That's true. I have a combo-c-lector that I tinkered with, and it was
interesting but not particularly useful. When I tried using it, I paid less
attention to much more important variables. Anyone want a free
combo-c-lector? I haven't opened it for about eight years, after getting it
back from a trip to the repair shop. You pay the postage, and it's yours,
free.

One a related note.... I had the dubious pleasure of meeting ol' Doc Hill
this past summer. I don't know if it was his usual manner or if he was just
irritated at the time, but I was underwhemed. I spent some time doing him a
favor, and he impressed me with his towering egotism. I usually find it easy
to get along with anyone and enjoy meeting people who have made an impact on
the fishing tackle industry, but I was relieved to turn him over to his
hosts. I'm not at all surprised by his former boss's assessment.

Joe


"Pat Goff @yahoo.com" pmgoffjrbot wrote in message
...
If you think it helps you catch more fish, then it will. You'll work your
bait better, and have more confidence.

If you think it's a bunch of hooey, then that's what it is also.


"Guy F. Anderson Sr." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:33:40 -0500, RichZ
wrote:

Some years back, I worked on a project with the Hunting & Fishing
Library, which involved, among other things, testing a bunch of them --
The readings, under identical conditions (with a dozen
sensors side by side in the same water) were all over the ball park.
.....................snips..............

Pay attention to Da' Man!

As usual, Rich has put forward exactly the right, relevant, solid,
hard data into a discussion which could (and probably will) degenerate
into pure personal preference.

But ain't it fun!
Guy A
Ripley, TN