![]() |
|
Health check
So, anyone grown up and developed an interest in
discussion?.....responsibility? g. |
Health check
Giles typed:
So, anyone grown up and developed an interest in discussion?.....responsibility? Discussion? Maybe, but that "responsibility" **** is for the birds. -- TL, Tim |
Health check
Tim J. wrote:
Giles typed: So, anyone grown up and developed an interest in discussion?.....responsibility? Discussion? Maybe, but that "responsibility" **** is for the birds. The grownups have signed onto Facebook using their real names and the discussion continues on Facebook roff. The so-called "Giles" would not be welcome there as far as I'm concerned. Although some misguided souls have invited the "Wolfgang" persona to participate there. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Health check
Ken Fortenberry typed:
Tim J. wrote: Giles typed: So, anyone grown up and developed an interest in discussion?.....responsibility? Discussion? Maybe, but that "responsibility" **** is for the birds. The grownups have signed onto Facebook using their real names and the discussion continues on Facebook roff. The so-called "Giles" would not be welcome there as far as I'm concerned. Although some misguided souls have invited the "Wolfgang" persona to participate there. I check in on Facebook ROFF from time to time, but have a much harder time following the discussions in that format vs. the Usenet threaded format. It would be nice if FB would have viewing options, such as a threaded view, to make navigation easier. The ability to start with a collapsed view and then expand or ignore threads accordingly is sorely missed - by me, anyway. -- TL, Tim |
Health check
On 06/22/2012 01:08 PM, Tim J. wrote:
Ken Fortenberry typed: Tim J. wrote: Giles typed: So, anyone grown up and developed an interest in discussion?.....responsibility? Discussion? Maybe, but that "responsibility" **** is for the birds. The grownups have signed onto Facebook using their real names and the discussion continues on Facebook roff. The so-called "Giles" would not be welcome there as far as I'm concerned. Although some misguided souls have invited the "Wolfgang" persona to participate there. I check in on Facebook ROFF from time to time, but have a much harder time following the discussions in that format vs. the Usenet threaded format. It would be nice if FB would have viewing options, such as a threaded view, to make navigation easier. The ability to start with a collapsed view and then expand or ignore threads accordingly is sorely missed - by me, anyway. I agree, Tim. Facebook is rather awkward. |
Health check
Russell D. wrote:
Tim J. wrote: I check in on Facebook ROFF from time to time, but have a much harder time following the discussions in that format vs. the Usenet threaded format. It would be nice if FB would have viewing options, such as a threaded view, to make navigation easier. The ability to start with a collapsed view and then expand or ignore threads accordingly is sorely missed - by me, anyway. I agree, Tim. Facebook is rather awkward. Usenet has been around a long time now and I can understand how folks are used to it. I guess I'm showing my geezerhood but I remember thinking Usenet was awkward. There was UUCP and VAX Notes and several other discussion formats which were better than Usenet but Usenet used NNTP and TCP/IP so it prevailed. It was much easier to administer than the other, arguably better, formats. What I'm saying is, I know what it's like to get used to something and then being forced to move on. It's happened before and if I live long enough it'll happen again. No biggy. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Health check
Ken Fortenberry typed:
Russell D. wrote: Tim J. wrote: I check in on Facebook ROFF from time to time, but have a much harder time following the discussions in that format vs. the Usenet threaded format. It would be nice if FB would have viewing options, such as a threaded view, to make navigation easier. The ability to start with a collapsed view and then expand or ignore threads accordingly is sorely missed - by me, anyway. I agree, Tim. Facebook is rather awkward. Usenet has been around a long time now and I can understand how folks are used to it. I guess I'm showing my geezerhood but I remember thinking Usenet was awkward. There was UUCP and VAX Notes and several other discussion formats which were better than Usenet but Usenet used NNTP and TCP/IP so it prevailed. It was much easier to administer than the other, arguably better, formats. What I'm saying is, I know what it's like to get used to something and then being forced to move on. It's happened before and if I live long enough it'll happen again. No biggy. It's not about you; it's about me. .... and you can't make me use that freakin' Twitter crap, either. -- TL, Tim |
Health check
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message ... Tim J. wrote: Giles typed: So, anyone grown up and developed an interest in discussion?.....responsibility? Discussion? Maybe, but that "responsibility" **** is for the birds. The grownups have signed onto Facebook using their real names and the discussion continues on Facebook roff. The so-called "Giles" would not be welcome there as far as I'm concerned. Although some misguided souls have invited the "Wolfgang" persona to participate there. -- Ken Fortenberry Ken, I love you like a brother, a younger brother...I will dine with you, have you to my house.....but in this instance, I must tell you frankly to shut the john |
Health check
john b wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: The grownups have signed onto Facebook using their real names and the discussion continues on Facebook roff. The so-called "Giles" would not be welcome there as far as I'm concerned. Although some misguided souls have invited the "Wolfgang" persona to participate there. Ken, I love you like a brother, a younger brother...I will dine with you, have you to my house.....but in this instance, I must tell you frankly to shut the john I'm happy you avoided jail time in your third world paradise but I think of you more as an older sister with bitchy issues than an older brother. Facebook roff is a forum where folks use their real names, it's quite a bit different than anonymous Usenet. I think that's a *good* thing. YMMV. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Health check
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:53:05 +0800, "john b"
wrote: "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message ... Tim J. wrote: Giles typed: So, anyone grown up and developed an interest in discussion?.....responsibility? Discussion? Maybe, but that "responsibility" **** is for the birds. The grownups have signed onto Facebook using their real names and the discussion continues on Facebook roff. The so-called "Giles" would not be welcome there as far as I'm concerned. Although some misguided souls have invited the "Wolfgang" persona to participate there. Amen to that brother |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter