"go-bassn" wrote in message
...

& one more color than the common cormorant...

Hm....

Both the beginning and the end of that sentence got chopped off somehow
before it got to my screen.

But, hey, the middle part is really pretty!

Like I said, cormorants with colorS...

Well, no, what you actually wrote was: "Loons=Cormorants w/color".

O.k., so, this gets confusing real quick. If loons are cormorants with
color, it naturally follows (that is, it's implicit) that cormorants are
loons WITHOUT color, which is to say that cormorants are entirely colorless.
But, others have suggested that loons have TWO colors. Still o.k. so
far.....this doesn't violate the loons=cormorants w/color postulate. But,
right up at the top of this page you clearly state that loons have ONE more
color than the common cormorant. You see the problem here?

Wolfgang
who, while he makes no claim to understanding science, sure does think it's
a whole lot of fun watching others do it.