"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
om...
Guy Thornberg wrote:
Dang Danl. Look what you started.

It was no accident. Dan'l started the thread because four
likeminded DYBS (dumbass, yuppie beer snobs) made disparaging
remarks about Budweiser in the Wednesday food section of the
Times. Not content to sip their effete, overhopped, bitter
tasting, ridiculously expensive glamour brews and leave real
beer drinkers well enough alone these DYBS feel compelled to
denigrate Budweiser at every opportunity. One wonders why.
Actually I asked Dan'l why, twice, and he didn't respond.

Perhaps he is reticent to state the obvious. No such squeamishness
here........it's be cause the stuff tastes really bad.

I've only read part of the thread but
thought I would put my 2 cents is as far as beer goes.
Beer! I see it. I drink it. Along with bourbon, scotch, gin and other
various sensory depressors. (Bud does go down pretty easy though).

Well, of course it goes down easy. It's damn good beer.
You've got to take formal classes if you want to learn
how to sneer at Budweiser.

I've never taken a class of any sort, formal or otherwise, that had anything
at all to do with the production, distribution, sales, marketing, storage,
serving, tasting, or enjoyment of beer. Budweiser is ****.

Wolfgang
ever wonder what it would be like to be a real boy?.......yes, of course you
have........well, keep on wondering.
and no, you can't be me.