![]() |
|
Tied up in knots....
I know this is a stupid newbie question, but I'm a stupid newbie.
I've been using Orvis knotless leaders and (here it comes) just clipping off the loop and tying them to line with the nail knot we've been discussing in other threads. Why? Because I have no clue how to join the loop to line without tying some god-awful conglomeration of knot. There's nothing on the Orvis website to help out either - at least not that I can see. Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? If so, can someone point me to an online resource for the knot? (I also intend to inquire at my local shop, but thought I'd ask here first.) Thanks in advance, and please be gentle. --------------------------------------------------------------------- "When you play with the Cubs, it's like playing with heavy shoes on." -- Pete LaCock, Cub-free since 1976 |
Tied up in knots....
Intellect Enabled wrote:
snip Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? ... Some folks nail knot a piece of mono the same size as the butt end of the tippet to the fly line and then tie a small perfection loop in it. (Google "perfection loop" for instructions.) I used to use this loop-to-loop method for attaching leader to fly line mainly because it's easier to change a loop-to-loop than tie a new nail knot. I don't bother with it anymore. I almost always get a full season out of a leader nail knotted directly to the fly line so the convenience of the loops is negligible and the nail knot passes through the guides better than the loops. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Tied up in knots....
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:12:43 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: I don't bother with it anymore. I almost always get a full season out of a leader nail knotted directly to the fly line so the convenience of the loops is negligible and the nail knot passes through the guides better than the loops. Thanks for the response, Ken. That's kind of what I thought, but I wondered if there was some other advantage I may be missing by not using the loops (For instance, I don't use a strike indicator, but I've seen some that only work on these types of leaders.) --------------------------------------------------------------------- "When you play with the Cubs, it's like playing with heavy shoes on." -- Pete LaCock, Cub-free since 1976 |
Tied up in knots....
"Intellect Enabled" wrote in message ... SNIP Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? If so, can someone point me to an online resource for the knot? (I also intend to inquire at my local shop, but thought I'd ask here first.) Thanks in advance, and please be gentle. --------------------------------------------------------------------- "When you play with the Cubs, it's like playing with heavy shoes on." -- Pete LaCock, Cub-free since 1976 Put a permanent loop of monofilament on the end of your line, and loop the leader to this. http://www.killroys.com/knots/looploop.htm For the monofil loop on the end of your line, you can use a nail knot or similar. Here is more info; http://www.killroys.com/knots/knots.htm#notice You can also use "line connectors" or "cast connectors" ; http://www.wiser-net.co.uk/hosted/ww...f82a8abf1b4011 A search on google should turn up an American source for you. TL MC TL MC |
Tied up in knots....
"Intellect Enabled" wrote in message ... SNIP Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? If so, can someone point me to an online resource for the knot? (I also intend to inquire at my local shop, but thought I'd ask here first.) Thanks in advance, and please be gentle. --------------------------------------------------------------------- "When you play with the Cubs, it's like playing with heavy shoes on." -- Pete LaCock, Cub-free since 1976 Put a permanent loop of monofilament on the end of your line, and loop the leader to this. http://www.killroys.com/knots/looploop.htm For the monofil loop on the end of your line, you can use a nail knot or similar. Here is more info; http://www.killroys.com/knots/knots.htm#notice You can also use "line connectors" or "cast connectors" ; http://www.wiser-net.co.uk/hosted/ww...f82a8abf1b4011 A search on google should turn up an American source for you. TL MC TL MC |
Tied up in knots....
Intellect Enabled wrote:
I know this is a stupid newbie question, but I'm a stupid newbie. I've been using Orvis knotless leaders and (here it comes) just clipping off the loop and tying them to line with the nail knot we've been discussing in other threads. Why? Because I have no clue how to join the loop to line without tying some god-awful conglomeration of knot. There's nothing on the Orvis website to help out either - at least not that I can see. Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? If so, can someone point me to an online resource for the knot? (I also intend to inquire at my local shop, but thought I'd ask here first.) Forget about the loops. They suck. Leave a mono butt section on your line and tie a new leader onto it with a blood knot. Three turns on each side will do fine. You should only have to tie one nail knot per line per year, unless you fish an awful lot more than I do, which I doubt. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Tied up in knots....
Intellect Enabled wrote:
I know this is a stupid newbie question, but I'm a stupid newbie. I've been using Orvis knotless leaders and (here it comes) just clipping off the loop and tying them to line with the nail knot we've been discussing in other threads. Why? Because I have no clue how to join the loop to line without tying some god-awful conglomeration of knot. There's nothing on the Orvis website to help out either - at least not that I can see. Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? If so, can someone point me to an online resource for the knot? (I also intend to inquire at my local shop, but thought I'd ask here first.) Forget about the loops. They suck. Leave a mono butt section on your line and tie a new leader onto it with a blood knot. Three turns on each side will do fine. You should only have to tie one nail knot per line per year, unless you fish an awful lot more than I do, which I doubt. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Tied up in knots....
"Intellect Enabled" wrote Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? I use the loops, a short section of Maxima needle nail knotted into the line and a Perfection loop on the other end. The loops does NOT go though the guides as well as a single knot, but I've never had it cost me a fish. I do change leaders fairly often, and sometimes on stream. The leader construction I'd use on a windy day to cast a #18 PMD dry is very different than what I'd use on a calm one, same river, same fly. I could "rebuild" the leader butt to fit the situation but I prefer to just slip one off and another one on ... laziness, for sure, but it works better for me ( I fished several years using " a single leader per year' and didn't like it ). I don't indicator nymph much, but when I do I use a very short stiff butt, short transition and long tippet, I've tried casting dries with the same leader and it is terrible, but very works well with weight and a bobber. Another example? I recently fished Silver Creek and most days I would fish downstream using a wimpy limpy LONG tippet, about 12 or 14 ft leader and a Fall River twitch, to the fish sitting where they were available to that presentation. When I reached the end of the area I intended to fish ( often defined by reaching another angler ) I would take a minute while resting myself and the area to change to a much shorter, mostly butt, short tippet ( 6 inches to a foot ) leader and work back upstream, casting across stream to fish in tough lies, right on the bank or inches below exposed weeds, fish that are nearly impossible to accurately cast to with either a Fall River Twitch or a long wimpy leader. The short leader wouldn't give more than a few inches of good drift, but greatly increased MY accuracy and added fish to the "bag" that otherwise I wouldn't have gotten. I have no doubt that those with greater skills than myself can "do it all" with exactly the same leader ... I can't. And like the search for the perfect "one rod for all fishing" I've given up on "one leader for all fishing" and find loop to loop to be the best way to change to meet changing conditions, mainly because I can spent the knot tying time indoors with no wind, and good light instead of rebuilding on stream, with cold hands and that rushed feeling feeding trout always instill in me. YMMV |
Tied up in knots....
"Intellect Enabled" wrote Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? I use the loops, a short section of Maxima needle nail knotted into the line and a Perfection loop on the other end. The loops does NOT go though the guides as well as a single knot, but I've never had it cost me a fish. I do change leaders fairly often, and sometimes on stream. The leader construction I'd use on a windy day to cast a #18 PMD dry is very different than what I'd use on a calm one, same river, same fly. I could "rebuild" the leader butt to fit the situation but I prefer to just slip one off and another one on ... laziness, for sure, but it works better for me ( I fished several years using " a single leader per year' and didn't like it ). I don't indicator nymph much, but when I do I use a very short stiff butt, short transition and long tippet, I've tried casting dries with the same leader and it is terrible, but very works well with weight and a bobber. Another example? I recently fished Silver Creek and most days I would fish downstream using a wimpy limpy LONG tippet, about 12 or 14 ft leader and a Fall River twitch, to the fish sitting where they were available to that presentation. When I reached the end of the area I intended to fish ( often defined by reaching another angler ) I would take a minute while resting myself and the area to change to a much shorter, mostly butt, short tippet ( 6 inches to a foot ) leader and work back upstream, casting across stream to fish in tough lies, right on the bank or inches below exposed weeds, fish that are nearly impossible to accurately cast to with either a Fall River Twitch or a long wimpy leader. The short leader wouldn't give more than a few inches of good drift, but greatly increased MY accuracy and added fish to the "bag" that otherwise I wouldn't have gotten. I have no doubt that those with greater skills than myself can "do it all" with exactly the same leader ... I can't. And like the search for the perfect "one rod for all fishing" I've given up on "one leader for all fishing" and find loop to loop to be the best way to change to meet changing conditions, mainly because I can spent the knot tying time indoors with no wind, and good light instead of rebuilding on stream, with cold hands and that rushed feeling feeding trout always instill in me. YMMV |
Tied up in knots....
"Intellect Enabled" wrote Question: is it best just to go ahead and use the nail knot (which is working fine) or is there some reason to learn to tie this loop to line? I use the loops, a short section of Maxima needle nail knotted into the line and a Perfection loop on the other end. The loops does NOT go though the guides as well as a single knot, but I've never had it cost me a fish. I do change leaders fairly often, and sometimes on stream. The leader construction I'd use on a windy day to cast a #18 PMD dry is very different than what I'd use on a calm one, same river, same fly. I could "rebuild" the leader butt to fit the situation but I prefer to just slip one off and another one on ... laziness, for sure, but it works better for me ( I fished several years using " a single leader per year' and didn't like it ). I don't indicator nymph much, but when I do I use a very short stiff butt, short transition and long tippet, I've tried casting dries with the same leader and it is terrible, but very works well with weight and a bobber. Another example? I recently fished Silver Creek and most days I would fish downstream using a wimpy limpy LONG tippet, about 12 or 14 ft leader and a Fall River twitch, to the fish sitting where they were available to that presentation. When I reached the end of the area I intended to fish ( often defined by reaching another angler ) I would take a minute while resting myself and the area to change to a much shorter, mostly butt, short tippet ( 6 inches to a foot ) leader and work back upstream, casting across stream to fish in tough lies, right on the bank or inches below exposed weeds, fish that are nearly impossible to accurately cast to with either a Fall River Twitch or a long wimpy leader. The short leader wouldn't give more than a few inches of good drift, but greatly increased MY accuracy and added fish to the "bag" that otherwise I wouldn't have gotten. I have no doubt that those with greater skills than myself can "do it all" with exactly the same leader ... I can't. And like the search for the perfect "one rod for all fishing" I've given up on "one leader for all fishing" and find loop to loop to be the best way to change to meet changing conditions, mainly because I can spent the knot tying time indoors with no wind, and good light instead of rebuilding on stream, with cold hands and that rushed feeling feeding trout always instill in me. YMMV |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter