View Single Post
  #27  
Old December 6th, 2005, 04:44 AM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,talk.environment,rec.outdoors.fishing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Marine Food Chain Affected by Global Warming

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
k.net...

"Coby Beck" wrote in message
news:G76lf.136987$y_1.135187@edtnps89...
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
http://yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwa...ent/index.html
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milanko...les#The_future
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=221
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:C...ide_400kyr.png
http://www.ucsc.edu/currents/02-03/05-12/warming.html
http://www.innovations-report.com/ht...ort-18375.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1110222129.htm
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globa.../holocene.html
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/figspm-1.htm
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=154
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/figspm-5.htm
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globa...paleolast.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2...Comparison.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:H...Variations.png
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=180
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm
http://www.radix.net/~bobg/climate/halpern.trap.html
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=142


Proof is also used outside of mathmatics. Been to court for a traffic
ticket? And you use things like Wikipedia. They are in the news for
the fact that the facts may not be true. And the question regards
Global Warming is what is the cause?


What specifically did you find wrong with the evidence and explanation I
presented?

You need more proof than what you post


Just curious: what would you consider convincing evidence (proof, if you
prefer)?


Something other than you have shown.


C'mon! You reject all the data from all the scientific institutions
specializing in atmosphere ocean and climate, you reject the opinions of
institutions like NASA GISS, NOAA, BAS, EPA, NAS etc etc and glibly demand
proof. I'm just asking you, what is missing? What would you accept as "the
smoking gun" of findings?

Do you need proof that the CO2 increase is anthropogenic? That the
temperature is rising? That is rising at an unatural rate? That it is
higher now than in thousands of years? That CO2 absorbs IR radiation? That
ancient ice is melting around the globe? That ocean temperatures are
rising? That CO2 in the ocean is rising? That in the ancient past massive
influxes of GHG shot the temperature up for a hundred thousand years? Would
all of that convince you?

--
Coby Beck
(remove #\Space "coby 101 @ bigpond . com")


And if I could come up with a great proof of what is causing global
warming, I would be cashing large grant money checks.