View Single Post
  #20  
Old December 3rd, 2005, 02:03 AM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,talk.environment,rec.outdoors.fishing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Marine Food Chain Affected by Global Warming


"NobodyYouKnow" wrote in message
.. .
Dave wrote:
We all have a right to question the truth of global warming and
climate change,


You have the right to question the law of gravity as well. However, there
are more useful things to do with your time than complaining about facts.

as we should question everything which is pushed at
us as these are.


You have problems with reality, do you? Reality pushes at you only because
you reject it. Relax and enjoy.

It's a perfectly good theory, but not really proven.


Ignorance of the term 'theory' shows that you do not have a background to
critise science. Theory is factual ( proven ). Hypothesis is speculative.

Widespread acceptance is not proof.


When the widespread acceptance includes the professional scientists who
are
directly studying the problem, yes it does. No other criteria for proof
other than widespread acceptance by those with the background and
education
to understand the data has ever been proposed as 'proof' in science.

Furthermore there are other more
likely causes for damage or change in the environment, such as
contamination of the air and water.


Irrelevant to the issue. One truth does not drive out another. Please get
a
clue. The fact that you are trying 'diversion' speaks to your lack of
facts
or serious logic.



And why was the Kyoto pact developed by non-hard science people. PhD's in
sociology and other non-hard science's do not speak for a studied solution.
Man may be aiding the "Global Warming" but the big fusion engine in the sky
is a bigger contributor. Mar's has also gone in to a warming trend, it's
ice caps are melting quicker and sooner. And if you think we should believe
you because you throw in a few big words, it would help if you spelled them
correctly. In the late 1800's 20 miles of Glacier Bay, AK melted, and has
not refrozen. What did man do to cause this little warming trend? Not many
cars running around then. You have a theory and are trying to make your
prejudices fit the model. Bad science. I criticize your conclusion and
most likely your background. Do you have a degree in the physical sciences?