![]() |
Fish do/don't anticipate things? (was: "ARAs" against Game chickens)
On 26 Aug 2005 Goo wrote:
dh wrote: Fish can and do anticipate Goo They don't. It has already been established that they do. One example of them anticipating is: lake fish hang out around lakeside restaurants because people feed them. And we've also noted that they follow ducks around, Goo, out of anticipation of the ducks getting some bread, and quite possibly of what might come out of the ducks' asses as well...processed bread. Those are two clear examples of anticipation in fish. There are probably plenty more of them. |
Yes, they do! When they see you outside the tank, don't they wiggle
with anticipation of being fed??? n |
NanK wrote:
Yes, they do! When they see you outside the tank, don't they wiggle with anticipation of being fed??? n Even the simplest organisms have some capacity for learning when it's directly related to their survival. If a fish always sees a person when it's being fed, it will associate the image of a person with food and will exhibit feeding behavior every time it sees somebody, even before any food is dropped in front of them. In the wild and in captivity, this ability to associate events ensures that the smartest fish gets to the food faster than the dumb ones and is thus more likely to survive longer to pass on it's "smart" genes. The only question I have, could such a fish (one having learned to associate the presence of humans with food) learn to distinguish between humans and other large creatures who show up in front of it's tank who don't feed it (like dogs or cats)? - Logic316 Logic: n. The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding. -- Ambrose Bierce |
|
NanK wrote:
Yes, they do! When they see you outside the tank, don't they wiggle with anticipation of being fed??? No. That's stimulus response, *not* anticipation. |
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:25:50 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote:
NanK wrote: Yes, they do! When they see you outside the tank, don't they wiggle with anticipation of being fed??? No. That's stimulus response, *not* anticipation. That stimulus response *is* anticipation Goo. |
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:06:41 -0400, Logic316 wrote:
wrote: I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself. -- I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself. This poem is fundamentally flawed. Most animals, including avian species, lack the necessary mental capacity to have a sense of "self" in the first place. - Logic316 There are examples that suggest otherwise. For example: We all know that a dog is aware of his balls, so what would make us believe he is not aware of himself? |
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:30:20 GMT, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:55:35 -0500, Cyli wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:06:26 GMT, wrote: I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself. And how is it that you know exactly what a dead bird felt before it died? Or how any wild thing is feeling about itself? Perhaps by the same reasoning that allows you to speak to squirrels and causes your paranoia with regards to trout. Maybe not. Why do you think animals can't feel sorry for themselves? What could prevent it? |
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:40:20 -0400, Logic316 wrote:
NanK wrote: Yes, they do! When they see you outside the tank, don't they wiggle with anticipation of being fed??? n Even the simplest organisms have some capacity for learning when it's directly related to their survival. If a fish always sees a person when it's being fed, it will associate the image of a person with food and will exhibit feeding behavior every time it sees somebody, even before any food is dropped in front of them. Goo insists that no animals can anticipate, but that humans are somehow projecting their emotions into the animals causing them to behave in a way which gives the obvious appearance that they are experiencing them themselves...most likely through voodoo or something...it's bizarre, whatever it is. In the wild and in captivity, this ability to associate events ensures that the smartest fish gets to the food faster than the dumb ones and is thus more likely to survive longer to pass on it's "smart" genes. I've explained to Goo that without the ability to anticipate, hawks would starve to death. They wouldn't look for food if they didn't anticipate finding it. That seemed as clear an example as I could think of, but he still can't understand. The only question I have, could such a fish (one having learned to associate the presence of humans with food) learn to distinguish between humans and other large creatures who show up in front of it's tank who don't feed it (like dogs or cats)? - Logic316 Most likely they can learn to avoid things as well as anticipate getting food from them. Amusingly, Goo can understand that animals feel fear and anger, but can't understand that they also feel pride, anticipation and disappointment. It's amusing, but in an almost pitiable way. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter