![]() |
|
first day with orvis waders
I ordered the silver label 2 waders from orvis in the afternoon on
tuesday, and first thing wednesday morning UPS knocked on my door with my orvis waders. Comments: Pro: booties are high density neoprene, and are alot more durable than the regular neoprene on my old ADG waders. Waders are 5 layer protected and are alot more durable than previous ADG waders. Cons: A big one, the knee patch's have a slit on the front that allows water to fill up the whole patch. VERY VERY annoying. I hope Orvis fixes this "design". |
first day with orvis waders
On Thu, 06 May 2004 21:26:35 GMT, Steve Sullivan wrote:
I ordered the silver label 2 waders from orvis in the afternoon on tuesday, and first thing wednesday morning UPS knocked on my door with my orvis waders. Comments: Pro: booties are high density neoprene, and are alot more durable than the regular neoprene on my old ADG waders. Waders are 5 layer protected and are alot more durable than previous ADG waders. Cons: A big one, the knee patch's have a slit on the front that allows water to fill up the whole patch. VERY VERY annoying. I hope Orvis fixes this "design". otoh... I've been using Silver Labels for a few years now. I noticed those openings, but I don't ever recall any measurable amount of water holding behind the patches once I've hauled out of the stream. In fact I believe they are there specifically to avoid water being retained behind the patches - and that still seems to have been a good design decision to me. If the openings *weren't* there such that the knee patches were intentionally sealed closed, and a patch got a small hole in it (not unreasonable) then there might be an actual problem to complain about... /daytripper () |
first day with orvis waders
From: daytripper
On Thu, 06 May 2004 21:26:35 GMT, Steve Sullivan wrote: Cons: A big one, the knee patch's have a slit on the front that allows water to fill up the whole patch. VERY VERY annoying. I hope Orvis fixes this "design". I've been using Silver Labels for a few years now. I noticed those openings, but I don't ever recall any measurable amount of water holding behind the patches once I've hauled out of the stream. In fact I believe they are there specifically to avoid water being retained behind the patches - and that still seems to have been a good design decision to me. Yup, the slit is there to allow the water to drain. Haven't had a problem with mine. George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
first day with orvis waders
Cons: A big one, the knee patch's have a slit on the front that allows
water to fill up the whole patch. VERY VERY annoying. I hope Orvis fixes this "design". I've been using Silver Labels for a few years now. I noticed those openings, but I don't ever recall any measurable amount of water holding behind the patches once I've hauled out of the stream. In fact I believe they are there specifically to avoid water being retained behind the patches - and that still seems to have been a good design decision to me. Yup, the slit is there to allow the water to drain. Haven't had a problem with mine. If you have "thick" legs, the slits tend to act like a dam. A little adjustment does the trick! |
first day with orvis waders
|
first day with orvis waders
|
first day with orvis waders
In article ,
daytripper wrote: It just dawned on me that perhaps Mr. Sullivan's waders have the knee patches sewn on up-side-down, so that the "v" notch is above the knee instead of below. If that's the case, I can see how they could fill up and retain water out of the stream, which might even rise to the level of "aggravating"... /daytripper (...and if it is the case, take 'em back for a replacement...) Nope, the slit is on the bottom of the patch. The problem is the space gets completely filled with water, which adds a considerable ammount of weight, and being in the water for several hours having to wade around with it is kind of a pain. I will probably just send them back and get the pro guides, which I have been told dont retain water. |
first day with orvis waders
On Fri, 07 May 2004 02:46:52 GMT, Steve Sullivan wrote:
In article , daytripper wrote: It just dawned on me that perhaps Mr. Sullivan's waders have the knee patches sewn on up-side-down, so that the "v" notch is above the knee instead of below. If that's the case, I can see how they could fill up and retain water out of the stream, which might even rise to the level of "aggravating"... /daytripper (...and if it is the case, take 'em back for a replacement...) Nope, the slit is on the bottom of the patch. The problem is the space gets completely filled with water, which adds a considerable ammount of weight, and being in the water for several hours having to wade around with it is kind of a pain. Interesting. For the years I've been using them, I've never noticed this as being an issue, but perhaps I'm not the most sensitive guy around ;-) I will probably just send them back and get the pro guides, which I have been told dont retain water. Let us know how you make out with them if you do... /daytripper |
first day with orvis waders
"Steve Sullivan" wrote in message The problem is having to wade around with a big heavy bunch of water in your waders. Maybe I will upgrade to the pro guides So it's heavier than the water surrounding it? The extra resistance must be what's bugging you. bruce h |
first day with orvis waders
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Steve Sullivan wrote:
Cons: A big one, the knee patch's have a slit on the front that allows water to fill up the whole patch. VERY VERY annoying. I hope Orvis fixes this "design". Well it's been 4 years and they still haven't. Every so often I have to stand on one leg and bend the other knee to drain the water, looking like a guy imitating a ****ing dog. Mu |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter