|
|
What better symbol of the bullshit....
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...s-sex-scandal/
No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. But to be fair, maybe it just wasn't as much real news as Simon Cowell's income per minute, Lisa Marie naming her twins, and "Gossip Girls" doing an anti-McCain ad... Sheesh, R |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: http://elections.foxnews... Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you. ABC News broke the story, I just found it interesting that CNN is/was the only major "news" outlet in the US that didn't have it "front page," but rather had **** about Simon Cowell per-minute income and Lisa Marie's twins' names, esp. after their coverage of Foley. No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. ... More comedy from the right field bleachers. Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Much like Clinton, it's not the "boinking," it's the activity surrounding it - in this case, bribery, obstruction of justice, theft of funds, misuse of funds, etc. And then, there's the lefties' old fav, "bu-bu-but he campaigned _specifically_ on a "morality" platform!!!!" Naturally, an international defender of homosexual rights such as yourself wouldn't suggest that a homosexual (unmarried) is somehow a pervert whereas a straight guy cheating on his wife, bribing mistresses with campaign and taxpayer funds, all while campaigning as the "candidate of morality" is OK. And there is some question as to her being his mistress when she became an aide rather than his beginning an affair with an existing aide. And FWIW, apparently even his objective critics and law enforcement acknowledge that while Foley did exchange improper emails and possibly engage in highly improper conversations with pages, he did not engage in any sexual activity with _anyone_, page or otherwise, while they were pages or underage. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? LOL !! Sad. HTH, R |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 14, 7:02*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: http://elections.foxnews... Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you. ABC News broke the story, I just found it interesting that CNN is/was the only major "news" outlet in the US that didn't have it "front page," but rather had **** about Simon Cowell per-minute income and Lisa Marie's twins' names, esp. after their coverage of Foley. No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in trouble, it was front and center for days. ... More comedy from the right field bleachers. Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Much like Clinton, it's not the "boinking," it's the activity surrounding it - in this case, bribery, obstruction of justice, theft of funds, misuse of funds, etc. *And then, there's the lefties' old fav, "bu-bu-but he campaigned _specifically_ on a "morality" platform!!!!" Naturally, an international defender of homosexual rights such as yourself wouldn't suggest that a homosexual (unmarried) is somehow a pervert whereas a straight guy cheating on his wife, bribing mistresses with campaign and taxpayer funds, all while campaigning as the "candidate of morality" is OK. * And there is some question as to her being his mistress when she became an aide rather than his beginning an affair with an existing aide. * And FWIW, apparently even his objective critics and law enforcement acknowledge that while Foley did exchange improper emails and possibly engage in highly improper conversations with pages, he did not engage in any sexual activity with _anyone_, page or otherwise, while they were pages or underage. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? LOL !! Sad. HTH, R What better demonstration of bull**** than you two bull****ters trying to bull**** each other. The two of you are primarily responsible for turning this group into nothing more than a complete shower of bull****. Quite poetic justice really to see you trying to bull**** each other. |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
|
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? But you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at least one male page. RAPED HIM! And you say nothing of that. Soliciting versus the actual act of forceable RAPE, and you say nothing of it. And, let's through in Barney's little "mistakes". Your slip is showing, Ken. Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? But you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at least one male page. RAPED HIM! And you say nothing of that. ... It's all Clinton's fault !! LOL !! I'll give you the same advice I gave the other vocal wingnut from the far right on this group, take a break, ignore the election and then come back on November 5, cry in your beer for awhile and move on. -- Ken Fortenberry |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Oct 14, 8:30*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry wrote: Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost immediately by the Dem leadership. Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ? But *you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at least one *male page. *RAPED HIM! * And you say nothing of that. Soliciting versus the actual act of forceable RAPE, and you say nothing of it. *And, let's through in Barney's little "mistakes". Your slip is showing, Ken. Dave And bull****ter number three chimes in on cue. Also boring...................... |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:37:37 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: It's all Clinton's fault !! LOL !! I'll give you the same advice I gave the other vocal wingnut from the far right on this group, take a break, ignore the election and then come back on November 5, cry in your beer for awhile and move on. Who the hell said anything about Clinton? Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. And *nothing* was done about it. Soliciting sex with pages? Yeah, well good luck. If you get caught you will be embarassed. Rape a page? Yeah, well good luck. If you get caught, and you're a Democrat, nothing will happen to you. I have said I can live with an Obama presidency, but I *know* you won't be able to function if McCain wins. Good luck, Ken. It is gonna be a miserable 8 years if McCain wins. d;o) Dave |
What better symbol of the bullshit....
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: It's all Clinton's fault !! LOL !! Who the hell said anything about Clinton? Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ... Everything wrong is Clinton's fault. The GOP sent out a memo, apparently you didn't get the memo. And Gerry Studds never did any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie. But of course we all know that the Dems are vicious child rapers and Republicans are all paragons of virtue who are the victims of a vast liberal conspiracy consisting of the mainstream media and a bunch of America hating ex-hippies and egghead professors who never served their country. I know this because I heard it in a country western song playing on the loudspeakers before the start of a NASCAR race. LOL !! I have said I can live with an Obama presidency, but I *know* you won't be able to function if McCain wins. Well, apparently your spouse won't be able to function if Obama wins. What's the deal with that ? Nobody I know bases their decision on when to retire on the political party of the current President. Good luck, Ken. It is gonna be a miserable 8 years if McCain wins. Well, that's surely true enough, but I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. -- Ken Fortenberry |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter