I looked up this definition in the well known dictionary by Joshuall
Webster.
______________________________________
Junk Science [junk si-ense]: N. Research results that don't support my pet
opinions. As in, "What do you mean the earth is round... that's junk
science!"
______________________________________

On one hand, a team of prominent veterinary scientists, following several
months of intensive laboratory research, having subjected their methodology
and findings to peer review and delivering their results to the government
who commissioned the study, are wrong. They claim (chortle) that earthworms
do not feel pain.

On the other hand, we have Joshuall, who has with his own eyes seen worms
wiggle when he poked them with a hook, and who imagines how he would feel if
a big ol' worm poked him with a hook. He, too, would writhe in pain. So,
based on intuition and imagination, horse sense, and.... uh, well, that's
about it.... Joshuall states emphatically that worms do, indeed, feel pain.

Well, that settles it for me. Next time the government should just save
their time and money and call Joshuall when they want to know something. :-)

Joe
_____________________________________
"Joshuall" wrote in message
...
I'm gonna bet crazy Joe Heaubonehoffer of Secret Weapons fifteen lamb chops,
two veal cutlets and a dolphin fish that by the end of the year another
study challenges the one in Norway -(where, throughout the course of their
18 month winter -night they all go nuts and suck on raw fish) and that it
proves two things. . .

1 Worms hurt ~!

2- Common sense prevails again over junk science !

love n kisses,

--
God Bless America

Josh The Bad Bear