"rw" wrote in message
ink.net...
Wolfgang wrote:

All of which is mildly interesting (if not necessarily an exhaustive or
unbiased survey of the extant literature on salmonid genetics), and
presents a fair to horse**** introduction (assuming one is generous
enough to overlook both a blatant bias and the absolutely pathetic device
of simply lifting brief quoted passages sans context or evidence) to a
particular point of view with regard to likely problems with hatchery
breeding programs (a point of view which, incidentally, I happen to
share), but none of it has anything at all to do with my point in
response to Stevie's just plain wrong factual statement.

Thanks.

And thanks for your armchair theorizing about "mutagens," which is of
course far more authoritative, unbiased, and exhaustive than anything that
actual scientists who spend their careers studying the question could
possibly come up with.

Mutagens......mutagens......hm, that sounds vaguely familiar. Is that the
sort of thing that might be studied in.....um.....research
labs......uh.....say, for instance, medical research labs in
particular.....the sort of thing you'd use immunohistochemistry,
immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridization, PCR, real time PCR, RTPCR,
western blots, southern blots, northern blots, SDS polyacrilimde gel
electrophoresis, gene sequencing, gel purification, cryostats, vibratomes,
ultra-microtomes, LR White resin embedding, CBQCA protein quantification,
cAMP colorimetric assays, sepahrose column separation, microarray analysis,
LCM, BLAST, FRED, DAB, IgG antibodies, HPLC, fluorometers........you know,
that sort of thing.....for? If so, I think I've heard of it. Teach me.

Wank on.

Dream on.

Wolfgang