![]() |
sinking line, moving water
I've been trying to figure out how to fish some waist to chest deep very
fast water near here. Thus far my most heavily weighted efforts have clearly zipped downstream well over any fish and/ or in a manner that allowed no contact with the fly to sense strikes. Last night I woke up at about 3:00AM thinking about sinking lines. I've used them for years in stillwaters but never in moving waters. So, my question, before I trundle off, at some risk to life and limb, to try it. Does "swinging" a fly on a HiSpeedHID ... down and across ... have hidden inherent problems that I'm not visualizing having never tried it? Turning around and facing the other direction, does the 'Brook's method' of high sticking with a sinking line have any advantage over lobbing a ton of lead and fuzzy bobber .. ah, I mean, casting large quanities of non-toxic shot and a strike indicator ... in water where getting anywhere near the bottom is the first big challenge? |
sinking line, moving water
On Oct 27, 10:05 am, "Larry L" wrote:
Last night I woke up at about 3:00AM thinking about sinking lines. When I saw your post yesterday I almost fired a quick reply saying to try sinking lines. it. Does "swinging" a fly on a HiSpeedHID ... down and across ... have hidden inherent problems that I'm not visualizing having never tried it? I've done this a few times up at the San Juan when I've gotten tired of watching an indicator, and have taken several nice fish. On one very strong seam (top of Texas Hole) one evening, I didn't fair catch anything but did tail-hook two browns. After the second happened I imagine they were slapping my fly with their tail. Turning around and facing the other direction, does the 'Brook's method' of high sticking with a sinking line have any advantage over lobbing a ton of I've also tried this and can't recall ever taking a fish, but maybe I have. The main problem here is detecting a strike. A fish just isn't going to move your sinking line much, it's much different than having only thin leader between the fly and indicator. You have to hope they hook themselves. in water where getting anywhere near the bottom is the first big challenge? I think the real issue for you here (although I haven't seen the water) is captured in that part of the Serenity Prayer that says "change the things I can change, accept the things I can't, and the wisdom to know the difference". There is water that simply is not practically fishable, runs that you simply cannot get a drift through, holes that you cannot get your fly into. No sense getting frustrated in trying. Leave 'em be; a better strategy might be to fish at times when fish holding in those places might move out into feeding water where you _can_ fish to 'em. Jon. |
sinking line, moving water
On Oct 28, 1:57*pm, wrote:
.. There is water that simply is not practically fishable, runs that you simply cannot get a drift through, holes that you cannot get your fly into. No sense getting frustrated in trying. Leave 'em be; a better strategy might be to fish at times when fish holding in those places might move out into feeding water where you _can_ fish to 'em. Jon. Often, "unfishable" water holds the best fish. Sinking lines cause a lot of problems unless used with taut line techniques, and these can also be extremely difficult to implement. For the type of water described in the original post, Czech-nymphing is a viable technique. http://globalflyfisher.com/fishbetter/czech/ http://www.bishfish.co.nz/articles/fresh/czechnymph.htm http://www.czechnymphs.co.uk/CzechNymphing.htm there are other techniques, but this one is particularly effective. One may also use such nymphs below a floating indicator if desired, which is then a slack line technique, but may be used at greater range. The links provided should contain sufficient info to at least get started. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter