![]() |
Shared weight in 2005?
I was looking at the open/elite 50 trail for next year and they had a
paragraph about riders will now have a 3-fish limit but will get to count their driver's 5-fish limit to their total? I thought a bit about this but it just doesn't seem to sit well with me. It is possible that a person with no fishing ability could pay the entry fee, do nothing, and still place somewhere in the money because of their driver. In fact, a good rider could be punished with a bad driver while a bad rider could benefit from a great driver. Am I misunderstanding this or does this really seem as bad as I think it sounds? |
Shared weight in 2005?
Sounds like they are copying what the walleye trails have done for years.
Joe Z. "Christopher P. Cericola" wrote in message groups.com... I was looking at the open/elite 50 trail for next year and they had a paragraph about riders will now have a 3-fish limit but will get to count their driver's 5-fish limit to their total? I thought a bit about this but it just doesn't seem to sit well with me. It is possible that a person with no fishing ability could pay the entry fee, do nothing, and still place somewhere in the money because of their driver. In fact, a good rider could be punished with a bad driver while a bad rider could benefit from a great driver. Am I misunderstanding this or does this really seem as bad as I think it sounds? |
Shared weight in 2005?
You get in the back of Shaw Grigsby's rig while he's bed-fishing & you'll be
glad his weight counts lol... Warren "Christopher P. Cericola" wrote in message groups.com... I was looking at the open/elite 50 trail for next year and they had a paragraph about riders will now have a 3-fish limit but will get to count their driver's 5-fish limit to their total? I thought a bit about this but it just doesn't seem to sit well with me. It is possible that a person with no fishing ability could pay the entry fee, do nothing, and still place somewhere in the money because of their driver. In fact, a good rider could be punished with a bad driver while a bad rider could benefit from a great driver. Am I misunderstanding this or does this really seem as bad as I think it sounds? |
Shared weight in 2005?
"go-bassn" wrote in message ... You get in the back of Shaw Grigsby's rig while he's bed-fishing & you'll be glad his weight counts lol... THat's my point..winning the rider side isn't necessarily skill anymore..all it takes is being partenered with a very skilled pro. As a rider, I could cull 3 bass for 12 lbs which is a pretty decent limit..but get killed because my driver sleeps at the wheel. Christopher |
Shared weight in 2005?
No offense Chris, but you've got it backwards.
WW "Christopher P. Cericola" wrote in message groups.com... "go-bassn" wrote in message ... You get in the back of Shaw Grigsby's rig while he's bed-fishing & you'll be glad his weight counts lol... THat's my point..winning the rider side isn't necessarily skill anymore..all it takes is being partenered with a very skilled pro. As a rider, I could cull 3 bass for 12 lbs which is a pretty decent limit..but get killed because my driver sleeps at the wheel. Christopher |
Shared weight in 2005?
"go-bassn" wrote in message ... No offense Chris, but you've got it backwards. Got it backwards? How so? Christopher |
Shared weight in 2005?
Let's just say that winning as an amateur in these things has little to do
with skill. It's all about getting the good rides. Warren "Christopher P. Cericola" wrote in message groups.com... "go-bassn" wrote in message ... No offense Chris, but you've got it backwards. Got it backwards? How so? Christopher |
Shared weight in 2005?
"go-bassn" wrote in message ... Let's just say that winning as an amateur in these things has little to do with skill. It's all about getting the good rides. I see your point. But I think with this combined weight it will really show that more and remove any competition on the rider side. BTW - I haven't heard from Bill so I'm assuming there was no rider seat available for either the next two tournies? Christopher |
Shared weight in 2005?
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:41:53 -0400, "Christopher P. Cericola"
wrote: "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Let's just say that winning as an amateur in these things has little to do with skill. It's all about getting the good rides. I see your point. But I think with this combined weight it will really show that more and remove any competition on the rider side. BTW - I haven't heard from Bill so I'm assuming there was no rider seat available for either the next two tournies? Christopher I believe you are paired up for Round Valley with Bill. I could be wrong, but that's the way I remember it going down. I have to suffer behind the human vacuum for that tournament and hope he leaves a dink or two for me. I can see it now: 50 fish caught, 0 fish weighed...all 11 3/4 inches long. Warren 5 fish 21bs...If we don't sink, that is. :-) Harry J aka Thundercat Brooklyn Bill's Tackle Shop Fishing Team http://www.geocities.com/brooklynbill2003/products.html Share the knowledge, compete on execution. |
Shared weight in 2005?
"Thundercat" wrote in message ... human vacuum Warren? Christopher |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter