![]() |
|
TR Cascade River
First time fishing this year. Two weeks off was hard to take, but I
spent some of the time skiing, and some building a new 10wt rod mostly for pike and sal****er use. I had to try the new rod, so I drove up to the Cascade river looking for steelhead or dollies. The steelhead didn't cooperate, but a nice 21 inch Dolly did. I've posted a picture on abpf, and on my website at: http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...D-1257387.html This fish didn't put up much fight, a fairly common result with dollies, but the water was 35 degrees or so. I wonder if cold temperatures are as hard on the fish as hot temperatures. Anybody know? It turns out that the rains we had a couple months ago moved the river north a bit, and not much water is in the section that's right in front of the hatchery. Fishermen have kept a few hundred steelies there this year, but the hatchery has only taken 28 fish with only 3 of those being hens. There are 3 large plastic fish holders on the bank for fishermen who catch hatchery hens to put their fish in and set in the river so the game department can get their quota of hens. One of the guys I talked to on the river said that he's seen one fish given to the hatchery this way. I've never seen anything like this, but I hope it works, and I'd give them my hen if I caught one. Chas remove fly fish to reply http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html San Juan Pictures at: http://home.comcast.net/~chasepike/wsb/index.html |
TR Cascade River
Chas,
I don't know it for a fact but in presentations by biologists my is impression that winter is indeed stressful for resident brown and brook trout in my local streams. How stressful probably varies from year to year and from stream to stream. For example, intuitively I would think that trout in spring creeks might withstand winter better than trout in freestone rivers because of the availability of food and more constant temperatures. I believe that very severe winters that result in anchor ice formation are deadly. A report that sticks in my mind was a radio-tracking experiment on brown trout in a local stream. The loss in body mass from fall to spring was very high, double digit percentages - don't quote me on this but it might have been of the order of 20-30%. I am not sure of the significance of the result because the sample size was very small and it was only for one winter in one stream. I am not sure how fishing regulations were developed over the years but it seems to me that closed trout seasons, while probably intended primarily to protect spawning fish, probably also serve to protect them during a period when they are most highly vulnerable. Yuji Sakuma ================================================== =============== "Chas Wade" wrote in message news:1isMb.28770$Rc4.118871@attbi_s54... This fish didn't put up much fight, a fairly common result with dollies, but the water was 35 degrees or so. I wonder if cold temperatures are as hard on the fish as hot temperatures. Anybody know? Chas remove fly fish to reply http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html San Juan Pictures at: http://home.comcast.net/~chasepike/wsb/index.html |
TR Cascade River
Nice fish Chas. Great Picture.
bruce h |
TR Cascade River
Hello Willi,
Around here, people are voluntarily choosing not to fish on vulnerable local streams if the water gets too low and the temperature rises too much in mid-summer. We also have a tailwater fishery which can be fished all summer without compunction. Our closed season is from the end of September until nearly the end of April, almost seven months, but even if it were open all year, I personally would be inclined to leave them alone during spawning season and in deep winter. I would like to be able to start earlier in the spring though, weather permitting. A trout's weight loss over the cold months is I believe, natural and not something to be overly concerned about; it is probably analagous to a bear's weight loss during hibernation. Its metabolism no doubt slows as the temperature drops and consequently it does not feed as actively, even if food is abundant. If so, they are probably harder to catch and not as much fun to catch anyway. Fishing in winter will not do an individual trout any good because of the extra stress during a stressful time but it probably will not do much harm on a population wide basis - I reckon the fishing pressure would be minimal from October to March and few fish would get caught anyway. There might be an additional reason not to fish in late fall though - extensive wading could possibly disturb redds. Best regards, Yuji Sakuma ================================================== == "Willi" wrote in message ... I'm pretty sure that catching fish at low water temps is less stressful than at high ones. (I'll see if I have any info on that) However, like you state, Winter can be tough on the fish. In streams and rivers, if anchor ice forms, there can be significant loss. Overall, although there is weight loss during the Winter, trout deal just fine with low water temps. The trout have evolved to be able to handle it. Shallow lakes do often fish kill during the Winter, but this is do to oxygen depletion and not temperatures that are too low. There are some sections of tailwaters where the temps "never" get out of the forties and the fish populations are high and the trout prosper. Higher water temps are generally the limiting factor in where trout can survive. As a river flows downstream, average temps generally rise until they reach the point where the trout can't survive. Today, most of the trout water that has been lost has been due to increased water temps caused by changes that man has made. Some of these things a removing water for for irrigation so water temps rise more easily, the removal of tree cover, etc. Willi |
TR Cascade River
Willi wrote in message ...
Higher water temps are generally the limiting factor in where trout can survive. As a river flows downstream, average temps generally rise until they reach the point where the trout can't survive. Willi, have you ever explored downstream to see if trout move down at different seasons? I could imagine that trout move down in winter (if there's enough water) and maybe back again when it gets too warm. You've talked here before about daily migrations of a hundred yards, but are there seasonal migrations on the order of miles? I could also imagine that in high-runoff years, quite a few trout may find themselves (either "purposefully" in their pea-brains or accidentally) quite a ways downstream, and not really make an effort to move back up as the water warms. This could be an opportunity to harvest some decent trout that would otherwise perish anyways. Maybe in the few weeks after runoff and before the water really starts warming up. Jon. I guess it should be noted that you live near streams that make a fairly abrupt change from good trout water to uninhabitable, with a fairly short amount of "marginal" habitat. In other areas of the country, this situation may be uncommon (I'm guessing). |
TR Cascade River
"Yuji Sakuma" wrote:
Chas, I don't know it for a fact but in presentations by biologists my is impression that winter is indeed stressful for resident brown and brook trout in my local streams. How stressful probably varies from year to year and from stream to stream. For example, intuitively I would think that trout in spring creeks might withstand winter better than trout in freestone rivers because of the availability of food and more constant temperatures. I believe that very severe winters that result in anchor ice formation are deadly. A report that sticks in my mind was a radio-tracking experiment on brown trout in a local stream. The loss in body mass from fall to spring was very high, double digit percentages - don't quote me on this but it might have been of the order of 20-30%. I am not sure of the significance of the result because the sample size was very small and it was only for one winter in one stream. I am not sure how fishing regulations were developed over the years but it seems to me that closed trout seasons, while probably intended primarily to protect spawning fish, probably also serve to protect them during a period when they are most highly vulnerable. Yuji Sakuma I know about that kind of stress, and I'm pretty sure it's no more of a problem than an Atkins diet. The question is how the fish recover from a fight when the water is very cold. Dolly Varden need very cold water to spawn, 37 degrees if I remember correctly, so I suspect they're little effected by the cold. I agree about your later comment, we certainly need to be aware of redds and avoid trampling them any time of year. Thanks, Chas remove fly fish to reply http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html San Juan Pictures at: http://home.comcast.net/~chasepike/wsb/index.html |
TR Cascade River
Jonathan Cook wrote: Willi wrote in message ... Higher water temps are generally the limiting factor in where trout can survive. As a river flows downstream, average temps generally rise until they reach the point where the trout can't survive. Willi, have you ever explored downstream to see if trout move down at different seasons? I could imagine that trout move down in winter (if there's enough water) and maybe back again when it gets too warm. You've talked here before about daily migrations of a hundred yards, but are there seasonal migrations on the order of miles? I've never read anything about that except for some reports from the East where the trout will migrate in the Summer to spring heads to get relief from the rising temps. I don't know how far they go. From what I've read, in some Yellowstone rivers, the trout migrate in and out of certain areas. Locally what I've observed is that they "hole up" during either high or low temps. During these low flow periods, I can clearly see the bottom of all but the very deepest pools and not see a fish. An influx of water or a moderation in temps will bring them out. I could also imagine that in high-runoff years, quite a few trout may find themselves (either "purposefully" in their pea-brains or accidentally) quite a ways downstream, and not really make an effort to move back up as the water warms. This could be an opportunity to harvest some decent trout that would otherwise perish anyways. Maybe in the few weeks after runoff and before the water really starts warming up. I think that since they evolved with runoff, they've adapted well to it. I'm sure there's some fish that end up like you describe. One of the things they do locally is run up irrigation canals during runoff, but when the water recedes some of them will get stuck. A few of them find spots that consistently hold enough water so they can live there. In the irrigation canal that borders my property, there's a big brown that lives under the bridge that's been there several years, even though flows in the Summer can be almost like bathwater. I guess it should be noted that you live near streams that make a fairly abrupt change from good trout water to uninhabitable, with a fairly short amount of "marginal" habitat. In other areas of the country, this situation may be uncommon (I'm guessing). I think many streams and rivers share this at some point. They flow from elevation which keeps them cool enough to support trout, but as they descend they reach an area where the water becomes too warm to support them. Willi |
TR Cascade River
Yuji Sakuma wrote: Hello Willi, Around here, people are voluntarily choosing not to fish on vulnerable local streams if the water gets too low and the temperature rises too much in mid-summer. We also have a tailwater fishery which can be fished all summer without compunction. Our closed season is from the end of September until nearly the end of April, almost seven months, but even if it were open all year, I personally would be inclined to leave them alone during spawning season and in deep winter. I would like to be able to start earlier in the spring though, weather permitting. A trout's weight loss over the cold months is I believe, natural and not something to be overly concerned about; it is probably analagous to a bear's weight loss during hibernation. Its metabolism no doubt slows as the temperature drops and consequently it does not feed as actively, even if food is abundant. If so, they are probably harder to catch and not as much fun to catch anyway. Most (all) of the Rocky Mountain states have no closed seasons (except for some specific streams and rivers). Winter does produce some midge hatches and you can even sometimes catch fish ontop. When the water temps are very cold, the fish are what I call, "ice cube trout" and aren't fun to catch. Most of the Winter fishing, at least in CO, are tailwaters whose temps stay moderate. There the fish feed "normally" all Winter. I've never caught a trout during cold water temps that needed any revival before releasing, but I have during "prime" times. I think closing streams and rivers when the temps get too high would do more for the fishery than closing them in the Winter. Fishing in winter will not do an individual trout any good I don't think it ever does an individual trout any good! because of the extra stress during a stressful time but it probably will not do much harm on a population wide basis - I reckon the fishing pressure would be minimal from October to March and few fish would get caught anyway. There might be an additional reason not to fish in late fall though - extensive wading could possibly disturb redds. I agree with this because it makes sense. However, the studies I've read comparing populations on streams when they were closed during spawning compared to when they were open, showed no difference. The redds of Browns and Brookies are pretty easy to spot and avoid because they are Fall spawners and during that time flows are low. The redds of Rainbows and Cutts are often difficult to see because of the higher flows in the Spring. Willi |
TR Cascade River
Willi,
In another post in this thread, I referred to a radio tracking study of brown trout on a local stream which showed that trout lose considerable weight over the winter, (at least in the experiment). I do not have a report, only recollection of a preliminary verbal presentation of findings. Among the discoveries was that trout do move around, some moving considerable distances, 8-10 kms, others not as much. Radio tracking is glamorous and consequently is somewhat of a fad among field biologists working on almost every species imaginable these days. Some aspects of it on some species bothers me. For instance, I was disturbed by tracking experiments on endangered sea turtles; even to my untrained eye the particular transmitter used had to have affected the hydrodynamics of the creature. Most researchers never recover their specimens but I recall reading of one team that did and found their specimen wasted and about to die, presumably because of an inability to swim normally and feed. The lead scientist chose to end his program at that point because of that. In the case of trout in my home river, there was a very high mortality of the specimens for reasons that apparently could not be identified. My suspicion is that the fish might have been very highly stressed not by the transmitter itself but by the procedure to install it. The fish are out of the water for 5-10 minutes during which time they are only doused with water laced with a disinfectant. This is inconsistent with the preachings of other biologists who advise anglers to release their catch as quickly as possible - I am surprised that any survived at all. However, in the case of fairly abundant species such as trout, I suppose sacrificing a few to find information to save many is a worthwhile trade off. Yuji Sakuma ================================================== ======= "Willi" wrote in message ... Jonathan Cook wrote: Willi wrote in message ... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter