![]() |
How many people read ROFF?
There are at most two dozen or so regular posters. Who knows how many
lurkers or occasional posters? Well, now I have a greatest-lower-bound approximation for this. So far, almost 80 people have viewed my two videos on YouTube (79 for the heron and 77 for the salmon). I suspect all but a small handful came to them from ROFF. YouTube is deluged with videos. Most of them get very little attention, including ones far better than mine. We can safely assume that there are about 80 ROFF readers with high-bandwidth Internet connections. I'm proposing an experiment to get better data. Click on one or the other of the YouTube videos and post a comment, identifying yourself as being from ROFF. You don't even have to watch them. I don't care. Just say "ROFF" or whatever else you want in the comments. You can even insult me if it makes you feel good. :-) The URLs a http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUIhNmC-diI (heron) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRnxKgZJws4 (salmon) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
How many people read ROFF?
rw wrote:
There are at most two dozen or so regular posters. Who knows how many lurkers or occasional posters? Well, now I have a greatest-lower-bound approximation for this. The standard Usenet approximation is 10:1 total readers to regular posters. So if your two dozen regular posters is accurate the best guess would be about 240 total readers. I'm proposing an experiment to get better data. ... Uh oh, not again. Your "experiments" tend to generate more heat than data. What was it, hauling loads the rod ? ;-) -- Ken Fortenberry |
How many people read ROFF?
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Uh oh, not again. Your "experiments" tend to generate more heat than data. What was it, hauling loads the rod ? ;-) Actually, Ken, that experiment threw cold water on the fire because it settled the argument once and for all. :-) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
How many people read ROFF?
|
How many people read ROFF?
"rw" wrote Screw it. actually, i think you are way short on your "regulars" count. i would put it closer to 40-50. check out a two week posting period and see what you think. yfitons wayno |
How many people read ROFF?
Judging from many of the replies, I'd say a lot less than the number who
look at the squiggly lines and pretty colors on the compuMicroWindowsTVthingy...or the iFruit, as the case may be... HTH, R |
How many people read ROFF?
"Wayne Harrison" wrote in message ... "rw" wrote Screw it. actually, i think you are way short on your "regulars" count. i would put it closer to 40-50.... I agree. What's more, there are also quite a few irregulars. And I sure would like to know how that "standard Usenet approximation" of 10 readers to each poster was derived. Wolfgang who, in any case, thinks the real reason for this thread.....and its antecedent.....is just about as funny as anything can be. :) |
How many people read ROFF?
Wolfgang wrote:
... And I sure would like to know how that "standard Usenet approximation" of 10 readers to each poster was derived. ... It's a guesstimate that works for most newsgroups in the Big 8. I really don't know how it was derived but if you Google up usenet arbitron readership you'll get more info than you want to read. -- Ken Fortenberry |
How many people read ROFF?
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message om... Wolfgang wrote: ... And I sure would like to know how that "standard Usenet approximation" of 10 readers to each poster was derived. ... It's a guesstimate that works for most newsgroups in the Big 8. Says who? I really don't know how it was derived but if you Google up usenet arbitron readership you'll get more info than you want to read. I don't want more information than I want to read. How's about you just summarize it for all of us. Wolfgang |
How many people read ROFF?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter