|
|
BWO Pattern
http://www.myfishingpictures.com/img/034852.jpg
The above fly, my version of the Fuzzball (#22 in the picture) , is the fly I expect I'll use most on my last day on the River this year (tomorrow). A truly simple tie. Tail (optional)- Couple strands micro fibbets, hackle fibers or zelon. Body- Olive thread or Olive Uni-Stretch Wing- Dun Snowshoe Hare Tie in the tails. Wrap body. Tie in with a couple thread wraps a tuft of grey snowshoe hare foot fur with tips just reaching the start of the hook bend. Then double the remainder of the tuft back over the the body and the wing. Tie down and finish head. Trim the doubled over wing to the same length as the bottom part of the wing (i.e. to the start of the hook bend.) Soak with Watershed or similiar over night or just dope it up with floatant on stream and go fishing. Works dry but can be retrieved back "damp". g.c. |
BWO Pattern
George Cleveland wrote:
http://www.myfishingpictures.com/img/034852.jpg The above fly, my version of the Fuzzball (#22 in the picture) , is the fly I expect I'll use most on my last day on the River this year (tomorrow). A truly simple tie. Tail (optional)- Couple strands micro fibbets, hackle fibers or zelon. Body- Olive thread or Olive Uni-Stretch Wing- Dun Snowshoe Hare George that looks like very productive pattern, but I am wondering why you relate it to BWO family? It certainly could not be due to the blue wings ;). |
BWO Pattern
George,
Report you success or the other for your last day this season. I wish I was in Wisc. tomarrow and Thurs. Have a great one! Joel Axelrad **DFD** |
BWO Pattern
|
BWO Pattern
|
BWO Pattern
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:12:16 -0700, "bruiser"
wrote: George, I fish a ton with a similar pattern - except I use Moose hair for the tail and make the wing a little smaller and denser. Willi showed me the pattern and it morphed a little at my vise. It's really effective in fast and slow water and that's the best thing about that fly - and it's easy to spot on the water. bruce h I think a "regulation" Fuzzball does have a denser wing but I've found it to be overkill in most of the water I fish. It really is the only dry fly style I've needed to match the smaller mayflies and caddis (#20 and smaller) this year. g.c. |
BWO Pattern
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:12:16 -0700, "bruiser"
wrote: George, I fish a ton with a similar pattern - except I use Moose hair for the tail and make the wing a little smaller and denser. Willi showed me the pattern and it morphed a little at my vise. It's really effective in fast and slow water and that's the best thing about that fly - and it's easy to spot on the water. bruce h I think a "regulation" Fuzzball does have a denser wing but I've found it to be overkill in most of the water I fish. It really is the only dry fly style I've needed to match the smaller mayflies and caddis (#20 and smaller) this year. g.c. |
BWO Pattern
Gary M wrote:
George Cleveland wrote: http://www.myfishingpictures.com/img/034852.jpg The above fly, my version of the Fuzzball (#22 in the picture) , is the fly I expect I'll use most on my last day on the River this year (tomorrow). A truly simple tie. Tail (optional)- Couple strands micro fibbets, hackle fibers or zelon. Body- Olive thread or Olive Uni-Stretch Wing- Dun Snowshoe Hare George that looks like very productive pattern, but I am wondering why you relate it to BWO family? It certainly could not be due to the blue wings ;). BWO's (at least out West) aren't a "family" in the scientific sense. There are many different insects that are referred to as Blue Winged Olives. They vary in size (usually small), color and other characteristics. Many BWO's aren't blue or olive. To my eyes, most are varied shades of gray. In my part of Colorado, they range from a size 18 down to about a 26. I have lots of effective patterns for the insects that are 18 and 20 but when the natural insect gets below a 20, the effectiveness of the many patterns I've tried goes way down. When the 18's are hatching, I can fish the same fly and go from one rising fish to the next, sometimes getting takes from each fish I present to. As the size of the natural drops, patterns seem to become less effective (or the difficulty in presenting them well goes up). There's a very tiny one hatching right now on my home river. I can generally get a fish out of each pod of feeding fish. It doesn't seem to matter what pattern I'm using, I can even use a fly that's a couple sizes too big. After the first fish is taken, it seems that the fish become alerted. Although they continue to readily feed on naturals, I can see frequents turns of fish to look at my fly that end in refusals when they get about 6 inches to a foot away. After a single fish refuses a given fly, they usually just ignore it in the future, not even turning to look at it when it passes. A fly change will provoke renewed interest and with about one out of four fly changes, resulting in a take. Then back to ignoring. Part of the problem, I know, is presentation. The fish are fairly hefty and I don't like going below 6X. 7 or 8X would make for a better presentation and result in more takes. However my experience is that when trout are rising to tiny Mayflies or midges, of all the patterns I've used, none are as effective as the patterns we use to represent larger insects. Although a given pattern will take an occasional fish, it's unusual to find a pattern that most of the feeding fish will take. I think that when our patterns go below a size twenty, the materials we use are too "gross" for a good representation. Our saving grace when fishing the small stuff, is that the trout have to eat ALOT of the insects to get a meal and with some many feedings, the chances that they'll make a mistake goes up. Willi |
BWO Pattern
Gary M wrote:
George Cleveland wrote: http://www.myfishingpictures.com/img/034852.jpg The above fly, my version of the Fuzzball (#22 in the picture) , is the fly I expect I'll use most on my last day on the River this year (tomorrow). A truly simple tie. Tail (optional)- Couple strands micro fibbets, hackle fibers or zelon. Body- Olive thread or Olive Uni-Stretch Wing- Dun Snowshoe Hare George that looks like very productive pattern, but I am wondering why you relate it to BWO family? It certainly could not be due to the blue wings ;). BWO's (at least out West) aren't a "family" in the scientific sense. There are many different insects that are referred to as Blue Winged Olives. They vary in size (usually small), color and other characteristics. Many BWO's aren't blue or olive. To my eyes, most are varied shades of gray. In my part of Colorado, they range from a size 18 down to about a 26. I have lots of effective patterns for the insects that are 18 and 20 but when the natural insect gets below a 20, the effectiveness of the many patterns I've tried goes way down. When the 18's are hatching, I can fish the same fly and go from one rising fish to the next, sometimes getting takes from each fish I present to. As the size of the natural drops, patterns seem to become less effective (or the difficulty in presenting them well goes up). There's a very tiny one hatching right now on my home river. I can generally get a fish out of each pod of feeding fish. It doesn't seem to matter what pattern I'm using, I can even use a fly that's a couple sizes too big. After the first fish is taken, it seems that the fish become alerted. Although they continue to readily feed on naturals, I can see frequents turns of fish to look at my fly that end in refusals when they get about 6 inches to a foot away. After a single fish refuses a given fly, they usually just ignore it in the future, not even turning to look at it when it passes. A fly change will provoke renewed interest and with about one out of four fly changes, resulting in a take. Then back to ignoring. Part of the problem, I know, is presentation. The fish are fairly hefty and I don't like going below 6X. 7 or 8X would make for a better presentation and result in more takes. However my experience is that when trout are rising to tiny Mayflies or midges, of all the patterns I've used, none are as effective as the patterns we use to represent larger insects. Although a given pattern will take an occasional fish, it's unusual to find a pattern that most of the feeding fish will take. I think that when our patterns go below a size twenty, the materials we use are too "gross" for a good representation. Our saving grace when fishing the small stuff, is that the trout have to eat ALOT of the insects to get a meal and with some many feedings, the chances that they'll make a mistake goes up. Willi |
BWO Pattern
George,
I fish a ton with a similar pattern - except I use Moose hair for the tail and make the wing a little smaller and denser. Willi showed me the pattern and it morphed a little at my vise. It's really effective in fast and slow water and that's the best thing about that fly - and it's easy to spot on the water. bruce h |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter