National Geographics new issue.
 

There is an article abut the evolution of feathers in this issue. Quite interesting reading for those of us non-birdmen.

Op

National Geographics new issue.
 

On Feb 3, 2:49*pm, "Mark H. Bowen" wrote:
There is an article abut the evolution of feathers in this issue. Quite interesting reading for those of us non-birdmen.

Op

Yeah, yeah... get to the topless native girls.
Frank Reid

National Geographics new issue.
 

On Feb 3, 4:24*pm, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:49*pm, "Mark H. Bowen" wrote:

There is an article abut the evolution of feathers in this issue. Quite interesting reading for those of us non-birdmen.

Op

Yeah, yeah... get to the topless native girls.
Frank Reid

I ain't looked much in recent years.....but occasional brief perusals
suggest that there ain't a whole lot of topless native girls in NatGeo
these days.

Dredging the memory banks suggests that the vast majority of topless
native girls offered in past issues would have been well served by a
liberal covering of feathers.

Doubtless, there is an adaptive convergent evolution of some sort or
another at work here.

Or, should be, anyway.

g.
hm.....what was it kurtz said? :(

National Geographics new issue.
 

On Feb 3, 6:20*pm, Giles wrote:

g.
hm.....what was it kurtz said? * * * *:(

Something about shop keepers sending someone or other to do something
or other. In Phoenix wus it?
Dave

National Geographics new issue.
 

On Feb 4, 3:27*am, DaveS wrote:
On Feb 3, 6:20*pm, Giles wrote:

g.
hm.....what was it kurtz said? * * * *:(

Something about shop keepers sending someone or other to do something
or other.

Having never experienced it oneself, one can nevertheless appreciate
the horror of suddenly discovering that one has spent a lifetime
trotting about the globe and committing sundry acts of heroism.....at
the behest of shopkeepers.

In Phoenix wus it?
Dave

Hm.....

Lost me entirely on that one. :(

giles
that's what i love about this place.