![]() |
The Cane Rod
I recently have been researching the traditional Bamboo (cane) rods. I'm
very much interested in the history, construction, casting techniques and the craftsmanship of these rods. I noticed there are quite a few good builders as well as newcomers to the art. I also read, and I'm sure it's old news to most here that the Bamboo team of Glenn Brackett, Jeff Walker and Jerry Kustich left R.L. Winston in October last year. I haven't heard on the impact that would have on Winston, but I'm sure it didn't suit well with the purist. Any traditionalist out there fly-fishing with the cane rod? -tom |
The Cane Rod
Tom Nakashima wrote:
I recently have been researching the traditional Bamboo (cane) rods. I'm very much interested in the history, construction, casting techniques and the craftsmanship of these rods. I noticed there are quite a few good builders as well as newcomers to the art. I also read, and I'm sure it's old news to most here that the Bamboo team of Glenn Brackett, Jeff Walker and Jerry Kustich left R.L. Winston in October last year. I haven't heard on the impact that would have on Winston, but I'm sure it didn't suit well with the purist. Any traditionalist out there fly-fishing with the cane rod? Careful Tom, you're dabbling in dangerous water here. This particular dalliance could end up costing you a small fortune. ;-) I have two 'boos, a Wright & McGill Granger Aristocrat (a middle of the line production rod from the 1940's - 1950's) and a Zimboo, a handcrafted piece of cane by the now retired rod maker Steve Zimmerman of Hamilton Rods. They are both delightful to cast and fish with. My 'boo, like most all 'boo, has a very slow action which is perfectly suited for casting dry flies. I would never sully a good piece of cane by using it to cast anything other than dry flies although I suppose it's not illegal in some states to fling a nymph with one. -- Ken Fortenberry |
The Cane Rod
In article , Tom Nakashima
wrote: Any traditionalist out there fly-fishing with the cane rod? -tom I now nearly always fish with cane - usually a Hardy 8 foot Palakona (with a silk line on a perfect reel), but more recently I've started again using a wonderful rod, a 6' 3" rod made by a long-dead rod-maker called Lance Nicholson, from Dulverton, on Exmoor in England (where, I think, Lorna Doone got married.) (I also use silk for that, on a Hardy lightweight reel.) I used to fish a lot on the Barle that flows through Dulverton, a beautiful river filled with small wild brown trout, that sometimes has a run of salmon at the end of the year. My Sage carbon rods are better, frankly, but somehow the cane rods are more fun. And many years ago I had some casting lessons from Andrew Murray, the Hardy's professional. I remember him saying then that although carbon is more efficient, cane is kinder. And he ought to know. Lazarus One thing, though, to anyone starting out. I wouldn't advise using cane any longer than 8'. |
The Cane Rod
On 3/6/06 12:39 PM, in article
alid, "Lazarus Cooke" wrote: One thing, though, to anyone starting out. I wouldn't advise using cane any longer than 8'. I can't quote it verbatim, but as I recall, Gierach in his book "Fishing Bamboo" states nearly the opposite, that rods under 8' in length are "specialty rods" and that he prefers those 8' and over. I don't believe he was stating this as advice to newcomers to bamboo per se, but I thought I'd bring it up since it is in such contrast to your statement. Are you suggesting that a bamboo rod over 8' in length is more difficult for a novice to cast? Bill |
The Cane Rod
"William Claspy" wrote in message ... On 3/6/06 12:39 PM, in article alid, "Lazarus Cooke" wrote: One thing, though, to anyone starting out. I wouldn't advise using cane any longer than 8'. I can't quote it verbatim, but as I recall, Gierach in his book "Fishing Bamboo" states nearly the opposite, that rods under 8' in length are "specialty rods" and that he prefers those 8' and over. I don't believe he was stating this as advice to newcomers to bamboo per se, but I thought I'd bring it up since it is in such contrast to your statement. Are you suggesting that a bamboo rod over 8' in length is more difficult for a novice to cast? Bill Bill, not sure if I should be the one answer this,but from what I've read, and spoke with a few local experts on bamboo rods. When you get up in length you also get up in the actual weight of the rod. I was surprised to pick up a 7 1/2 4wt vs. a 8 1/2 6wt, there's a great amount of weight difference. There is also a huge difference between the 7 1/2 4wt bamboo rod vs. a 9' 5wt carbon fiber rod. Most of the experts I've talked with on cane rods told me the same, stay under 8'. And most agreed 7.5- 7.9 4wt -5wt do cast the best. It's on my mind and I'm very close to dishing out the bucks for a new Winston 7 1/2 4wt 3pc with two tips since they're not being made anymore. Welcome and open to suggestions. -tom |
The Cane Rod
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:58:09 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: I would never sully a good piece of cane by using it to cast anything other than dry flies although I suppose it's not illegal in some states to fling a nymph with one As a nympher, I have to agree. But/however, I have used cane with a nymph or two. d;o) I have two Kusse (3 and 5), a Zimmerman (4), another made by roff's own Peter Collin (a 5 which I use the most), and a Gehrke *******. |
The Cane Rod
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: I would never sully a good piece of cane by using it to cast anything other than dry flies although I suppose it's not illegal in some states to fling a nymph with one As a nympher, I have to agree. But/however, I have used cane with a nymph or two. d;o) I have two Kusse (3 and 5), a Zimmerman (4), another made by roff's own Peter Collin (a 5 which I use the most), and a Gehrke *******. DOH !! I forgot, I too have a garden stake from the Gehrke bamboo experiment. It's crap. -- Ken Fortenberry |
The Cane Rod
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:32:08 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: DOH !! I forgot, I too have a garden stake from the Gehrke bamboo experiment. It's crap. While I agree, I also think you are overreacting; after all, you never saw #11 and #12. d;o) When Peter Collin was at the house, we cast some canes on the grass. He showed me flaws in the Gehrke that aren't as obvious as most, and there were too many to list here. I didn't like the feel or cast of the rod, but it could be used to catch fish. |
The Cane Rod
Dave LaCourse typed:
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:32:08 GMT, Ken Fortenberry wrote: DOH !! I forgot, I too have a garden stake from the Gehrke bamboo experiment. It's crap. While I agree, I also think you are overreacting; after all, you never saw #11 and #12. d;o) When Peter Collin was at the house, we cast some canes on the grass. He showed me flaws in the Gehrke that aren't as obvious as most, and there were too many to list here. I didn't like the feel or cast of the rod, but it could be used to catch fish. I don't personally own a bamboo rod, but if I did purchase one, the main reason would be for the feel and casting characteristics. If those aren't there, it seems to me you could just use a willow branch, no? -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
The Cane Rod
Tim J. wrote:
I don't personally own a bamboo rod, but if I did purchase one, the main reason would be for the feel and casting characteristics. If those aren't there, it seems to me you could just use a willow branch, no? You should consider the Orvis Classic Traditional Package. It comes with a bamboo rod, a silk line, a gut leader, a tweed jacket, a briar pipe, and a split willow creel. :-) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter