I don't have any info on the 5wt, but I did try the Winston Boron IIx in a 9
ft 7 wt, and was decidedly unimpressed. I didn't think it carried the line
well when making longish casts (60ft). Ended up getting an Orvis T3 9ft 7wt
mid flex. Love the rod, but had a problem with the line. Many manufacturers
are making their lines a half weight too heavy, and I found that on a long
cast, the extra weight was a hindrance. Once I got an AFTMA conforming 7wt
line the rod really performed well, even at 60 foot and longer casts (which
is why I bought the rod). I have never tried a St. Croix, not that I
wouldn't like to, but my local shop just doesn't carry them.

HTH,

Jim Ray
wrote in message
oups.com...
I know, I know, this is a stupid comparison, and a stupid post. The
Boron is twice as expensive. Their actions - while both med-fast - are
entirely different, and of course every fisherman will have his own
personal preference in any case. Finally, I'll be surprised if even a
few of you have actually had a chance to even lawn cast both, much less
fish them both. But for all that:

Anyone have any opinions on the 9' 5-wt Winston Boron IIx versus the
same-sized St. Croix Legend Ultra?

I have my own initial opinion. I'd just like to hear what anyone else
has to say. (Other than: "Idiot!")

Thanks, Tim