New Issue: This Is Fly
 

Beautiful online magazine:

'This is Fly | Fly Fishing Magazine' (http://tinyurl.com/3x384y)

Randy


--
Randyflycaster
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Randyflycaster's Profile: http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...hp?userid=2298
View this thread: http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...ad.php?t=13652


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

New Issue: This Is Fly
 

On Jan 18, 9:11 am, Randyflycaster Randyflycaster.
wrote:
Beautiful online magazine:

'This is Fly | Fly Fishing Magazine' (http://tinyurl.com/3x384y)


There does seem to be some good content there....I'll look
harder and longer some other time.

But--at first glance anyway--it does look like that site has no text
content
what-so-ever: it's all javascript and flash, which is entirely
invisible
to search engines. So even if you had the world's best written
pages, about the most riveting and crucial topics, Google will never
know
it was there.........and so it would remain effectively invisible,
forever.

New Issue: This Is Fly
 

"while-one" wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 9:11 am, Randyflycaster Randyflycaster.
wrote:
Beautiful online magazine:

'This is Fly | Fly Fishing Magazine' (http://tinyurl.com/3x384y)


There does seem to be some good content there....I'll look
harder and longer some other time.

But--at first glance anyway--it does look like that site has no text
content
what-so-ever: it's all javascript and flash, which is entirely
invisible
to search engines. So even if you had the world's best written
pages, about the most riveting and crucial topics, Google will never
know
it was there.........and so it would remain effectively invisible,
forever.



And I guess the day's when page-weight was a prime concern of all web
designers is over .... I never got the first page loaded before I gave up.
"Beautiful" is of limited value if nobody sees it ( um maybe, I'll have to
ponder that ... wilderness is of great value, imho, even though few see it,
maybe the same applies to websites? )