riverbum.com/2020-Magneti...ader/*Actually works fairly well. *Alternately, I can use a threader flybox. However, how the hell do you see to tie one of these little *******s? I got it made, personally, as my dentist gave me an old pair of these,http://www.designsforvision.com/Dent...-TTL1.htm*Then I found out the cost between 500 and a thousand dollars!!! *He had some old ones in his drawer that he didn't use, as the new ones have a light. *They give you an area of about 3" at 2.5 or 3X magnification. Found out you can get something similiar for about 15 bucks if you go to ebay: Listed in category: Bread Crumb LinkJewelry & Watches Jewelry Design & Repair Tools Loupes, Magnifiers For those of us that are getting just a year or two older, this might help. *I know the ones I have may look geeky, but what the hell, I can see. Frank Reid I use the mag-eyes deals, use the same lens as Hat -eyes As Tom suggests, it takes some getting used to having something on your head, but not that much. I've tried the magnifier/lite on an arm deal and find that harder to get used to, personally NOTE: my 'dandruff' flies are NOT very detailed, so in some cases I just use the same old cheater glasses I use for all tying and kinda work by feel FURTHER NOTE: |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 9:55*am, Larry L wrote:
FURTHER NOTE: |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:53:59 -0800 (PST), Frank Reid © 2010
wrote: & Repair Tools Loupes, Magnifiers For those of us that are getting just a year or two older, this might help. I know the ones I have may look geeky, but what the hell, I can see. Frank Reid Unfortinately I gave up a long time ago w anything but sal****er flies anything smaller than a 12 for me is out. Have any of you tried the Clics? I use them for reading and on the strean when threading line thru the eye of a small fly. Inexoenssive - lightweight and easy to use. http://www.speert.com/reading-glasse...FQEMbAoddXlhJQ There are quite a few other places Fred |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 9:55*am, Larry L wrote:
Hit some key and got posted before I was done ! FURTHER NOTE: I have come to believe that in tiny flies the EXACT amount of tiny is usually the most important trait of successful flies ( at least in selective periods ) and that including the eye of the hook in your overall size can pay dividends .... as can using a very small knot .... so if you carry a short piece of Metric ruler ( suggested ) and measure your natural, tie at least some of your imitations where that measurement is not the shank length but the eye and shank length, or at least a compromise As I said, I currently believe that size is usually THE important trait in tiny imitations and that includes 'fatness' ... sparse is almost always better and in many cases 'sparse enough' is impossible since the hook and a wrap of 8/0 is already too fat... LAST NOTE: I don't think this is too important in 'searching' tiny flies, little nymphs ala the San Juan .... I'm thinking of actual hatch periods, midges and baetis, mainly .... flash back ... I was fishing the Big Lost, sight nymphing with a red tailed Copper John ... I guy came along as I was landing a fish and asked what I was using ..... I told him and he replied that he was fishing one too, with a bobber .... next bit is the flash-back ... and "the smaller fly I use the bigger the fish I seem to catch" ..... IMHO a seine sample of the BL shows why, even in non-hatch times it can pay to give something they are used to seeing and eating...doh, of course |
Fly Tying Magnification
All three of the sponsored links over there in the right hand margin
are now for magnifiers ..........kinda creepy ........careful Todd, they ARE out to get us |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 12:16*pm, Larry L wrote:
On Jan 23, 9:55*am, Larry L wrote: Hit some key and got posted before I was done ! FURTHER NOTE: I have come to believe that in tiny flies the EXACT amount of tiny is usually the most important trait of successful flies ( at least in selective periods ) and that including the eye of the hook in your overall size can pay dividends .... as can using a very small knot * .... so if you carry a short piece of Metric ruler ( suggested ) *and measure your natural, tie at least some of your imitations where that measurement is not the shank length but the eye and shank length, or at least a compromise As I said, I currently believe that size is usually THE important trait in tiny imitations and that includes 'fatness' ... sparse is almost always better and in many cases 'sparse enough' is impossible since the hook and a wrap of 8/0 is already too fat... LAST NOTE: *I don't think this is too important in 'searching' tiny flies, little nymphs ala the San Juan .... I'm thinking of actual hatch periods, midges and baetis, mainly * .... flash back ... I was fishing the Big Lost, sight nymphing with a red tailed Copper John ... I guy came along as I was landing a fish and asked what I was using ..... I told him and he replied that he was fishing one too, with a bobber .... next bit is the flash-back ... and "the smaller fly I use the bigger the fish I seem to catch" ..... IMHO a seine sample of the BL shows why, even in non-hatch times it can pay to give something they are used to seeing and eating...doh, of course So, what's funnier than a bunch of *maturing* fly fishers trying to find "JUST" the right angling aid? ****ed if I know. Alls I know is that none of us (well, with one rather obvious exception) has said "**** it" and packed his dittybag and gone off to some *godforsaken* island in the Phillipines to live out "his" "our" "my" "your" dream/ nightmare. The rest is just blather of one sort (or degree) or another.** g. **not that there's anything wrong with that. :) |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 12:29*pm, Larry L wrote:
All three of the sponsored links over there in the right hand margin are now for magnifiers .........kinda creepy .......careful Todd, they ARE out to get us And one is tempted to say, "They WILL!"......but, of course, they already did.....a long long time ago. g. taxonomist to......well, whoever cares. |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 23, 4:14*pm, Giles wrote:
So, what's funnier than a bunch of *maturing* fly fishers trying to find "JUST" the right angling aid? *****ed if I know. I tend to agree and find my own compulsive behavior pretty amusing, BUT in 'some' self defense, I've noticed that, apparently, in all areas of human interest there are individuals obsessed with inspecting the smallest details, minutely ..... just part of the Nature of the Beast, imho I watched a PBS special about Birds of Paradise last night that recorded people sitting in tree stumps, in a downpour, for days on end, to get the chance to see a particular bird perform it's mating dance .... then the damn thing ****ed without dancing !! ..... can't believe I'm too unique in "level of absurdity' in my own fields of interest ;-) .... in fact I'd have to get more involved to make TV, I'd guess |
Fly Tying Magnification
On Jan 24, 1:35*pm, Larry L wrote:
On Jan 23, 4:14*pm, Giles wrote: So, what's funnier than a bunch of *maturing* fly fishers trying to find "JUST" the right angling aid? *****ed if I know. I tend to agree and find my own compulsive behavior pretty amusing, BUT in 'some' *self defense, I've noticed that, apparently, *in all areas of human interest there are individuals obsessed with inspecting the smallest details, minutely ..... just part of the Nature of the Beast, imho I carry a jewelers loupe wherever I go these days. There is no better pocket-sized tool for giving a boy a good sense of how large the world actually is. I watched a PBS special about Birds of Paradise last night that recorded people sitting in tree stumps, in a downpour, for days on end, to get the chance to see a particular bird perform it's mating dance .... then the damn thing ****ed without dancing !! ..... can't believe I'm too unique in "level of absurdity' in my own fields of interest ;-) .... in fact I'd have to get more involved to make TV, I'd guess Was that Attenborough's film....or something else? If the former, I watched it less than a year ago. If the latter.....don't know.....may or may not have seen it.....can't keep track of it all. In any case, they are a most unusual family. Puts one in mind of 17th century European nobility at court.....except for the rampant inbred vacuity, of course. giles |
Fly Tying Magnification
On 1/22/2011 6:53 PM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
.... However, how the hell do you see to tie one of these little *******s? I got it made, personally, as my dentist gave me an old pair of these, http://www.designsforvision.com/DentHtml/D-TTL1.htm Then I found out the cost between 500 and a thousand dollars!!! He had some old ones in his drawer that he didn't use, as the new ones have a light. They give you an area of about 3" at 2.5 or 3X magnification. A number of years ago, I bought a pair of these http://www.orvis.com/store/product.a...ubcat_id=16050 in 4X. They're great. I may eventually buy the 5X if I need them. - JR |
Thats why I like the ones I have. They are "through the lens" magnification. Its about like a bifocal, a VERY able bifocal. The rest of the lens is apparent glass. I can attending through at the vise without accepting annihilation in the way. I'm accepting added and added used the NorVise.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter