OT Tee hee
 

A link to an editorial in the LA Times presented with almost no comment.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...0,927819.story

LOL !! (Well, I did say *almost* ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

OT Tee hee
 

la times is a joke.......






On Apr 24, 11:35*am, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
A link to an editorial in the LA Times presented with almost no comment.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...apr24,0,927819....

LOL !! (Well, I did say *almost* ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

OT Tee hee
 

On Apr 24, 10:49*am, "~^ beancounter ~^"
wrote:
la times is a joke.......

On Apr 24, 11:35*am, Ken Fortenberry



wrote:
A link to an editorial in the LA Times presented with almost no comment..

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...apr24,0,927819....

LOL !! (Well, I did say *almost* ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No actually the LA Times is considered a conservative paper, just not
Whackjob rightwing Aryan Nations/Rushparrot. Bill M is obviously not a
conservative.

Dave

OT Tee hee
 

LOL !! (Well, I did say *almost* ;-)



"Like Trekkies, but paranoid."

OT Tee hee
 

no it's not....


" No actually the LA Times is considered a conservative paper "

OT Tee hee
 

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
no it's not....

" No actually the LA Times is considered a conservative paper "

I Dave's comment did not imply "considered by beancounter" but rather
something like "considered by people who don't move their lips when they read"

- JR

OT Tee hee
 

any dumb ass knows the la times is a lib rag......
same w/sf chronical.......except if you are a lib, i
guess.......






On Apr 24, 5:32*pm, JR wrote:
~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
no it's not....

" *No actually the LA Times is considered a conservative paper "

I Dave's comment did not imply "considered by beancounter" but rather
something like "considered by people who don't move their lips when they read"

- JR

OT Tee hee
 

On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:35:41 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

A link to an editorial in the LA Times presented with almost no comment.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...0,927819.story

LOL !! (Well, I did say *almost* ;-)

I just skim-read it, but what I saw, I'd agree with, or, at least, nothing
jumped out at me that I particularly disagreed with. Plus, it was funny...

TC,
R