|
|
Shippam's paste
You supposed to *EAT* it!
apparently. -- Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at: http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html Admission *FREE* - even for libruls! |
"Honest Aryan" wrote in message oups.com... You supposed to *EAT* it! apparently. -- Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at: http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html Admission *FREE* - even for libruls! ----------------------------------------------------------------- Your racist rant does still not explain why 60% of Americans are illiterate trailer park swamp trash. |
"Honest Aryan" wrote in message
oups.com... You supposed to *EAT* it! apparently. -- Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at: http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html Admission *FREE* - even for libruls! I read that website you link to. It seems more like a parody site than a real one. The fact someone would spend sooo much time trying to portray the BBC as inherently evil and biassed, when there are real media organisations out there who are actively engaging in screwing with democracy through a complete lack of objectivity. Doesn't that strike you as odd? It's almost as if you're not actually angry that they "lie", but because their "lies" don't gel well with your twisted agenda. Dripping with hypocrisy. |
d wrote:
I read that website you link to. It seems more like a parody site than a real one. The fact someone would spend sooo much time trying to portray the BBC as inherently evil and biassed, when there are real media organisations out there who are actively engaging in screwing with democracy through a complete lack of objectivity. Doesn't that strike you as odd? It's almost as if you're not actually angry that they "lie", but because their "lies" don't gel well with your twisted agenda. Dripping with hypocrisy. Er, you missed 'something': the infamous letter institutionalising atrocity propaganda at the BBC, to distract attention from the doings of the Red Army/******s/Judaeo-Bolshevism etc. http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/bbclies.html "We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bessarabia only recently. We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave in when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country. We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them - and ourselves - from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy ... your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your whole-hearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry." Extract from the infamous letter, sent February 29, 1944, to the BBC by the British Ministry of Information (nice Orwellian touch). Reproduced from "Allied Wartime Diplomacy", by Edward J. Rozek -- Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at: http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html Admission *FREE* - even for libruls! |
That's the best you have? From 1944? Can't find anything more up-to-date,
I guess. "Honest Aryan" wrote in message oups.com... d wrote: I read that website you link to. It seems more like a parody site than a real one. The fact someone would spend sooo much time trying to portray the BBC as inherently evil and biassed, when there are real media organisations out there who are actively engaging in screwing with democracy through a complete lack of objectivity. Doesn't that strike you as odd? It's almost as if you're not actually angry that they "lie", but because their "lies" don't gel well with your twisted agenda. Dripping with hypocrisy. Er, you missed 'something': the infamous letter institutionalising atrocity propaganda at the BBC, to distract attention from the doings of the Red Army/******s/Judaeo-Bolshevism etc. http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/bbclies.html "We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bessarabia only recently. We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave in when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country. We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them - and ourselves - from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy ... your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your whole-hearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry." Extract from the infamous letter, sent February 29, 1944, to the BBC by the British Ministry of Information (nice Orwellian touch). Reproduced from "Allied Wartime Diplomacy", by Edward J. Rozek -- Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at: http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html Admission *FREE* - even for libruls! |
"Honest Aryan" wrote in message
oups.com... Velocette wrote: Your racist rant does still not explain why 60% of Americans are illiterate trailer park swamp trash. Because 60% of Americans are not 'illiterate trailer park swamp trash'. That's why. But ******s *DO* commit a lot of crime. That's a fact. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/jailrair.htm http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/kidsrates.txt http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/cpracept.htm http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm http://www.cnn.com/US/9509/crime_gen...onf/index.html http://www.cnn.com/US/9901/02/murder.rate/ http://www.lp.org/press/archive.php?...iew&record=184 http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/pdf/t410.pdf http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/tost_4.html#4_f http://www.cnn.com/US/9606/19/church.fire.stats/ I think you'll find it's POVERTY that causes crime, not the colour of one's skin. If the ridiculous racial disparity in the US was reversed - as in all white people were replaced with black folks and vice versa, you'd see that WHITES would be committing more crime than blacks. But you don't agree with that, as it shows that your ridiculous notion that black folks are somehow born with a "rape white women" gene or something equally ridiculous, is in fact bull****. Beat your ignorance, mate. You're better than this. |
In article ,
"d" wrote: "Honest Aryan" wrote in message oups.com... Velocette wrote: Your racist rant does still not explain why 60% of Americans are illiterate trailer park swamp trash. Because 60% of Americans are not 'illiterate trailer park swamp trash'. That's why. But ******s *DO* commit a lot of crime. That's a fact. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/jailrair.htm http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/kidsrates.txt http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/cpracept.htm http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm http://www.cnn.com/US/9509/crime_gen...onf/index.html http://www.cnn.com/US/9901/02/murder.rate/ http://www.lp.org/press/archive.php?...iew&record=184 http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/pdf/t410.pdf http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/tost_4.html#4_f http://www.cnn.com/US/9606/19/church.fire.stats/ I think you'll find it's POVERTY that causes crime, not the colour of one's skin. That's only your opinion. If poverty caused crime, then why do the wealthy commit crime? If the ridiculous racial disparity in the US was reversed - as in all white people were replaced with black folks and vice versa, you'd see that WHITES would be committing more crime than blacks. But you don't agree with that, as it shows that your ridiculous notion that black folks are somehow born with a "rape white women" gene or something equally ridiculous, is in fact bull****. South Africa is the rape capital of the world: CBS News 60 Minutes II New Goals For Women's Rights Every 26 Seconds a woman is raped in South Africa. According to Interpol statistics the country is the rape capital of the world. http://www.cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1...7-412,00.shtml Beat your ignorance, mate. You're better than this. Back to ya. Perfesser White __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter