FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing Tying (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Can fish count? (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=15003)

riverman January 28th, 2005 07:52 PM

Can fish count?
 
Certain mayfly nymph patterns insist on three tails. Has anyone done an
experiment where they have tied up several identical patterns, differing
only in the number of tails, and fished them in the same water? I'm
wondering if it really makes any difference at all.

--riverman



Tim Lysyk January 28th, 2005 08:05 PM

riverman wrote:
Certain mayfly nymph patterns insist on three tails. Has anyone done an
experiment where they have tied up several identical patterns, differing
only in the number of tails, and fished them in the same water? I'm
wondering if it really makes any difference at all.

--riverman


Not sure I would really care too much about how many tails a nymph
pattern has. If the live mayfly nymph is a swimmer, the tails will get
pressed together as it swims anyway. For the imitations, I tend to use
hackle fibres, antron, or pheasant tail fibres.

I am more inclined to worry about tails on a dryfly pattern if I am
trying to imitate an adult that sits on the surface of the water as the
tails can make an impression in the surface film that is likley visible
to the trout.

Tim Lysyk

Lazarus Cooke January 28th, 2005 08:09 PM

In article , riverman
wrote:

Certain mayfly nymph patterns insist on three tails. Has anyone done an
experiment where they have tied up several identical patterns, differing
only in the number of tails, and fished them in the same water? I'm
wondering if it really makes any difference at all.

--riverman


Yes they have, and quite a long time ago. I'll have to look it up.

In the UK, it's generally accepted that they can't, and that you'd be
daft not to put 4, 5 or even 6 tails to make room for the ones that get
chewed off.

Lazarus

--
Remover the rock from the email address

riverman January 29th, 2005 10:10 AM


"Tim Lysyk" wrote in message
news:OVwKd.54367$Ob.11843@edtnps84...
riverman wrote:
Certain mayfly nymph patterns insist on three tails. Has anyone done an
experiment where they have tied up several identical patterns, differing
only in the number of tails, and fished them in the same water? I'm
wondering if it really makes any difference at all.

--riverman


Not sure I would really care too much about how many tails a nymph pattern
has. If the live mayfly nymph is a swimmer, the tails will get pressed
together as it swims anyway. For the imitations, I tend to use hackle
fibres, antron, or pheasant tail fibres.

I am more inclined to worry about tails on a dryfly pattern if I am trying
to imitate an adult that sits on the surface of the water as the tails can
make an impression in the surface film that is likley visible to the
trout.


Good catch...I meant dry patterns. I had just been looking at that Japanese
site Willi posted and 'nymph' was in my brain.

--riverman



W. D. Grey February 3rd, 2005 01:16 PM

In article , riverman
writes
Certain mayfly nymph patterns insist on three tails. Has anyone done an
experiment where they have tied up several identical patterns, differing
only in the number of tails, and fished them in the same water? I'm
wondering if it really makes any difference at all.

--riverman


Welsh trout can, they're damned clever :-)

Seriously, some of the dry fly patterns which should have two tails are
frequently tied with a small bunch of whisks of cock hackle and they
work well.
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

Steve W February 6th, 2005 09:47 PM

"W. D. Grey" wrote in message ...
In article , riverman
writes
Certain mayfly nymph patterns insist on three tails. Has anyone done an
experiment where they have tied up several identical patterns, differing
only in the number of tails, and fished them in the same water? I'm
wondering if it really makes any difference at all.

--riverman


Welsh trout can, they're damned clever :-)

Seriously, some of the dry fly patterns which should have two tails are
frequently tied with a small bunch of whisks of cock hackle and they
work well.


Have to agree with Bill, though I'd emphasise 'small'. There comes a
point where the tail becomes thick enough to be a body extension
rather than a tail
(in the imitative sense).

Steve

W. D. Grey February 6th, 2005 10:18 PM

In article , Steve W
writes
Seriously, some of the dry fly patterns which should have two tails are
frequently tied with a small bunch of whisks of cock hackle and they
work well.


Have to agree with Bill, though I'd emphasise 'small'. There comes a
point where the tail becomes thick enough to be a body extension
rather than a tail
(in the imitative sense).


Quite so - by a bunch I meant, probably 5 or six whisks rather than the
"correct" two or three.
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter