I'm sorry if I've touched a nerve here. This is a subject which
requires serious debate, and firm adherence to scientific method.
Faith, emotion and excuse me, propaganda will not do.
No, widespread acceptance is not proof, regardless of the credentials
or peer status of those accepting.
Nor is proof in the gathering or display of data. Proof is different.
It is demonstrable, repeatable, and consistent.
As for my grip on reality Gentlemen, it's one thing to prove the
thermodynamics of CO2 in the lab, quite another to extrapolate the
results to the entire globe and follow by scrapping the internal
combustion engine (in case that's what we're really talking about).
Best wishes .............Dave