View Single Post
  #10  
Old March 21st, 2005, 01:00 AM
Bob La Londe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hiw dies it handle Lake Mead or Lake Powell size waves?

--
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"Pat Goff @yahoo.com" pmgoffjrbot wrote in message
...
Sergio,
The 1860 Tunnel Special is one of my most popular boats this yeat, go
anywhere, do anything in it.


"Sergio Ramirez" wrote in message
...
Pat:

What model of Alumacraft are you referring to?


"Pat Goff @yahoo.com" pmgoffjrbot wrote in message
...
Sergio,
There are plenty of good options for you to review. If you're wanting

to
stay with Aluminum, a nicely equipped tunnel mod v will get you into

5"
of
water, and still maintain control in rough water. Alumacraft makes a

nice
package.

If you'd like to test ride one, drop me a line and

we
can set it up.


"Sergio Ramirez" wrote in message
...
Bill, Bob, SimRacer:

Thank you all for your help. From your comments it's obvious that

the
jet
propelled engine is not the best choice for my target application. I

was
thinking that a jet-driven engine could add extra capability to the

boat
for
shallow water and allow me to fish the shallow flats in the Gulf

coast,
but
it's obviously not the case. You need a more specific rig for that.

In
reality I'd do such a fishing trip rarely. I would say 99.9% of the

times
I
will be doing bass fishing.

Sergio

"bill a" wrote in message
om...
Like some other guys said, jets are bad about intake clogging.

I've
had
one for a couple of years with a 6 degree deadrise bottom, but I

run
it
in
shallow, fast running gravel type streams. If I was mostly going

in
lakes and inshore, I think I would stick with a prop as the others

said
(power, speed, fuel mileage, noise, clogging). The other thing

not
mentioned so far, is that jets don't corner well, even with

v-bottoms.
I
frequently see newbies sitting in their boats on dry land because

they
misjudged making a corner. While you don't have to do the twisty

stuff
near as much in lakes, some hard swerving is bound to come up
eventually.
The other thing on aluminum hulls is the bottom thickness. If you

get
overly brave about running shallow, you inevitably will hit the

bottom
at
some point. Why have it if you don't use it?
The common jet boat bottoms around here are .19" thick and a 5052
alloy,
very tough stuff. They call them plate boats. If you have .100"

or
less
thickness and 2024 alloy, touching hard rock and even gravel

sometimes
will open you up. You then sink really fast.
hth
bill

"Sergio Ramirez" wrote in message
...
Hello all:

I'm considering buying my first boat, and wonder if any of you

folks
have
any advice/opinion on the following:

- Lund boats or Alumacraft boats. I want a light 16' deep-V boat

that
I
can trailer in my small Toyota pickup, which is rated for 3500 lbs
trailering. Around here there are a lot of Tracker boats, but I've
heard
complaints on Tracker customer service and problem with leakage
through
the welds. They tell me Alumacraft is a good quality boat, and

Lund
is
top of the line.

- The jet propulsion engines from Honda (BF35 or BF65). They

really
look
interesting because it allows access to shallow areas and it's
quieter,
but I wonder if this new technology (or perhaps not new, I don't

know)
is
not that well developed that it's best not to get into it at this
moment.

I'm in central Texas and I'm looking to do mainly bass fishing

around
the
Hill Country lakes (some of them pretty large bodies), and perhaps
once
in a while go to the Gulf coast to do bay fishing or

close-to-shore
fishing.

Thanks in advance for your help
Sergio