Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

http://missoulian.com/news/state-and...cc4c03286.html

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 11:31*am, Larry L wrote:

http://missoulian.com/news/state-and...2427464-4a07-1...

Hm.....

Have tried to decode it.

But all I keep seeing is: http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional

I confess I am unable to decode this.

g.
who remembers a time when those with opinions they considered worth
the trouble of having generally assumed that they were worth sharing.

yeah, they were usually wrong.....but it's the thought that
counts.....ainna? :)

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 1:10*pm, Giles wrote:
On Mar 9, 11:31*am, Larry L wrote:

http://missoulian.com/news/state-and...2427464-4a07-1...

Hm.....

Have tried to decode it.

But all I keep seeing is:http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional

I confess I am unable to decode this.

g.
who remembers a time when those with opinions they considered worth
the trouble of having generally assumed that they were worth sharing.

yeah, they were usually wrong.....but it's the thought that
counts.....ainna? * * *:)

Works fine for me.

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

"Giles" wrote in message
...
On Mar 9, 11:31 am, Larry L wrote:

I confess I am unable to decode this.

g.
who remembers a time when those with opinions they considered worth
the trouble of having generally assumed that they were worth sharing.

yeah, they were usually wrong.....but it's the thought that
counts.....ainna? :)

Works fine.

This might help:
http://tinyurl.com/6ek3uu5

JT

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 2:50*pm, " wrote:
On Mar 9, 1:10*pm, Giles wrote:





On Mar 9, 11:31*am, Larry L wrote:

http://missoulian.com/news/state-and...2427464-4a07-1....

Hm.....

Have tried to decode it.

But all I keep seeing is:http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional

I confess I am unable to decode this.

g.
who remembers a time when those with opinions they considered worth
the trouble of having generally assumed that they were worth sharing.

yeah, they were usually wrong.....but it's the thought that
counts.....ainna? * * *:)

Works fine for me.

Thank you.

Most penetrating and cogent words you ever posted here.

g.

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 3:06*pm, "JT" wrote:
"Giles" wrote in message

...

On Mar 9, 11:31 am, Larry L wrote:
I confess I am unable to decode this.

g.
who remembers a time when those with opinions they considered worth
the trouble of having generally assumed that they were worth sharing.

yeah, they were usually wrong.....but it's the thought that
counts.....ainna? * * *:)

Works fine.

Good to know. What would make it even better is knowing 'what' works
fine.

This might help:http://tinyurl.com/6ek3uu5

Help what?

g.
anybody here know of a fly fishing usenet group where english is the
langue de jour?

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 2:15*pm, Giles wrote:
On Mar 9, 3:06*pm, "JT" wrote:

"Giles" wrote in message

....

On Mar 9, 11:31 am, Larry L wrote:
I confess I am unable to decode this.

g.
who remembers a time when those with opinions they considered worth
the trouble of having generally assumed that they were worth sharing.

yeah, they were usually wrong.....but it's the thought that
counts.....ainna? * * *:)

Works fine.

Good to know. *What would make it even better is knowing 'what' works
fine.

This might help:http://tinyurl.com/6ek3uu5

Help what?

The way it works is that you use your mouse or your trackpad (or your
finger if you have a touch-sensitive screen) over the highlighted text
(called a "link"), click on it (or just touch it if you have a touch-
sensitive screen), and your browser goes to a page specified by a
certain URL (uniform resource locator).

That's the way things have worked for several years.

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 4:14*pm, " wrote:
On Mar 9, 2:15*pm, Giles wrote:





On Mar 9, 3:06*pm, "JT" wrote:

"Giles" wrote in message

....

On Mar 9, 11:31 am, Larry L wrote:
I confess I am unable to decode this.

g.
who remembers a time when those with opinions they considered worth
the trouble of having generally assumed that they were worth sharing.

yeah, they were usually wrong.....but it's the thought that
counts.....ainna? * * *:)

Works fine.

Good to know. *What would make it even better is knowing 'what' works
fine.

This might help:http://tinyurl.com/6ek3uu5

Help what?

The way it works is that you use your mouse or your trackpad (or your
finger if you have a touch-sensitive screen) over the highlighted text
(called a "link"), click on it (or just touch it if you have a touch-
sensitive screen), and your browser goes to a page specified by a
certain URL (uniform resource locator).

That's the way things have worked for several years.

And my incentive for doing this is........?

g.
you don't learn.

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 3:39*pm, Giles wrote:

And my incentive for doing this is........?

Then what are you complaining about?

Glad to see this ... politics but NOT OT
 

On Mar 9, 5:06*pm, " wrote:
On Mar 9, 3:39*pm, Giles wrote:



And my incentive for doing this is........?

Then what are you complaining about?

My incentive is "Then what are you complaining about?"?

That doesn't sound like an incentive to me. Sounds more like a
question. And given that it has nothing to do with MY question, it
sounds very much like a stupid question. Morevoer, history tells us
that this is a given.

Now, would someone who understands English like to tell me what my
incentive for following stevie's excellent instructions is?

g.
the boy just WILL NOT learn.