![]() |
AFTMA number.
How does one find / calculate the AFTMA number on a trout rod that is
notmarked with one? SS |
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:38:29 +0100, "simon"
wrote: How does one find / calculate the AFTMA number on a trout rod that is notmarked with one? Only practical way is to try a number of lines and find out which weight suits both the rod, your own casting style and the intended use. AFTMA ratings for rods are purely arbitrary anyway, and are based on the judgement of whoever tests out the prototype, so doing the above could often be a good move even when you 'think' you know the AFTMA rating. I've often used rods where I've had to use lines up to +/- 2 AFTMA sizes from that specified, to suit the occasion. Cheers Ian D |
In article , Ian D
writes On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:38:29 +0100, "simon" wrote: How does one find / calculate the AFTMA number on a trout rod that is notmarked with one? Only practical way is to try a number of lines and find out which weight suits both the rod, your own casting style and the intended use. AFTMA ratings for rods are purely arbitrary anyway, and are based on the judgement of whoever tests out the prototype, so doing the above could often be a good move even when you 'think' you know the AFTMA rating. I've often used rods where I've had to use lines up to +/- 2 AFTMA sizes from that specified, to suit the occasion. Cheers Ian D Good advice Ian, but I'd offer a word of caution to anyone having to follow it. A line which is one or two # over that for which the line was designed will usually fly out of the rings. I have had a rod break when using a line only one # higher than the rod design. Rods will usually take 1 # more than the rated #. but enthusiastic casting could prove disastrous :-). -- Bill Grey http://www.billboy.co.uk |
The number is a function of the weight of the first 10 (I think) yards of
the fly line. Therefore it's simply how much weight you need to put the optimal tension in the rod to achieve maximum casting distance. If you don't (or can't) aerialise the appropriate length of line you won't load the rod adequately and won't maximise the cast. This means two things. Firstly if, for instance, you fish small streams with a short line you probably need to fish a heavier line than the rod is rated for and secondly if you overload a rod with too heavy a line it could well break. With an unmarked rod it's going to be trial and error, but bear in mind how you are going to use the rod in practical situations as well as simply heading for your local park with a selection of lines. Mark "W. D. Grey" wrote in message ... In article , Ian D writes On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:38:29 +0100, "simon" wrote: How does one find / calculate the AFTMA number on a trout rod that is notmarked with one? Only practical way is to try a number of lines and find out which weight suits both the rod, your own casting style and the intended use. AFTMA ratings for rods are purely arbitrary anyway, and are based on the judgement of whoever tests out the prototype, so doing the above could often be a good move even when you 'think' you know the AFTMA rating. I've often used rods where I've had to use lines up to +/- 2 AFTMA sizes from that specified, to suit the occasion. Cheers Ian D Good advice Ian, but I'd offer a word of caution to anyone having to follow it. A line which is one or two # over that for which the line was designed will usually fly out of the rings. I have had a rod break when using a line only one # higher than the rod design. Rods will usually take 1 # more than the rated #. but enthusiastic casting could prove disastrous :-). -- Bill Grey http://www.billboy.co.uk |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter