|
|
Malcolm Kane spills the beans!
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:14:30 -0400, ah wrote:
©¿© wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:05:47 +0100, Malcolm wrote: In article , BAC writes "Malcolm" wrote in message ... In article , writes Malcolm Kane a Penrith jeweller and holiday chalet landlord has spilled the beans on the hunting community thus furthering the call for banning shooting of wildlife. In an Internet posting addressed to Angus Macmillan of Killhunting UK he says. "I am considerably nearer to these hunts than you are. I am in a better position to know what's going on" He goes on to say, "The numbers now being killed AND those suffering by escaping wounded are the very reason I changed my mind from being against hunting. Mainly due to examining the situation due to your posts". It is clear Mr Kane has some inside information from local hunts in Cumbria to arrive at this conclusion, so I challenge him to produce evidence that his accusations against the hunting fraternity are correct so the his assertions can be used in the campaign to ban shooting. A copy of this post is being sent to border hunts so they may have the chance to comment. Why don't you just Google instead of posting silly rubbish like the above? Here are the first three items that came up when I looked: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4724028.stm http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...2/19/nhunt19.x ml http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...?id=1339272004 The last one says that the number killed in the Borders has doubled, using figures from the huntsmen themselves. And if you think the above will aid you in a campaign against shooting, then good luck to you. Sport shooting will still be taking place long after you are long dead and buried. And as I will be, too, there's no point in having a bet on it :-) Is shooting of foxes flushed from cover by hounds classed as sports shooting? I've no idea, but Angus was, I thought, referring to the banning of all shooting as he done so before now. I suspect he would like to ban all fishing, too. Quite right. Where's the difference? Fishing is cruel, usually carried out by thugs of limited intelligence, litterbugs, drunks and bums. Same weirdo's who enjoy hunting animals for fun, as long as the odds are stacked in their favour. Where's the good in letting that continue? Fishing is a time-hono(u)red activity--you soil the name of Jesus, Ser! Jesus did it for food, not for phun. |
Malcolm Kane spills the beans!
©¿© wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:14:30 -0400, ah wrote: ©¿© wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:05:47 +0100, Malcolm wrote: In article , BAC writes "Malcolm" wrote in message ... In article , writes Malcolm Kane a Penrith jeweller and holiday chalet landlord has spilled the beans on the hunting community thus furthering the call for banning shooting of wildlife. In an Internet posting addressed to Angus Macmillan of Killhunting UK he says. "I am considerably nearer to these hunts than you are. I am in a better position to know what's going on" He goes on to say, "The numbers now being killed AND those suffering by escaping wounded are the very reason I changed my mind from being against hunting. Mainly due to examining the situation due to your posts". It is clear Mr Kane has some inside information from local hunts in Cumbria to arrive at this conclusion, so I challenge him to produce evidence that his accusations against the hunting fraternity are correct so the his assertions can be used in the campaign to ban shooting. A copy of this post is being sent to border hunts so they may have the chance to comment. Why don't you just Google instead of posting silly rubbish like the above? Here are the first three items that came up when I looked: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4724028.stm http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...2/19/nhunt19.x ml http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...?id=1339272004 The last one says that the number killed in the Borders has doubled, using figures from the huntsmen themselves. And if you think the above will aid you in a campaign against shooting, then good luck to you. Sport shooting will still be taking place long after you are long dead and buried. And as I will be, too, there's no point in having a bet on it :-) Is shooting of foxes flushed from cover by hounds classed as sports shooting? I've no idea, but Angus was, I thought, referring to the banning of all shooting as he done so before now. I suspect he would like to ban all fishing, too. Quite right. Where's the difference? Fishing is cruel, usually carried out by thugs of limited intelligence, litterbugs, drunks and bums. Same weirdo's who enjoy hunting animals for fun, as long as the odds are stacked in their favour. Where's the good in letting that continue? Fishing is a time-hono(u)red activity--you soil the name of Jesus, Ser! Jesus did it for food, not for phun. I eat all my caught fish! -- ah |
Malcolm Kane spills the beans!
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:12:33 -0400, ah wrote:
©¿© wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:14:30 -0400, ah wrote: ©¿© wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:05:47 +0100, Malcolm wrote: In article , BAC writes "Malcolm" wrote in message .. . In article , writes Malcolm Kane a Penrith jeweller and holiday chalet landlord has spilled the beans on the hunting community thus furthering the call for banning shooting of wildlife. In an Internet posting addressed to Angus Macmillan of Killhunting UK he says. "I am considerably nearer to these hunts than you are. I am in a better position to know what's going on" He goes on to say, "The numbers now being killed AND those suffering by escaping wounded are the very reason I changed my mind from being against hunting. Mainly due to examining the situation due to your posts". It is clear Mr Kane has some inside information from local hunts in Cumbria to arrive at this conclusion, so I challenge him to produce evidence that his accusations against the hunting fraternity are correct so the his assertions can be used in the campaign to ban shooting. A copy of this post is being sent to border hunts so they may have the chance to comment. Why don't you just Google instead of posting silly rubbish like the above? Here are the first three items that came up when I looked: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4724028.stm http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...2/19/nhunt19.x ml http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...?id=1339272004 The last one says that the number killed in the Borders has doubled, using figures from the huntsmen themselves. And if you think the above will aid you in a campaign against shooting, then good luck to you. Sport shooting will still be taking place long after you are long dead and buried. And as I will be, too, there's no point in having a bet on it :-) Is shooting of foxes flushed from cover by hounds classed as sports shooting? I've no idea, but Angus was, I thought, referring to the banning of all shooting as he done so before now. I suspect he would like to ban all fishing, too. Quite right. Where's the difference? Fishing is cruel, usually carried out by thugs of limited intelligence, litterbugs, drunks and bums. Same weirdo's who enjoy hunting animals for fun, as long as the odds are stacked in their favour. Where's the good in letting that continue? Fishing is a time-hono(u)red activity--you soil the name of Jesus, Ser! Jesus did it for food, not for phun. I eat all my caught fish! I know a man who caught crabs once. |
Malcolm Kane spills the beans!
Is it legal to eat all the fish you catch?
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter