![]() |
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
ROFFers:
Do you know if any rod company makes a nice 3-piece 4-weight graphite rod, 8-1/2 or 9 feet long? I just broke the Orvis Zephyr I've been using for 27 years. I don't really want to switch to a four-piece rod. Thanks, John in Denver |
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
|
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
|
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
In article .com,
wrote: ROFFers: Do you know if any rod company makes a nice 3-piece 4-weight graphite rod, 8-1/2 or 9 feet long? I just broke the Orvis Zephyr I've been using for 27 years. I don't really want to switch to a four-piece rod. Hi john I'm curious as to why you don't want a four-piece. I don't have any (well one - one of the very first, a 9 foot Hardy Pall Mall Exclusive), but people suggest that a 4-piece made today is at least as good as a 2-piece made, say , fifteen or twenty years ago. any thoughts? Lazarus |
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
"Lazarus Cooke" wrote in message news:030720072235576339%lazaruscooke@britishlibrar y.invalid... In article .com, wrote: ROFFers: Do you know if any rod company makes a nice 3-piece 4-weight graphite rod, 8-1/2 or 9 feet long? I just broke the Orvis Zephyr I've been using for 27 years. I don't really want to switch to a four-piece rod. Hi john I'm curious as to why you don't want a four-piece. I don't have any (well one - one of the very first, a 9 foot Hardy Pall Mall Exclusive), but people suggest that a 4-piece made today is at least as good as a 2-piece made, say , fifteen or twenty years ago. any thoughts? The modern multi section rods are in my opinion quite marvellous. I have as my primary rod for my favourite stream a 5 piece 8 and a quarter foot #4 (Missionary) rod by Greys and I love it. I don't use many 2 piece rods as I think that multi sectioned rods are really handy and they cast as good as my ability (i.e. I am the limiting factor) I guess that we have the CNC type precision in the joints of the rods that have enabled multisection blanks to behave as well as they do. In virtually all my rods they are overslide joints and they seem to be good. I have a Hardy Smuggler rod (9.5 foot #7 from 1990s) that has the spigot type joints, and they do look fragile compared to overslide joints. In fact I broke a bit of the blank on the Smuggler when I negligently allowed a section to come loose, and casted with it in this condition. I had it repaired and have to check that the joints are tight periodically to try to avoid a recurrence (one of only downsides of multi section IMO) ~ Rod is still casting ok, but I always seem to be thinking about the spigots when I cast with that rod... Overslide joints just seem to be less worrisome, and I cast without nagging thoughts with this type of joint. |
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
On Jul 3, 4:35?pm, "MichaelM" wrote:
"Lazarus Cooke" wrote in message news:030720072235576339%lazaruscooke@britishlibrar y.invalid... In article .com, wrote: ROFFers: Do you know if any rod company makes a nice 3-piece 4-weight graphite rod, 8-1/2 or 9 feet long? I just broke the Orvis Zephyr I've been using for 27 years. I don't really want to switch to a four-piece rod. Hi john I'm curious as to why you don't want a four-piece. I don't have any (well one - one of the very first, a 9 foot Hardy Pall Mall Exclusive), but people suggest that a 4-piece made today is at least as good as a 2-piece made, say , fifteen or twenty years ago. any thoughts? The modern multi section rods are in my opinion quite marvellous. I have as my primary rod for my favourite stream a 5 piece 8 and a quarter foot #4 (Missionary) rod by Greys and I love it. I don't use many 2 piece rods as I think that multi sectioned rods are really handy and they cast as good as my ability (i.e. I am the limiting factor) I guess that we have the CNC type precision in the joints of the rods that have enabled multisection blanks to behave as well as they do. In virtually all my rods they are overslide joints and they seem to be good. I have a Hardy Smuggler rod (9.5 foot #7 from 1990s) that has the spigot type joints, and they do look fragile compared to overslide joints. In fact I broke a bit of the blank on the Smuggler when I negligently allowed a section to come loose, and casted with it in this condition. I had it repaired and have to check that the joints are tight periodically to try to avoid a recurrence (one of only downsides of multi section IMO) ~ Rod is still casting ok, but I always seem to be thinking about the spigots when I cast with that rod... Overslide joints just seem to be less worrisome, and I cast without nagging thoughts with this type of joint.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for your replies, guys. I guess I'm laboring under the old assumption that the more the joints in the fly rod, the worse the action. I thought the three-piece fly rod was the perfect compromise, but I just cast a four-piece Winston Boron IIt rod that was great. A little pricey, and I was surprised that it was about the same weight (in ounces, not line weight) as the Orvis Zephyr that I bought 27? years ago. I wonder if the Winston would have the same longevity. I have to admit that it's really fun to be shopping for a new rod after all this time with my steady gal. Thanks, John |
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
wrote in message oups.com... Thanks for your replies, guys. I guess I'm laboring under the old assumption that the more the joints in the fly rod, the worse the action.... Well, the joints MUST be considered the weak points.....whether in strictly physical terms or by other criteria......else, why not build a 53 piece rod, eh? :) Wolfgang who can hardly wait for his first 11 bladed razor! |
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:28:19 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Thanks for your replies, guys. I guess I'm laboring under the old assumption that the more the joints in the fly rod, the worse the action.... Well, the joints MUST be considered the weak points.....whether in strictly physical terms or by other criteria......else, why not build a 53 piece rod, eh? :) Because nobody would have the time, energy, or even ability to remember which piece went where? Unless they had an elastic thread down the center, like tent poles. That'd work. And then if the rod fell apart midstream, you'd just snap it back into shape. Yeah. -- r.bc: vixen Minnow goddess, Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher. Almost entirely harmless. Really. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
3-piece 4-weight graphite rod
On Jul 3, 6:56 pm, wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:35?pm, "MichaelM" wrote: "Lazarus Cooke" wrote in message news:030720072235576339%lazaruscooke@britishlibra ry.invalid... In article .com, wrote: ROFFers: Do you know if any rod company makes a nice 3-piece 4-weight graphite rod, 8-1/2 or 9 feet long? I just broke the Orvis Zephyr I've been using for 27 years. I don't really want to switch to a four-piece rod. Hi john I'm curious as to why you don't want a four-piece. I don't have any (well one - one of the very first, a 9 foot Hardy Pall Mall Exclusive), but people suggest that a 4-piece made today is at least as good as a 2-piece made, say , fifteen or twenty years ago. any thoughts? The modern multi section rods are in my opinion quite marvellous. I have as my primary rod for my favourite stream a 5 piece 8 and a quarter foot #4 (Missionary) rod by Greys and I love it. I don't use many 2 piece rods as I think that multi sectioned rods are really handy and they cast as good as my ability (i.e. I am the limiting factor) I guess that we have the CNC type precision in the joints of the rods that have enabled multisection blanks to behave as well as they do. In virtually all my rods they are overslide joints and they seem to be good. I have a Hardy Smuggler rod (9.5 foot #7 from 1990s) that has the spigot type joints, and they do look fragile compared to overslide joints. In fact I broke a bit of the blank on the Smuggler when I negligently allowed a section to come loose, and casted with it in this condition. I had it repaired and have to check that the joints are tight periodically to try to avoid a recurrence (one of only downsides of multi section IMO) ~ Rod is still casting ok, but I always seem to be thinking about the spigots when I cast with that rod... Overslide joints just seem to be less worrisome, and I cast without nagging thoughts with this type of joint.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for your replies, guys. I guess I'm laboring under the old assumption that the more the joints in the fly rod, the worse the action. I thought the three-piece fly rod was the perfect compromise, but I just cast a four-piece Winston Boron IIt rod that was great. A little pricey, and I was surprised that it was about the same weight (in ounces, not line weight) as the Orvis Zephyr that I bought 27? years ago. I wonder if the Winston would have the same longevity. I have to admit that it's really fun to be shopping for a new rod after all this time with my steady gal. Thanks, John John, If you are under cost constraints, another good place to look is ebay. Back in the days of my laziness and unemployment, I needed a smaller stream rod. I bought a nice IM-6 rod handmade by a guy I met on ebay. It was a 7'6" 4 piece, came with a case, and he even engraved my initials on the bottom of the blank. It's a great little rod (especially for the money) - and even now that I have several other Winstons and Sages, I still break the little guy out when I hit the small creeks in the rockies. Don't overlook the homemades - you won't get the big name (or the lifetime warranty) - but you can get a good rod at a great price. jc |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter