On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:24:44 +0000, Lazarus Cooke
wrote:

In article .com,
wrote:

[Latin nn sequitur, it does not follow : nn, not + sequitur, third
person sing. present tense of sequ, to follow.]

The interesting thing about this, of course, is that it a deponent verb
- active in meaning, but passive in form.

Is THAT the interesting thing about this? I would have guessed it was
something like, oh, say, Ken didn't blame it on the Bush administration
and claim the Dems could fix it, RW didn't offer up that when Clinton
did it personally and repeatedly it was trivial but that Bush should be
imprisoned for being within 100 nautical miles of someone who thought
about it, you didn't claim it was all America's fault, Louie didn't
accuse it of claiming a Purple Heart it didn't earn, Sarge didn't blame
it on the Jew...er, Zionists, Wolfgang didn't take 437 lines to argue
with it, wayno didn't try to, er, "change" it, Reid didn't fall over it,
Church didn't killfill it, BJ didn't call it "Laten," Peter didn't claim
the Canadians invented it...well, OK, they didn't actually INVENT it,
but they use it better, and I didn't make any smart-assed remarks
about...well, OK, so that's one thing taken care of...

H _T_ H,
R
....Reform?! Oh, ****...FIGHT!...