| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Recipes, anyone?
http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_127519.asp If it ever happens here, my guess is it would start in ... California :-) Jon. |
Recipes, anyone?
On May 30, 8:40 pm, daytripper wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT), wrote: http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_127519.asp If it ever happens here, my guess is it would start in ... California :-) Well, if it ever does, we can hope it ends there, too :-) Fortunately, the Greens hold little sway Stateside. I doubt they could get anything like this passed - even in the land of fruits, nuts and flakes :-) Meanwhile, I expect there'll be a lot of net-less Swiss "accidentally" dropping their catch back in the water. Repeatedly and often - them fish is slippery, ya know... /daytripper (and that'll be just fine) Whatever. My prediction stands: 2025. |
Recipes, anyone?
On Sat, 31 May 2008 07:40:35 -0700 (PDT), Halfordian Golfer
wrote: Whatever. My prediction stands: 2025. And only stocked fish by 2050. |
Recipes, anyone?
|
Recipes, anyone?
On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:09:07 -0600, rw
wrote: wrote: http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_127519.asp If it ever happens here, my guess is it would start in ... California :-) Jon. What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? A rule promulgated by idiots, the point is atop their heads... /daytripper (obviously) |
Recipes, anyone?
On May 31, 6:15 pm, daytripper wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:09:07 -0600, rw wrote: wrote: http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_127519.asp If it ever happens here, my guess is it would start in ... California :-) Jon. What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? A rule promulgated by idiots, the point is atop their heads... /daytripper (obviously) It's fairly obvious that humankind is moving, inextricably, towards a more humane relationship with wild animals. You have a choice. 1) call them idiots or 2) try to understand their point of view while protecting your right to harvest from God's abundance My only caution would be that you should consider the scope of this problem and the trends, carefully. As fun as it may be you are not arguing with me. You are arguing with the inhabitants of all those lofts that are being constructed in the urban reformations. They eat sushi and raise puppies and outnumber you 100 to 1. To quote Russell Chatham, "their only encounter with un-reconstructed nature is stepping in a pile of poodle excement on the sidewalk". I've said my piece on this for 2 decades, yet, admittedly, even I was stunned by the clarity of the wording, because it cut directly to the core of the issue, far sooner and far more clear than I had anticipated. It about sums it up. "it is not permitted to go fishing with the 'intention' to release the fish.", the word "intention" being fulcrum. Anyway, the jig is up. This one has been decided. This specific question should become a lot more real now: If I had to kill the fish I catch, would I still fish? -- Halfordian Golfer Guilt replaced the creel |
Recipes, anyone?
Halfordian Golfer wrote:
On May 31, 6:15 pm, daytripper wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:09:07 -0600, rw wrote: wrote: http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_127519.asp If it ever happens here, my guess is it would start in ... California :-) Jon. What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? A rule promulgated by idiots, the point is atop their heads... /daytripper (obviously) It's fairly obvious that humankind is moving, inextricably, towards a more humane relationship with wild animals. You have a choice. 1) call them idiots or 2) try to understand their point of view while protecting your right to harvest from God's abundance I repeat: What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? I could see banning fishing altogether as being at least logically consistent, but this? It's absurd. ------ Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Recipes, anyone?
On Jun 1, 10:10 am, rw wrote:
Halfordian Golfer wrote: On May 31, 6:15 pm, daytripper wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:09:07 -0600, rw wrote: wrote: http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_127519.asp If it ever happens here, my guess is it would start in ... California :-) Jon. What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? A rule promulgated by idiots, the point is atop their heads... /daytripper (obviously) It's fairly obvious that humankind is moving, inextricably, towards a more humane relationship with wild animals. You have a choice. 1) call them idiots or 2) try to understand their point of view while protecting your right to harvest from God's abundance I repeat: What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? I could see banning fishing altogether as being at least logically consistent, but this? It's absurd. ------ Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Why not ask them rw? Nothing I say will satisfy you anyway. Halfordian Golfer Culling. Bait. Think. |
Recipes, anyone?
On Jun 1, 10:10 am, rw wrote:
Halfordian Golfer wrote: On May 31, 6:15 pm, daytripper wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:09:07 -0600, rw wrote: wrote: http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_127519.asp If it ever happens here, my guess is it would start in ... California :-) Jon. What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? A rule promulgated by idiots, the point is atop their heads... /daytripper (obviously) It's fairly obvious that humankind is moving, inextricably, towards a more humane relationship with wild animals. You have a choice. 1) call them idiots or 2) try to understand their point of view while protecting your right to harvest from God's abundance I repeat: What is the point of banning BOTH C&R and barbed hooks? I could see banning fishing altogether as being at least logically consistent, but this? It's absurd. ------ Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Guys. I've unsubscribed from ROFF. Just not worth the abuse from a few people. If you want me I'll respond to polite posts in alt.flyfishing and, if ever in Colorado, get hold of me there and I'll see if I can arrange a pass with ya or send ya some bugs. Your pal, Halfordian Golfer Guilt replaced the Creel. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter