Kind of a tough call. It seems like you had the "right of way" considering
your location and the ship should have at least contacted you on 16 but he
might could argue that he couldn't manuver well enough to avoid you. See
this link.
http://www.boatingbasicsonline.com/c...ting/6_2_b.php
LD
"Eppefour" wrote in message
...
No the separation zone is well south of us.
--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from junk email by MailFrontier Desktop
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
link.net...
Do you have charts. They could very well be in the designated ship
movement area. Called a separation zone.
"Eppefour" wrote in message
...
no we were 38 miles offshore in the open ocean
--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from junk email by MailFrontier Desktop
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
hlink.net...
Were you in the ship channel? The VTS?
"Eppefour" wrote in message
...
We were out on Saturday July 2 again at 750 Square. It is about 40
miles off of Cape May. A container ship the Evergreen Lines Ever
Refine
almost ran us down. I think sportfishermen should report these
instances to the coast guard. I am hearing too many of these stories.
Even though they can't do much about 1 instance , multiple reports
will
allow them to determine if there is a pattern to these instances.
Following is my letter describing the incident that I am sending to
Evergreen and the Coast Guard
Vessel Ever Refine
Dear Sir:
My son and I were fishing on Saturday July 2nd at 73.53.00 38.55.00
approximately,
when your ship Evergreen Ever Refine almost ran us down.. We were
drifting with our
lines on the starboard side of the boat. Ever Refine approached us
from
our port side. The
visibility was restricted to about 1.5 miles. At first I thought the
ship would pass slightly
in front of us, but as it got closer I realized it was going to hit
us
amidships. We started
the engines and accelerated to maximum power. We were able to avoid
the
ship by 100
feet.
I realize that a large ship has a hard time turning and that we are
not
visible to him when he is 0.5 miles away from us. There was 1.5 miles
of visibility and he should have seen us. Rule 5 of the rules of the
road state that a proper lookout by sight and all other means
available
should be maintained at all times. If Ever Refine was following rule
5,
why did they not sound a danger signal ?
Rule 6 states that a vessel shall maintain a safe speed taking into
account visibility and stopping and turning ability in the prevailing
conditions. If they were traveling too fast they violated rule 6.
I am unclear how restricted visibility must be to sound fog signals
but
Ever refine was not sounding any. Rule 35 states that fog signals
should be used in or near any ares of restricted visibility. 1.5
miles
was the maximum visibility that day. Many nearby areas were
restricted
to ¼ mile of less.
I am sending a copy of this letter to the US Coast Guard Group, Cape
May, NJ. I also am going to make sport fishermen in this area aware
of
the incident and encourage them to report all such encounters to the
Coast Guard to build a case history. I also am going to publicize the
incident on the internet to make all aware of your disregard for
human
life and safety. You should inform your captains that even though you
are a big company with big ships, you do not own the ocean.
Sincerely
Captain John W Eppehimer
--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from junk email by MailFrontier Desktop
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com