![]() |
OT - Fantasy Football
Okay, I've qualified for the playoffs but I don't want to drop farther
than I am. I've got three running backs for this weekend that could have big games, but I can only play two. Who do I play? Justin Fargas of Oakland playing KC - 12 points projected Frank Gore of SF playing Buffalo - 16 points projected Michael Turner of Atlanta playing San Diego - 10 points projected Turner and Gore have been my go-to guys all season and done quite well. Hell, Turner had 4 TD's last week. Right now, Fargas is projected to gain more points than Turner. Fargas is going against the perennial powerhouse KC (Bwahahahaha!). Based on defense against the run, and all those other thingies that you would take into consideration, who should I play? Frank Reid www.flytyer37.blogspot.com |
OT - Fantasy Football
Frank Reid © 2008 wrote:
Okay, I've qualified for the playoffs but I don't want to drop farther than I am. I've got three running backs for this weekend that could have big games, but I can only play two. Who do I play? Justin Fargas of Oakland playing KC - 12 points projected Frank Gore of SF playing Buffalo - 16 points projected Michael Turner of Atlanta playing San Diego - 10 points projected I'd sit Gore. Gore doesn't get a lot of opportunities in a lopsided game where the 49ers are throwing the ball and playing catchup. And I think the 49ers at Buffalo is going to be way lopsided. On the other hand, it must be hard to sit a guy named Frank. ;-) -- Ken Fortenberry |
OT - Fantasy Football
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
snip On the other hand, it must be hard to sit a guy named Frank. ;-) It makes the bench seem, well, . .. dangerous. -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter